Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sequential
Decision Analysis Practice
Decision Tree
Sequential
Decision Analysis Practice
Decision Tree
The Southern Textile Company is considering two alternatives: to expand its existing
production operation to manufacture a new line of lightweight material or to purchase
land on which to construct a new facility in the future. Each of these decisions has
outcomes based on product market growth in the future that result in another set of
decisions (during a 10-year planning horizon).
The first decision facing the company is whether to expand or buy land. If the company
expands, two states of nature are possible. Either the market will grow (with a probability
of .60) or it will not grow (with a probability of .40). Either state of nature will result in a
payoff. On the other hand, if the company chooses to purchase land, three years in the
future another decision will have to be made regarding the development of the land.
If the plant is expanded, two states of nature are possible. Whether the market will grow,
with a probability of .60, or it will not grow or will decline, with a probability of .40. If the
market grows, the company will achieve a payoff of $2,000,000 over a 10-year period.
However, if no growth occurs, a payoff of only $225,000 will result. [ ... ]
Sequential
Decision Analysis Practice
Decision Tree
The management of State Union Bank was concerned about the potential loss that might
occur in the event of a physical catastrophe such as a power failure or a fire. The bank
estimated that the loss from one of these incidents could be as much as $100 million,
including losses due to interrupted service and customer relations. One project the bank
is considering is the installation of an emergency power generator at its operations
headquarters. The cost of the emergency generator is $900,000, and if it is installed no
losses from this type of incident will be incurred. However, if the generator is not installed,
there is a 10% chance that a power outage will occur during the next year. If there is an
outage, there is a .04 probability that the resulting losses will be very large, or
approximately $90 million in lost earnings. Alternatively, it is estimated that there is a .96
probability of only slight losses of around $2 million.
Using decision tree analysis, determine whether the bank should install the new
power generator
Mary Decker is suing the manufacturer of her car because of a defect that she
believes caused her to have an accident and kept her out of work for a year.
She is suing the company for $3.5 million. The company has offered her a
settlement of $700,000, of which Mary would receive $600,000 after attorneys’
fees. Her attorney has advised her that she has a 50% chance of winning her
case. If she loses she will incur attorneys’ fees and court costs of $75,000. If
she wins she is not guaranteed her full requested settlement. Her attorney
believes that if she wins, there is a 50% chance she could receive the full
settlement, in which case Mary would get $2 million after her attorney takes his
cut, and a 50% chance that the jury will award her a lesser amount of
$1,000,000, of which Mary would get $500,000.
Using decision-tree analysis, decide if Mary should sue the manufacturer.
The Orchard Wine Company purchases grapes The two grapes and because of differences in taste,
from one of two nearby growers each season to the company charges different prices for their wine
produce a particular red wine. It purchases enough depending on which grapes they use. The annual
grapes to produce 3000 bottles of the wine. Each profit from the wine produced from each grower’s
grower supplies a certain portion of poor-quality grapes for each percentage defective is as follows:
grapes that will result in a percentage of bottles growers charge a different price for their
being used as fillers for cheaper table wines
according to the following probability distribution:
Use decision-tree analysis to determine from which grower the company should purchase grapes.
Huntz Food Products is attempting to decide if it should introduce a new line of salad dressings
called Special Choices. The company can test market the salad dressings in selected
geographic areas or bypass the test market and introduce the product nationally. The cost of
the test market is $150,000. If the company conducts the test market, it must wait to see the
results before deciding whether or not to introduce the salad dressings nationally. The
probability of a positive test market result is estimated to be .6. Alternatively, the company
cannot conduct the test market and make the decision to introduce the dressings or not. If the
salad dressings are introduced nationally and are a success, the company estimates it will
realize an annual profit of $1,600,000, while if the dressings fail it will incur a loss of $700,000.
The company believes the probability of success for the salad dressings is .50 if they are
introduced without the test market. If the company does conduct the test market and it is
positive, the probability of successfully introducing the salad dressings increases to .8. If the
test market is negative and the company introduces the salad dressings anyway, the probability
of success drops to .30.
Using decision-tree analysis, determine if the company should conduct the test market.
[ThisNation.com, 2018]