You are on page 1of 2

In biological phylogenetics, a clade (from Ancient Greek κλάδος

(kládos) 'branch'), also known as a monophyletic group or natural group,[1] is a


grouping of organisms that are monophyletic – that is, composed of a common
ancestor and all its lineal descendants – on a phylogenetic tree.[2] In the
taxonomical literature, sometimes the Latin form cladus (plural cladi) is used
rather than the English form.[citation needed] Clades are the fundamental unit of
cladistics, a modern approach to taxonomy adopted by most biological fields.
The common ancestor may be an individual, a population, or a species (extinct or
extant). Clades are nested, one in another, as each branch in turn splits into
smaller branches. These splits reflect evolutionary history as populations diverged
and evolved independently. Clades are termed monophyletic (Greek: "one clan")
groups.
Over the last few decades, the cladistic approach has revolutionized biological
classification and revealed surprising evolutionary relationships among organisms.
[3] Increasingly, taxonomists try to avoid naming taxa that are not clades; that
is, taxa that are not monophyletic. Some of the relationships between organisms
that the molecular biology arm of cladistics has revealed include that fungi are
closer relatives to animals than they are to plants, archaea are now considered
different from bacteria, and multicellular organisms may have evolved from archaea.
[4]
The term "clade" is also used with a similar meaning in other fields besides
biology, such as historical linguistics; see Cladistics § In disciplines other than
biology.
The term "clade" was coined in 1957 by the biologist Julian Huxley to refer to the
result of cladogenesis, the evolutionary splitting of a parent species into two
distinct species, a concept Huxley borrowed from Bernhard Rensch.[5][6]
Many commonly named groups – rodents and insects, for example – are clades because,
in each case, the group consists of a common ancestor with all its descendant
branches. Rodents, for example, are a branch of mammals that split off after the
end of the period when the clade Dinosauria stopped being the dominant terrestrial
vertebrates 66 million years ago. The original population and all its descendants
are a clade. The rodent clade corresponds to the order Rodentia, and insects to the
class Insecta. These clades include smaller clades, such as chipmunk or ant, each
of which consists of even smaller clades. The clade "rodent" is in turn included in
the mammal, vertebrate and animal clades.
The idea of a clade did not exist in pre-Darwinian Linnaean taxonomy, which was
based by necessity only on internal or external morphological similarities between
organisms. Many of the better known animal groups in Linnaeus's original Systema
Naturae (mostly vertebrate groups) do represent clades. The phenomenon of
convergent evolution is responsible for many cases of misleading similarities in
the morphology of groups that evolved from different lineages.
With the increasing realization in the first half of the 19th century that species
had changed and split through the ages, classification increasingly came to be seen
as branches on the evolutionary tree of life. The publication of Darwin's theory of
evolution in 1859 gave this view increasing weight. Thomas Henry Huxley, an early
advocate of evolutionary theory, proposed a revised taxonomy based on a concept
strongly resembling clades,[7] although the term clade itself would not be coined
until 1957 by his grandson, Julian Huxley.
German biologist Emil Hans Willi Hennig (1913–1976) is considered to be the founder
of cladistics.[8]
He proposed a classification system that represented repeated branchings of the
family tree, as opposed to the previous systems, which put organisms on a "ladder",
with supposedly more "advanced" organisms at the top.[3][9]
Taxonomists have increasingly worked to make the taxonomic system reflect
evolution.[9] When it comes to naming, this principle is not always compatible with
the traditional rank-based nomenclature (in which only taxa associated with a rank
can be named) because not enough ranks exist to name a long series of nested
clades. For these and other reasons, phylogenetic nomenclature has been developed;
it is still controversial.
As an example, see the full current classification of Anas platyrhynchos (the
mallard duck) with 40 clades from Eukaryota down by following this Wikispecies link
and clicking on "Expand".
The name of a clade is conventionally a plural, where the singular refers to each
member individually. A unique exception is the reptile clade Dracohors, which was
made by haplology from Latin "draco" and "cohors", i.e. "the dragon cohort"; its
form with a suffix added should be e.g. "dracohortian".
A clade is by definition monophyletic, meaning that it contains one ancestor (which
can be an organism, a population, or a species) and all its descendants.[note 1]
[10][11] The ancestor can be known or unknown; any and all members of a clade can
be extant or extinct.
The science that tries to reconstruct phylogenetic trees and thus discover clades
is called phylogenetics or cladistics, the latter term coined by Ernst Mayr (1965),
derived from "clade". The results of phylogenetic/cladistic analyses are tree-
shaped diagrams called cladograms; they, and all their branches, are phylogenetic
hypotheses.[12]
Three methods of defining clades are featured in phylogenetic nomenclature: node-,
stem-, and apomorphy-based (see Phylogenetic nomenclature§Phylogenetic definitions
of clade names for detailed definitions).
The relationship between clades can be described in several ways:
The age of a clade can be described based on two different reference points, crown
age and stem age. The crown age of a clade refers to the age of the most recent
common ancestor of all of the species in the clade. The stem age of a clade refers
to the time that the ancestral lineage of the clade diverged from its sister clade.
A clade's stem age is either the same as or older than its crown age.[15] Note that
ages of clades cannot be directly observed. They are inferred, either from
stratigraphy of fossils, or from molecular clock estimates.[16]
Viruses, and particularly RNA viruses form clades.[17] These are useful in tracking
the spread of viral infections. HIV, for example, has clades called subtypes, which
vary in geographical prevalence.[18] HIV subtype (clade) B, for example is
predominant in Europe, the Americas and Japan, whereas subtype A is more common in
east Africa.[19]

You might also like