Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Figure 22.1
Darwin made two major points in his book
Figure 22.2
The Scale of Nature and
Classification of Species
The Greek philosopher Aristotle
◦ Viewed species as fixed and unchanging
The Old Testament of the Bible
◦ Holds that species were individually designed by God and
therefore perfect
Carolus Linnaeus
◦ Interpreted organismal adaptations as evidence that the
Creator had designed each species for a specific purpose
◦ Was a founder of taxonomy, classifying life’s diversity “for
the greater glory of God”
Fossils, Cuvier, and Catastrophism
Figure 22.3
Paleontology, the study of fossils
◦ Was largely developed by French scientist Georges
Cuvier
Figure 22.4
Concept 22.2: In The Origin of Species, Darwin
proposed that species change through natural
selection
England
EUROPE
NORTH
AMERICA
PACIFIC ATLANTIC
OCEAN OCEAN
SOUTH
Darwin in 1840, AMERICA
after his return
AUSTRALIA
Cape of
Andes
Good Hope
Tasmania
Cape Horn New
Tierra del Fuego Zealand
Figure 22.5
Darwin’s Focus on Adaptation
As Darwin reassessed all that he had observed during the voyage of the
Beagle
◦ He began to perceive adaptation to the environment and the origin of new
species as closely related processes
From studies made years after Darwin’s voyage
◦ Biologists have concluded that this is indeed what happened
to the Galápagos finches
(a) Cactus eater. The long, (c) Seed eater. The large ground
sharp beak of the cactus finch (Geospiza magnirostris)
ground finch (Geospiza has a large beak adapted for
scandens) helps it tear cracking seeds that fall from
and eat cactus flowers plants to the ground.
and pulp.
Figure 22.11
In 1844, Darwin wrote a long essay on the origin of species and
natural selection
◦ But he was reluctant to introduce his theory publicly,
anticipating the uproar it would cause
In June 1858 Darwin received a manuscript from Alfred Russell
Wallace
◦ Who had developed a theory of natural selection similar to
Darwin’s
Darwin quickly finished The Origin of Species
◦ And published it the next year
Descent with Modification
The phrase descent with modification
◦ Summarized Darwin’s perception of the unity of life
◦ States that all organisms are related through descent from
an ancestor that lived in the remote past
In the Darwinian view, the history of life is like a tree
◦ With multiple branchings from a common trunk to the tips
of the youngest twigs that represent the diversity of living
organisms
Sirenia
Elephas Loxodonta Loxodonta
Hyracoidea (Manatees
maximus africana cyclotis
(Hyraxes) and relatives)
(Asia) (Africa) (Africa)
Years ago
Mammuthus
Stegodon
Mammut
Deinotherium
Platybelodon
Millions of years ago
Barytherium
Moeritherium
Figure 22.7
Natural Selection and
Adaptation
Evolutionary biologist Ernst Mayr
◦ Has dissected the logic of Darwin’s theory into
three inferences based on five observations
Observation #1: For any species, population sizes would
increase exponentially
◦ If all individuals that are born reproduced successfully
Figure 22.8
Observation #2: Nonetheless, populations tend to be stable in
size
◦ Except for seasonal fluctuations
Observation #3: Resources are limited
Figure 22.9
Observation #5: Much of this variation is heritable
EXPERIMENT Reznick and Endler transplanted guppies from pike-cichlid pools to killifish pools
and measured the average age and size of guppies at maturity over an 11-year period (30 to
60 generations). Pools with killifish,
but not guppies prior
to transplant
Experimental
transplant of
Predator: Killifish; preys guppies
mainly on small guppies
Guppies:
Larger at
sexual maturity
than those in
“pike-cichlid pools”
Figure 22.12
RESULTS After 11 years, the average size and age at maturity of guppies in the transplanted
populations increased compared to those of guppies in control populations.
Weight of guppies
at maturity (mg)
at maturity (days)
185.6
85.7 92.3 Control Population: Guppies
Age of guppies
161.5
from pools with pike-cichlids
58.2 as predators
48.5
67.5 76.1
Experimental Population:
Guppies transplanted to
Males Females Males Females pools with killifish as
predators
CONCLUSION Reznick and Endler concluded that the change in predator resulted in different variations
in the population (larger size and faster maturation) being favored. Over a relatively short time, this altered
selection pressure resulted in an observable evolutionary change in the experimental population.
The Evolution of Drug-Resistance
In humans, the use of drugs
◦ Selects for pathogens that through chance mutations are resistant to the
drugs’ effects
Natural selection is a cause of adaptive evolution
Drugs do not create resistant pathogens, they select for resistant
individuals already in the population
The Fossil Record
The succession of forms observed in the fossil record
◦ Is consistent with other inferences about the major branches of descent in
the tree of life
Anatomical Homologies
Homologous structures between organisms
◦ Are anatomical resemblances that represent variations on a structural theme
that was present in a common ancestor
Pharyngeal
pouches
Post-anal
tail
Human 100%
Mouse 87%
Chicken 69%
Frog 54%
14%
Figure 22.16 Lamprey
Homologies and the Tree of Life
The Darwinian concept of an evolutionary tree of life
◦ Can explain the homologies that researchers have observed
Biogeography
Darwin’s observations of the geographic distribution of
species, biogeography
◦ Formed an important part of his theory of evolution
Some similar mammals that have adapted to similar
environments
◦ Have evolved independently from different ancestors
NORTH
Sugar AMERICA
glider
AUSTRALIA
Flying
squirrel
Figure 22.17
Summarizing
Evolution is a change in species over time
Heritable variations exist within a population
These variations can result in a differential
reproductive success
Over generations, this can result in changes in
the genetic composition of the population