Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Decisions
Accepting projects that yields a return higher
than the hurdle rate
Capital Budgeting Decisions
Capital budgeting decisions relate to selection of
a long-term asset or investment proposal or
course of action that generally involves use of
funds today but generate regular and
recurring benefits in future.
❑ Benefit may be in the form of increased revenue or
reduced cost
❑ Capital budgeting decisions could relate to:
– Additions
– Modifications
– Replacements
– Disposals Narain
Capital Budgeting Decision Process
1. Simplicity
2. Sufficiency
3. Objectivity
4. Consistency
5. Reasonable
Narain
Desirable features of evaluation
techniques in Capital Budgeting
Narain
Accounting Rate of Return
It compares the average annual profits to average
investment
❑The steps to determine the ARR is:
1. Determine after tax expected Profits for the
life of the project
2. Take the average of these profits for the life of
the project
3. Determine average investment over the life of
the project like: Average investment = Net working
capital + (Initial outlay + Salvage value)/2
4. Divide the two average figures to get the ARR
❑ It ignore the time value of money
Narain
Illustration
A company takes a project costing Rs.
1,20,000 with expected life of 5-years
and the salvage value of Rs. 20,000.
The project requires an additional
working capital of Rs. 20,000 and is
expected to generate annual average
profit after tax of Rs. 18,000.
What is the Accounting Rate of Return of
this project?
Narain
Exercise 1
Narain
Exercise 3
Determine the payback period of the following
projects: Annual CFAT Cumulative CFAT
Narain
Illustration 1.8
Project A Project B
Cash 50,000 35,000
outflow
Cash inflows
1 40,000 30,000
2 40,000 30,000
Narain
Exercise
Narain
Illustration 1.9
Narain
Illustration
Narain
Exercise
You are required to analyse following two projects, each
with a cost of Rs. 10,000 and cost of capital is 5%. The
projects’ expected net cash flows are as follows:
Year 1 2 3 4
Project X 6,500 3,000 3,000 1,000
Project Y 3,500 3,500 3,500 3,500
Period 0 1 2
Cash flows 1,000 -3,000 2,500
❑ IRR= Not defined NPV at 10% = 339
Narain
Pitfall 3: Mutually Exclusive Projects
❑ Mutually exclusive projects are those projects
from which only one of them is to be chosen
– Technically or Financially
❑ Inconsistent ranking of projects based on the
IRR criterion and other evaluation criterion
– Size-disparity
– Time-disparity
– Life-disparity
Narain
Size Disparity Problem
❑ Try this:
Printer Outlay CFAT1 IRR NPV @ 10%
Inkjet 10,000 20,000 100% 8,182
LaserJet 20,000 35,000 75% 11,818
❑ Which project will you prefer?
❑ The difference lies in the implicit compounding rate of
interest
– IRR – funds are compounded at the project IRR
– NPV – funds are compounded at the discount rate
❑ Use incremental project analysis if IRR has to be computed
Narain
Time Disparity Problem
❑ Try this:
Machine CF0 CF1 CF2 CF3 CF4 IRR NPV @
10%
A -10,500 6,000 5,000 4,000 1,500 26% 3,117
B -10,500 3,000 4,000 5,000 6,000 22% 3,388
C -6,000 2,700 2,700 2,700 17% 715
Narain
Life Disparity Problem
❑ Try this:
Machine Outlay CF1 CF2 IRR NPV @ 10%
P 2,000 2,400 - 20% 182
Q 2,000 - 2,650 15% 190
❑ The key question here is:
What happens at the end of the shorter-lived
project?
– If we replace the project with identical project
– may use Equivalent Annual NPV
– If we reinvest in some other project – use NPV
❑ Use incremental project analysis if IRR has to be
computed
Narain
Pitfall 4: Term structure of required return
Narain
INDIAN PRACTICES
Narain
RELATIVE IMOPTANCE OF THE FOLLOWING PROJECT CHOICE CRITERIA
58.20%
BREAK-EVEN-ANALYSIS
35.10%
PROFITABILITY INDEX (PI) 85.00%