Graduate School:

Sport Science, Movement and Human Factors

(GS-SMFH)

Master M1 and M2
Physical Activity, Exercise and Health
(PAEH)

Internship, Dissertation
and
Oral Presentation
Guidelines

Unit Leader: Dr Philippe LOPES

Email: philippe.lopes@univ-evry.fr
Table of Contents
TABLE OF CONTENTS ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 2
INTRODUCTION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
AIMS OF THE INTERNSHIP UNIT ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
OBJECTIVES -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
SELECTING A RESEARCH QUESTION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
ASSESSMENT------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
ASSESSMENT CRITERIA------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 3
LEARNING METHODS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
ADVISING & SUPPORT -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 4
INTERNSHIP STUDENT AND ADVISOR EXPECTATIONS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5
ADVISOR EXPECTATIONS ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5
STUDENT EXPECTATIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 5
SUGGESTED SCHEDULE OF WORK ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 6
ETHICS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6
ETHICS IN THE CONDUCT OF RESEARCH----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6
Ethical Violations --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6
The Document of Informed Consent: -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6
Authorship of Research Papers -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6
ETHICAL APPROVAL. ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6
Application Steps --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 6
Required Information ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 7
INTERNSHIP/DISSERTATION GUIDELINES --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8
INTRODUCTION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8
PRESENTATION & SUBMISSION ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8
STRUCTURE & CONTENT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 8
Informational Aspects --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
Title Page ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
Table of Contents --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
List of Tables --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
List of Figures -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
Abstract --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
Acknowledgements ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
Substantive Sections ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 9
Chapter 2. LITERATURE REVIEW ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 9
Chapter 3. METHODS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10
Chapter 4. RESULTS --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 10
Chapter 5. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11
Supporting Information ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 11
References (Bibliography) -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 11
Appendices --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12
PLAGIARISM: IS IT WORTH? -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12
ORAL PRESENTATION GUIDELINES---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12
INTRODUCTION --------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12
STRUCTURE OF THE PRESENTATION -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12
Before the presentation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12
During the presentation ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 12
After the presentation ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13
CONTENT OF THE PRESENTATION ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 13
APPENDIX 1: ETHICS APPLICATION FORM ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 14
APPENDIX 2: SAMPLE TITLE PAGE ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 15
APPENDIX 3: SAMPLE TABLE OF CONTENTS -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 16
APPENDIX 4: SAMPLE ABSTRACT ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ 17
APPENDIX 5: ORAL PRESENTATION EVALUATION CRITERIA ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 18
APPENDIX 6: INTERNSHIP DETAILS IN FRENCH ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 19
APPENDIX 7: IMPORTANT RECOMMENDATIONS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 20
Introduction
This unit is double unit that spans both semesters and comprises the completion of a piece of research of your choice approved by your advisor. Your
project is one of the most important assignments that you will undertake at the University Evry Paris Saclay. It accounts for 1/3 of your master’s degree
which under the current scheme contributes 1/4 of your final master’s degree classification. As such, this unit will have a significant impact on your final
master’s degree classification.

The unit requires an internship 200 hours minimum in the first year and 400 hours minimum in the second year. Furthermore, you will need to dedicate
an additional 200-300 hours of study to the internship/placement (review of literature, setting up protocol, analysis of results, writing up the dissertation,
etc, etc). This commitment of time is necessary to complete your project and produce a piece of work of a high standard. You are strongly advised to
attend workshops/seminars/lectures that could help construct your project and regularly consult your advisor (no formal schedule, but you are advised
to meet at least monthly).

This is meant to be an independent piece of work. Time management and self-discipline are essential and form important elements of the learning
outcomes of this unit. You must pace yourself across the year (both years) so that things are not left until the last minute when it becomes impossible to
complete the unit or by 'cramming' for the project you neglect your other units. You also need to keep the project in perspective in that while it is a key
piece of work, it is not the only piece of work that contributes to your degree classification. You need to strike a balance between all the demands on
your time.

For most of you this will prove to be a challenging, demanding, but rewarding experience. Completion of the unit will bring about a great sense of
personal achievement and a level of expertise in an area of personal interest.

Aims of the Internship Unit

• To enable students to experience organizing and conducting their own investigation in applied exercise sciences
• To develop time management and communication skills while working with a supervisor
• To enhance students' ability to think and write critically
• To enhances students' analytical skills
• To provide students with the intellectual means against which to evaluate or better understand their work
• To enable students to apply theoretical and conceptual frameworks to their field of study

Objectives
Upon completion students should be able to:
• Identify some issue in Exercise Science which may be investigated
• Evaluate extensively the relevant literature
• Propose appropriate research methods to investigate these issues
• Participate in research activities
• Search the literature, collect, and analyze data and write a report
• Demonstrate how the study contributes to the body of knowledge in the area investigated

Selecting a Research Question

You could be working from the first year of your master on a research project either in a laboratory, hospital, rehabilitation clinic or association (clubs,
sport federations, etc). However, it might not be always possible to collect and analyze data the first year, and some students will work on an extensive
review of literature, establish a research question and complete methodology usually in preparation for the full research project of the following year (i.e
including results, discussion, recommendations., etc)
You are free to select a topic of your own choice and it is highly recommended that you select a topic of personal interest in order to maximize your
motivation and commitment to the project. Most of the time, you will be directed to the research themes of the associated laboratories (LBEPS, Hospital,
etc) and to the contributing researchers. The methodology you employ needs to be applicable to your question but will typically be quantitative. The
following condition apply to the selection of a research topic: that needs to be approved by the master’s research committee.
• The focus of the research project must reflect the master’s degree pathway the student is taking.
• The content can be broad or narrow but must be related to physical activity and health in its broadest sense.
• The focus can be on one discipline or based on several.
• The research must be theoretically based, scientifically sound but should have an applied focus.

Assessment
You are required to submit, excluding references and appendices, a 20,000-word dissertation (around 40 pages). Details of the content to submit,
formatting requirements and evaluation criteria are specified in the following guidelines.

The hand-in date will be given in the respective M1 and M2 PAEH respective schedules.
The document will be deposited in the eLearning platform (ecampus)

Assessment Criteria
The project Dissertation will be graded in accordance with the following assessment criteria. Briefly, this entails:
 85 - 100% (≥ 17/20) Original and imaginative.
75 - 84% (≥ 15/20) Complete and with insight.
70 - 74% (≥ 14/20) Comprehensive, critical. Well-ordered arguments. Subtlety in analysis
60 -69% (≥ 12/20) Well-rounded statements, all to the point. Interpretative review. Clear conclusions. Analysis of data in as full
a manner as possible. Statistical grasp. Efficient data gathering with economy of effort. Showed initiative in
organizing subjects and experiments.
50 -59% (≥ 10/20) Literature review is succinct and appropriate. Valid argument and conclusion, possibly incomplete in view
of the available data. An adequate and safe report but lacking sparkle. A methodical approach to data
gathering. Effort put in to gather sufficient data/subjects
40 - 49% (≥ 8/20) A limited endeavor, with incomplete statements and review. Errors of commission. Graphs and tables
correct, but untidy or badly presented. More like a pilot study which the student could have pursued further
in the circumstances
0 - 39% (≤ 7/20) Incomplete. Poorly presented. Irrelevant or wrongly oriented material. Errors of both omission and
commission. Little knowledge displayed. Inadequate review

Learning Methods
This unit is primarily an independent study. However, to provide students with additional help, they will be assigned an advisor (see below) and through
the course of both semester a series of workshops will be run that will focus on:

1. Asking good questions These topics will be dealt with in the Internship/dissertation workshop with the help of the current internship
2. Qualitative methods guidelines, the research methods and statistics classes, the conception of innovative projects seminars, the
3. Quantitative methods international workshop and a variety of classes that will involve the collection of data. In other words, nearly
4. Data analysis all classes prepare for the internship/dissertation project
5. Submitting the thesis

Advising & Support

The project unit is primarily an independent study. However, each student is appointed an advisor whose role is to provide support and guidance in the
completion of the project. Advisors will be selected in part based on student choice (you are advised to approach staff and determine their expertise
and interest in your proposed topic) and on availability. The specific expectations and responsibilities of you and the advisor are laid out below. You
will need to sign and date this form.
There is no formal schedule of meetings and no requirement that the student and advisor meet on a specific number of occasions. However, past
experience has shown that those students who interact regularly with their advisor are more successful. Typically, monthly meetings are held with more
frequent meetings at key times such as designing the methodology and data analysis. It is the student's responsibility to arrange these meetings. You
are also advised to submit work for feedback on a regular basis. Remember that supervisors are busy people:
• appointments will need to be made in advance by email
• if you need to cancel an appointment do so well in advance and DO NOT MISS APPOINTMENTS
• supervisors may be away from their office (online, conferences, holidays, etc.) so you need to plan for this!
• send draft copies of things to be looked at in advance of the meeting. It wastes time for all concerned to have to read things through at the
time of the meeting
• plan what you wish to discuss at the meeting and be organized in order to make the most use of the time

Generally, you will need to see your supervisor more frequently when:
• You are designing the study - protocol preparation
• Before you start collecting the data, as a final check on your methods, use of equipment, etc.
• During the data analysis process
• During the writing-up process

Your supervisor will act as first marker for your project and a second marker from the academic staff will be appointed nearer the time of completion.

The supervisor will comment/make suggestions about your draft write up and may be willing to look at it a second time, but this will be at the discretion
of the individual. Some supervisors prefer not to comment on the 'discussion' part of your write-up, as they feel that this is your part of the document,
where you can demonstrate some creative thought!
Internship Student and Advisor Expectations
To prevent confusion arising as to what the advisor and the student should expect of each other’s involvement with respect to the project, the following
expectations apply.

Advisor Expectations

1. Students will have read the internship/dissertation project handbook and be conversant with the project requirements and regulations.

2. Students are responsible for arranging to meet their advisor, in some manner, monthly (more frequent meetings may be arranged at the
student's request). Meetings may be to up-date the advisor on progress or they may be to discuss concerns and seek resolutions to
problems that have arisen.

3. Students are responsible for meeting the deadlines set for the presentation of interim material (e.g., chapter drafts) in order that their
progress be charted, and potential problems identified.

4. Students are responsible for obtaining ethical approval and are required to adhere to accepted ethical practices in conducting research with
human participants.

5. Students are responsible for acting on feedback regarding modifications and changes deemed appropriate by the advisor. Changes and
modifications can be open to discussion and if valid reasons are presented, or alternatives given, they need not be made. The student
should be aware that the advisor will be more familiar with the issues and thus better able to determine the appropriate course of action.
Once modifications and changes have been agreed, they must be acted on.

6. Students are responsible for managing their time appropriately and in accordance with the hours allotted to the project. This should be seen
as the minimum level of time involvement to meet the requirements for adequate completion of the project.

Student Expectations

1. The advisor will make clear to the student his area of expertise. Unless otherwise requested by the student, the advisor will not undertake to
supervise a project unless he/she feels competent in the area chosen by the student.

2. The advisor will, at the request of the student, go through the project requirements and guidelines to make sure the student is aware of what
is expected. Further, the advisor will make clear, by providing written and/or verbal guidelines, of any additional criteria they feel are
appropriate given the nature of the student’s specific proposal.

3. The advisor will make time available such that students can meet to fulfil the requested meetings. This may take the form of a phone
conversation, a face-to-face meeting, or a written dialogue. A log of these meetings will be kept a copy of which the student may keep.

4. Materials presented by students in response to the stated deadlines will be evaluated in a timely manner and arrangements made to convey
feedback.

5. The advisor will provide suggestions and directions for modifications and changes that he feels are appropriate given the student’s project
question.

6. The advisor’s time and level of involvement in the student’s project will be heavily influenced by the student’s own time and level of
involvement and their commitment to their project.

7. The advisor will consult with the student on ethical requirements and the process of obtaining ethical approval
Suggested Schedule of Work

Question finalized (M1 and M2) Mid December

Ethical Approval (M2) Mid-January
Introduction/Literature (M2) First draft by End February
Methodology (M2) Designed by end of December. Draft of methodology just after Christmas
REMEMBER YOU MUST OBTAIN ETHICAL APPROVAL BEFORE YOU COLLECT ANY DATA
Data Collection (M2) Completed by Easter break
ALL DATA COLLECTION MUST BE CONDUCTED ACCORDING TO ACCEPTED ETHICAL
PRACTICES FOR IN RESEARCH WITH HUMAN PARTICIPANTS
Results Underway at Easter
Proposed study methodology (M1) After easter
Bibliographic document (M1) End April time
Discussion (M2) Beginning may
Proofing/Binding (M1 and M2) Mid may

Please note that most staff will be unavailable during the Christmas and Easter vacations so you must plan accordingly the submission of drafts or
requests for meetings.

Ethics
Ethics in the Conduct of Research
Adherence to a high standard of behavior, honesty and protection of human participants are qualities that cannot be ignored or breached without severe
consequences. It is expected that each student will honor his or her personal reputation and that of the graduate School, University of Evry Paris
Saclay.

Ethical Violations
The following behaviors are not only unacceptable but may result in a requirement to repeat the project work.

• Failure to explain the study and have subjects read and sign a document of informed consent prior to the collection of data. This includes
classmates.
• Failure to comply with any regulations imposed by the supervisor of the project or an Ethics committee in any aspect of the project.
• Any alteration of data collected, manufacturing of data, or falsification of results and events.
• A breach of confidentiality by revealing information about subjects and their participation in the study in a way that reveals their identity.
• Failure to report to your supervisor any incident with a subject that results in injury or illness. (Any complaint from a subject should be put in
writing with a complete description of the incident and given to the supervisor... for the protection of all.)
The Document of Informed Consent:
In the use of human beings for research, it cannot be left to individuals to determine what is right and what is not right; and what is acceptable and what
is not acceptable. Community beliefs, perceptions of abuse of rights, and fears about 'research' require that the community of scientists establish
unassailable standards to assure that the human ethos is never sacrificed for the scientific.
Authorship of Research Papers
In the past, some student research projects have been suitable for publication as either a research paper or poster presentation. In such cases, the
advisor typically re-formats the work to make it appropriate for publication and would normally be first author with the student given second authorship.
If the student undertakes the majority of the preparation work for publication, they may be given first authorship.

Ethical Approval.

You must obtain ethical approval for your project. You need to complete the application form (Appendix 1) and also provide supporting documentation.
The more complete this documentation, the quicker the application process will proceed. Return all forms to your advisor who will forward them to the
ethics committee. The committee will then inform me if the application has been approved.
Typically, the applications are approved pending the submission of further supporting materials--usually this is because insufficient information is
provided on the participants, the testing protocols, and the protection of participants' rights. In rare cases, the application will be denied and may be due
to the application being incomplete and/or deals with at risk groups (e.g., children, elderly, disabled) or uses invasive methods (e.g., blood samples, fluid
ingestion) or very strenuous tests (e.g., maximal tests).
Application Steps
1. Get application form (Appendix 1)
2. Complete form and provide supporting documentation (i.e., consent forms, information for participants, testing protocols, participant
recruitment) on separate sheets if required. You must ensure that the information you provide is legible, coherent, and relevant
3. Return all paperwork to your advisor
4. The graduate school’s ethics committee will inform students of the decision
5. If required, additional paperwork will be requested and provided and/or testing protocols modified
Required Information

Clear, concise, and accurate title of the project

Comprehensive • Process of participant selection (how and why) --provide accompanying letters if applicable
information on the • Comprehensive description of participants including age, type of activity, gender, ethnicity, fitness levels or any
participants relevant details to fully describe the participants
• Whether participants are volunteers or paid subjects
Comprehensive • How will the data be collected?
information on the • Laboratory protocols, equipment and questionnaires used,
testing protocols • You must supply sufficient information on aspects of the tests (i.e from amount of fluid ingested to type of questions
to 'script' to be read to participants)
• You must also describe the exact steps each subject will go through to complete the testing protocols
Information on the • Informed Consent Form (all adult participants)
protection of o Description of project, why they have been asked, the costs and benefits of participation
participants' rights o Length of participation and what will be required of them
o Right to withdraw at any time at no penalty
o Right of privacy, confidentiality
o Place to sign and date for participants and researcher
o Contact details so participant can obtain more information if required
o In a language the participant can understand
• Assent Form if the participating subjects are children (children cannot give consent only assent--consent has to be
sought and obtained from parents or legal guardian)
o Description of project, why they have been asked, the costs and benefits of participation
o Length of participation and what will be required of them
o Right to withdraw at any time at no penalty
o Right of privacy, confidentiality
o Place to sign and date for participants and researcher
o Contact details so participant can obtain more information if required
o In a language the participant can understand
• Parent Consent Letter (necessary when using children as research participants)
o Description of project, why their child has been asked, the costs/benefits of participation to their child
o Length of participation and what will be required of their child
o Right to withdraw at any time at no penalty (child and parent)
o Right of privacy, confidentiality (child and parent)
o Place to sign and date for parent
o Contact details so parent can obtain more information if required
o In a language the parent can understand
INTERNSHIP/DISSERTATION GUIDELINES
The guidelines provided here MUST be followed.
Failure to do so may lead to you being asked to resubmit your project.

Introduction
Your internship/dissertation is the culmination of your M1 master’s degree and spans both semesters of the year. This is not a piece of work to be taken
lightly or left to the ‘last minute.’ It should also be an enjoyable project as you will have the opportunity to study in-depth something that is of personal
interest to you and which may be a springboard to your future career.

The following guidelines should be read in conjunction with the writing and referencing guidelines given to you in the Research Methods unit as well as
in various other units including statistics. The guidelines presented here are those specific to the submission of your project and fall into two broad
categories:

• Presentation & Submission (font, size, paper, margins, binding, referencing style etc., page limits, number of words, tables, figures)
• Structure & Content (order and name of chapters; what needs to be in each chapter)

Issues related to supervision are covered in the unit guide, as are some useful tips.

Presentation & Submission

These guidelines are specific to the project and how to format the document you need to submit; the following format must be adhered to:

• Use Arial or Arial Narrow or Calibri or a times roman style font in 12 point (this document is in 10pt Arial Narrow)
• Text should be in black although color may be used in tables and figures (photographs can be used where appropriate)
• Type on one-side of the paper only
• 1.5-space all work (except the abstract which is single-spaced-see appendix 4)
• Indent the first line of a new paragraph
• Set margins at 2 cm on all sides (the margins set for this document)
• All pages must be numbered except the title page. Page numbers for the title page (it is numbered but does not appear), abstract,
acknowledgements, table of contents, list of tables, and list of figures are numbered in lower case Roman numerals (i.e., i, ii, v, etc.). From
Chapter 1 on through to the appendices (if used), pages are numbered sequentially using Arabic numerals (i.e., 1, 2, 34, etc.).
• Use a running header that captures the nature of the dissertation
• Conform to the Harvard referencing style
• Adhere to the principles of good academic writing

You must submit an electronic copy of the project written in a recognized word processor (Word, Libre office, etc) .

You must also provide any data, audio or video interview or any other information collected from your participants. This will need to be stored in order
to meet ethical issues related to the conducting of research on human subjects. This can be provided in electronic format within the E-campus platform
(https://ecampus.paris-saclay.fr/ ) as a separate file.

The dissertation document must be sent by the deadline provided in the unit guide distributed at the start of the unit. Any work handed-in after the
deadline will be deemed a failure and require the student to re-take the assessment at the next assessment opportunity. The only exception will be
where an extension has been formally requested and granted by the Project Supervisor.

Structure & Content

Within the various sections of the project there is scope to present your work in the manner that best conveys the question you have addressed. You
should discuss your individual approach with your supervisor.

The various sections are listed as follows and fall into three broad categories. The first covers the informational aspects of the thesis such as table of
contents and abstract, the second the substantive chapters, and the third supporting information (Note: these labels for each of the categories are NOT
USED).

Informational Aspects Substantive Sections Supporting Information

Title page Introduction References
Table of contents Literature Review Appendices
List of tables Methodology
List of figures Results
Abstract Discussion/Conclusions
Acknowledgements
 Informational Aspects

Title Page
There is a prescribed form of title page, which you must adhere to (see Appendix A). The title itself should be brief, but comprehensive. Do not include
redundant words in a title. In particular, it is not appropriate to use A study of…. since it is obviously a study.

Table of Contents
This table should list the acknowledgements, list of tables, list of figures, chapter headings into which the dissertation is divided and subdivisions within
each chapter, with beginning page numbers (see Appendix 3). The numbering of chapters and the wording, capitalization and punctuation of titles and
headings should be exactly the same as they are in the text.

References and Appendices are included as main divisions in this table and follow the listing of chapters.

List of Tables
This list occupies its own page and consists of the exact captions of all tables. Numbering, wording, capitalization and punctuation should
be exactly as they are in the body of the dissertation.

List of Figures
As for List of Tables.

Abstract
The abstract (appendix 4) should include a statement of the problem; a brief description of the research design and methods; major findings including a
note of their significance; and conclusions. It can, of course, only be written after the study report has been written. It must fit, single-spaced, on one
side of A4 paper.

Acknowledgements
This section should identify those people to whom you are indebted for guidance and assistance, and those to whom you are grateful for any special or
non-routine aid. Your acknowledgements should also be expressed simply and tactfully.
Substantive Sections

Chapter 1. INTRODUCTION
The first chapter constitutes the planning phase of the study and should contain the following subdivisions:

An introduction to the area of study. What is the general question you are seeking to address? In broad terms this should allow the reader to ascertain
the disciplinary focus of your study and the general area you will be investigating (e.g., the physiology of rowing; Connected objects for health, cardiac
rehabilitation, stress and anxiety, self-confidence, mental health, etc, etc, etc,)

An indication of the importance of the particular problem selected for investigation. You need to tell the reader why this is a question worthy of study.
What is the reason for asking this question? This has to be more than it being of personal interest or because it is a course requirement.

The theoretical framework of the study. Having outlined the general area of study and the question in its broadest sense, you need to give the reader
an idea of how you will address the question. What conceptual approach will you employ and why? What methodological approach will you take? This
is outlined in its simplest form as each of these points will be comprehensively detailed in subsequent chapters.

A 'route-map' of the paper/dissertation/thesis. As a summary to this chapter, reiterate the purpose of the study and provide a brief outline of the
chapters to come and what they will contain.

Chapter 2. LITERATURE REVIEW

The second chapter constitutes the review of the relevant literature:

A detailed and critical review of related research and, if appropriate, professional literature. This will inevitably include major subdivisions together with a
summary of the review. The literature review may also provide a rationale for the research question and for the methods which you will subsequently
use.

You must ensure that the review is more than a descriptive list of past research in chronological order. You will need to find a way to distill the literature
and present a focused, logical, coherent and critical review. The review must be integrated, critical, and synthesized.

You need to be able to present to the reader a 'golden thread' that ties your entire dissertation together. What is the strand(s) that hold your study
together and draw the various sections together? It is sometimes like telling a story--what story do you want to tell and what 'message' do you want to
convey?.
A clear and sharply focused statement of the problem together with a list of hypotheses and an analysis and description of the delimitations and
limitations. Brief definitions of these terms are given below, but you will also need to refer to a relevant text (e.g. Thomas, J.R and Nelson, J.K. [2015].
Research Methods in Physical Activity [7th edition]. Champaign, IL.: Human Kinetics) in order to be able to understand them fully.

Note: “delimitation” - A limitation, imposed by the researcher, in the scope of the study; a choice the researcher makes to effect a
workable research problem.’ (Thomas and Nelson, 2015). For example, the study might be delimited to just females rather than including both males
and females.

“limitation” – A possible shortcoming or influence that either cannot be controlled or is the result of the delimitations imposed by
the investigator’ (Thomas and Nelson, 2015). For example, you might not be able to control pre-testing diet and your experiment is limited by the
possible impact of glycogen depletion.

To complete the Literature review, you can get help from the University library as mentioned earlier, but also look specifically at specialized scientific
papers that relate to your subject with in particular (Science & Sport, Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise, Journal of Applied Physiology, Journal of
Sport Sciences, to name a few). Some scientific journals periodically offer important bibliographies on a particular subject, or annually review all
previously published articles.

From the University of Evry library website (https://www.biblio.univ-evry.fr/index.php?id=1 ), you can access a wide range of electronic resources
(https://www.biblio.univ-evry.fr/index.php?id=19), in particular, the online catalogue of scientific publications

Databases are also available on the Internet often offering summaries of research articles or even full articles in HTML or PDF format. As part of this
research/investigation, it is necessary or even essential to identify the key words of the query. Here are just a few examples of internet databases of
scientific journals and papers:
• PubMed (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/ )
• Free Medical Journals (http://www.freemedicaljournals.com/)
• British Medical Journal (http://bmj.bmjjournals.com/)

Several free tools can help you construct and gather you own bibliography including ZOTERO (https://www.zotero.org/) and MENDELEY
(https://www.mendeley.com/ )
The bibliography establishes an exhaustive inventory of the sources used and cited in the text and will be placed in alphabetical order.

Chapter 3. METHODS
This chapter reports how your information was gathered and then analyzed. It should include a summary of subject details, descriptions of measuring
instruments and procedures, and an explanation of the experimental design. This may also include information on any developments that were made to
your methods as a result of any pilot work that you undertook. A full rationale should also be provided for the methods used to analyze your information
(statistical or otherwise). This chapter will inevitably include subdivisions (e.g. subjects, equipment, procedures, and data analysis) and should
give enough information to enable a reader to replicate your investigation.

Participants—is it clear who the subjects will be and why and how they were selected? Have you described them in sufficient detail (demographic and
participant information)

Materials/Design—is it clear what approach you have taken and why (qualitative versus quantitative)? What design have you employed (experimental
versus non-experimental)? Have you described your measures in sufficient detail (IVs, DVs, surveys, questionnaires, interview protocols, behavioral
observation)? Is it clear why, what, and how any equipment was used?

Ensure that protocols and validated surveys are described in detail (include sample questions or scripts in the case of interviews) and a clear rationale
is provided. Provide the full copy of the interview schedule and the surveys used in the appendices.

Procedures—is it clear what happened to the participants in your study from initial to final involvement? Have you reported any instructions or
debriefing given to the participants? Have you explained ethical and consent procedures?

Hypotheses Testing—What statistical tests were used, and why, to test the hypotheses laid out in chapter 2?

Chapter 4. RESULTS
The fourth chapter includes all the pertinent findings from your investigation. Information should be appropriately presented in, for example, graphical
and/or tabular from. NB table titles should appear above the table and figure titles should appear below the figures. A summary of results from any
statistical treatments should also be included, although statistical calculations etc. should be placed in an appendix.

The validity and reliability of any innovative measurement instruments should also be included in this section. The validity and reliability of more
established instruments should be obtained from published sources and also included here. The important findings should also be summarized,
particularly in relation to any hypotheses, which were stated in Chapter 1. This chapter constitutes the heart of any dissertation. Thus, logic in
organization of material and clarity in statement should be apparent. One possible approach is as follows:

Data Cleaning—Provide descriptive statistics and show how items have been retained or dropped.

Scale Construction—How did you go about determining whether your measures were reliable and how did you create scales for subsequent
analyses?

The reporting of the data would then occur in the results section and might consist of multiple results chapters each organized around a theme that
emerged from the analysis of the transcripts. These results chapters would then become results/discussion chapters with the discussion/conclusion
chapter omitted but replaced by a final chapter that draws together the various results chapters into some conclusion and recommendations for the
future.

Chapter 5. DISCUSSION & CONCLUSIONS/RECOMMENDATIONS

The last chapter should begin with a brief summary of the research problem, methods and results. The results should then be explained in relation to
previous theories and findings and what you hypothesized. All possible explanations should be given for the results, as should the effect of any
limitations. You also need to ensure that you explain any discrepancies between what you hypothesized and what you found. Practical applications of
your findings should also be included in this section along with recommendations for future research.

This chapter is often one that is left to the last minute and, after having spent so long on the topic, one that is rushed off and given little intention. In
reality, this chapter is probably key to the mark you will receive. It is in this chapter that bring everything you have done together and demonstrate to
the reader your understanding of the question and what you have found. It is also where you start to speculate on explanations for what you have
found and how your work might make a contribution to the literature and to the fields of fitness and health and sports development.

MAKE SURE YOU GIVE THIS CHAPTER THE TIME AND ATTENTION IT DESERVES
Supporting Information

References (Bibliography)
In this section you are obliged to fully reference all sources quoted or referred to in the text. Intellectual honesty is simply a matter of giving credit for
ideas and information obtained from others. Whether you paraphrase the original author or quotes him or her directly is irrelevant to the issue of giving
credit. To acknowledge one’s debt is a matter of ethics as well as of self-interest.
Sources included in the References Section are listed in alphabetical order without numbering and must follow the Harvard System detailed on the
inside of the rear cover of the Journal of Sport Sciences and in the following link: https://libraryguides.vu.edu.au/harvard/internet-websites

You can find below some examples of publications from members of the laboratory of Biology of Exercise for health and Performance (LBEPS) , in peer
reviewed scientific international publications, in books or chapter in books and in national or international conferences:

• Articles published in a peer reviewed scientific journal:

Couderc A, Gabbett TJ, Piscione J, Robineau J, Peeters A, Igarza G, Thomas C, Hanon C, Lacome M. Repeated High-Intensity Effort Activity in
International Male Rugby Sevens. J Strength Cond Res. 2019 Jan 22
Dardari D, Van GH, M'Bemba J, Laborne FX, Bourron O, Davaine JM, Phan F, Foufelle F, Jaisser F, Penfornis A, Hartemann A Rapid glycemic regulation
in poorly controlled patients living with diabetes, a new associated factor in the pathophysiology of Charcot's acute neuroarthropathy..PLoS One. 2020
May 21;15(5): e0233168.
Bohnert KR, Goli P, Roy A, Sharma AK, Xiong G, Gallot YS, Kumar A. TLR/MyD88/XBP1 signaling axis mediates skeletal muscle wasting during cancer
cachexia. Mol Cell Biol. 2019; 39(15): e00184-19.
Dubitzky W, Lopes P, Davis J, Berrar D. The Open International Soccer Database for machine learning. Machine Learning (Special Issue- 0ct 2018 p1-
20).
Jacquet A, Barbeau D, Arnaud J, Hijazi S, Hazane-Puch F, Lamarche F, Quiclet C, Couturier K, Fontaine E, Moulis JM, Demeilliers C. Impact of maternal
low-level cadmium exposure on glucose and lipid metabolism of the litter at different ages after weaning. Chemosphere. 2019 Mar; 219:109-121
Houdebine, L., D’Amico, D., Bastin, J., Chali, F., Desseille, C., Rumeau, V., Soukkari, J., Oudot, C., Rouquet, T., Bariohay, B., Roux, J., Sapaly, D., Weill,
L., Lopes, P., Djouadi, F., Bezier, C., Charbonnier, F., & Biondi, O. (2019). Low-Intensity Running and High-Intensity Swimming Exercises Differentially
Improve Energy Metabolism in Mice With Mild Spinal Muscular Atrophy. Frontiers in Physiology, 10, 1258.
Erblang M, Drogou C, Gomez-Merino D, Metlaine A, Boland A, Deleuze JF, Thomas C, Sauvet F, Chennaoui M. The Impact of Genetic Variations in
ADORA2A in the Association between Caffeine Consumption and Sleep. Genes (Basel). 2019 Dec 6;10(12)
Quiclet C, Dittberner N, Gässler A, Stadion M, Gerst F, Helms A, Baumeier C, Schulz TJ, Schürmann A. Pancreatic adipocytes mediate hypersecretion
of insulin in diabetes-susceptible mice. Metabolism. 2019 Aug; 97:9-17.
Quiclet C, Dubouchaud H, Berthon P, Sanchez H, Vial G, Siti F, Fontaine E, Batandier C, Couturier K. Maternal exercise modifies body composition and
energy substrates handling in male offspring fed a high‐fat/high‐sucrose diet. J Physiol. 2017 Dec 1;595(23):7049‐7062
Gallot YS, McMillan JD, Xiong G, Bohnert KR, Straughn AR, Hill BG, Kumar A. Distinct roles of TRAF6 and TAK1 in the regulation of adipocyte survival,
thermogenesis program, and high-fat diet-induced obesity. Oncotarget. 2017 Nov 3;8(68):112565-112583.
Biondi O*, Lopes P*, Desseille C, Branchu J, Chali F, Salah AB, Pariset C, Chanoine C, Charbonnier F. Physical exercise reduces cardiac defects in
type spinal muscular atrophy-like mice. J Physiol. 2012 Nov 15 ;590(Pt 22):5907-25.
Thomas C, Bernard O, Enea C, Jalab C, Hanon C. Metabolic and respiratory adaptations during intense exercise following long-sprint training of short
duration. Eur J Appl Physiol. 2012 Feb;112(2):667-75.
• Books and books chapters:
Thomas C. Chapitre 6 : "Comprendre les interférences des différents types de séances d'entraînement". Sport à Haute Intensité : Mieux les comprendre
pour mieux les entrainés. Sous la direction de Christine HANON. Edition INSEP 2019
Hubball, H.T., & Lopes, P. (2019). Performance analysis in elite masters football: Strategic team and player development implications. In M. Hughes and
Ian M. Franks (3nd Edition), Essentials of Performance Analysis in Sport. New York, USA: Routledge
Lopes P and JA White (2005): “Heart rate variability: control mechanisms, measurement methods and practical implications” in P Maud and C Foster:
Physiological Assessment of Human Fitness, 2nd Edition.
• Congress/conference publications:
Erblang M, Guillard M, Rabat A, Gomez-Merino D, Drogou C, Sauvet F, Thomas C, Chennaoui M. : “Genetic polymorphisms influence on decreased
cognitive performance during total sleep deprivation in healthy subjects” 5th International Congress on Soldiers’ Physical Performance à Québec, Canada
,
Gallot YS, Vernus B, Perek N, Bonnieu A, Freyssenet D, 2011: “Myostatin gene inactivation reduces skeletal muscle mass loss and tumor growth and
increases lifespan in mice with cancer cachexia”. 6th Cachexia Conference, Milan.
Lopes P and White JA, 2003: “Relationships between respiratory sinus arrhythmia, CHD risk and cholesterol levels in middle-aged males”. American
College of Sport Medicine conference, San Francisco.

Appendices
These should be used for raw data and other material that is not directly central to the dissertation but is an important part of your overall work. For
example, you might include the results of a pilot study; or a detailed description of any novel or unusual apparatus; or a discursive analysis of a
theoretical issue; or templates of subject information sheets, questionnaires used. All appendices should be titled and denoted using a letter (e.g.
APPENDIX 1: Sample title page, …, APPENDIX 4. Instrument Calibration, etc, etc).

Plagiarism: Is it worth?
With the advent of the Internet, the ways of obtaining information are also evolving. The wealth of sources that students can refer to and the range of
ways to produce academic work with less effort has fueled the explosion of plagiarism. It could be plagiarism or the facilitated distribution of ready-made
work. In itself, the phenomenon is not really new, but the Internet is renewing the ways of learning as well as of cheating.
Please find below a few websites that will certainly get more than one student thinking. Do not hesitate to contact the teaching team about the
consequences of plagiarism.
https://www.turnitin.com/
https://www.plagiarism.org/
https://responsable-unige.ch/accueil.html (in French)
Your documents (internship dissertations, etc) will be analyzed with plagiarism prevention software.

Oral presentation guidelines

Introduction
The oral defense in English is intended to present your work in front of a jury. It is important to go to the essentials in the presentation of your work.
Nevertheless, you can detail certain aspects and above all, you must situate your personal contribution within the framework of the internship.
Plan for a 15-minute presentation (exactly) followed by around 15 minutes of questions and discussion (see evaluation criteria).
You will have the opportunity to use traditional means of presentation such as whiteboard. However, the use of presentation software is mandatory
(Microsoft Powerpoint, LibreOffice, Prezzi, etc, etc).

Structure of the presentation

Before the presentation

• Make a logical plan: introduction, presentation of your work and conclusion (cf. background = content).
❖ Prepare the supports: slides of the presentation software (PowerPoint, LibreOffice, prezzi or other).
❖ Allow around 1 min per slide, ie around 14-15 slides for the defense.
❖ Do not saturate the slides with information, especially if you do not comment on them!
❖ State one or two ideas per slide (very few lines of text).
❖ Give each slide a title.
❖ Use color, perspective for your diagrams and figures which must be legible and neat.
❖ Finally, the spelling must be perfect ...
• Rehearse the talk at least twice, with a test audience if possible, to avoid "long gaps" and to appreciate the length of your
performance.
• Verify and prepare the room before the presentation (make sure everyone can read your overheads and hear what you are
saying).

During the presentation

• Please do not read your notes.
• Speak clearly and distinctly with the appropriate vocabulary using short sentences, avoid repeating: "you should know that", "I will tell
you about",…
• Please avoid turning your back to the audience.
• Use an accessory to designate the lines of text on the slide or to show the elements of a figure (ruler, pen, laser pointer ...).
• Watch the audience while speaking and don't read your notes (we said this before, but since you ignored it).
• Be stable: do not squirm, sway, run right and left, or play with your pen ...
• Do not place yourself in the field of the overhead projector.
• Speak calmly, still don't read your notes (yes, that's difficult).
After the presentation
• Listen to the questions and answer with maximum precision.

Content of the presentation

The presentation will consist of an introduction, the body of the presentation and a conclusion (If it is a research project, we can expect introduction,
methods, results, conclusions, and recommendations).
The introduction provides the field/theme, the review and purpose of the work and presents the outline of the presentation.
The body of the presentation includes as many parts as necessary for the presentation of the subject (question justifying your intervention,
methods/protocols, synthesis of the main results, conclusions, and recommendations).
The conclusion could also include future work and possibly, a personal report on what the internship will have brought you.
APPENDIX 1: Ethics Application Form

First Name: Name:

To: M1 Ethics Committee (Graduate School of SSMH)

Date:

Application for the approval of a master’s student project (This form when filled in should not exceed 2 pages)

Title of Course:

Student number:

Name of project supervisor:

Expected duration of project: Start date: Expected completion date:

Methodology (please provide a brief outline of the methodology to be used and a description of the expected sample of participants:

Please describe briefly how the following ethical considerations will be addressed:

• Obtaining consent:

• Right of withdrawal:

• Issues of confidentiality:

• Other ethical considerations:

Is ethical clearance required from any other ethical committee? Yes/No …If 'YES' please give the name and address of the organization:

Signed Date:

Supervisors signature of agreement: Date:

(NB. 2 copies of this form should be handed in with your project proposal)
APPENDIX 2: Sample Title Page

University of EVRY PARIS SACLAY

Graduate School of Sport Science, movement, and Human Factors

Effects of physical inactivity and chronic exposure to confined environments

on COVID-19 incidence

A dissertation submitted in partial satisfaction of the requirements for

the master’s degree (M1)
in
Physical Activity, Exercise and Health (PAEH)

by

Jean NEYMAR

Advisor/supervisor (s)

2020
APPENDIX 3: Sample Table of Contents

TABLE OF CONTENTS

LIST OF TABLES ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VII

LIST OF FIGURES----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- VIII
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- IX
ABSTRACT ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- XI
CHAPTER I: INTRODUCTION 1
OVERVIEW AND RATIONALE 1
USING MODELS OF COMMITMENT TO EXAMINE PERSISTENCE IN YOUTH SPORT 3
Summary 11
CHAPTER II: A REVIEW OF THE LITERATURE 13
THE CONSTRUCT OF COMMITMENT 13
Defining Commitment 13
Measuring Commitment 15
The Faces of Commitment 15
Hypotheses 16
CHAPTER III: METHODOLOGY 17
SUBJECTS 17
Instruments 18
Procedures 21
CHAPTER IV: RESULTS 26
RELIABILITY ANALYSIS 35
Scale Construction 35
Regression Analyses 39
Exploratory Analyses 39
CHAPTER V: DISCUSSION 40
OVERVIEW 41
MEASUREMENT DEVELOPMENT 42
MODEL PREDICTIONS 43
Model Intercorrelations 44
LIMITATIONS OF THE STUDY 48
SUMMARY 49
REFERENCES ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 51
APPENDIX A: LETTER TO COACHES -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 69
APPENDIX B: SURVEY ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- 80

NB: The list of tables and the list of figures need to be on separate pages.
APPENDIX 4: Sample Abstract

DECREASED RESPIRATORY SINUS ARRHYTHMIA AS AN INDICATOR OF CORONARY HEART DISEASE

RISK IN MIDDLE AGED MALES
Philippe Lopes 1, John Anderson 2 and John A. White 3
1. Laboratoire de biologie de l'exercice pour la performance et la sante (LBEPS), Univ Evry, IRBA, Université Paris Saclay, 91025 Evry
2. Northern Ireland Bioengineering Center (NIBEC), University of Ulster, Newtownabbey, BT37 OQB, Northern Ireland
3. Dept. of Public Health Medicine and Epidemiology, University Hospital, Queen's Medical Centre, Nottingham, NG7 2UH, England
[Introduction] Heart rate variability has been used as a non-invasive index of parasympathetic activity as well as a possible predictor of
mortality and sudden cardiac death. The purpose of this study was to investigate the relationship between patterns of heart rate variability
associated with respiratory sinus arrhythmia (RSA) and primary CHD risk factors which together may be used as potential screening
indicators for the evaluation of coronary status.
[Materials and Methods] 129 middle aged male asymptomatic subjects underwent a seated resting ECG measurement at a fixed
respiratory frequency (6 breaths.min-1) and volume (30 % of Vital Capacity). Subjects breathed through a pneumotach (Spirotrak III,
Vitalograph, Ireland) and were trained to synchronize their breathing using visual cues on the computer screen. Lead II ECG signals were
digitized at 1 kHz with 12-bit resolution on a IBM-PC. 256 RR intervals were detected and analyzed using autoregressive modelling with
absolute low frequencies (LF6/30) and high frequencies (HF6/30) spectral powers measured in the 0.03-0.07 and 0.07-0.13 Hz frequency
bands respectively. Standard screening tests were performed to identify selected modifiable and non-modifiable CHD risk factors. Finally,
CHD risk factor scores were calculated using four currently used scoring systems (Tunstall-Pedoe H et al-1991, Shaper A.G et al-1987,
Wilson A et al-1991 and Anderson K.M et al-1991).
[Results] The results indicated significant negative correlations between HF6/30 and systolic and diastolic Blood Pressures, both (-0.31,
p<0.001), and also between HF6/30 and total cholesterol (ToTCol) (-0.26, p<0.01), LDL (-0.35, p<0.001), ratio ToTCol/HDL (-0.26, p<0.01),
ratio LDL/HDL (-0.27, p<0.01). However, a significant positive correlation was found between HF6/30 and HDL (0.17, p<0.05), but no
association was noted with triglycerides (-0.08, NS). When comparing the risk factor score systems and HF 6/30, significant negative
correlations were also noted respectively with Shaper (-0.44, p<0.001), Wilson (-0.29 , p<0.001) and Anderson (-0.45, p<0.001), but not
with Tunstall-Pedoe (- 0.10 , NS),
[Conclusion] RSA seems to be reduced in middle aged asymptomatic subjects who nevertheless exhibit recognized CHD risk factors. If
this is the case, RSA values derived from short term ECG measurements could be used as a screening tool in primary and secondary
prevention of CHD to indicate coronary status. More investigation is required to verify the contribution of abnormal lipid profiles on RSA
indices in larger population groups.
APPENDIX 5: Oral Presentation Evaluation Criteria

Master: Physical activity, Exercise and Health

Oral Presentation The presentation matches expectations / 1 pt.

(8 points) Quality of synthesis of the work provided / 2 pts

Theoretical references / 3 pts

Ease, speech, general impression / 1 pt.

Respect of the allotted time and use of PowerPoint / 1 pt.

Discussion The answers to the questions correspond to the expectations / 2 pts

(12 points) Argumentation / 3 pts

Knowledge of current literature / 2 pts

Theoretical references / 3 pts

Ease, conciseness of answers, general impression / 2 pts

Mark:

Name; First Name Date

Assessors signature:
APPENDIX 6: Internship details in French
Please note that this document needs to be filled only after ethical approval (applies to M2) and given to Madame Martha VAN
DER HORST in person with the necessary documents

DESCRIPTIF DE STAGE / INTERNSHIP

1 – L’Etablissement d’inscription administrative (ci-après
« l’Etablissement »)
Nom : UNIVERSITE D EVRY VAL D ESSONNE
Adresse : BATIMENT IBGBI – 23 BOULEVARD DE FRANCE
91037 EVRY CEDEX
Représenté par : Patrick CURMI
En qualité de : Président de l’Université
Contact administratif : Martha VAN DER HORST
@ : martha.vanderhorst@univ-evry.fr  : 01 64 85 34 22
2 – Etablissement référent de la formation pour laquelle l’Université
Paris-Saclay est accréditée (ci-après « l’Etablissement référent »)
Nom : UNIVERSITE D EVRY VAL D ESSONNE
Adresse : BATIMENT IBGBI – 23 BOULEVARD DE FRANCE
91037 EVRY CEDEX
Représenté par : Patrick CURMI
En qualité de : Président de l’Université
Contact administratif : Martha VAN DER HORST
@ : martha.vanderhorst@univ-evry.fr  : 01 64 85 34 22 @ : …………

3 – L’Organisme d’accueil (ci-après « l’Organisme ») 4 – Le Stagiaire (ci-après le « Stagiaire »)

Nom : ……………………………….………………………….…………
Ecole Supérieure d’Ostéopathie Nom : ……………………………………….…………….………………
Tordjman
Adresse : ………………………………………….……………..……… Prénom : ………………………………………………….………………
8 rue Alfred Nobel, 77420 Champs sur Marne Julia
Pays : …………………………………………………….………………N° étudiant : ………………………………………….….………………
France 20220477
N° SIRET : ……………………………………………………….…….. @ : …………………………………… julia_tordjman@hotmail.fr  : …………..……………
06.67.13.57.37

Représenté par : …………………………………………….………….

Kathleen Martinet Intitulé de la formation suivie : Physical
………….………..……………………
Activity, Exercise and Health

En qualité de : ………………………………………………….…….…
Directrice générale …………………………………………………….………………………
Organisme :  X de droit français  autre Statut de l’étudiant :
Service d’affectation du stagiaire : ………………………….…………
Recherche formation initiale  X
Adresse : …………………………………………………………………
8 rue Alfred Nobel, 77420 Champs sur Marne formation continue 
@ : ……………………………..
scolarite@eso-suposteo.fr  : …………..……….…………
01.64.61.66.21 formation permanente 
Lieu de stage (si différent) : ……………………………..….….………Organisme d’affiliation de sécurité sociale : …………….…………… Régime général.
Adresse : ………………………………………………………………… N’ de sécurité sociale: 298059521005928
@ : ………………………………  : ………………………………
5 – L’enseignant référent (ci-après « l’Enseignant ») 6 – Le tuteur de stage de l’Organisme d’Accueil (ci-après « le Tuteur »)
Nom : ……………………………….………………………….…………Nom : ……………………………….………………………….………… Marin

Prénom : ………………………………………………….………………Prénom : ………………………………………………….……………… Thibault

@ : ……………………………..  : ………..…………………… Fonction : ……….…………….…………………………………….……
Ostéopathe, enseignant et chercheur
Adresse professionnelle : ……………………………..………….……
thibault.marin@eso-suposteo.fr : ………………..……………
@ : ……………………………..

Conditions Particulières du stage

Sujet du stage :

Determine the effects of a standardized osteopathic protocol on areas away the diaphragm muscle in enhancing his mobility,
life quality, exercise capability, and cardiorespiratory parameters in healthy individuals.

Compétences à acquérir : …………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..

………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………….
Activités confiées : ……………………………………………………………………..………………………………………….…………………………
Prise en charge ostépathique de sujets, réalisation de tests cardio-respiratoires (spiromètre, échographie
………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………………..……….….…………….
diaphragmatique), réalisation d’un mémoire de fin d’études
Du : ………………………..…
27/02/2024 Au : ……………….........…………..
03/05/2024
Périodes d’interruption : ☐X non ☐ oui : …………………..…………
Présence hebdomadaire effective dans l’Organisme : ……… 30 heures. Nombre de jours de congés : ……………….……………………………
0

Nombres de semaines de présence effective : ……………………

10 Nombre d’heures de présence effective : ………………………………
308

Si le stagiaire doit être présent dans l’Organisme la nuit, le dimanche ou les jours fériés, préciser les cas particuliers : …………………………
X

Suivi par l’enseignant : ☐

X mél ☐ contacts téléphoniques Modalités d’évaluation : ☐ rapport de stage ☐
X soutenance

Gratification (hors avantages offerts) : ☐ minimale (3.75€/h) ou ☐ autre : ….………………………………………………..………………..

Modalités de versement de la gratification : ☐ virement ☐ chèque ☐ espèces
Avantages complémentaires accordés : ……………………………………………………………………………………………………………………
APPENDIX 7: Important recommendations

The signing of the agreement by yourself, the head of course, the President of the
university and the host institution takes at least 4 weeks.
Consequently, it is up to you to make the necessary arrangements to make the
request sufficiently in advance of your departure for the internship

Internship Abroad
Vous devez joindre, impérativement, au descriptif de stage les documents suivants (valables pour la durée du stage) :

• attestation vitale papier (pas la photocopie de la carte vitale), et le formulaire de prise en charge dans le pays de stage à retirer auprès
de la caisse d'affiliation. (Ex : pour la CEE, copie de la carte européenne de santé),

• attestation d'assurance responsabilité civile valable pour un stage, VALABLE DANS LE PAYS DE STAGE - le nom du pays doit être
spécifié sur l'attestation (RC)

• attestation d'assurance de protection individuelle accident (+ assurance accident du travail fortement conseillée), VALABLE DANS
LE PAYS DE STAGE - le nom du pays doit être spécifié sur l'attestation (IA)

• attestation d’assurance rapatriement (Rap),

• copie des (demandes de) visas ou permis de travail permettant à l'étudiant de rentrer en qualité de stagiaire sur territoire étranger.

• Pour les étudiants de nationalité du pays dans lequel se déroule le stage, joindre la copie du passeport.

NB :
Vous avez trouvé votre stage à l’étranger et souhaitez avoir plus d’informations relatives aux démarches administratives,
contactez le service des relations internationales, au bâtiment IDF.