Seeq - Spring 2022 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I Eng-1001-07-Dl

SEEQ - Spring 2022 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I (ENG-1001-07-DL)
7 6 6 100% 0 4 mins
Viewed  Total Responses Completed Completion Rate Dropouts Average Time
50% DESKTOP / LAPTOP 67% Windows 33% Mac 0% Linux 0% Other
50% SMARTPHONES 33% Android 67% iPhone 0% Windows 0% Other
0% TABLETS 0% iPad 0% Android 0% Windows 0% Other
Response Count Time Line

Response Counts
12:00 3. May 12:00 4. May 12:00 5. May 12:00 6. May 12:00
Spring 2021 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I (ENG-

1001-07-DL)
1001-07-DL)
1. I found this course intellectually challenging and stimulating.
Agree : 16.67%
Strongly agree : 83.33%
Weighting & Balancning is active for
Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%
Strongly disagree 0 0%
Disagree 0 0%
Neutral 0 0%
Agree 1 16.67%
Strongly agree 5 83.33%
Total 6 100%
Mean: 4.833 Variance: 0.167
Standard Deviation: 0.408 Standard Error: 0.167
Con dence Interval: [4.507 - 5.160]

1001-07-DL)
2. I learned something valuable in this course that has increased my interest in the subject.
Disagree 0 0%
Neutral 0 0%
Agree 0 0%
Strongly agree 6 100%
Total 6 100%

1001-07-DL)
3. Course materials provided by the instructor were well prepared and clearly explained the
subject.
Disagree 0 0%
Neutral 0 0%
Agree 0 0%
Total 6 100%

1001-07-DL)
4. I found the instructor to be enthusiastic, dynamic, energetic, and engaged with students in
conducting this course.
Disagree 0 0%
Neutral 0 0%
Agree 0 0%
Total 6 100%

1001-07-DL)
5. The instructor made me feel welcome in seeking help/advice inside and outside of the
course.
Disagree 0 0%
Neutral 0 0%
Agree 0 0%
Total 6 100%

1001-07-DL)
6. I was encouraged to participate in class discussions and to share my ideas and knowledge.
Disagree 0 0%
Neutral 0 0%
Agree 0 0%
Total 6 100%

1001-07-DL)
7. The instructor clearly noted the due dates for all assignments.
Agree : 16.67%
Disagree 0 0%
Neutral 0 0%
Agree 1 16.67%
Total 6 100%

1001-07-DL)
8. Feedback on my work was timely and valuable.
Disagree 0 0%
Neutral 0 0%
Agree 0 0%
Total 6 100%

1001-07-DL)
9. The exams, quizzes, and homework tested my knowledge of the course content as
emphasized by the instructor.
Disagree 0 0%
Neutral 0 0%
Agree 0 0%
Total 6 100%

1001-07-DL)
10. The instructor discussed current developments in the eld.
Agree : 16.67%
Disagree 0 0%
Neutral 0 0%
Agree 1 16.67%
Total 6 100%

1001-07-DL)
11. The instructor was available and helpful through of ce hours and emails.
Disagree 0 0%
Neutral 0 0%
Agree 0 0%
Total 6 100%

1001-07-DL)
12. Rate the instructor's teaching effectiveness.
Exceptionally High : 100.00%
Exceptionally Low 0 0%
Low 0 0%
Average 0 0%
High 0 0%
Exceptionally High 6 100%
Total 6 100%

1001-07-DL)
13. Rate the overall quality of the course.
Exceptionally High : 100.00%
Exceptionally Low 0 0%
Low 0 0%
Average 0 0%
High 0 0%
Exceptionally High 6 100%
Total 6 100%

1001-07-DL)
14. Which of the following technologies and/or features did the instructor use throughout this
course? (check all that apply)
Other : 1.64% Blogs : 3.28%
Student Companion Websites : 1.64% Custom Textbooks : 1.64%

Originality Checker/Plagiarism : 4.92% Digital Grade Book : 3.28%
Online Tutors : 1.64% Discussion Boards/Forums : 9.84%
Online Syllabus/Course Outline : 6.56%
Online Resource Centers/Research Tools : 4.92%
Drop Boxes : 4.92%
Online Quizzes/Tests : 4.92% e-Books : 1.64%
Online Presentations : 3.28%

Email : 9.84%
Online Library Resources : 8.20%

Files/Attachments : 6.56%
General Research Websites : 4.92%

Live Conferencing with Audio or Video (Zoom, etc.) : 6.56%
Homework Helpers (online versions) : 1.64%
Instant Messaging/Chat Room : 3.28%
Images : 4.92%
Blogs 2 3.28%
Custom Textbooks 1 1.64%
Digital Grade Book 2 3.28%
Discussion Boards/Forums 6 9.84%
Drop Boxes 3 4.92%
e-Books 1 1.64%
Email 6 9.84%
Files/Attachments 4 6.56%
General Research Websites 3 4.92%
Homework Helpers (online versions) 1 1.64%
Images 3 4.92%
Instant Messaging/Chat Room 2 3.28%
Instructor Companion Websites 0 0%
Interactive Classroom Response Technology

0 0%
(clickers/voting)
Interactive Labs 0 0%
Live Conferencing with Audio or Video (Zoom,

4 6.56%
etc.)
Online Games 0 0%
Online Library Resources 5 8.2%
Online Presentations 2 3.28%
Online Quizzes/Tests 3 4.92%

1001-07-DL)
Online Resource Centers/Research Tools 3 4.92%
Online Survey/Polls 0 0%
Online Syllabus/Course Outline 4 6.56%
Online Tutors 1 1.64%
Originality Checker/Plagiarism 3 4.92%
Personalized Web Site 0 0%
Social Media 0 0%
Student Companion Websites 1 1.64%
Webcasts/Podcasts 0 0%
Wikis 0 0%
Other 1 1.64%
Total 61 100%
Which of the following technologies and/or features did the instructor use throughout this course? (check all that apply) - Text Data for Other
No Data To Display

1001-07-DL)
15. What are the major strengths and weaknesses of the instructor?
05/06/2022 74318070 she was amazing, she was well organized, the way she cared for her students was great.
Dr. Weber was not only professional, but she was also very helpful and knowledgeable. She gave a ton of feedback which helped us all to
05/05/2022 74088900 become better writers. Dr. Weber has made this class a sheer delight for me, I cannot thank her enough for all of her help and support
throughout this class.
05/04/2022 74024340 This instructor was great! She has a lot to offer many students.
05/04/2022 74008789 Responding in a respectful way and no weaknesses
05/03/2022 73847296 Her Patience!
05/02/2022 73681919 Loved everything about this course and this professor- no complaints at all.

1001-07-DL)
16. What aspects of this course were most bene cial to you?
05/06/2022 74318070 everything was bene cial.
There is so much honestly. In the beginning, I was so scared to be in this class, I said I am going to fail, I am not a very good writer, AND who
05/05/2022 74088900 wanted to do peer reviews, NOT ME! But she made it so fun that I quickly got over all of my fears and right away and excelled in this class.
Not only did I become a better writer, but I also overcame my fear of writing.
05/04/2022 74024340 I found learning how to write at a college level more bene cial, by the time I was done with my last paper I was more con dent with myself
05/04/2022 74008789 Learning How to improve on my Typing Skills
05/03/2022 73847296 Discussions, peer reviews
05/02/2022 73681919 Helped me transition back to academic writing after being out of school for many years

1001-07-DL)
17. What do you suggest to improve this course?
05/06/2022 74318070 nothing, she was a great professor
05/05/2022 74088900 Nothing at all. Please share with Dr. Weber that she is an amazing educator, I am super grateful for her!
05/04/2022 74024340 This professor should not change anything
05/04/2022 74008789 Nothinf it’s great
05/03/2022 73847296 she is awesome. Cant think of any suggestions but to continue to be there for he students.
05/02/2022 73681919 Nothing at all, course was perfect.

1001-07-DL)

Seeq - Spring 2022 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I Eng-1001-07-Dl

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Seeq - Spring 2022 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I Eng-1001-07-Dl

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

SEEQ - Spring 2022 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I (ENG-1001-07-DL)

50% DESKTOP / LAPTOP 67% Windows 33% Mac 0% Linux 0% Other

50% SMARTPHONES 33% Android 67% iPhone 0% Windows 0% Other

0% TABLETS 0% iPad 0% Android 0% Windows 0% Other

Response Count Time Line

12:00 3. May 12:00 4. May 12:00 5. May 12:00 6. May 12:00

Spring 2021 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I (ENG-

Strongly agree : 83.33%

Weighting & Balancning is active for

Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Strongly agree 5 83.33%

Mean: 4.833 Variance: 0.167

Standard Deviation: 0.408 Standard Error: 0.167

Con dence Interval: [4.507 - 5.160]

Spring 2021 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I (ENG-

Strongly agree : 100.00%

Weighting & Balancning is active for

Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Strongly agree 6 100%

Mean: 5.000 Variance: 0.000

Standard Deviation: 0.000 Standard Error: 0.000

Con dence Interval: [5.000 - 5.000]

Spring 2021 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I (ENG-

Strongly agree : 100.00%

Weighting & Balancning is active for

Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Strongly agree 6 100%

Mean: 5.000 Variance: 0.000

Standard Deviation: 0.000 Standard Error: 0.000

Con dence Interval: [5.000 - 5.000]

Spring 2021 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I (ENG-

Strongly agree : 100.00%

Weighting & Balancning is active for

Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Strongly agree 6 100%

Mean: 5.000 Variance: 0.000

Standard Deviation: 0.000 Standard Error: 0.000

Con dence Interval: [5.000 - 5.000]

Spring 2021 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I (ENG-

Strongly agree : 100.00%

Weighting & Balancning is active for

Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Strongly agree 6 100%

Mean: 5.000 Variance: 0.000

Standard Deviation: 0.000 Standard Error: 0.000

Con dence Interval: [5.000 - 5.000]

Spring 2021 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I (ENG-

Strongly agree : 100.00%

Weighting & Balancning is active for

Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Strongly agree 6 100%

Mean: 5.000 Variance: 0.000

Standard Deviation: 0.000 Standard Error: 0.000

Con dence Interval: [5.000 - 5.000]

Spring 2021 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I (ENG-

Strongly agree : 83.33%

Weighting & Balancning is active for

Answer Count Percent 20% 40% 60% 80% 100%

Strongly agree 5 83.33%

Mean: 4.833 Variance: 0.167

Standard Deviation: 0.408 Standard Error: 0.167

Con dence Interval: [4.507 - 5.160]

Spring 2021 - Daneryl Weber - Composition I (ENG-