Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Writ 2 - Track Changes WP 1
Writ 2 - Track Changes WP 1
Fashion, a dynamic and broad phenomenon, spreads through every aspect of daily human
life, serving as a visual language that displays one’s identity, social status, cultural values, and
more.Fashion not only encompasses clothing, but alsoaccessories, makeup, and hairstyles.It is
a reflection of society–mirroring beliefs, attitudes, and goals of a specific time and place. The
making it a compelling subject of study across various academic disciplines. Fashion has
attracted the attention of scholars in two disciplines in particular: history and engineering. With
fashion being a broad subject of inquiry, both disciplines are very different in naturewhile
studying it. While history focuses on wholesale catalogs of mass fashion in Birmingham from
the 1920s to the 1960s, engineering centers on researching 3D printing in fashion using
development of mass fashion in Birmingham through the utilization of wholesale catalogs from
the 1920s to the 1920s, engineering examines the integration of sustainable materials such as
drastic differences between disciplines, each of them communicate their fashion research
differently through their texts.These different objectives shed light on the multifaceted nature of
fashion as both a historical and technological topic, with contrasting audiences, evidence use,
In the history academic research article “‘Better Dressed than Birmingham’? Wholesale
Clothing Catalogues and the Communication of Mass Fashion, 1920s to 1960s,” Jenny Gilbert
presents her topic about the “Big Four” of Birmingham clothing and textile companies from the
mid-nineteenth century until the 1970s and their role in communicating and distributing mass
Lim2
fashion through printed communications.1 Gilbert’s argument centers on the significance of
argues in her research article that thesewholesale clothing catalogsas essential tools inserved as
pivotal tools incirculating mass fashion trendsand designsto a wide audience throughout
fashion trends in the1920s to 1960s. By examining the catalog’s layouts, contents, and strategies
for distribution, Gilbert illustrates how they functioned as the “vital link ‘in the chain of
primary source materials, including archival documents, catalogs, and testimonies from the
industries, which makes her argument very convincing for the audience.3 She also uses many
figures throughout her research paper that all consist of different catalogs from the “Big Four”
companies. Gilbert’s presentation of her evidence is clear and convincing. She uses her sources
by implementing historical context to support her argument regarding the importance of
wholesale clothing catalogs. Additionally, the usage of her visual aids, or figures, showcasing
different catalogs from the “Big Four” companies enhances the credibility of Gilbert’s analysis,
and allows readers to visualize the evolution of fashion trends over Birmingham.Through her
thoughtful research, Gilbert effectively demonstrates the relationship between the “Big Four”
Birmingham companies and the spread of mass fashion in the 1900s.Gilbert’s focus on the
socio-economic factors underlying the fashion industry further enhances her research topic
argument, providing compelling evidence about fashion consumption and trends during a
specific historical period.4 Gilbert’s usage of reliable, primary source materials reflects the
narratives of the past. In the field of history, the authenticity of a source is paramount, as it
provides direct evidence of historical events. Gilbert, by relying on these dependable sources, is
able to effectively establish her argument and credibility—the materials used by Gilbert enhance
the credibility of her research and solidifies her argument about fashion history.
Engineering, on the other hand, delves into the topic of fashion through a completely
different lens. In the research article titled “Thermoplastic Polyurethane Based on the 3d Printing
Fashion Clothing-Conceptual Model of The Fashion Industry,” authors Muhammad Ilias Hossen
and Chaoxia Wang venture intothe intersection of engineering and fashion by exploring the
showcase the impact and importance of this innovative approach in the fashion industry.5 Hossen
and Wang first make their argument by providing an overview of the current landscape of 3D
printing technology in fashion;.Theyassert that although 3D printing has problems and concerns
usage of TPU as a sustainable material. They delve into the unique, sustainable properties of
TPU, emphasizing that it has outstanding “properties like tear resistance, resistance to chemicals,
low-temperature resistance, resistance to oxygen, low long-term deformation rate, resistance to
oil and fuels, antimicrobial properties, resistant to fungus,…soft elasticity, and excellent
bending and tension strength.”6 Hossen and Chaoxia use a plethora of Google Scholar articles
5
Muhammad Ilias Hossen and Chaoxia Wang, “ThermoplasticPolyurethane Based on the 3d Printing Fashion
lothing-Conceptual Model of The Fashion Industry,”Fibres & textiles in Eastern Europe30, no. 6 (2022):1,
C
https://doi.org/10.2478/ftee-2022-0047
6
Hossen and Chaoxia, “Thermoplastic Polyurethane Basedon the 3d Printing Fashion Clothing,” 2.
Lim4
researchingmodels from their referenced articles. The authors use scientific scholarly literature
to provide a theoretical framework for their article. These reliable, scholarly articles make the
author’s claim clear and convincing, ensuring that the audience understands the revolutionary
which rely on empirical data, experimentation, and scientific literature. By utilizing these
credible sources, engineers ensure accuracy and credibility on their research, facilitating the
experimentation, the authors take a scientific approach to fashion to demonstrate the benefits of
Jenny Gilbert’s article seems to target an audience of scholars and researchers interested
in the fashion industry, as well as individuals interested in economics and history. Her focus on
mass fashion and the role of wholesale catalogs suggests an audience that is interested in
understanding consumer culture, mass fashion, and commercialization during a specific period,
or in this case, Birmingham in the 20th century. Gilbert assumes that her audience has a basic
understanding of historical research and concepts,andasshe utilizes some jargon throughout her
article. Although Gilbert uses jargon such as “wholesaler,” she immediately defines it as
“companies who provided the distribution channel between the small independent clothing
retailer … and the small to medium-sized manufacturer,”8 to ensure clarity.Terms like “swagger
coat,” “tweeds” and “smock,” while it may confuse readers who do not understand specific
7
ossen and Chaoxia, “Thermoplastic Polyurethane Basedon the 3d Printing Fashion Clothing,” 2.
H
8
Gilbert, “Better Dressed than Birmingham’?,” 258.
Lim5
fashion terms, are used to build specificity to the article. Through herfocususage of jargon terms
andfocuson the “Big Four”Birmingham clothing andtextile companies and their use of
wholesale clothing catalogs, Gilbert contributes to the discussion of fashion production and
On the other hand, Hossen and Wang’s article appears to target an audience of engineers
and researchers in the fields of fashion technology. Specifically, their focus on 3D printing
technology using TPU for fashion clothing production suggests that their audience would be
interested in innovative fashion, environment and sustainability, and the fashion industry. The
and Wang use an abundance of jargon such as “antimicrobial,” “warpage” and “Eigenvalues.”
These jargon terms would not make sense to the average reader who has no knowledge of
fashion and engineering and has a high possibility of getting confused. Hossen and Wang do not
explain these terms and assume that the readers have a preconceived understanding of these
terms, suggesting that the audience would be engineers and researchers who are already in this
production, the authors are able to contribute new insights into the interconnectedness of fashion
and ideas, reflecting the history discipline’s emphasis on clarity and coherent arguments.She
usesThrough her usage offootnotes andathe adherence of theChicago Manual of Style, Gilbert
establishes a scholarly frameworkcitation in her notes. Her article consists of different sections
and subheadings: the abstract,“The Wholesale Clothing Trade, 1920s to 1960s,” “The
Lim6
Birmingham ‘Big Four’: The Companies and Locations,” “Communication through Catalogues,”
“Bells, Birds and Greyhounds: Branding and Own-Brand Goods,” her arguments with unique
subheadings,the conclusion and finally, her acknowledgments. Gilbert is able to further organize
her analysis and allow easy navigation for the reader through her subheadings and sections,
Gilbert’s tone throughout her research article is scholarly, informative, and authoritative. She
also uses formal and precise language to ensure clarity and accuracy in her informationwhich
Authors Muhammad Ilias Hossen and Chaoxia Wang follow a similar format to Gilbert’s
article. Their article begins with an abstract with a summary of the research, then it is followed
by their article with the introduction section that provides background information on 3D
printing and TPU. Their article includes many subheadings with different titles, in which they
discuss their methodology, research, and visual figures. They also include a “Figures and Tables”
section where they present their findings with different figures such as graphs and tables. Finally,
they have a references section where they also use the Chicago Manual of Style citations.This
structural approach to their research article are indicative of the engineering discipline’s focus on
methodological analysis and data.The tone of their article is significantly scholarly, especially
with their usage of figures from their conducted research. Their language is professional, formal,
and specialized, which is catered to an audience familiar with engineering terminology, which
In conclusion, this comparative analysis of different scholarly approaches to the study of
fashion in the disciplines of history and engineering provides an understanding of the differences
and similarities between the two. Through the examination of Jenny Gilbert’s research of
Lim7
Catalogues and the Communication of Mass Fashion, 1920s to 1960s,” and Muhammad Ilias
Hossen and Chaoxia Wang’s research of Thermoplastic Polyurethane in 3D printed fashion items
in “Thermoplastic Polyurethane Based on the 3d Printing Fashion Clothing-Conceptual Model of
The Fashion Industry,” valuable insights have been gained. Their diverse methodologies in
research, arguments, sources, language, tone, and organization all contribute to the comparative
nature of both disciplines. Gilbert’s analysis of primary archival sources illustrates the historical
and economic context of shaping mass fashion trends while offering a narrative of how mass
fashion was communicated throughout the 20th century. In contrast, Hossen and Wang’s
production, highlighting the usage of TPU and the interconnectedness of fashion and
engineering. Comparing and contrasting these different disciplinary perspectives brings forth a
and history.
Lim8
Notes
Gilbert, Jenny. “‘Better Dressed than Birmingham’? Wholesale Clothing Catalogues and the
258–274.https://doi.org/10.1080/0047729X.2020.1767978
Hossen, Muhammad Ilias, and Chaoxia Wang. “Thermoplastic Polyurethane Based on the 3d