Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Writ 2 - Final Revised wp1
Writ 2 - Final Revised wp1
Fashion, a dynamic and broad phenomenon, spreads through every aspect of daily human
life, serving as a visual language that displays one’s identity, social status, cultural values, and
more. It is a reflection of society–mirroring beliefs, attitudes, and goals of a specific time and
place. The evolution of fashion is intertwined with historical events and technological
Fashion has attracted the attention of scholars in two disciplines in particular: history and
engineering. With fashion being a broad subject of inquiry, both disciplines are very different in
nature. While history approaches the topic of fashion to elucidate the development of mass
fashion in Birmingham through the utilization of wholesale catalogs from the 1920s to the 1920s,
Polyurethane into fashion production through 3D printing. These different objectives shed light
on the multifaceted nature of fashion as both a historical and technological topic, with
In the history academic research article “‘Better Dressed than Birmingham’? Wholesale
Clothing Catalogues and the Communication of Mass Fashion, 1920s to 1960s,” Jenny Gilbert
presents her topic about the “Big Four” of Birmingham clothing and textile companies from the
mid-nineteenth century until the 1970s and their role in communicating and distributing mass
fashion through printed communications.1 Gilbert’s argument centers on the significance of
wholesale clothing catalogs as essential tools in circulating mass fashion trends to a wide
during the 1920s to 1960s. By examining the catalog’s layouts, contents, and strategies for
1
Jenny Gilbert, “‘Better Dressed than Birmingham’? Wholesale Clothing Catalogues and the Communication of
ass Fashion, 1920s to 1960s,”Midland history45, no. 2 (2020): 258,
M
https://doi.org/10.1080/0047729X.2020.1767978
Lim2
distribution, Gilbert illustrates how they functioned as the “vital link ‘in the chain of
primary source materials, including archival documents, catalogs, and testimonies from the
industries, which makes her argument very convincing for the audience.3 She also uses many
figures throughout her research paper that all consist of different catalogs from the “Big Four”
companies. Gilbert’s presentation of her evidence is clear and convincing. She uses her sources
by implementing historical context to support her argument regarding the importance of
wholesale clothing catalogs. Additionally, the usage of her visual aids, or figures, showcasing
different catalogs from the “Big Four” companies enhances the credibility of Gilbert’s analysis,
and allows readers to visualize the evolution of fashion trends over Birmingham. Gilbert’s focus
on the socio-economic factors underlying the fashion industry further enhances her research
topic argument, providing compelling evidence about fashion consumption and trends during a
specific historical period.4 Gilbert’s usage of reliable, primary source materials reflects the
narratives of the past. In the field of history, the authenticity of a source is paramount, as it
provides direct evidence of historical events. Gilbert, by relying on these dependable sources, is
able to effectively establish her argument and credibility—the materials used by Gilbert enhance
the credibility of her research and solidify her argument about fashion history.
Engineering, on the other hand, delves into the topic of fashion through a completely
different lens. In the research article titled “Thermoplastic Polyurethane Based on the 3d Printing
Fashion Clothing-Conceptual Model of The Fashion Industry,” authors Muhammad Ilias Hossen
and Chaoxia Wang venture into the intersection of engineering and fashion by exploring the
2
ilbert, “Better Dressed than Birmingham’?,” 258.
G
3
Gilbert, “Better Dressed than Birmingham’?,” 258.
4
Gilbert, “Better Dressed than Birmingham’?,” 259.
Lim3
implementation of 3D printing technology within the fashion industry. Their study revolves
printing clothing items, offering various models that showcase the impact and importance of this
innovative approach in the fashion industry.5 Hossen and Wang first make their argument by
providing an overview of the current landscape of 3D printing technology in fashion. They assert
that although 3D printing has problems and concerns within the fashion industry, there is
material. They delve into the unique, sustainable properties of TPU, emphasizing that it has
outstanding “properties like tear resistance, resistance to chemicals, abrasion resistance, skin
compatibility, large elongation break … soft elasticity, and excellent bending and tension
strength.”6 Hossen and Chaoxia use a plethora of Google Scholar articles about 3D printing and
fashion and integrate multiple quotes and research models from their referenced articles. The
authors use scientific scholarly literature to provide a theoretical framework for their article.
These reliable, scholarly articles make the author’s claim clear and convincing, ensuring that the
audience understands the revolutionary benefits of TPU usage in 3D printing. The engineering
developing practical solutions to problems, which rely on empirical data, experimentation, and
scientific literature. By utilizing these credible sources, engineers ensure the accuracy and
credibility of their research, facilitating the advancement of science. Through a combination of
models/tables, theoretical analysis, and experimentation, the authors take a scientific approach to
5
Muhammad Ilias Hossen and Chaoxia Wang, “Thermoplastic Polyurethane Based on the 3d Printing Fashion
lothing-Conceptual Model of The Fashion Industry,”Fibres & textiles in Eastern Europe30, no. 6 (2022): 1,
C
https://doi.org/10.2478/ftee-2022-0047
6
Hossen and Chaoxia, “Thermoplastic Polyurethane Based on the 3d Printing Fashion Clothing,” 2.
Lim4
fashion to demonstrate the benefits of utilizing TPU-based 3D printing technology for fashion
clothing production.7
Jenny Gilbert’s article seems to target an audience of scholars and researchers interested
in the fashion industry, as well as individuals interested in economics and history. Her focus on
mass fashion and the role of wholesale catalogs suggests an audience that is involved in
understanding consumer culture, mass fashion, and commercialization during a specific period,
or in this case, Birmingham in the 20th century. Gilbert assumes that her audience has a basic
understanding of historical research and concepts, as she utilizes some jargon throughout her
article. Although Gilbert uses jargon such as “wholesaler,” she immediately defines it as
“companies who provided the distribution channel between the small independent clothing
retailer … and the small to medium-sized manufacturer,”8 to ensure clarity. Terms like “swagger
coat,” “tweeds” and “smock,” while it may confuse readers who do not understand specific
fashion terms, are used to build specificity to the article. Through her usage of jargon terms and
focus on the “Big Four” textile companies and their use of wholesale clothing catalogs, Gilbert
contributes to the discussion of fashion production and consumerism from the early to mid-20th
On the other hand, Hossen and Wang’s article appears to target an audience of engineers
and researchers in the fields of fashion technology. Specifically, their focus on 3D printing
technology using TPU for fashion clothing production suggests that their audience would be
interested in innovative fashion, environment and sustainability, and the fashion industry. The
authors assume that their audience has a thorough understanding of the engineering discipline,
3D printing, and manufacturing processes. Hossen and Wang use an abundance of jargon such as
7
ossen and Chaoxia, “Thermoplastic Polyurethane Based on the 3d Printing Fashion Clothing,” 2.
H
8
Gilbert, “Better Dressed than Birmingham’?,” 258.
Lim5
“antimicrobial,” “warpage” and “Eigenvalues.” These jargon terms would not make sense to the
average reader who has no knowledge of fashion and engineering and has a high possibility of
getting confused. Hossen and Wang do not explain these terms and assume that the readers have
a preconceived understanding of these terms, suggesting that the audience would be engineers
and researchers who are already in this field. By exploring the potential of TPU-based 3D
printing technology in fashion clothing production, the authors are able to contribute new
and ideas, reflecting the history discipline’s emphasis on clarity and coherent arguments.
Through her usage of footnotes and the adherence to the Chicago Manual of Style, Gilbert
establishes a scholarly framework. Her article consists of different sections and subheadings: the
abstract, her arguments with unique subheadings, the conclusion, and finally, her
acknowledgments. Gilbert is able to further organize her analysis and allow easy navigation for
the reader through her subheadings and sections, underscoring history’s commitment to
organizing information systemically. Furthermore, Gilbert’s tone throughout her research article
is scholarly, informative, and authoritative. She also uses formal and precise language to ensure
clarity and accuracy in her information which embodies the disciplinary values in history.
Authors Muhammad Ilias Hossen and Chaoxia Wang follow a similar format to Gilbert’s
article. Their article begins with an abstract with a summary of the research, then it is followed
by their article with the introduction section that provides background information on 3D
printing and TPU. Their article includes many subheadings with different titles, in which they
discuss their methodology, research, and visual figures. They also include a “Figures and Tables”
section where they present their findings with different figures such as graphs and tables. Finally,
Lim6
they have a references section where they also use the Chicago Manual of Style citations. This
structural approach to their research article is indicative of the engineering discipline’s focus on
methodological analysis and data. The tone of their article is significantly scholarly, especially
with their usage of figures from their conducted research. Their language is professional, formal,
and specialized, which caters to an audience familiar with engineering terminology, which
In conclusion, this comparative analysis of different scholarly approaches to the study of
fashion in the disciplines of history and engineering provides an understanding of the differences
and similarities between the two. Through the examination of Jenny Gilbert’s research of
Catalogues and the Communication of Mass Fashion, 1920s to 1960s,” and Muhammad Ilias
Hossen and Chaoxia Wang’s research of Thermoplastic Polyurethane in 3D printed fashion items
in “Thermoplastic Polyurethane Based on the 3d Printing Fashion Clothing-Conceptual Model of
The Fashion Industry,” valuable insights have been gained. Their diverse methodologies in
research, arguments, sources, language, tone, and organization all contribute to the comparative
nature of both disciplines. Gilbert’s analysis of primary archival sources illustrates the historical
and economic context of shaping mass fashion trends while offering a narrative of how mass
fashion was communicated throughout the 20th century. In contrast, Hossen and Wang’s
production, highlighting the usage of TPU and the interconnectedness of fashion and
engineering. Comparing and contrasting these different disciplinary perspectives brings forth a
and history.
Lim7
Notes
Gilbert, Jenny. “‘Better Dressed than Birmingham’? Wholesale Clothing Catalogues and the
258–274.https://doi.org/10.1080/0047729X.2020.1767978
Hossen, Muhammad Ilias, and Chaoxia Wang. “Thermoplastic Polyurethane Based on the 3d