MOOT PROBLEM-1

Radhika, resident of Malleshwaram, came to Jayanagar on 5/01/2020 to sec her mother in-Law
Kamalamma. who was ill. The next day i.c on 6/01/2020, at about 3 P.m, Radhika came to the
bus stop at Jayanagar to board a B.T.S bus in order lo return to Malleshwaram, Kamalamma, the
mother -in-law. also came to bus stop to see-oft Radlhika. At about 3:15 pm B.T.S bus bearing
NO-7695 came. Radhika boarded the bus & took her seat, Kamalamma, Who was having a
vegetable bag also got into the bus in order to hand over the said bag to her daughter-in -Law
After handing over the bag to Radhika, Kamalamma was alighting from the bus. At that point of
time the conductor Ramaiah blew the whistle & the Driver Giriyappa started the bus.
Kamalamma having lost her balance, fell from the bus the left side rear wheel of the bus ran over
her right thigh. The passengers eried out & the driver immediately stopped the bus. However,
Kamalamma. the mother -in-law of Radhika. died at the spot itself.

Issues:
. Whether the death of Kamalamma was due to act of the rash & negligence of B.T.S
driver?
2. Whether kamalamma was found negligent on taking care of herself?
3. Can the accused be tried before the court for the offence punishable under Sec 304A of

I.P.C

4 Whether the conductor is liable for Kamalamma's death?

MOOT PROBLEM-II
MEERA PATEL V. SONIA PATEL

Patel, software engineer, employed with multinational software development

a
Deepak a
executive employed in the same company,
company at Bangalore, got married to Sonia Patel, an
accident and suffered disablement
in January 2017. On 1 march 2019, Deepak Patel met with an

making it impossible to use his hands intelligently, which lead to termination from his job.
Meera Patel visited her son Deepak Patel at Bangalore on August 2019. She was shocked to
23
see that her son Deepak
left all the in the care of a maid servant, while Sonia Patel, was
Patel was
distress
away at work. She also
learnt from the maid that Deepak Patel had suffered emotional
home.
due to his physical condition and loneliness at

treatment given to Deepak Patel and informed Sonia

Meer Patel, expressed her displeasure at the
where she could look after him along
Patel that she could take Deepak Patel with her to Delhi,
Sonia Patel refused the suggestion of Meera
with other members.of the joint family. However,
concerned about the welfare of her son, Meera
Patel and asked her to leave the house. Being
of Deepak Patel. The petitioner
Patel filed a petition before the High Court, seeking custody
to be taken to Delhi. The High Court issued
a
produced a letter from Deepak Patel agreeing
December 2019.
notice and fixed the case for final hearing on 26"

brief for Petitioner Meera Patel and Respondent Sonia Patel.

Mooters shall prepare a
 MOOT PROBLEM-III|
Ram s/o Chandrappa aged about 45
absolute owner in possession of immovable resident of Vijayanagar, Bangalore. He was the
years

huilding bearing No. 10, 8" Cross property consisting of 8 shops and a
residential
allotment made in his favor by BDAVijayaNagar.He
in the year
had acquired the said
property by virtue of
purchasethe property and the the 1965,Ravi friend of Ram
approached Ram to
transaction culminated in
lakhs was fixed as the sale price. an
agreement sale date 10/1/2017 Rs 35

In the term of
agreement Ram executed the deed in favour
in the office of the sub of Ravi,21/1/2017
which is registered
registered office Vijayanagar. However, at the time of
deed Ravi didn't have the entire
sale consideration therefore he registration of sale
due 10 lakh. believing
Ravi in
paid him only 25 lakh and was
good faith.
Ram sold the said
property to him on the condition that would pay the balance amount of Rs 10
lakh with in a period of one
year, to secure the said amount Rs 10 lakh the Ravi on the same
21/01/17 Mortgage the schedule day
property in favor of Ram by virtue of deed of simple mortgage
dated 21/1/2017 the said document is
produced here with marked as annexure 'A' ( Sale deed)
Ram submits that despite of
giving sufficient time to Ravi, the Ravi failed to discharge the loan
and the Mortgage is still
subsisting.
Apart from the principal of Rs10 lakhs the Ravi is liable to pay the Ram interest atl%
sum
per
mensum from 21/2/2017 till the date
of filing of this suit.The total amount due by the Ravi on the
mortgage of the schedule property is Rs 16 lakhs. Ram had called upon the defendant to
discharge the loan, but Ravi failed.Having no choice, Ram has filed this suit to recover the
amount due to Ravi by sale of schedule
property.

Issues-
1. Whether the plaintiff proves that the defendant was due Rs10 lakhs and whether he is
entitled to recover Rs 10 lakhs with interest at 1% p.m?
2. Whether the defendant proves , he paid to Bank Rs. 2,00,000/- towards discharge of loan
payable by the plaintiffunder decree in O.S.No -2/2009 ?

3. Whether Defendant (Ravi) prove he is entitled to set off, the amount, due under the deed?

4. Whether Defendant Proves he is entitled to interest on the sum of rupees 14, 00,000/
from the date of payment till realization of loan by him?