Title: The Challenges of Crafting a Dissertation Background and Justification

Crafting a dissertation is no small feat; it is a monumental task that demands extensive research,
critical thinking, and a deep understanding of the chosen subject. One of the crucial sections of a
dissertation is the Background and Justification, which sets the stage for the entire research
endeavor. As aspiring scholars embark on this arduous journey, they quickly realize the complexities
and challenges that come with writing this section.

The Background and Justification section requires a comprehensive review of existing literature, a
meticulous examination of the research gap, and a compelling rationale for the study. Scholars must
delve into the existing body of knowledge, synthesize relevant information, and identify gaps that
warrant further investigation. This process demands a level of expertise and dedication that can be
overwhelming, especially for those who are new to the rigors of academic research.

One of the primary difficulties faced by students is the sheer volume of information they need to sift
through and comprehend. Navigating through a myriad of scholarly articles, books, and research
papers can be a daunting task, consuming a significant amount of time and energy. Moreover, the
pressure to contribute something novel to the academic discourse adds an extra layer of stress.

Another challenge is the need for clarity and precision in articulating the research background and
justification. Crafting a well-structured narrative that seamlessly integrates existing knowledge,
identifies research gaps, and justifies the significance of the study is no small feat. This demands not
only a profound understanding of the subject matter but also exceptional writing skills.

Recognizing the difficulties associated with writing a dissertation, many individuals turn to
professional assistance. Among the myriad of options available, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ stands out
as a reliable and trustworthy service. With a team of experienced writers and researchers, ⇒
HelpWriting.net ⇔ offers specialized support for crafting dissertation Background and Justification
sections.

By opting for professional assistance, individuals can alleviate the burden of extensive research and
intricate writing. ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ ensures that the Background and Justification section is
meticulously crafted, meeting the highest academic standards. This allows scholars to focus on other
aspects of their research and academic journey while ensuring that this pivotal section of their
dissertation is in capable hands.

In conclusion, the challenges of writing a dissertation Background and Justification are substantial,
requiring a blend of research skills, critical thinking, and effective writing. For those seeking support
in navigating these challenges, ⇒ HelpWriting.net ⇔ provides a reliable solution, allowing
individuals to tackle their dissertation with confidence and precision.
You might check your aim statement to ensure it reflects the philosophical perspective you claim to
adopt in your proposal. Any typographical or grammatical errors should be corrected at revision, so
please note any specific errors here. 5. Review Comments to the Author Please use the space
provided to explain your answers to the questions above. As a result, its full editorial history
(including decision letters, peer reviews and author responses) may not be present. In practice
however the minimum standards in the legislation, and the procedures are interpreted by employers
as all that they are required to do. In this sense, the introduction serves as a kind of map or abstract
of the proposed research as well as of the main body of the research proposal. We have revised the
manuscript in accordance with these comments by addressing all issues from the editor and from the
reviewers below. Focus on what you know well (and if you need to learn something new, go and
learn it before you write about it). PLOS ONE does not copyedit accepted manuscripts, so the
language in submitted articles must be clear, correct, and unambiguous. Speeding up uni-processors is
harder and harder Intel, Sun (RIP), AMD, IBM now focusing on “multi-core” architectures. As
against a Kantian interpretation, it proposes an alternative interpretation. Psychology Tension-type
headache is extremely prevalent and is associated with significant personal and social costs. Numbers
don’t always lend themselves to an obvious outcome. The philosophical perspective underpinning
your research is then reflected in the research aim. Report this Document Download now Save Save
Education and Justification Revisited For Later 0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes)
38 views 16 pages Education and Justification Revisited Uploaded by skatos28 AI-enhanced
description R.S. Peters aspired to give a non-instrumental justification of education. Peters explicitly
dealt with the second, normative question in chapter 5 of his 1966 book. Paul, Minnesota. He is
currently working on his masters in Education Technology from Boise State University. In light of
this information, one might conclude that there is a psychosocial component to these perceptions of
the benefit of pre-exercise stretching. Write down the learner characteristics that you are considering
and why they are relevant. In this resource, these elements are referred to as the research
justification, the literature review and the research design. Congratulations! Your manuscript is now
with our production department. The research focus is the question at the heart of the research,
designed to produce new knowledge. It's also known as the justification of the study, rationale, or
thesis statement. Disagreements on study selection were resolved by consensus and discussion with a
third reviewer, if needed. And once you’ve written your thesis or dissertation, consider sending it to
us. This may raise questions as to the validity of our findings, as the majority of the meta-research
studies only provide an indication of the citation of systematic reviews to justify new studies, not
whether the systematic review cited was relevant, recent and of high-quality, or even how the
systematic review was used. Survey projects must include interventions, not just surveys. The
findings showed substantial variability in the use of systematic reviews when justifying new clinical
studies, with the incidence of use ranging from 16% to 87%. The risk-of-bias assessments are shown
in Table 3. The authors thank the Section for Evidence-Based Practice, Department for Health and
Function, Western Norway University of Applied Sciences for their generous support of the
EBRNetwork. Or even worse when it was just on your desk and you look away for one second and
look back and its gone.
Response: Thank you for this response and that is exactly the purpose. 2. The content of the rest of
the series was not made clear, but a decision has been made to publish them singly. Risk of bias
assessment Overall, most studies were determined to exhibit a low risk of bias in the majority of
items, and all of the included meta-research studies reported an unambiguous aim and a match
between aim and methods. Subscribe and get curated reads that will help you write an excellent
manuscript. Response: We fully agree with you on this topic and the author group and colleagues are
currently working on an improved checklist tool. Two reviewers independently extracted data, with
other reviewers available to resolve disagreements. Risk-of-bias assessment No standard tool was
identified to assess the risk of bias in empirical meta-research studies. I think the short description of
the rest of the programme could be expanded a little to put the work in context and help the reader
understand how the work fits together. Therefore, we have chosen not to elaborate further on the
topic in the manuscript, to give an appropriate consideration more space is needed. The formatting
and structure of your justification will depend on your field of study and your institution’s
requirements, but below, we’ve provided questions to ask yourself as you outline your justification.
Elimination of gap in the present literature is one of the compulsory requirements for your study.
Before conducting research: The study rationale is a central component of the research proposal. We
have already encountered so some problems as the project is very time consuming and it was difficult
for Mihail and I to come up with a problem that we really found interesting. Among the criteria used
to write a justification, the usefulness of the research for other academics or for other social sectors
(public officials, companies, sectors of civil society), the significance in time that it may have, the
contribution of new research tools or techniques, updating of existing knowledge, among others.
Therefore, you should not simply provide details about your topic but explicitly show how and why
your research is important and necessary. For instance, a completely novel or unconventional
approach might warrant a longer and more detailed justification. Is the manuscript presented in an
intelligible fashion and written in standard English? 6. Thank you to the reviewers for the positive
and constructive comments concerning the manuscript. I used line to help split the image up in to,
two separate parts. Printable design templates are pre-made digital files that can be personalized and
printed to develop numerous products, such as leaflets, posters, pamphlets, resumes, invites, and
more. This part in your paper needs to explain uniqueness and importance of your research. A
research rationale is usually written toward the end of the introduction. Although Peters himself
(1977a, 1977b) acknowledged ambiguities and dilemmas in liberal education, he tends to exclusively
identify education with the ac qu is it io n of th eo re ti ca l kn ow le dg e an d to do wn gr ad e or
ev en ne gl ec t th e contribution of practical knowledge and skill to our understanding of the world.
They can produce labels, present tags, and other home design products. For example using it at the
beach or at any outdoor activity. The heading in the Color Coded Parts of Speech image is a much
bolder, bigger font than. Example: The work of English novelist E. M. Forster has been extensively
researched for its social, political, and aesthetic dimensions. The present systematic review aimed to
identify and synthesize results from meta-research studies, regardless of study type, evaluating if and
how authors of clinical health research studies use systematic reviews to justify a new study. The
second is a summary of the main questions, approaches or accepted conclusions in your topic area in
the field or discipline at present ('what is known'). We have answered each point above. 2. The
inclusion criteria should be defined more clearly in the text Response: Methods section: we have
clarified the inclusion criteria in the methods section. 3. Systematic review and meta analysis are
relatively new and first papers go to late seventies in previous century. Or if you want to conduct an
interdisciplinary research project, consider partnering up with collaborators whose expertise
complements your own.
A solution that involves development of a system software. Our systematic review found that the
proportion of original studies justifying their new research using evidence syntheses is sub-optimal
and, thus, the potential for research redundancy continues to be a challenge. The different disciplines
have different research out puts as the basis for systematic reviews which makes the comparison
difficult. Keep a small notebook with you throughout the day to write down relevant thoughts. It
may be referred to as an objective, a question or an aim. Research question: Research into a new sub-
field may call for a longer or more detailed justification than a study that plugs a gap in literature. In
the beginning... The 1990s. The University’s focus shifts to o perating like a corporation. Paul,
Minnesota. In 2008 Ale x graduated with a bachelors degree in elementary education with an
emphasis in middle school math and science. External factors have changed and this has minimized
or removed the relevance of previous research. Are they action-oriented, recommending action to
remedy unfavorable conditions discovered. Color and depth is demonstrated in the Parts of Speech
graphic activity used in Lesson. Students in school or anyone who writes daily would have a
problem like this. Or if you want to conduct an interdisciplinary research project, consider partnering
up with collaborators whose expertise complements your own. Levy Family Chair Director, Aging
Brain Center Hebrew SeniorLife. This may raise questions as to the validity of our findings, as the
majority of the meta-research studies only provide an indication of the citation of systematic reviews
to justify new studies, not whether the systematic review cited was relevant, recent and of high-
quality, or even how the systematic review was used. How do the different studies relate, and are
other papers needed to put the current work in context. If consensus was not reached, a third
reviewer was involved. Justification of new studies in clinical health research using systematic
reviews is highly variable, and fewer than half of new clinical studies in health science were justified
using a systematic review. A completely novel or unconventional approach might warrant a longer
and more detailed justification than an approach that slightly deviates from well-established methods
and approaches. This would not be possible unless a focused issue is chosen as an example.
Similarly, establishing that there is a gap in the literature is often not enough on its own to persuade
the reader that the research is important. Methodology employed in previous study may be flawed in
terms of research design, research approach or sampling. Information sources and search strategy
This study is one of six ongoing evidence syntheses (four systematic reviews and two scoping
reviews) planned to assess the global state of evidence-based research in clinical health research. He
is also try ing to get graduate certificates in technology coordination, and as a technology integration
specialist. Examples of 'research problems' in opening sentences and paragraphs of research writing
Management The concept of meritocracy is one replicated and sustained in much discourse around
organisational recruitment, retention and promotion. Report this Document Download now Save
Save Justification Paper For Later 0 ratings 0% found this document useful (0 votes) 140 views 14
pages Justification Paper Uploaded by Alex Villwock AI-enhanced description Alex grew up in the
Chicago area. There may also be a need to continue with the present investigation to affirm or negate
the findings of other inquiries about the same research problem or topic so that generalizations or
principles may be formulated. This study will try to examine policy options targeted on a particular
problem of under-utilized spaces and systematically document and defend a policy strategy on the
utilization of those spaces. For problems with your glasses no real solutions are created for rain or
comfortableness. The subject matter of social scientists is usually human behaviour and the
aggregates that arise from it—whether social, economic, psychological or political—and their.