Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Writing Project 2 Revised 1
Writing Project 2 Revised 1
Toby Michelson
Writing 2
Maddie Roepe
3/16/2024
Script
Lazere: Welcome back listeners to Writing Teacher Talk. As always I’m joined by Dennis
Lynch, William H. Thelin and Gerald Graff. Today we’re going over a viewer submission. I’ll
Viewer: Hey Donald, William and Gerald, this is Toby speaking. I was wondering what your
thoughts on Maxine Hairston’s take on politics in writing classes were. Love the show, keep
Lazere: Thanks so much for the submission Toby. If I recall correctly, Maxine had the opinion
Graff: Yes I believe she was of the opinion that introducing politics into writing was a radical
leftist plot to indoctrinate students and that there is no other reason to include political rhetoric in
writing classes. She also argued that if politics are normalized within writing classes, nothing
would stop teachers from teaching things like facism and racial superiority rather than marxism
or the like.
2
Lynch: This entire question of whether we should be including politics in writing classes is a
silly one. A class that teaches rhetoric will always inherently link to politics. This question of
implementing politics or removing it from the classroom is too vague, and when examined
Lynch: I don’t want to propose anything specific on how implementing politics in classrooms
would work. The main idea I want to communicate is that politics is inexorably tied to rhetoric,
and people should give up on trying to disconnect politics from writing classes and focus on how
Lazere: I see. Well now that you mention it, personally, I think that it’s absolutely plausible to
teach political topics without forcing your students to take a stance they don’t agree with and I
think it’s important to try. I believe political literacy is an important skill for any educated citizen
to have and should be taught in writing classes for the benefit of the student.
Graff: I agree, but how do we make sure that we retain democracy within the classroom while
introducing these political ideas to our students? It’s important that we don’t simply teach our
own political views but rather encourage and facilitate students coming to their own conclusions
on the topics.
3
Lazere: That’s a good point, I think the ideal teaching model to allow for political ideas to be
taught in the classroom would be to teach the different stances on the topics and then once
they’ve grasped these positions, allow them to argue for their own conclusions through the
writing course. This way, students will feel as though they have the freedom to express their own
political views without feeling pressured by the political perspectives of their teachers, which is
the main issue that those who are against political topics being taught in classrooms seem to
have.
Graff: I like what you’re thinking. I believe that maintaining student autonomy should definitely
be a higher priority than teaching political topics, and by allowing students to choose which
perspectives to represent within their writing, I think politics can be integrated into writing
curriculum without forcing any political ideologies onto the students. The key is definitely to
make sure all sides of any given political conflict are represented so that the student isn’t forced
Thelin: I don’t know, I feel like this teaching model still lacks a level of student autonomy.
There’s no regulation on which perspective teachers choose to have their students study.
Lazere: What do you mean, are you talking about what Maxine Hairston said about teachers
possibly teaching their students political ideas like facism and racist ideology?
Thelin: No nothing like that, I just feel like the teacher being the one that picks what topics and
perspectives to examine can lead to the student simply following the narrative laid out by the
4
teacher by memorizing the information mechanically, which would mean the students would
come to less of their own conclusions on political conflicts and reduce critical thinking overall.
Lazere: So what would you propose as an alternative? I don’t see a clear way to achieve
democratic political curriculum while not having the teacher pick the subjects for the students to
analyze. Why would the students look at the full picture if they weren’t given all the
perspectives?
Thelin: I’ve actually had my students choose their own topics to cover in the past and the results
I’ve gotten have been great! For example, I once had the students vote on what topic to cover
and they chose serial killers. While at first they were merely transfixed by the fascination with
these killers, I posed the question of why they were so transfixed on individual murder compared
to the very common mass murder that happen around the globe like the murders by dictators. I
then made an assignment to research serial killers and dictators, and I really felt like the students
both learned about these mass murders and utilized critical thinking skills while questioning their
fascination with serial killers. This is just one example of an assignment within my teaching
model but I think the model as a whole has merit and greatly improves the amount of student
Lazere: That’s an interesting perspective on the matter, I wonder what our listeners think? we’re
gonna have a short ad break, stick around to hear more on the subject! See you on the other side
Works Cited
Dennis A. Lynch (1995) Teaching rhetorical values and the question of student autonomy,
Graff, Gerald. “Teaching Politically Without Political Correctness.” The Radical Teacher, no.
Hairston, Maxine. “Diversity, ideology, and teaching writing.” College Composition and
Lazere, Donald. “Teaching the political conflicts: A rhetorical schema.” College Composition
Thelin, William H. “Student Investment in Political Topics.” College English, vol. 69, no. 2,
Dennis A. Lynch (1995) Teaching rhetorical values and the question of student autonomy,