Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
3. Origin
Why did you choose to work toward becoming a chemical or bioengineer? Was it
the starting salary? Did you have a role model who was a chemical or bioengineer,
or did you live in a community in which engineers were prominent? Or were you
advised that you would do well as a chemical or bioengineer because you were
adept at math and chemistry and/or biology? In fact, most prospective engineers
choose this field without fully understanding the profession (i.e., what chemical
and bioengineers actually do and what they are capable of doing). This brief
chapter will attempt to shed some light on this issue.
Chemical and bioengineers today hold a unique position at the interface between
molecular sciences and macroscopic (large-scale) engineering. They participate in
a broad range of technologies in science and engineering projects, involving nano-
materials, semiconductors, and biotechnology. Note that we say “participate”
because engineers most often work in multidisciplinary groups, each member
contributing his or her own expertise.
Origin
Although the chemical engineering field owes its existence to Democritus, a Greek
philosopher who proposed the concept of the atom around 440 BC, this event
technically relates to chemistry. The proposal of an atom led to further
developments in chemistry throughout the ages, eventually culminating in the
advent of industrial chemistry. Industrial chemistry is where the story of chemical
engineering truly begins.
Before the Industrial Revolution, industrial chemicals were produced via batch
production, limited by the amount of reagents used to produce them. The Industrial
Revolution created a serious demand for industrial chemicals and strained the
limited resources produced by batch production. Something needed to be done so
that resource production could keep up with the newly inflated demand.
The Industrial Revolution led to an unprecedented escalation in demand, both with
regard to quantity and quality, for bulk chemicals such as soda ash. This meant two
things: one, the size of the activity and the efficiency of operation had to be
enlarged, and two, serious alternatives to batch processing, such as continuous
operation, had to be examined.
The chemical engineering profession evolved from the industrial applications of
chemistry and separation science (the study of separating components from
mixtures), primarily in the refining and chemical industry, which we will refer to
here as the chemical process industries (CPI). The first high-volume chemical
process was implemented in 1823 in England for the production of soda ash, which
was used for the production of glass and soap.
During the same time, advances in organic chemistry led to the development of
chemical processes for producing synthetic dyes from coal for textiles, starting in
the 1850s. In the latter half of the 1800s a number of chemical processes were
implemented industrially, primarily in Britain.
Davis’ work in his consulting business and the contents of his lecture series
became the basis for his most famous publication: the Handbook of Chemical
Engineering, published in 1901. Among other things, this textbook introduced the
concept of unit operations (although not named as such until 1915 by Arthur D.
Little) and was where he first used the term “chemical engineering”.
The definition provided by the commission left space for various interpretations
certainly on purpose. At the Rio Conference in 1992 and over the years which
followed, the content of this concept was defined more precisely, and it has been
confirmed since through a wide range of agreements, national programmes, action
plans and scientific studies [4]. Today there are very few scientific, societal and
political areas which have not been the subject of an examination based on
sustainability criteria. It should be noted that sustainable development is a
continuing process during which the definitions and activities it generates are in
constant evolution. The evolutionary process which consists of reflecting on how
we can ensure that our descendants have a decent future and assuming
responsibility for our actions is in itself positive, although there is also the risk that
theory will be put into practice in a number of different ways, creating a highly
complex situation. It is for this reason that there are many different interpretations
of what constitutes sustainability and sustainable development, a term which is
often misused well-worn concept to serve particular interests. An analysis of the
definition is presented in text trying to clarify the meaning of sustainability within
the area of chemical engineering.
The hackneyed argument that the welfare state of modern society lies on a range of
products that are produced in different chemical processes throughout the world
and that ‘unfortunately’ this has caused severe damage to the environment is
applicable once more [5], [6]. As Albert Einstein observed we are facing these
consequences now and as he pointed out the urgent problems that exist in the
world ‘today’ cannot be solved by the level of thinking that created them. For us,
our thinking (read here engineering disciplines) must evolve (be transformed) in
such an innovative ways that can reconcieve the problems (starting from scratch?)
providing the world with novel sustainable solutions.
A great variety of questions arise. What do and do not contribute to the sustainable
development? What can a Chemical Engineer (CE) do to assure that a product, a
process or a production system, PPS, is sustainable? What can a CE do to
transform engineering disciplines in order to promote sustainability? Is Green
Engineering (GE) the solution for CEs? Is it necessary to change minds at the
industry, at professionals, at universities or users? How can we tackle the problem?