Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Open
Open
TH
AN
NI
RY
VERSA
GEM 2023/2024
Global Report
25 Years and Growing
Although GEM data were used in the preparation of this report, the interpretation and use of the data are
the sole responsibility of the authors.
FOUNDING ORGANIZATIONS
Cover:
freepik.com (foreground image), nohat.cc (globe)
Design and production:
Witchwood Production House http://www.witchwoodhouse.com
BBR Design https://bbrdesign.co.uk
© 2024 The authors and the Global Entrepreneurship Research Association (GERA)
KINGDOM OF MOROCCO
MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC INCLUSION, SMALL BUSINESS,
EMPLOYMENT AND SKILLS, MOROCCO
The Ministry of Economic Inclusion, Small Business, Employment and Skills is responsible, within
I
the framework of the legislative and regulatory texts in force, for drawing up and implementing
government policy in the areas of work, employment, vocational training, very small businesses and
MINISTRY OF ECONOMIC INCLUSION, SMALL
BUSINESS, EMPLOYMENT AND SKILLS
self-employment, and for evaluating their action plans. It steers strategic entrepreneurship programs.
KINGDOM OF MOROCCO
MINISTRY OF HIGHER EDUCATION, SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
AND INNOVATION, MOROCCO
The Ministry of Higher Education, Scientific Research and Innovation oversees and regulates higher
education in the country. The ministry plays a crucial role in shaping the future of education in
I
Morocco by developing policies and strategies that promote academic excellence, scientific research
SCIENTIFIC RESEARCH
AND INNOVATION
and innovation.
1.3 Why is entrepreneurship important? 27 4.5 Which sectors are the new businesses in? 51
1.4 Global Report structure 27 4.6 What are the policy implications of this
chapter? 52
1.5 GEM 2023 participating economies 29
1.6 Changes in household income 30
1.7 Conclusions 31 5. The Social and Economic Impacts
of Entrepreneurship 53
5.1 What determines the impact of new starts? 53
2. The GEM Conceptual Framework
and Methodology 32 5.2 How many people will the new business
employ? 53
2.1 Introduction 32
5.3 How innovative are new business products or
2.2 The GEM methodology and measures of services? 55
entrepreneurship 33
5.4 How competitive are new businesses? 57
5.5 How export-intensive are new businesses? 58
5.6 Are new startups focused on the Sustainable
Development Goals (SDGs)? 61
5.7 What are the policy implications of this
chapter? 63
7.3 Did the COVID-19 pandemic create new 9.8 What are the policy implications of this
opportunities? 77 chapter? 105
Tables
Table 1.1 Income groups 30
Table 8.1 Motivation by educational attainment: number of economies with the proportion of
graduates agreeing with the motivation exceeding the proportion of non-graduates,
and vice versa 87
Table 9.1 Summary of national Entrepreneurial Framework Conditions (EFCs) 96
Table 9.2 Changes in Entrepreneurial Framework Condition Scores, 2021–2023 (41 economies) 98
Table A1 Changes in household income in 2023 (% of adults aged 18–64 ) 208
Table A2 Entrepreneurial activity (% of adults aged 18–64) 212
Table A3 Public attitudes and perceptions (% of adults aged 18–64 somewhat or strongly agree) 214
Table A4 Attitudes and perceptions of entrepreneurs: % of Total early-stage Entrepreneurial
Activity (TEA) and % of Established Business Ownership (EBO) 218
Table A5 Entrepreneurial activity by age, gender and education 222
Table A6 Sector distribution of new entrepreneurial activity
(% of Total early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity) 226
Table A7 Business exits, and reason for exit (positive, negative [non-COVID] and COVID-
related), % of adults aged 18–64 228
Table A8 Entrepreneurial expectations and scope (% of adults aged 18–64) 230
Table A9 The motivation to start a business (% of Total early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity
who somewhat or strongly agree) 234
Table A10 National Entrepreneurship Context Index and number of Entrepreneurial Framework
Conditions (EFCs) scored as sufficient or better (score ≥5) 236
National This summarizes in one figure the average state of 13 national EFCs selected by GEM researchers as
Entrepreneurial the most reliable determinants of a favourable environment for entrepreneurship. It is calculated as
Context Index (NECI) the simple average of 13 variables that represent the EFCs, and which have been measured through
a block of items evaluated by an 11-point Likert scale and summarized by applying factorial analyses
(principal component method).
National Team GEM is a consortium of “National Teams”. Each Team is led by a local university or other institution
with a strong interest in entrepreneurship. The team is the official national representative of
the project: responsible for collecting GEM data in the country on an annual basis, producing a
“National Report” on their findings, and acting as the point of contact for GEM enquiries.
Level B Economies with a GDP per capita of between $25,000 and $50,000.
contexts and nurturing entrepreneurship? “Reporting on the findings from the Global
Entrepreneurship Monitor’s Entrepreneurial
Collaborate with GEM to find answers to Ecosystem Quality Index in our region
of Nova Scotia, Canada, generated a
these questions in cities and regions that significant amount of interest from
are important to you! Our Entrepreneurial policymakers and ecosystem actors. Some
of the notable findings, based on our data,
Ecosystem Quality Composite Index (ESI) have informed debate and helped leading
is a diagnostic tool that provides frameworks ecosystem players to think about strategies
for further ecosystem development.”
and data to analyse just about any subnational —Kevin McKague, PhD,
Canada Research Chair and Associate
ecosystem. ESI reports have been conducted Professor of Entrepreneurship, Shannon
in several ecosystems around the world. School of Business, Cape Breton University
Aileen Ionescu-Somers, PhD Aurea Almanso, MBA Kevin Anselmo Henrique Bastos
Executive Director Operations, GEM Global Communications Advisor Research Support
asomers@gemconsortium.org aalmanso@gemconsortium.org
Jonathan Francis Carmona, MSc Professor Alicia Coduras, PhD Stephen Hill, DSc
Data Team Supervisor National Expert 2023/24 Global Report
Survey Coordinator Lead Author
GOVERNANCE BOARD
José Ernesto Amorós, PhD Ana Fernández-Laviada, PhD Ehud Menipaz, PhD Jeffrey Shay, PhD
Interim Board Chair National Team Representative National Team Representative National Team Representative
National Team Representative GEM Spain GEM Israel GEM USA
GEM Mexico
When next year’s surveys are completed, the Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM)
will have been collecting primary data about entrepreneurship for 25 years, making it by
far the world’s largest and longest-running research study on levels of entrepreneurial
activity. In that period, around 4 million people will have been surveyed across 120
different countries, and views sought from nearly 50,000 national experts.
Why all this effort over such a long period? Because entrepreneurship, defined by GEM
as the act of starting or running a new business, matters. Of course it matters to the
people involved, who are taking brave steps to secure their own livelihoods, to shape
their own futures and, sometimes, to change the world. But entrepreneurship also
matters to the wider economy and society. Those starting new businesses can bring
new ideas turned into new products and processes, enhancing consumer and producer
choice, building the next Apple or Tesla, or simply making a better cup of coffee.
Entrepreneurs identify and exploit new opportunities, create new jobs and value-added,
enhance (and sometimes disrupt) supply chains, and tackle some of the world’s most
pressing problems, including climate change, the shortage of liquidity in developing
economies and environmental pollution. Many entrepreneurs seized new opportunities
during and after the COVID-19 pandemic, from delivering takeaway food to delivering
new vaccines. Some new businesses fail, but resilient entrepreneurs will pick
themselves up, reflect on lessons learned and try again.
The GEM project has provided consistent, coherent and contemporary data across
different economies and through time. The Adult Population Survey (APS), and its
smaller brother, the National Expert Survey (NES), are both conducted to rigorous
standards, asking the same questions across the globe, with responses coded,
harmonized and quality-checked by GEM Global, so that levels of entrepreneurial
activity can be compared across space and through time.
This 2023/2024 Global Report presents the results of GEM APS and NES surveys
conducted in summer/autumn 2023 at a time when the global economy was continuing
its hesitant recovery from the shocks and aftershocks of the COVID-19 pandemic and the
war in Ukraine.
Here are some key baseline statistics related to the 2023 GEM surveys:
• The APS was conducted in 46 economies, representing nearly 60% of current world
population and 70% of global GDP.
• An additional 2,000 experts from 49 economies offered their assessments for the
NES.
• The highest levels of entrepreneurial activity are in the Latin America &
Caribbean region, with all five highest rates of adults starting and running new
businesses coming from this region. However, levels of new entrepreneurial
activity are highly variable, across all regions and all income groups. For
example, in the Latin America & Caribbean region the level varied from 17% in
Mexico to 31% in Panama, while in the low-income Level C group it varied from 6%
in Morocco to (again) 31% in Panama. Other regions and income groups display
similar variability. Established Business Ownership is typically both lower and less
variable.
• Experts in most economies (37 out of 49) rated social support for women
as unsatisfactory. However, in a majority of economies (27 out of 49), women
entrepreneurs’ access to resources, as compared to that of men, rated as satisfactory
or better. In only five economies did experts assess both social support for women
entrepreneurs and their resource access compared to men as satisfactory or better:
India, Qatar, Norway, Sweden and the United Arab Emirates.
5 Norway
4 Sweden
2 India
Qatar 3
LEVEL C
LEVEL A average
average
51% 66%
Oman (83%) India (77%)
Venezeula (83%)
Panama (80%)
LEVEL B
average
Chile (73%)
36%
than twice as likely to be expecting to start a new business in the next three years
than the general public.
• But a small group of high-income economies in Europe and North America, since
the pandemic, have seen the assessed quality of their overall entrepreneurial
environment slip into the “less than sufficient” category. These include
Canada, Sweden, Norway, Germany and even the United States, with France and
Latvia close behind.
The chapters that follow will present much more details about entrepreneurial activity
across the world in 2023. Within this rich tapestry will be more evidence that supports
the key findings outlined above, as well as a host of other findings with important policy
implications.
Introduction
1
Introduction to the
2023/2024 Global Report
Stephen Hill and Aileen Ionescu-Somers
1.1 INTRODUCTION
Global Entrepreneurship Monitor (GEM) is The GEM APS and NES databases are a
celebrating its 25-year Silver Anniversary in resource of inestimable value to GEM’s key
2024. It marks a quarter-century of collaborative stakeholders. Summary hard data may be directly
research focused on measuring and monitoring accessed from the GEM website (http://www.
levels of entrepreneurial activity across the world. gemconsortium.org). Insights from the data can
What started with just 10 participating economies be used in policymaking discussions and strategic
in 1999 has grown to become the world’s largest decision-making, as well as in a plethora of
and longest-running study of entrepreneurship, research initiatives.
backed up by a research organization and highly GEM’s 25th anniversary is an appropriate
recognizable brand familiar to entrepreneurial moment to reflect on lessons learned and to
academics, practitioners and policymakers. contemplate future challenges. Since 1999, GEM
GEM is a consortium of National Teams, has surveyed almost 4 million adults in nearly 120
primarily associated with top academic countries, building the world’s largest sustained
institutions, which carry out surveys around the database on individual activities, perceptions and
world. GEM is the only global research source attitudes in relation to entrepreneurship.
that collects data on entrepreneurship directly Each year, the annual launch of GEM’s
from individual entrepreneurs. GEM’s Adult Global Report paves the way for the publication
Population Survey (APS) provides an analysis of of numerous National Reports which further
the characteristics, motivations and ambitions leverage the data at a detailed, national level.
of individuals starting businesses, as well as GEM also produces reports on topics of special
social attitudes towards entrepreneurship. The interest: most recently, the GEM 2022/23
GEM National Expert Survey (NES) focuses on European Regional Report: Research Insights
the national context in which individuals start for Policymakers and the 2022/23 GEM Women’s
businesses. Entrepreneurship Report: Challenging Bias and
In 2023, the APS was conducted in 46 different Stereotypes — all available for free on the GEM
national economies across the globe, collectively website.
representing some 57% of the world’s population The 20th Anniversary edition of the GEM
and 70% of global Gross Domestic Product Global Report (2018/2019) reviewed changes in
(GDP).3 It is the consistency of the questions entrepreneurial activity over the previous two
in this survey, across countries and over time, decades, and concluded that, after two decades
asked of a large random sample of adults in each of rising incomes, levels of entrepreneurial
participating economy, that makes GEM such an activity had generally increased, both for new
important research resource for policymakers. The and established entrepreneurs. Today, the
NES was conducted across over 2,000 experts in accumulated evidence over GEM’s 25 years allows
49 countries in 2023. Again, it is the consistency for some further conclusions, especially given the
of the questions asked of experts that creates such significant social and economic shocks that have
significant scope for monitoring entrepreneurial taken place during this time. Here are three points
environments over time. of particular interest.
Thank you to the Cartier Women’s Initiative, one of our report sponsors, for providing
this material and helping to put our data in a real-world context.
11 from Europe, five from Central or South with six from Central or South America, five
America and three from Asia. Finally, Level C from Asia, two from Africa, plus Ukraine (see
economies are more geographically diverse, Table 1.1).
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
% of adults 18–64
10
−10
−20
−30
−40
−50
−60
−70
−80
Ukraine
Venezuela
South Africa
Ecuador
India
Jordan
China
Mexico
Morocco
Thailand
Iran
Guatemala
Brazil
Colombia
Panama
Greece
Poland
Chile
Uruguay
Puerto Rico
Slovak Republic
Lithuania
Spain
Hungary
Cyprus
Estonia
Israel
Latvia
Oman
Romania
Croatia
Republic of Korea
Canada
Italy
Luxembourg
Switzerland
Germany
United States
Sweden
United Kingdom
Qatar
France
Netherlands
Saudi Arabia
Slovenia
Norway
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 1.2
The percentage of
1.7 CONCLUSIONS adults reporting a
change in household
A brief review of entrepreneurial activity over United Nations itself, pre-pandemic worldwide income in 2023
the first 25 years of GEM suggests that the levels poverty rates were decreasing, and extreme Source: GEM Adult
Population Survey 2023
have increased overall, that entrepreneurship poverty was looking likely to be completely
has been consistently resilient during and in the eradicated by 2030. However, the reported
aftermath of global crises, and that the rate of decreases in household incomes identified
female entrepreneurship is slowly catching up in GEM’s research between 2020 and 2023,
with that of men. These trends certainly have especially in low-income economies, point
positive impacts on SDG 5 (Gender Equality) to likely negative impacts for the desired
and on SDG 8 (Decent Work and Economic achievement of SDG 1 (No Poverty) and SDG 10
Growth). As widely reported, including by the (Reduced Inequalities).
2.1 INTRODUCTION
GEM is a long-term multinational research entrepreneurial environment that impacts that
study of entrepreneurship, conducted annually decision and its implementation, both directly
using population-based data to carefully (via access to resources) and indirectly (via social
measure the level of entrepreneurship in priorities and values). The relevant environment
each participating economy. GEM defines and can be local, regional or national or a mixture
measures entrepreneurship as the act of starting of all three, depending on the nature of the new
or running a new business. Note that it is the act business and its scale.
of entrepreneurship that is the key differentiator: The decision to start a business is then
simply thinking about starting a business or set within a social, economic and political
planning to do so at some point in the future is context which conditions that decision in
not counted, according to the GEM measure of terms of variables, including choice of sector,
entrepreneurial activity. scale of operations, and levels of ambition
The GEM Conceptual Framework is illustrated and innovation. These variables in turn
in Figure 2.1. It shows the relationship between influence the impacts of the new business on
FIGURE 2.1 the decision to start a new business and the other factors, such as number of jobs, levels
The GEM Conceptual
Framework
OUTCOME
(socio-economic development)
Social, cultural, political,
economic context
◆ BY TYPE
TEA, EBO, EEA
TOTAL EARLY-STAGE
ENTREPRENEURIAL ACTIVITY (TEA)
POTENTIAL NASCENT OWNER-MANAGER OWNER-MANAGER
ENTREPRENEUR: ENTREPRENEUR: OF A NEW OF AN ESTABLISHED
opportunities, capa- involved in setting BUSINESS more than
bilities and intentions up a business (up to 3.5 years) 3.5 years)
FIGURE 2.2
The entrepreneurial
process and GEM Figure 2.2 illustrates the entrepreneurial context, which can be one that either supports
indicators pipeline, beginning from when potential or constrains the new startup and its subsequent
entrepreneurs perceive new opportunities to development. To assess the quality of each
grasp, to when they start expending resources national entrepreneurial business context, GEM
to become nascent entrepreneurs, and then classifies the entrepreneurial environment into
to become a new business, having paid wages 13 dimensions common to all contexts (referred
for three months. Of course, at any stage the to as the Entrepreneurial Framework Conditions
entrepreneur can exit that business, which or EFCs), and then surveys a group of national
may or may not continue without them. If the experts in each country to assess the quality of
new business endures long enough, it becomes each framework condition. These assessments are
established. then harmonized to provide a single figure for the
The figure also shows the major GEM measures quality of that entrepreneurial environment. This
of entrepreneurial activity. Each is important, consistent qualitative data allows a simultaneous
especially in relation to the level of TEA. For comparison of national entrepreneurial
example, a high ratio of TEA to EBO may indicate environments. It can also trace the evolution of
difficulties in transitioning new businesses a national entrepreneurial environment over
into established ones, sometimes because of an time. The NES provides a crucial complement
unsupportive entrepreneurial environment, while to the individual APS. Taken together, these
a high ratio of TEA to business exits may suggest a unique surveys provide a detailed assessment of
growing entrepreneurial base. entrepreneurial activity in each economy, as well
The decision to start a new business as the quality of the entrepreneurial ecosystem
inevitably takes place within a particular within which that activity takes place.
Analysis
3
Entrepreneurship: Public
Attitudes and Perceptions
Stephen Hill and Jeffrey Shay
100
90
80
70
% of adults 18–64
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Thailand
South Africa
Morocco
Iran
Mexico
China
Jordan
India
Ukraine
Venezuela
Ecuador
Brazil
Colombia
Guatemala
Greece
Latvia
Estonia
Romania
Poland
Spain
Panama
Hungary
Slovak Republic
Uruguay
Oman
Cyprus
Puerto Rico
Israel
Lithuania
Croatia
Chile
Germany
Republic of Korea
United States
Luxembourg
Italy
Norway
Sweden
Canada
United Kingdom
Qatar
Switzerland
Slovenia
Netherlands
France
Saudi Arabia
38
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
100
Iran Iran
Ukraine China
Jordan Jordan
Ecuador Ukraine
Colombia Brazil
Mexico Venezuela
South Africa Colombia
Level C
Level C
Brazil Ecuador
Venezuela Guatemala
China Mexico
Level B
Level B
Romania Lithuania
Uruguay Hungary
Chile Chile
Lithuania Cyprus
Puerto Rico Panama
Croatia Oman
Oman Estonia
Poland Poland
Italy Italy
Republic of Korea Germany
Germany Republic of Korea
United Kingdom France
Luxembourg United States
Slovenia Luxembourg
France Qatar
FIGURE 3.3 In the next six months, there will be good opportunities to start a business where I live (% adults agree)
Switzerland Slovenia
United States United Kingdom
Level A
Level A
Canada Canada
Netherlands Switzerland
Norway Norway
Qatar Sweden
Sweden Netherlands
Saudi Arabia Saudi Arabia
100
90
80
70
% of adults 18–64
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
China
Ukraine
Iran
Brazil
Morocco
Mexico
South Africa
Colombia
Jordan
Ecuador
Thailand
Guatemala
India
Venezuela
Israel
Hungary
Estonia
Poland
Slovak Republic
Latvia
Romania
Spain
Greece
Lithuania
Cyprus
Uruguay
Puerto Rico
Oman
Croatia
Chile
Panama
Germany
Switzerland
Netherlands
Sweden
United States
France
Luxembourg
Italy
United Kingdom
Norway
Republic of Korea
Canada
Slovenia
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Thank you to the Cartier Women’s Initiative, one of our report sponsors, for providing
this material and helping to put our data in a real-world context.
60
50
% of adults 18–64
40
30
20
10
0
Iran
Venezuela
Ecuador
Morocco
Colombia
Guatemala
Mexico
Brazil
Ukraine
Thailand
Jordan
South Africa
India
China
Hungary
Lithuania
Oman
Israel
Estonia
Chile
Panama
Puerto Rico
Croatia
Spain
Latvia
Slovak Republic
Uruguay
Poland
Greece
Cyprus
Romania
Republic of Korea
Switzerland
Germany
France
Netherlands
Qatar
Norway
Sweden
Slovenia
United States
Luxembourg
Italy
United Kingdom
Canada
Saudi Arabia
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 3.5
You would not
economic costs, individuals may hesitate to start start businesses and equipping enough people start a business for
fear it might fail
a business. Similarly, attitudes towards risk and with the skills and knowledge to start businesses
(% of those agreeing
failure also vary widely. Figure 3.5 shows the can all help to improve the potential level of new there are good
percentage of adults seeing good opportunities startups launched, but will count for little when opportunities locally)
who agree that they would not start a business for so many of those seeing good opportunities are Source: GEM Adult
Population Survey 2023
fear it might fail. deterred by fear of failure. The GEM Global Report
Once more there is widespread variation, for 2022 noted that, in 37 out of 49 participating
including within income groups, from one in economies, two out of five or more of those seeing
four of those adults seeing good opportunities good opportunities would not start because of fear
in Iran and the Korean Republic, to three out of failure, and called for more research into the
of five in India, China, South Africa and Saudi financial, social and psychological costs of failure,
Arabia. It is interesting that some economies and actions to mitigate these. Little appears to
with low proportions seeing good opportunities have changed since then.
(Iran, Republic of Korea, Hungary) also have low Delving a little deeper, Figure 3.6 compares
proportion of those seeing opportunities who how men and women view the fear of failure.
would be deterred by fear of failure, while many In eight of the 45 economies, the proportion of
economies with high proportions seeing good women who see good opportunities but would
opportunities also have high proportions deterred be deterred by fear of failure is less than the
by fear of failure (such as China, India, Canada, corresponding proportion of men, meaning that in
Poland and Saudi Arabia). 37 of these economies, the proportion of women
Figure 3.5 clearly shows that fear of failure is seeing good opportunities but would not start a
a major deterrent to starting a business in most business because of fear of failure is higher than
economies, with two in five or more of those the corresponding proportion of men.
seeing good opportunities agreeing that they Many of the differences in Figure 3.6 are in
would not start a business for fear it might fail in fact very small. In fact, in 17 of the 45 economies,
35 of the 46 economies. there was no significant difference between the
Improving opportunity recognition, profiling proportions of men and women seeing good
successful entrepreneurs, making it easier to opportunities but agreeing that they would not
80
70
60
% of adults 18–64
50
40
30
20
10
0
Iran
Venezuela
Ecuador
Colombia
Morocco
Guatemala
Mexico
Thailand
Brazil
Jordan
South Africa
India
China
Hungary
Lithuania
Panama
Oman
Israel
Chile
Puerto Rico
Estonia
Croatia
Spain
Uruguay
Greece
Latvia
Slovak Republic
Poland
Cyprus
Romania
Republic of Korea
Switzerland
Germany
France
Norway
Netherlands
Qatar
Sweden
Luxembourg
United States
Slovenia
Italy
Canada
Saudi Arabia
United Kingdom
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 3.6
The percentage of
start a business for fear it might fail. There are the United Kingdom, where 63% of those women
men and of women
who see good two economies in which the proportion of women who saw good opportunities to start a business
opportunities also was significantly lower than that of men: India agreed they would not do so because of the fear
agreeing that they and the Republic of Korea. This leaves 26 of of failure, compared to just 44% of men who saw
would not start a
the 45 economies with a proportion of women good opportunities. Campaigns to reduce the
business because
it might fail significantly lower than the corresponding perceived fear of failure may therefore be more
Source: GEM Adult proportion of men. The largest difference was in effective if aimed at women rather than at the
Population Survey 2023 general population.
60
50
% of adults 18–64
40
30
20
10
0
China
South Africa
Iran
Colombia
India
Morocco
Mexico
Thailand
Guatemala
Jordan
Brazil
Venezuela
Ecuador
Poland
Romania
Hungary
Greece
Spain
Slovak Republic
Lithuania
Estonia
Israel
Latvia
Cyprus
Croatia
Puerto Rico
Uruguay
Panama
Chile
Oman
Germany
Norway
Switzerland
Italy
Sweden
United Kingdom
United States
Luxembourg
France
Canada
Slovenia
Netherlands
Republic of Korea
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 3.7
Are you expecting
both within and across income groups. There Of the 46 participating economies in 2023,
to start a business
is some evidence that intentions are inversely there are 12 in which three in 10 adults or more in the next three
related to income, with less than one in five adults intend to start a business in the next three years? (% of adults
intending to start a business in the next three years. Seven of those economies are in the responding yes)
years in five Level C economies, 10 Level B and 12 Latin America and Caribbean region, while Source: GEM Adult
Population Survey 2023
Level A. Conversely two out of five adults or more five are in Asia. Despite making up half of
intended to start in five Level C economies, three GEM 2023 economies, none of these are from
Level B and just one Level A. Europe.13
20
% of adults 18–64
15
10
0
Mexico
Colombia
India
Iran
Ecuador
South Africa
Morocco
Venezuela
China
Thailand
Brazil
Jordan
Guatemala
Romania
Israel
Hungary
Poland
Greece
Spain
Croatia
Puerto Rico
Cyprus
Oman
Slovak Republic
Lithuania
Estonia
Latvia
Uruguay
Panama
Chile
Italy
Republic of Korea
United Kingdom
Slovenia
Germany
United States
Norway
Sweden
Netherlands
France
Qatar
Canada
Luxembourg
Switzerland
Saudi Arabia
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 3.8
Investing in
someone else’s low, but can be significant in certain national Level C, 14 Level B and six Level A). This
new business economies. was the case for one in 10 or more adults in
(% of adults) In 29 of the 45 economies, less than one Jordan and in Guatemala, and one in five
Source: GEM Adult
Population Survey 2023
in 20 adults had invested in someone else’s adults in Saudi Arabia and nearly one in four
new business in the past three years (nine adults in Chile.
14 The APS sample for Ukraine was just over 600. This 15 So, for example, Country x may have a level of
is sufficient to report TEA and EBO (though each with entrepreneurial activity that is significantly greater than
a wide confidence interval), but not enough to report that of country y, with less than a 5% probability that
subdivisions within these. the difference in sample means occurred by chance.
35
30
25
% of adults 18–64
20
15
10
0
Morocco
China
Iran
South Africa
India
Jordan
Mexico
Brazil
Ukraine
Venezuela
Colombia
Thailand
Guatemala
Ecuador
Poland
Romania
Lithuania
Greece
Spain
Israel
Hungary
Oman
Slovak Republic
Cyprus
Estonia
Croatia
Latvia
Puerto Rico
Uruguay
Chile
Panama
Norway
Slovenia
Germany
Italy
Sweden
Luxembourg
Republic of Korea
Switzerland
France
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Qatar
United States
Canada
Saudi Arabia
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 4.1
Total early-stage
Entrepreneurial levels of early-stage entrepreneurial activity 10 adults starting or running a new business,
Activity (TEA) and generally declined as income increased, although compared to 13 economies out of 32 in Levels B
Established Business the seven lowest levels were all Level B or Level C and A combined.
Ownership (EBO)
economies.16 There were five Level C economies The relationship between early-stage
(both % adults)
Source: GEM Adult
with one in five or more adults starting or running entrepreneurial activity and income has been a
Population Survey 2023 a new business, compared to four in Level B and recurring theme in Global Reports over time. As
just one in Level A. Conversely, Level C had just in 2022, there is a negative association between
three economies out of 14 with less than one in TEA and income, though with considerable
variation within income groups, and with nine
Level A economies having one in 10 or more
adults starting or running a new business.
However, in general, as income rises the necessity
to start a business declines, because there are
more employment opportunities and better
SDG FOCUS . . . support systems. The regional variation in TEA
rates has also been discussed in previous reports,
with Latin America & Caribbean emerging as a
Established businesses (owning and managing a running region of high early-stage entrepreneurial activity,
business that has paid salaries, wages or any other closely followed in recent years by the Gulf.
payments to the owners for more than 42 months) provide Figure 4.1 provides some support for both of these
the majority of employment in most economies, as well as notions. As with many perception variables in the
stability. previous chapter, Saudi Arabia leads the Level A
The formation of established business should be a key group in terms of early-stage entrepreneurial
policy objective. It directly connects to ending poverty activity.
in all its forms (UN SDG #1) and reducing inequalities
(UN SDG #10). 16 Poland, Romania, Morocco, Lithuania, Greece, Spain
and China.
30
25
Ecuador
20 Republic of Korea
EBO (% of adults 18–64)
Greece
15
Lithuania Guatemala
Saudi Arabia
India
Poland Brazil Thailand
Latvia
10 Slovenia Iran United Kingdom
Cyprus Estonia
Norway
Italy Hungary Netherlands Canada
Morocco Jordan Uruguay
Switzerland United States
Spain South Africa Puerto Rico Chile
Sweden Croatia
5 Ukraine
Romania Israel France Qatar Venezuela Panama
China Slovak Republic Mexico Colombia
Germany Oman
Luxembourg
0
0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35
19 The correlation coefficient between TEA and EBO is 20 India, the Republic of Korea, Norway, Greece,
0.18. Lithuania, Morocco and Poland.
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
0
10
20
30
40
Morocco Morocco
Iran India
Level C
Level C
India Colombia
Guatemala Brazil
Brazil Guatemala
Croatia Spain
Panama Oman
Israel Greece
2019
2019
Spain Cyprus
Level B
Level B
Cyprus Israel
Poland Latvia
Latvia Panama
2021
2021
FIGURE 4.4 Established Business Ownership (EBO), 2019, 2021 and 2023 (% adults)
Qatar Italy
Luxembourg Germany
FIGURE 4.3 Total early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA), 2019, 2021 and 2023 (% adults)
Italy Slovenia
Sweden Sweden
Germany Norway
2023
2023
Norway Switzerland
Canada Luxembourg
Level A
Level A
49
Republic of Korea Canada
THE REAL WORLD
BEHIND THE
DATA . . .
Government Programs to
Support Entrepreneurs
MIEPEEC, Morocco
One of the GEM Entrepreneurial Framework
Conditions (see p. 96) is “Government
Entrepreneurial Programs”, which serves as a
measure of a country’s widely available quality
support programs for entrepreneurs.
Thank you to MIEPEEC, one of our report sponsors, for providing this material and
I
100
90
80
70
% of adults 18–64
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
India
South Africa
Ecuador
Colombia
Venezuela
Guatemala
Thailand
Morocco
Jordan
Mexico
China
Brazil
Iran
Oman
Uruguay
Panama
Romania
Chile
Puerto Rico
Poland
Latvia
Greece
Estonia
Cyprus
Hungary
Lithuania
Slovak Republic
Croatia
Spain
Israel
Saudi Arabia
Republic of Korea
United States
Qatar
Netherlands
Italy
United Kingdom
Luxembourg
Canada
Sweden
Slovenia
Germany
France
Norway
Switzerland
35
30
25
% of adults 18–64
20
15
10
0
Mexico
China
Morocco
Iran
South Africa
Venezuela
India
Colombia
Guatemala
Jordan
Brazil
Thailand
Ecuador
Poland
Romania
Cyprus
Greece
Lithuania
Puerto Rico
Slovak Republic
Spain
Hungary
Latvia
Israel
Estonia
Croatia
Panama
Chile
Oman
Uruguay
Republic of Korea
Luxembourg
Norway
Slovenia
Saudi Arabia
Germany
Qatar
United States
United Kingdom
France
Italy
Sweden
Switzerland
Netherlands
Canada
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 5.1
Job growth
expectations The lowest job growth expectations (in terms of all income groups, less than one in four new
among early-stage
percentage of adults) were in Ecuador, where one in entrepreneurs is expected to employ no more
entrepreneurs
expecting to employ five adults was starting or running a new business people in five years’ time.
0, 1–5 or 6 more and expecting to employ no more people in five The lowest shares of new entrepreneurs
people in five years’ years’ time, and in Canada, where that proportion expecting to employ another six or more people
time (% adults)
was one in 10. There were also three economies, in five years’ time were in India, Ecuador, Spain
Source: GEM Adult
Population Survey 2023 Poland, Greece and the Republic of Korea, in and Greece. At the same time, there were nine
which just one in 100 adults or less was starting or economies in which three in 10 new entrepreneurs
running a new business and expecting to employ or more expected to employ at least another six
no more people in five years’ time. people, three from Level C (Mexico, Brazil and
The highest job growth expectations (as a Thailand), four from Level B (Puerto Rico, the
percentage of adults) were in the Latin America Slovak Republic, Latvia and Chile), and just Qatar
& Caribbean region, home to eight of the 11 and Saudi Arabia from Level A. In terms of job
economies having more than one in 20 of their growth expectations, Latin America & Caribbean
adults starting or running a new business and lead the way, although closely followed by two
expecting to employ another six people or more in Gulf economies. Job expectations in Europe &
five years’ time. The others were Thailand, Saudi North America were typically much more modest.
Arabia and Qatar, the latter two being the only The job growth expectation analysis showed
Level A economies in this category. interesting patterns. It may also be interesting
Turning to those starting or running a new to compare these job expectations to the current
business, more than half were expecting to employment levels of new businesses: in
employ no more people in five years’ time in two other words, to know what proportion of new
Level C, five Level B and six Level A economies. entrepreneurship represents “solo entrepreneurs”
Hence the expectation of a new entrepreneur (defined as one owner, no employees) and what
employing no more people increases with income currently represents “high jobs” (defined as five or
group. In 29 of the 45 economies spread across more employees).
70
60
50
40
% of TEA
30
20
10
0
China
South Africa
Mexico
Venezuela
Jordan
Morocco
Colombia
Thailand
Iran
Brazil
Guatemala
India
Ecuador
Greece
Panama
Cyprus
Uruguay
Oman
Hungary
Latvia
Spain
Poland
Romania
Croatia
Puerto Rico
Lithuania
Chile
Estonia
Slovak Republic
Israel
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Norway
Netherlands
Canada
Luxembourg
Switzerland
Italy
Germany
United States
Sweden
France
Republic of Korea
Slovenia
United Kingdom
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 5.2
The percentage of
Not surprisingly, in Figure 5.2, the proportion more in Saudi Arabia, Qatar, China, Germany and Total early-stage
of solo entrepreneurs usually exceeded that of Canada, and one in 10 or more in eight others. Entrepreneurial
those currently employing five or more people Of the 13 economies with half or more of their Activity (TEA)
who are solo
(except in Qatar and Saudi Arabia). There were new entrepreneurs expecting to employ no more
entrepreneurs
eight economies, from all income groups, where people in five years’ time, all but three had at least (one owner, no
more than one in two of those adults starting or two out of five solo entrepreneurs. The exceptions employees) and
running a new business were solo entrepreneurs, were Oman, the Netherlands and Canada. those currently
employing five
rising to 29 economies with two in five or more solo Additionally, both Saudi Arabia and Qatar each
or more people
entrepreneurs. To be currently employing five or had high proportions already employing five or Source: GEM Adult
more was much less likely, accounting for less than more people, and high proportions expecting to Population Survey 2023
one in 20 new entrepreneurs in 14 economies, again employ at least another six people in five years’
from all income groups, but reaching one in five or time.
20
18
16
14
% of adults 18–64
12
10
0
Morocco
China
Iran
Brazil
Jordan
India
South Africa
Venezuela
Ecuador
Colombia
Mexico
Thailand
Guatemala
Lithuania
Poland
Romania
Greece
Oman
Israel
Spain
Slovak Republic
Hungary
Estonia
Cyprus
Latvia
Croatia
Puerto Rico
Uruguay
Panama
Chile
Republic of Korea
Norway
Slovenia
Germany
United Kingdom
Switzerland
Sweden
Italy
Luxembourg
France
Qatar
Netherlands
United States
Saudi Arabia
Canada
20
18
16
14
% of adults 18–64
12
10
0
China
Morocco
Iran
Jordan
India
Ecuador
Brazil
South Africa
Venezuela
Colombia
Thailand
Mexico
Guatemala
Lithuania
Poland
Romania
Oman
Greece
Israel
Spain
Estonia
Hungary
Latvia
Slovak Republic
Cyprus
Croatia
Puerto Rico
Uruguay
Panama
Chile
Norway
Republic of Korea
Slovenia
Germany
United Kingdom
Switzerland
Sweden
France
Italy
Luxembourg
United States
Netherlands
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Canada
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 5.4
The percentage of
5.4 HOW COMPETITIVE ARE NEW BUSINESSES? adults starting new
businesses using
There are a number of ways to assess the Figure 5.5 shows Total early-stage technologies or
competitiveness of a business: by its changes in Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA) levels and processes that are
new to their area,
market share, by the responsiveness of demand businesses with local customers, only customers new to their country
to changes in price, by the effects of price within their country or with customers outside or new to the world
changes by one business on the sales of another, their country. The percentage of adults in each Source: GEM Adult
Population Survey 2023
or by the unit labour costs of each. This kind of category clearly depends on the level of TEA in
data cannot be derived from the responses in each economy (the height of each column in
the APS; however, some inferences can be made Figure 5.5), as well as its distribution between
from the replies to questions about the scope the categories. There are five economies in
of a new business’s customers or whether that which more than a quarter of adults were
new business only had customers within their
own local area, only within their own country or
had international customers as well. Some care
must be taken in interpreting these responses,
because the definition of a local area may well
depend on the size of the individual country: in
relatively small countries like Cyprus or Qatar, SDG FOCUS . . .
local and national markets may be virtually
synonymous.
A number of the targets under UN SDG #9 – Build
Having customers beyond the local area is
resilient infrastructure, promote inclusive and sustainable
important in terms of impact because it brings
industrialization and foster innovation – relate to the
money into the local economy, and because a
themes of competitiveness and innovation described in
diversified customer base increases resilience and
this chapter.
reduces dependency on that local economy.
35
30
25
% of adults 18–64
20
15
10
0
Morocco
China
Iran
India
South Africa
Jordan
Mexico
Brazil
Venezuela
Colombia
Thailand
Ecuador
Guatemala
Poland
Romania
Spain
Greece
Lithuania
Israel
Hungary
Oman
Slovak Republic
Cyprus
Croatia
Estonia
Latvia
Puerto Rico
Uruguay
Panama
Chile
Norway
Slovenia
Germany
Italy
Sweden
Luxembourg
Switzerland
Republic of Korea
France
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Qatar
United States
Canada
Saudi Arabia
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 5.5
The level of Total early-
stage Entrepreneurial starting or running new businesses with only in 11 economies (one Level C, and five each from
Activity (TEA) and local customers, four from the Latin America Levels A and B). There is therefore some evidence
those within this & Caribbean region, plus Saudi Arabia. Many that the percentage of adults starting or running
with only local
economies had low proportions of adults starting businesses with international customers increases
customers, only
national customers, or running new businesses with only local with income level.
or with international customers: 33 out of 45 had less than one in 20. This is confirmed by examining the proportion
customers (%) The proportion of adults starting or running of new entrepreneurs with international
Source: GEM Adult
Population Survey 2023
a new business with just national customers customers. Among Level C economies, 13 had
was typically low, with just seven economies one in five or less of their new entrepreneurs
in which that proportion exceeded one in 10 with international customers, compared to
(three Level C and Level B and one Level A). seven Level B economies and just two Level A.
Finally, and as expected, relatively few adults Not surprisingly, many lower-income economies
were starting or running a new business with have high proportions of only local customers, in
international customers, with 2% of adults or fact forming the majority of customers for seven
less in 18 of the 45 economies (nine Level C, six Level C economies, three from Level B but no
Level B and three Level A), and just 4% or more Level A.
Thank you to the School of Management Fribourg (HEG-FR), one of our report
sponsors, for providing this material and helping to put our data in a real-world context.
35
30
25
% of TEA
20
15
10
0
Ecuador
Guatemala
India
Brazil
Colombia
Morocco
Iran
Venezuela
China
Mexico
Jordan
Thailand
South Africa
Poland
Uruguay
Chile
Lithuania
Oman
Panama
Romania
Hungary
Slovak Republic
Puerto Rico
Israel
Spain
Greece
Cyprus
Croatia
Latvia
Estonia
Republic of Korea
Saudi Arabia
Italy
Qatar
Norway
France
Netherlands
United States
United Kingdom
Switzerland
Sweden
Canada
Germany
Slovenia
Luxembourg
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 5.6
The percentage
of those starting For a new business that is able to export, As anticipated, there is some positive
or running new the opportunities are endless, while the host association with income, with just one Level C
businesses in each economy also benefits from the flow of money economy (South Africa) having one in 10 or
economy and
from abroad. The APS asks those starting or more of its new businesses classed as export-
anticipating 25%
or more of revenue running a new business what percentage of intensive, compared to nine Level B economies
coming from revenue they anticipate coming from customers and 13 from Level A. Export-intensity levels
customers outside outside of their own country. GEM defines a were lowest in Ecuador, Guatemala, India
that economy
new business as export-intensive if its owner and Brazil (all less than 2%) and highest in
Source: GEM Adult
Population Survey 2023 anticipates receiving 25% or more of its revenue Luxembourg (where two in five new businesses
from abroad. Figure 5.6 shows the percentage of were export-intensive), followed by Estonia,
those starting or running new businesses within Slovenia, Latvia and Croatia (all one in four or
this category. more). There are exceptions, with Level A Saudi
Arabia and the Republic of Korea each having
one in 20 or less of their new entrepreneurs
classed as export-intensive. Relatively small
Qatar (with some very big neighbours), only
just exceeded one in 10 of its new entrepreneurs
SDG FOCUS . . . being export-intensive.
90
80
70
60
% of TEA
50
40
30
20
10
0
Colombia
Ecuador
Morocco
Jordan
India
Mexico
Thailand
China
South Africa
Estonia
Israel
Latvia
Chile
Greece
Hungary
Uruguay
Spain
Croatia
Poland
Romania
Slovak Republic
Cyprus
Lithuania
Republic of Korea
France
Norway
Slovenia
Switzerland
Italy
Netherlands
Luxembourg
Qatar
Canada
A University Entrepreneurship
Centre Helping a Country’s
Entrepreneurial Ecosystem
Hassan II University of Casablanca
In most economies, entrepreneurial education at
schools continues to be assessed as poor. However,
as this GEM Global Report notes, there are
encouraging signs from a number of universities.
• Hassan II University Incubators. These enable
The Hassan II University of Casablanca (UH2C) is
young entrepreneurs to benefit from support,
contributing to Morocco’s national entrepreneurial
infrastructure and resources, as well as the
dynamic through a number of programs while also
university’s network of partners. One example is
carrying out research and development projects for
BlueSpace, a partnership between the Faculty
the benefit of industry and innovation.
of Law, Economics and Social Sciences – Ain
UH2C’s student support structures dedicated to Chock (located at UH2C) and the Bank of
promoting entrepreneurship are carried out by its Africa. Its aim is to help entrepreneurs develop
Career Center, the incubators of the university and innovative, sustainable businesses that create
its various establishments, and the Innovation and jobs, through training and coaching services
Technology Transfer Center, with the support of a and co-working spaces.
number of partners such as the Casablanca-Settat
Regional Council. Initiatives include: Research
The “Entrepreneurship and SMEs” research
• National Status for Student Entrepreneurs laboratory at UH2C, in charge of the GEM Morocco
(SNE). An initiative of the Ministry of Higher study since 2015, aims to advance knowledge and
Education, Scientific Research and Innovation, support the development of entrepreneurship
to help students set up a business during their across three broad areas. (1) Research — creating
studies. an environment conducive to increasing scientific
• Career Center UH2C. Created by USAID, knowledge in the field of entrepreneurship, training
this is deployed in several universities and new researchers, and experimenting with new
aims to provide individual coaching and theories. (2) Studies/Consultancy — macro and
support workshops, led by entrepreneurship micro studies on behalf of government institutions,
professionals. professional associations within the framework of
sectoral studies, and international organizations.
• Yabda Entrepreneurship Center. This offers (3) Training — of future entrepreneurs and
training and support for business startups mentors, notably through the Master’s degree in
• ANAPEC UH2C University Agency. UH2C and Entrepreneurial Mentoring, the fruit of a partnership
ANAPEC (National Agency for the Promotion between the Faculty of Law, Economics and
of Employment and Competencies) partner to Social Sciences – Ain Chock and the Mohamed V
provide students with information, guidance Foundation for Solidarity, through the Center for
and training workshops linked to the promotion Solidarity-based Very Small Enterprises (CTPES).
of entrepreneurship.
Thank you to Hassan II University of Casablanca, one of our report sponsors, for
providing this material and helping to put our data in a real-world context.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
Colombia Morocco
Mexico China
China Iran
Venezuela India
Morocco South Africa
Jordan Jordan
South Africa Brazil
Level C
Level C
Iran Mexico
India Venezuela
Chile Oman
EBO Female
Level B
Level B
Hungary Slovak Republic
Spain Estonia
EBO Male
Poland Uruguay
Lithuania Panama
Greece Chile
Luxembourg Norway
Germany Slovenia
Sweden Germany
Qatar Italy
France Sweden
FIGURE 6.2 Levels of Established Business Ownership (EBO) by women and by men (% women and % men)
Italy Republic of Korea
Slovenia Luxembourg
FIGURE 6.1 Levels of Total early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA) by women and by men (% women and % men)
Netherlands France
Level A
Level A
United Kingdom Switzerland
Switzerland United Kingdom
United States Netherlands
Canada United States
Norway Qatar
Saudi Arabia Canada
65
Republic of Korea Saudi Arabia
percentage points: Chile, Mexico, Poland, Qatar,
Spain and Switzerland.
It is evident from these charts that the absolute
SDG FOCUS . . . entrepreneurial activity gap was typically smaller
for new than for established businesses, suggesting
either a recent flourish in women starting new
UN SDG # 5 is to achieve gender equality and empower all
businesses or a lower transition rate from new
women and girls. At GEM, we are committed to do our part
to established businesses for women, with the
to help make this goal a reality.
latter perhaps more likely. When this happens,
This chapter has shown that entrepreneurial inequality women and their economies are missing out on
between men and women was much more prevalent in the employment and stability these women would
those owning established businesses than in those starting have brought with their established businesses.
new ones. More understanding is needed of the obstacles Figure 6.3 shows the relative entrepreneurial
that are preventing women from sustaining their new gap for both new and established businesses and
businesses. confirms much of what has been inferred from the
absolute gaps. The ratio of women to men falls
sharply as new businesses become established.
In 29 of the 45 economies, there were at least
in which this absolute gap was two percentage two women starting or running a new business
FIGURE 6.3 points or less: two from Level C, six from Level B for every three men doing the same, but only 16
The ratio of women and five from Level A, suggesting that the absolute economies where the same applied to the ratio of
to men new
gap between men and women owning established women to men owning established businesses.
entrepreneurship
(TEAf/TEAm) businesses may decrease with income level. The ratio of female to male new entrepreneurship
and the ratio of Note that there were six economies in which exceeded that for Established Business Ownership
women to men both the difference between (a) the percentage in 34 of 45 economies, including all Level C, 10
owning established
of men and women starting new businesses and Level B and 11 Level A.
businesses
(EBOf/EBOm) (b) the percentage of men and women owning Only two economies had two men starting or
Source: GEM Adult established businesses was less than two running new businesses for every woman doing
Population Survey 2023
1.4
1.2
Ratio of women to men
1.0
0.8
0.6
0.4
0.2
0.0
Jordan
Morocco
India
Brazil
South Africa
Guatemala
Iran
Venezuela
Mexico
Ecuador
Thailand
China
Colombia
Cyprus
Hungary
Croatia
Estonia
Oman
Slovak Republic
Romania
Latvia
Israel
Greece
Puerto Rico
Spain
Uruguay
Panama
Poland
Chile
Lithuania
Slovenia
Norway
Republic of Korea
Italy
Canada
Germany
Sweden
France
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Luxembourg
United States
Saudi Arabia
Switzerland
Qatar
Thank you to the School of Management Fribourg (HEG-FR), one of our report
sponsors, for providing this material and helping to put our data in a real-world context.
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
40
0
5
10
15
20
25
30
35
Colombia Morocco
Venezuela China
Mexico South Africa
China India
Morocco Iran
Iran Jordan
South Africa Mexico
Level C
Level C
Jordan Brazil
Thailand Thailand
Level B
Level B
Panama Estonia
Romania Slovak Republic
Level A
FIGURE 6.5 The level of Established Business Ownership (% adults in each age group) for age groups 18–34 and 35–64
United States Qatar
Italy France
Luxembourg United Kingdom
FIGURE 6.4 The level of Total early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity (% adults in each age group) for age groups 18–34 and 35–64
Netherlands Netherlands
Canada United States
Republic of Korea Saudi Arabia
69
Saudi Arabia Canada
HUMAN FACES
BEHIND THE
DATA . . .
Thank you to the Cartier Women’s Initiative, one of our report sponsors, for providing
this material and helping to put our data in a real-world context.
This finding underscores the importance of UN SDG #4: Ensure inclusive and
equitable quality education and promote lifelong learning opportunities for all.
45
40
35
30
% of adults 18–64
25
20
15
10
0
Morocco
China
Iran
South Africa
India
Jordan
Brazil
Colombia
Mexico
Venezuela
Thailand
Ecuador
Guatemala
Poland
Romania
Lithuania
Greece
Spain
Israel
Oman
Slovak Republic
Cyprus
Hungary
Estonia
Croatia
Latvia
Uruguay
Puerto Rico
Chile
Panama
Norway
Slovenia
Sweden
Germany
Republic of Korea
Switzerland
Luxembourg
Italy
France
United Kingdom
Netherlands
United States
Qatar
Canada
Saudi Arabia
45
40
35
30
% of adults 18–64
25
20
15
10
0
Ecuador
Guatemala
Colombia
Thailand
Venezuela
Brazil
Mexico
Jordan
India
Iran
South Africa
China
Morocco
Chile
Panama
Uruguay
Puerto Rico
Croatia
Estonia
Latvia
Oman
Israel
Cyprus
Spain
Slovak Republic
Hungary
Greece
Lithuania
Romania
Poland
Canada
Republic of Korea
Netherlands
Saudi Arabia
United States
Qatar
United Kingdom
Switzerland
France
Luxembourg
Germany
Sweden
Italy
Norway
Slovenia
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Thailand Mexico
Colombia South Africa
Level C
Level C
India Morocco
Ecuador Guatemala
Level B
Hungary
Level B
Slovak Republic
Israel Spain
Level A
Level A
Switzerland Germany
United Kingdom Canada
Qatar Norway
Germany United Kingdom
Luxembourg Republic of Korea
FIGURE 7.1 The percentage of Total early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA) who think starting a business is more difficult compared
75
Republic of Korea Luxembourg
FIGURE 7.2 The percentage of Total early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity (TEA) whose business growth expectations are lower compared
HUMAN FACES
BEHIND THE
DATA . . .
Thank you to the Cartier Women’s Initiative, one of our report sponsors, for providing
this material and helping to put our data in a real-world context.
80
70
60
50
% of TEA/EBO
40
30
20
10
0
Morocco
Iran
Jordan
Colombia
Ecuador
China
South Africa
Guatemala
Mexico
Thailand
Venezuela
Brazil
India
Hungary
Slovak Republic
Estonia
Greece
Croatia
Poland
Cyprus
Oman
Spain
Romania
Uruguay
Latvia
Lithuania
Israel
Panama
Puerto Rico
Chile
Republic of Korea
Norway
Switzerland
Sweden
Italy
France
Netherlands
Slovenia
Qatar
Germany
Luxembourg
United States
United Kingdom
Canada
Saudi Arabia
100
90
80
70
% of TEA/EBO
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
China
India
Jordan
Iran
Morocco
Ecuador
Colombia
South Africa
Thailand
Mexico
Guatemala
Venezuela
Brazil
Lithuania
Estonia
Romania
Slovak Republic
Hungary
Poland
Greece
Spain
Cyprus
Latvia
Croatia
Israel
Oman
Uruguay
Chile
Panama
Puerto Rico
Republic of Korea
Netherlands
Switzerland
France
Sweden
Germany
United States
Slovenia
Norway
Italy
Canada
Luxembourg
United Kingdom
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 7.4
The percentage of
7.5 ARE ENTREPRENEURS MINIMIZING THEIR new and established
business owners
ENVIRONMENTAL IMPACTS, OR MAXIMIZING THEIR SOCIAL expecting to
IMPACTS? use more digital
technologies to
Last year’s Global Report looked at whether Figure 7.5 shows that, in the past year, at least sell their products
or services in the
new and established entrepreneurs took one in two new entrepreneurs had taken steps to
next six months
environmental and social implications into minimize environmental impacts in 27 of the 45 (Total early-stage
account when making decisions about the future economies (including six in Level C, 13 in Level B Entrepreneurial
of their businesses. A majority of both those and eight in Level A). Established Business Owners Activity [TEA] and
Established Business
starting or running new businesses, and those were even more emphatic, with at least one in two
Ownership [EBO])
running established businesses, agreed that they taking steps to minimize environmental impact Source: GEM Adult
did, although that majority declined slightly as in 36 of the 45 economies (eight in Level C, and Population Survey 2023
income group increased. 14 in each of B and A, respectively). Even those
In this report, the focus shifts slightly to economies with fewer entrepreneurs taking steps
two related questions about entrepreneurial to minimize environmental impact usually had
behaviour, asking both new and established more than two in five: just five economies had less
entrepreneurs whether they had taken than two in five new entrepreneurs, falling to just
any steps in the past year to minimize the four economies for Established Business Owners.
environmental impacts of their business, Interestingly, Established Businesses Owners were
such as energy-saving measures or the use of more likely than new entrepreneurs to have taken
more environmentally friendly materials, or to steps to minimize environmental impact in the
maximize the social impacts of that business, past year.26
such as creating new jobs for young people or There is clear agreement among both new
ensuring fair workplace conditions and wages and established entrepreneurs that steps had
in their suppliers. Results are shown in Figures
7.5 and 7.6.
26 With % EBO > % TEA in 37 of 45 economies.
100
90
80
70
% of TEA/EBO
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Morocco
India
Iran
Colombia
Jordan
Ecuador
Venezuela
South Africa
Mexico
Guatemala
Thailand
China
Brazil
Lithuania
Israel
Estonia
Latvia
Spain
Oman
Poland
Uruguay
Slovak Republic
Cyprus
Hungary
Romania
Puerto Rico
Chile
Greece
Croatia
Panama
France
Norway
Slovenia
Netherlands
Qatar
United Kingdom
Germany
Sweden
Republic of Korea
United States
Italy
Canada
Switzerland
Luxembourg
Saudi Arabia
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 7.5 The share of new and established business owners who have taken steps in the past year to minimize the environmental
impact of their business (% Total early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity [TEA] and % Established Business Ownership [EBO])
Source: GEM Adult Population Survey 2023
been taken to minimize environmental impacts. Figure 7.6 relates to entrepreneurs having
Exceptions included Morocco and Iran (for both taken steps to maximize social impacts, again
TEA and EBO), Lithuania and France (TEA), and with regard to both new entrepreneurs and
the United States (EBO). Established Business Owners. This time the
SDG FOCUS . . .
We asked both new and established entrepreneurs There is clear agreement, among both new and
whether they had taken any steps in the past year to: established entrepreneurs, that steps were taken
to minimize environmental impacts. Established
1. Minimize the environmental impacts of their
Business Owners were a bit more likely than new
business (such as energy-saving measures
entrepreneurs to have taken steps to maximize the
or the use of more environmentally friendly
social impact of their business.
materials) or
This potentially correlates to progress on UN SDGs
2. Maximize the social impacts of that business,
#6, Clean Water and Sanitation; #7, Affordable
such as creating new jobs for young people or
and Clean Energy; #13, Climate Action; and 14, Life
ensuring fair workplace conditions and wages
Below Water; among others.
in their suppliers.
100
90
80
70
% of TEA/EBO
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
India
Iran
Colombia
Morocco
Ecuador
Jordan
Venezuela
Guatemala
Mexico
South Africa
Thailand
China
Brazil
Estonia
Latvia
Lithuania
Slovak Republic
Spain
Hungary
Cyprus
Israel
Oman
Uruguay
Greece
Poland
Chile
Romania
Croatia
Puerto Rico
Panama
France
Norway
Republic of Korea
Slovenia
United Kingdom
Sweden
Netherlands
United States
Italy
Qatar
Switzerland
Germany
Luxembourg
Canada
Saudi Arabia
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 7.6
The share of new
picture is more mixed, still with widespread ones. Estonia, France and Norway had the lowest and established
business owners
agreement but less emphatic. At least one in two proportions of new entrepreneurs agreeing, while
who have taken
or more new entrepreneurs had taken steps to Sweden and Estonia had the lowest proportions of steps in the past
maximize the social impact of their business in 15 Established Business Owners in agreement. year to maximize
of the 45 economies (five Level C, six Level B and Taking steps in the past year to minimize the social impact
of their business
four Level A). The same was true of Established environmental impacts or to maximize social
(% Total early-stage
Business Owners in 22 of the 45 economies, so impacts was more common among established Entrepreneurial
Established Business Owners were a bit more entrepreneurs than new ones, possibly because Activity [TEA] and %
likely than new entrepreneurs to have taken steps new entrepreneurs are more focused on survival. Established Business
Ownership [EBO])
to maximize the social impact of their business. More new or established entrepreneurs were
Source: GEM Adult
Relatively few economies had less than one in taking steps to minimize environmental impact Population Survey 2023
three of their businesses taking steps to minimize than to maximize social impact, possibly because
their environmental impact (four for new the latter may be more difficult, or perhaps
businesses and none for established). In relation revealing differences in preferences. It is clear that
to entrepreneurs taking steps to maximize their many new and established entrepreneurs are not
social impacts, this number of economies rises to just thinking about their social and environmental
seven for new businesses and 12 for established impacts but are doing something in response.
Thank you to the Cartier Women’s Initiative, one of our report sponsors, for providing
this material and helping to put our data in a real-world context.
70
60
50
% of TEA/EBO
40
30
20
10
0
Morocco
Ecuador
Jordan
India
Colombia
Mexico
South Africa
China
Thailand
Cyprus
Uruguay
Romania
Estonia
Chile
Slovak Republic
Israel
Croatia
Hungary
Greece
Latvia
Lithuania
Spain
Poland
Qatar
Slovenia
Republic of Korea
Canada
Switzerland
France
Netherlands
Luxembourg
Italy
Norway
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 7.7
Are you aware
(especially SDGs 9, 11 and 12).27 But the question 59%, EBO 55%), Poland (TEA 47%, EBO 67%) and of the United
must still be asked: are entrepreneurs aware of the in China (TEA 37%, EBO 53%). The chart shows Nations Sustainable
SDGs and, if so, is this awareness changing over awareness of the SDGs typically increasing with Development
Goals (SDGs)?
time? Is there evidence to support the notion that income, and lowest in Level C Morocco, Ecuador (% Total early-stage
the SDGs are becoming more influential in the and Jordan. Entrepreneurial
entrepreneurial world? So there is little evidence that awareness of the Activity [TEA] and %
The GEM APS asks both new and established SDGs is widespread among entrepreneurs. But are Established Business
Ownership [EBO])
entrepreneurs if they are aware of the UN SDGs. there signs that this awareness is increasing?
Source: GEM Adult
This is an optional question and not asked by all There are just 20 economies where this Population Survey 2023
National Teams. For those that did, results for question was asked in each of the last three
2023 are shown in Figure 7.7. years. These include seven economies in which
Awareness of the SDGs was patchy at best, the proportion of new entrepreneurs who
reaching one in two or more new entrepreneurs were aware of the SDGs increased each year.28
in Norway, and one in two Established Business However, there were also eight economies in
Owners in Poland, Norway and China. Across which awareness was lower in 2023 than in
the 33 economies where this question was asked 2021.29 Finally, there are 11 economies in which
in 2023, less than one in five new entrepreneurs the level of awareness among new entrepreneurs
were aware of the SDGs in 10 economies (all either fell and then increased or increased and
income levels), compared to less than one in five then fell. A very mixed picture indeed, and no
Established Business Owners in 12 economies. The support for the notion that entrepreneurial
highest levels of awareness were in Norway (TEA awareness of SDGs is increasing.
100
90
80
70
60
% of TEA
50
40
30
20
10
0
China
Morocco
Jordan
Iran
Ecuador
Colombia
Thailand
South Africa
Mexico
Venezuela
Brazil
Guatemala
India
Poland
Greece
Estonia
Croatia
Slovak Republic
Spain
Israel
Cyprus
Uruguay
Oman
Lithuania
Latvia
Hungary
Chile
Romania
Panama
Puerto Rico
Republic of Korea
France
Italy
Norway
Sweden
Netherlands
Qatar
Germany
Luxembourg
Switzerland
Slovenia
United Kingdom
Canada
United States
Saudi Arabia
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 8.1 Agreement with motivations “to make a difference in the world” and “to build great wealth or very high income” (% Total
early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity [TEA])
Source: GEM Adult Population Survey 2023
“To continue a family tradition” “To earn a living because jobs are scarce”
100
90
80
70
60
% of TEA
50
40
30
20
10
0
Iran
Morocco
Jordan
China
Colombia
Brazil
Ecuador
South Africa
Guatemala
Venezuela
Mexico
Thailand
India
Poland
Estonia
Spain
Lithuania
Israel
Slovak Republic
Croatia
Cyprus
Chile
Latvia
Hungary
Puerto Rico
Uruguay
Greece
Romania
Oman
Panama
Republic of Korea
Switzerland
France
Norway
United Kingdom
Netherlands
Sweden
Slovenia
Germany
Italy
Luxembourg
United States
Qatar
Canada
Saudi Arabia
FIGURE 8.2 Agreement with motivations “to continue a family tradition” and “to earn a living because jobs are scarce” (% Total
early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity [TEA])
Source: GEM Adult Population Survey 2023
TABLE 8.1
Out of 45 Out of 45
Motivation by
Motivation Grad > Non-grad Non-grad > grad educational
attainment: number
“to make a difference in the world” 23 22
of economies with
difference > 5 percentage points 15 7 the proportion of
graduates agreeing
“to build great wealth or very high income” 21 24 with the motivation
exceeding the
difference > 5 percentage points 11 15 proportion of
non-graduates,
“to continue a family tradition” 6 39 and vice versa
Source: GEM Adult
difference > 5 percentage points 4 27 Population Survey 2023
Thank you to the Cartier Women’s Initiative, one of our report sponsors, for providing
this material and helping to put our data in a real-world context.
FIGURE 8.3
The percentage
8.3 HOW MANY ADULTS EXITED A BUSINESS? of adults exiting
a business in the
The GEM APS asks adults whether, “in the past 12 proportion of adults responding yes is the exit past 12 months,
months, they have sold, shut down, discontinued rate, shown in Figure 8.3. Subsequent questions and whether that
or quit a business they owned and managed”. The consider whether the business continued its business continued
Source: GEM Adult
Population Survey 2023
16
14
12
% of adults 18–64
10
0
China
India
Colombia
Morocco
Iran
Thailand
South Africa
Guatemala
Ecuador
Jordan
Brazil
Mexico
Venezuela
Ukraine
Romania
Greece
Cyprus
Lithuania
Slovak Republic
Spain
Poland
Hungary
Israel
Latvia
Estonia
Croatia
Puerto Rico
Uruguay
Panama
Chile
Oman
Republic of Korea
Germany
Italy
United Kingdom
Norway
Switzerland
Slovenia
France
Sweden
Luxembourg
Netherlands
United States
Saudi Arabia
Qatar
Canada
12
10
8
% of adults 18–64
0
China
India
Colombia
Iran
Morocco
South Africa
Thailand
Guatemala
Ecuador
Venezuela
Jordan
Brazil
Mexico
Romania
Greece
Cyprus
Lithuania
Slovak Republic
Spain
Israel
Hungary
Poland
Latvia
Puerto Rico
Estonia
Croatia
Uruguay
Panama
Chile
Oman
Norway
Republic of Korea
Germany
Italy
United Kingdom
Slovenia
Switzerland
France
Sweden
Luxembourg
Netherlands
United States
Qatar
Saudi Arabia
Canada
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 8.4
Positive, negative
and COVID- activities after they quit, and what was the most Businesses were least likely to continue in
related reasons important reason for the exit. Morocco and Romania (around one in 10).
within total exits The total exit rate is shown by the height of Those exiting a business in the past year were
Source: GEM Adult
Population Survey 2023
each column. Exit rates were highest in Ukraine asked to choose the most important reason from
(14%) and Oman (13%), followed by four a list of 12, ranging from selling the business to
Level C economies (Venezuela, Mexico, Brazil family or personal reasons. Some of these reasons
and Jordan), and lowest in Level B (Romania, can be classed as positive (selling the business,
Greece, Cyprus and Lithuania) and Level A another job or business opportunity or retirement)
(Republic of Korea, Italy and Germany). Exit with the rest classed as negative. Figure 8.4 shows
rates appear to decline slightly with income the distribution of exits by positive, negative
group, although with exceptions. Exiting a or pandemic-related reasons. Many of the most
business is very much a minority activity, with important reasons are negative, ranging from
less than one in 20 adults involved in 26 of the less than two out of five exits in Norway and
45 economies. Switzerland to nine out of 10 in Jordan and the
However, exiting a business doesn’t have Republic of Korea. COVID continues to decline as
to mean that the business did not continue its the most important reason for exit, accounting for
activities. In Figure 8.3, the share of businesses less than 1% of exits in Italy, Hungary, Lithuania
that continued their activities after exit is shown and Iran, although still more than three in 10 exits
by the blue (darker) portion of the column. In in Thailand and Poland.
most economies (37 out of 45), between one in The proportion reporting positive reasons for
five and one in two businesses continue their exit generally rises with income group, from a low
activities after the previous owner-manager of about one in 20 exits in Jordan and Thailand,
exited, with the figure peaking at just under to around three in every five exits in Slovenia and
three in five in Lithuania and Saudi Arabia. Norway.
90
80
70
60
% of adults 18–64
50
40
30
20
10
0
Morocco
Iran
China
South Africa
Ecuador
Mexico
Colombia
Thailand
Jordan
Brazil
Guatemala
India
Venezuela
Greece
Poland
Hungary
Slovak Republic
Romania
Cyprus
Spain
Lithuania
Latvia
Estonia
Croatia
Uruguay
Israel
Puerto Rico
Chile
Panama
Oman
United Kingdom
Norway
Slovenia
Switzerland
Sweden
France
Italy
Netherlands
United States
Republic of Korea
Germany
Luxembourg
Qatar
Canada
Saudi Arabia
National Contexts
and Individual
Economy Profiles
This part of the Global Report concerns the significance of place, first
by setting out the GEM approach to analysing the characteristics of
place that matter most to entrepreneurial activity, and then by assessing
each economy against those characteristics. This is followed by a set of
Economy Profiles, one for each of the GEM 2023 participating economies,
including a “bird’s-eye view” of key country-specific GEM research
results alongside basic socio-economic data for that economy. Each
is accompanied by a Policy Roadmap which identifies strengths and
weaknesses in individual entrepreneurial ecosystems as well as recent
trends in entrepreneurial activities.
9
Where Are the Best Places
to Start a Business?
Stephen Hill and Alicia Coduras
The decision to start a business is inevitably set bureaucracy. Social and cultural norms may
within a local and national context, or the local discourage risk-taking. Women or minorities may
and national conditions that can support or feel there is little support for starting a businesses.
constrain that new business. Most people start Of course, one key characteristic of a successful
businesses within their own neighbourhoods, entrepreneur is tenacity in overcoming obstacles.
since this is the place they know best. Some businesses succeed in the most adverse
The location may be a source of encouragement of environments, while others may fail to grow
for the new enterprise by providing quality despite the most auspicious circumstances. The
education (on starting a business, for example), success or failure of an individual new business is
by having excellent communication links (not unpredictable. But a supportive environment can
just internet and mobile phone networks, but make a big difference as to whether the business
good roads, public transport, etc.), by providing gets started, and whether the businesses that do
access to resources, including finance, premises, start endure into maturity. Evidence shown earlier
affordable utilities and quality local services, and reveals that some economies have much higher
with markets that are both growing and easy to levels of Total early-stage Entrepreneurial Activity
enter. Obviously, the reverse may be true: national (TEA) than Established Business Ownership (EBO).
and local governments may have few or low-quality In an unsupportive or hostile business environment,
programs to support enterprise, and may burden starting a new business may be significantly easier
the new business with high taxes, fees and heavy than managing a new business into maturity.
E. Research and Development Transfers: research is easily transferred into new businesses
F. Commercial and Professional infrastructure: quality services are available and affordable
G1. Ease of Entry — Market Dynamics: markets are free, open and growing
G2. Ease of Entry — Burdens and Regulations: regulations encourage not restrict entry
12
11
10
No. of sufficient EFC scores
0
Iran
South Africa
Brazil
Ecuador
Colombia
Mexico
Morocco
Thailand
Venezuela
Guatemala
Ukraine
Jordan
China
India
Cyprus
Spain
Croatia
Slovak Republic
Argentina
Greece
Israel
Japan
Panama
Poland
Romania
Chile
Hungary
Puerto Rico
Uruguay
Latvia
Oman
Estonia
Lithuania
Italy
Luxembourg
Norway
Sweden
United States
Germany
Slovenia
Canada
United Kingdom
France
Switzerland
Qatar
Republic of Korea
Saudi Arabia
Netherlands
United Arab Emirates
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 9.1
Number of
9.3 HAVE ENTREPRENEURIAL ENVIRONMENTS RECOVERED Entrepreneurial
Framework
FROM THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC? Conditions (out
of 13) scored as
The 2022 Global Report suggested that, for a either increased or decreased by a quarter or more sufficient (score ≥5)
handful of economies (South Africa, Croatia, from 2021. (49 economies, 2023)
Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates), there For nine of 13 EFCs, many more economies Source: GEM National
Expert Survey, 2023
was evidence of some improvement in EFCs since experienced a decrease in score between 2021 and
2021, but for most economies the evidence was 2023 than experienced an increase, including, as
either too mixed, or changes too small, to draw expected, for those EFCs most directly concerned
conclusions. Two other economies, Mexico and with government, but also for both finance
Spain, showed some signs of deterioration in their EFCs, for research and development transfers,
EFCs. commercial and professional infrastructure, and
This report compares scores for 2021 and for physical infrastructure. Recurring economies
2023 for each EFC, and for the 41 economies in the list of those whose particular EFC scores
participating in the NES in both years, noting had declined markedly included Spain, Iran,
that many governments were providing strong Israel and Norway.
financial support for businesses in 2021, Successive Global Reports have pointed to
especially in higher-income economies, and that persistent low scores for the two educational
by 2023 most of these support schemes had been EFCs, especially for entrepreneurial education
reduced or withdrawn. Hence there may be some at school, so seeing more economies with
decline in scores for the EFCs Government Policy: improvements than declines in these scores since
Support and Relevance and for Government 2021 is very welcome. Six economies improved
Entrepreneurial Programs. Table 9.2 sets out the their entrepreneurial education at school by
details, simply counting the number of economies more than 25%, although less welcome were the
for which each EFC score had increased or five economies whose score fell by 25% or more.
decreased over the period. Many of these changes Market dynamics and social and cultural norms
are very small, so the table also identifies those both had more economies with score increases
economies in which the particular EFC score than with decreases, hinting that many economies
B1. Policy 27 14
B2. Burdens 23 18
C. Programs 24 17
D1. Schools 16 25
D2. Colleges 13 28
E. R&D Transfer 24 17
F. Commercial 26 15
H. Infrastructure 27 13
I. Culture 17 28
NECI score
Atilana Piñón
(Chile and Colombia)
Cartier Women’s Initiative 2023 Fellow
Thank you to the Cartier Women’s Initiative, one of our report sponsors, for providing
this material and helping to put our data in a real-world context.
6
National expert score
0
Iran
Brazil
Venezuela
Ecuador
South Africa
Mexico
Jordan
Colombia
Morocco
Thailand
Ukraine
China
India
Argentina
Cyprus
Israel
Spain
Puerto Rico
Panama
Chile
Poland
Hungary
Slovak Republic
Uruguay
Romania
Oman
Greece
Croatia
Japan
Latvia
Estonia
Lithuania
United States
Italy
United Kingdom
Canada
Luxembourg
Qatar
Sweden
France
Netherlands
Germany
Norway
Slovenia
Saudi Arabia
Switzerland
Republic of Korea
United Arab Emirates
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 9.3
National expert scores
for the perceived of the 4834 economies, 22 scored satisfactorily economies. Indeed, three times as many Level C
prioritization in terms of the priority given to economic economies scored over 5 for prioritizing good
of economic performance (three from Level C, six from B sustainability practices than they did for
performance, good
and 13 from A), 36 scored satisfactorily for the prioritizing economic performance.
environmental
practices and priority given to good environmental practices These three scores added together give some
good sustainability (4 from Level C, 17 from B and 15 from A), and 39 indication of the prioritization perceived by
practices scored satisfactorily for the priority given to good experts as given to these three complementary
Source: GEM National
Expert Survey, 2023 sustainability practices (9 from Level C, 14 from B objectives. The highest total was for the United
and 16 from A). So while the number of economies Arab Emirates (23.6), closely followed by India
with satisfactory scores typically increased (20.6), and Sweden and Estonia (both 19.9). The
with income group, there is no evidence that lowest total scores, indicating priorities that
prioritizing good environmental or sustainability were seen to lie elsewhere, were for Iran (7.9),
practices was only affordable for higher-income Venezuela (11.1) and Israel (12.1).
Empowering Tomorrow’s
Entrepreneurs in Switzerland
through Education and
Experience
ADOpreneurs
School of Management Fribourg (HEG-FR)
Professor Raphaël Gaudart joined the Swiss Global
Entrepreneurship Monitor team back in 2015. One
particular finding stood out for him: Switzerland
was lagging behind other peer economies with
regard to entrepreneurship education in primary
schools. The week culminates with a launch event in which
the teenagers present their projects to parents,
Gaudart decided he would proactively address this
professors and representatives from the different
concern by launching a summer entrepreneurship
organizations involved with ADOpreneurs. According
camp for teenagers in Fribourg. He identified
to Marie, a former participant:
a sponsor — the Fribourg Canton Chamber
of Commerce — which made it possible for 17 “It’s great to carry out a project and get
teenagers to go through a week-long immersion help and guidance from entrepreneurs and
into the world entrepreneurship. professionals.”
“ADOpreneurs” was launched in July 2016, also in Timon, another former participant, added:
partnership with the Engineering School and the “It was fun, varied but also educational. As an
Innovation Lab Fribourg. It has been running every entrepreneur you have a lot of freedom but
year since (with the exceptions of 2020 and 2021 due you also have to think about a lot of things.”
to COVID-19). Said Gaudart:
Thank you to the School of Management Fribourg (HEG-FR), one of our report
sponsors, for providing this material and helping to put our data in a real-world context.
6
National expert score
0
Iran
Brazil
Mexico
Venezuela
Morocco
Guatemala
Ecuador
Colombia
Jordan
South Africa
Thailand
China (PRC)
Ukraine
India
Cyprus
Israel
Japan
Greece
Slovak Republic
Poland
Spain
Croatia
Chile
Romania
Argentina
Puerto Rico
Uruguay
Hungary
Panama
Estonia
Oman
Latvia
Lithuania
Italy
United Kingdom
United States
Germany
Luxembourg
Switzerland
Canada
France
Netherlands
Republic of Korea
Slovenia
Norway
Qatar
Sweden
Saudi Arabia
United Arab Emirates
Level C Level B Level A
FIGURE 9.4
National expert
scores for the public procurement opportunities, and less access than they have in providing the support (often
perceived social to financing compared to men. social) that some women need to run their
support for women Figure 9.4 shows expert scores for their businesses. The highest expert scores for
entrepreneurs,
perceptions of the level of support for women perceived support for women entrepreneurs were
and their relative
access to the entrepreneurs, and their access to the resources in the United Arab Emirates, India and Saudi
resources necessary necessary to run a new and growing business. Arabia, with the lowest scores in Iran, Cyprus and
to start and run This time the perceptions are very different, and Brazil. Indeed, there were far too many economies
their businesses
there is little correlation in the same economy with poor scores for social support of women
Source: GEM National
Expert Survey, 2023 between the score for support and the score for entrepreneurs, with 22 of the 49 economies
access to resources.35 Of the 49 economies, only scoring 3.5 or less, including three from Level A
11 scored as satisfactory in terms of support for (Italy, the United Kingdom and the United States),
women entrepreneurs (one from Level C, four 11 from Level B and eight from Level C. There is
from Level B and six from Level A), whereas 27 considerable room for improvement across the
scored satisfactory for women entrepreneurs board.
having similar access to resources compared to The perceived access to resources for women
men (seven Level C, seven Level B and 13 Level A). entrepreneurs relative to men was rather better,
In 39 of these economies, the score for access not only with more high scores but with many
to resources exceeded the score for support. fewer low ones. Only two economies scored less
Economies appear to have made much more than 3.5 (Oman and Ukraine), although both
progress in ensuring equal access to resources Spain and Slovenia were close.
Argentina
Q Population (2022): 46.2 million (World Bank)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 26.5 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.1 (13/19) 2.2 (19/19)
Brazil
Q Population (2022): 215.3 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 17.8 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
3.1 (12/14) 2.8 (12/14)
Canada
Q Population (2022): 38.9 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 58.4 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.3 (13/16) 5.0 (8/16)
Chile
Q Population (2022): 19.6 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 30.2 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.2 (11/19) 6.0 (3/19)
China
Q Population (2022): 1,412.2 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 21.5 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
3.9 (5/14) 6.4 (1/14)
Colombia
Q Population (2022): 51.9 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 20.3 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.2 (4/14) 3.6 (9/14)
Croatia
Q Population (2022): 3.9 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 40.4 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.0 (14/19) 4.3 (13/19)
Cyprus
Q Population (2022): 1.3 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 49.9 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
3.8 (16/19) 4.9 (7/19)
Ecuador
Q Population (2022): 18.0 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 12.8 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
3.8 (7/14) 4.0 (7/14)
Estonia
Q Population (2022): 1.3 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 46.7 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
5.7 (2/19) 6.7 (1/19)
France
Q Population (2022): 67.9 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 55.5 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.7 (10/16) 4.9 (10/16)
Germany
Q Population (2022): 84.1 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 63.1 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.9 (6/16) 4.2 (15/16)
Greece
Q Population (2022): 10.6 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 36.8 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.5 (5/19) 4.8 (8/19)
atsakanikas@iobe.gr
Guatemala
Q Population (2022): 17.4 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 10.8 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.3 (3/14) 3.5 (10/14)
zelaya@ufm.edu
Hungary
Q Population (2022): 9.7 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 41.9 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.4 (7/19) 5.0 (6/19)
Team csaknefilep.judit@uni-bge.hu
Funders
Team leader
Budapest Business University (BBU)
Judit Csákné Filep
India
Q Population (2022): 1,417.2 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 8.4 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
6.5 (1/14) 6.2 (2/14)
Iran
Q Population (2022): 88.6 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 18.1 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
2.1 (14/14) 2.6 (13/14)
abazarga@ut.ac.ir
Israel
Q Population (2022): 9.6 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 49.5 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
2.4 (19/19) 2.4 (18/19)
Italy
Q Population (2022): 58.9 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 51.9 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.3 (15/16) 3.8 (16/16)
Japan
Q Population (2022): 125.1 million (World Bank)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 45.6 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.1 (12/19) 4.5 (10/19)
Kwansei Gakuin University Prof. Yuji Honjo Social Survey Research Information
Prof. Takehiko Yasuda Co. Ltd (SSRI)
Prof. Masatoshi Kato
Type of institution Contact
University
noriyuki@cc.musashi.ac.jp
Jordan
Q Population (2022): 11.3 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 11.0 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.4 (2/14) 4.7 (3/14)
Latvia
Q Population (2022): 1.9 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 40.0 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
5.3 (3/19) 5.1 (5/19)
Lithuania
Q Population (2022): 2.8 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 48.4 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
6.0 (1/19) 6.3 (2/19)
saule.maciukaite-zviniene@vm.vu.lt
Team Funders
Type of institution Moody’s Lithuania
Team leader
University Innovation Agency
Prof. Saule Maciukaite-Zviniene
Website Vilnius University Business School
Team members Ministry of Economics and Innovation
https://www.vm.vu.lt/en/
Vytenis Mockus
Luxembourg
Q Population (2022): 0.7 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 142.2 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.4 (12/16) 4.8 (11/16)
Website
https://statistiques.public.lu/en/
statistique-publique/statec/red.html
Mexico
Q Population (2022): 127.5 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 21.5 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
3.9 (6/14) 3.1 (11/14)
Morocco
Q Population (2022): 37.5 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 9.5 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
3.5 (10/14) 4.6 (4/14)
Netherlands
Q Population (2022): 17.7 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 69.6 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
6.2 (2/16) 6.0 (5/16)
Team j.snijders@panteia.nl
Funders
Team leader
The Ministry of Economic Affairs and
Jacqueline Snijders
Climate Policy of the Netherlands
Norway
Q Population (2022): 5.5 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 114.9 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.4 (11/16) 4.7 (13/16)
Oman
Q Population (2022): 4.6 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 41.7 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.6 (4/19) 5.1 (4/19)
Panama
Q Population (2022): 4.4 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 39.3 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
3.8 (15/19) 4.3 (12/19)
acarbonell@cdspanama.org
AMPYME
Team
Type of institution
Team leader
Foundation
Alejandro Carbonell
Poland
Q Population (2022): 37.6 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 43.3 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.2 (10/19) 4.0 (14/19)
anna_tarnawa@parp.gov.pl
Puerto Rico
Q Population (2022): 3.2 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 40.5 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
3.6 (17/19) 2.6 (17/19)
Qatar
Q Population (2022): 2.7 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 114.6 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
5.1 (4/16) 6.3 (3/16)
Republic of Korea
Q Population (2022): 51.6 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 50.1 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
5.0 (5/16) 6.1 (4/16)
Romania
Q Population (2022): 19.0 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 41.9 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.4 (6/19) 4.3 (11/19)
Saudi Arabia
Q Population (2022): 36.4 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 59.1 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
6.0 (3/16) 6.4 (2/16)
Slovak Republic
Q Population (2022): 5.4 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 37.5 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.3 (8/19) 3.8 (15/19)
Slovenia
Q Population (2022): 2.1 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 50.0 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.9 (7/16) 4.3 (14/16)
Institution Website Prof. Katja Crnogaj, PhD Slovenian Research and Innovation
https://www.um.si/en Prof. Barbara Bradač Hojnik, PhD Agency
Lead institution https://www.epf.um.si/en/ Matej Rus, MSc Institute for Entrepreneurship and
University of Maribor, Faculty of Small Business Management at
https://ipmmp.um.si/ Ivona Huđek, PhD Faculty of Economics & Business,
Economics and Business globalni-podjetniski-monitor/ Prof. Emeritus Miroslav Rebernik, PhD University of Maribor
South Africa
Q Population (2022): 59.9 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 15.9 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
3.2 (11/14) 3.7 (8/14)
Spain
Q Population (2022): 47.6 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 45.8 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
3.4 (18/19) 3.2 (16/19)
Institution Manuel González Díaz, PhD, GEM Ignacio Contín Pilart, PhD, GEM Yago Atrio Lema
Asturias; Julio Batle Lorente, PhD, Navarra; Martín Larraza Quintana, Ariadna Monje Amor, PhD
Lead institution GEM Baleares; Rosa Batista Canino, PhD, GEM Navarra; María Saiz Santos,
PhD, GEM Canarias; Ana Fernández PhD, GEM País Vasco; Luis Ruano Paula San Martin Espina, PhD
Observatorio del Emprendimiento de Laviada, PhD, GEM Cantabria; Paula Marrón, PhD, GEM Rioja; Jose Manuel Ignacio Mira Solves, PhD
España (OEE) Martin Espina, PhD, GEM Cantabria; Sánchez Vázquez, PhD, GEM Cádiz; Mª del Mar Fuentes Fuentes, PhD
Juan José González Moreno, PhD, Emilio Jesús Morales Fernández,
María Saiz Santos, PhD
GEM Castilla la Mancha; Ángela PhD, GEM Córdoba; Esteban Almirón
González Moreno, PhD, GEM Castilla Navarro, PhD, GEM Córdoba; María
la Mancha; Nuria González Álvarez, Jesús Hernández Ortiz, PhD, GEM Funders
PhD, GEM Castilla León; Carlos Jaén; Rafael Ventura Fernández, PhD,
Type of institution Guallarte Núñez, PhD, GEM Cataluña; GEM Málaga; Carmen Cabello Medina,
ENISA (Ministry of Industry,
Non Profit Organization Gabriel Parada Arias, PhD, GEM PhD, GEM Sevilla; Francisco Liñán,
Commerce and Tourism)
Ceuta; José María Gómez Gras, PhD, PhD, GEM Sevilla/Huelva; Carlos Jesús
Website GEM C. Valenciana; Ignacio Mira Cano Guillén, PhD GEM Almeria
http://www.gem-spain.com Solves, PhD, GEM C. Valenciana; APS vendor
Antonio Fernández Portillo, PhD,
GEM Extremadura; Maricruz Sánchez National team
Opinometre
Regional teams Escobedo, PhD, GEM Extremadura;
Loreto Fernández Fernández, PhD, Team leader
María Jesús Hernández Ortiz, PhD, GEM Galicia; Miguel Angoitia Grijalba, Ana Fernández Laviada, PhD Contact
GEM Andalucía; Lucio Fuentelsaz PhD, GEM Madrid; Mª del Mar Fuentes
Lamata, PhD, GEM Aragón; Consuelo Fuentes, PhD, GEM Granada/Melilla; National team members presidencia@gem-spain.com
González Gil, PhD, GEM Aragón; Alicia Rubio Bañon, PhD, GEM Murcia; Nuria Calvo Babío, PhD
Sweden
Q Population (2022): 10.5 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 64.6 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.3 (14/16) 4.8 (12/16)
Switzerland
Q Population (2022): 8.8 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 83.6 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.9 (8/16) 5.6 (6/16)
Thailand
Q Population (2022): 71.7 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 20.7 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
3.7 (8/14) 4.4 (5/14)
Ukraine
Q Population (2022): 38.0 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 12.7 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
3.5 (9/14) 4.4 (6/14)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
7.3 (1/16) 7.5 (1/16)
United Kingdom
Q Population (2022): 67.0 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 54.6 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.7 (9/16) 5.2 (7/16)
Institution University of Glasgow Neha Prashar Department for the Economy (NI)
University of Edinburgh Karen Bonner Be the Business
Lead institution University of Strathclyde Anastasia Ri Mastercard
Aston Business School, Aston Ulster University Samuel Mwaura Aston University
University
Sreevas Sahasranamam
Team Andy Loung APS vendor
United States
Q Population (2022): 333.3 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 76.4 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.2 (16/16) 5.0 (9/16)
Uruguay
Q Population (2022): 3.4 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 28.8 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
4.2 (9/19) 4.6 (9/19)
Team ANDE
lveiga@um.edu.uy
COUSA
Team leader
Professor Leonardo Veiga, PhD
Venezuela
Q Population (2022): 28.3 million (UN)
Q GDP per capita (2022; PPP, international $): 17.5 thousand (World Bank)
4
3
G2. Ease of Entry: 2
B2. Government Policy:
Burdens and Regulation Taxes and Bureaucracy
1
3.0 (13/14) 1.1 (14/14)
Appendix
Tables
GEM Indicators
Knowing a Startup Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who personally know someone who
Entrepreneur has started a business in the past two years.
Perceived Opportunities Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who agree that they see good
opportunities to start a business within the next six months in the
area in which they live.
Ease of Starting a Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who agree that it is easy to start a
Business business in their country.
Perceived Capabilities Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who agree that they have the required
knowledge, skills and experience to start a business.
Fear of Failure Rate Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who agree that they see good
opportunities but would not start a business for fear it might fail.
Nascent Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who are currently nascent
Entrepreneurship Rate entrepreneurs, i.e. are actively involved in setting up a business they
will own or co-own; this business has not yet paid salaries, wages or
made any other payments to the owners for more than three months.
New Business Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who are currently owner-managers of
Ownership Rate a new business, i.e. who own and manage a running business that has
paid salaries, wages or made any other payments to the owners for
more than three months, but not more than 42 months (3.5 years).
Total early-stage Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who are either a nascent
Entrepreneurial Activity entrepreneurs or owner-managers of a new business, i.e. the
(TEA) proportion of the adult population who are either starting or running
a new business.
Established Business Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who are currently owner-managers of
Ownership Rate (EBO) an established business, i.e. who are owning and managing a running
business that has paid salaries, wages or made any other payments to
the owners for over 42 months (3.5 years).
Business Services Percentage of TEA respondents involved in business services.
Entrepreneurial Employee Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who, as employees, have been
Activity (EEA) involved in entrepreneurial activities such as developing or launching
new goods or services, or setting up a new business unit, a new
establishment, or a subsidiary in the last three years.
Sponsored Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who are involved in TEA and that
business is part-owned with their employer.
Independent Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who are involved in TEA and that
business is independently owned.
Motive for Starting a Percentage of TEA respondents who agree that a reason for starting
Business: “To make a their business is “to make a difference in the world”.
difference in the world”
Motive for Starting a Percentage of TEA respondents who agree that a reason for starting
Business: “To continue a their business is “to continue a family tradition”.
family tradition”
Motive for Starting a Percentage of TEA respondents who agree that a reason for starting
Business: “To earn a living their business is “to earn a living because jobs are scarce”.
because jobs are scarce”
High Growth Expectation Percentage of adults aged 18–64 involved in TEA who expect to
Entrepreneurial Activity employ another six or more people five years from now.
Internationally Oriented Percentage of adults aged 18–64 involved in TEA who anticipate 25%
Entrepreneurial Activity or more revenue coming from outside their country.
Scope (local/national/ Percentage of adults aged 18–64 involved in TEA having customers
international) only within their local area, only within their country, or those having
international customers.
Product/Services Impact Percentage adults aged 18–64 involved in TEA having products or
(local/national/global) services that are either new to the area, new to their country or new to
the world.
Technology/Procedures Percentage of adults aged 18–64 involved in TEA having technology or
Impact (local/national/ procedures that are either new to the area, new to their country or new
global) to the world.
Informal Investment Percentage of adults aged 18–64 investing in someone else’s new
business in the last three years.
Business Exit Rate Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who have exited a business in
the past 12 months, either by selling, shutting down or otherwise
discontinuing an owner/management relationship with that business.
Exit, Business Continues Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who have exited a business in the
past 12 months and that business has continued.
Exit, Business Does Not Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who have exited a business in the
Continue past 12 months and that business has not continued.
Household Income Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who reported that their household
Change income had somewhat or strongly decreased.
PANDEMIC-RELATED INDICATORS
Knowing an Entrepreneur Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who know someone who has stopped
Who Stopped a Business a business because of the pandemic.
Knowing an Entrepreneur Percentage of adults aged 18–64 who know someone who has started
Who Started a Business a business because of the pandemic.
Pandemic Opportunities Percentage of TEA respondents who agree or strongly agree that the
pandemic has provided new opportunities they wish to pursue.
20.5 2.7
18.1 4.6
20.7 2.6
10.5 0.8
29.1 4.7
50.2 7.1
16.5 3.0
8.0 0.7
28.7 2.6
25.9 10.2
18.2 7.0
6.4 1.1
21.8 6.4
24.1 3.3
14.3 1.3
1.9 0.3
20.9 2.3
15.5 2.1
7.2 0.6
26.7 4.7
16.5 2.5
31.6 3.3
18.3 6.1
8.7 0.3
28.2 4.1
31.2 5.5
11.1 0.6
16.9 4.3
16.8 2.1
18.3 3.7
13.5 2.9
21.1 0.0
20.9 1.6
28.2 2.7
19.2 2.6
28.6 3.2
8.4 7.3
6.8 1.6
31.7 4.5
26.1 2.4
15.9 1.0
8.0 1.7
7.9 3.0
23.0 3.5
18.5 4.1
12.9 3.8
Total early-stage
Entrepreneurial Established Business
Activity Ownership Informal investment
73.2 52.1 47
* Strictly, this is the percentage of adults excluding those already engaged in entrepreneurial activity.
% of % of non-
% 18–34 % 35–64 graduates graduates
% of % of non-
% 18–34 % 35–64 graduates graduates
Business- Consumer-
oriented oriented Extractive Transforming
services services sector sector
Negative,
not including
COVID-19 COVID-19
Exiting rate Positive pandemic pandemic
Republic of
0.8 7.8 1.6 1.9 0.3 1.0 0.1
Korea
Slovak
4.3 2.3 4.1 10.0 1.7 0.7 0.2
Republic
United
4.7 4.1 3.0 19.4 2.3 0.3 0.9
Kingdom
“To earn a
“To make a “To build great “To continue living because
difference in wealth or very a family jobs are
the world” high income” tradition” scarce”
Number of Entrepreneurial
Framework Conditions
(EFCs) scored as
Income level sufficient or better (≥5) NECI score