SCHEDULE-1

FORM-1 MEDIATION APPLICATION FORM

DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY,
CENTRAL DISTRICT
TIS HAZARI COURTS, DELHI-110054

DETAILS OF PARTIES:

1. APPLICANT

M/S RRM TRADING COMPANY.

Through its Partner, ROHIT JAIN

Working at: 5066, Roshanara Road,
Opposite Roshanara Bagh
Delhi-110007.

2. OPPOSITE PARTY

1. Mr. Sunil Bansal

Partner: M/s UNI SWIFT

2. M/s UNI SWIFT

Through its Partner Mr. Sunil Bansal

Both Working at: 2110, phase- II, Rai Industrial Area,

Rai, Sonipat Haryana-131029.
MOBILE: 9958220333

DETAILS OF DISPUTE:

1. Nature of Dispute:
That present dispute arises out of a business transaction
that took place between the Applicant who deals in
various types of stamping foils, UV Inks, Varnishes, and
other related goods, and the Opposite Party. The last
Invoice raised against supply to the Opposite Party was on
DATE for an amount of Rs. ……./- and the Gross total
outstanding amount payable by the Opposite Party is
Rs.2,70,478/-. The interest @24% amounting to
Rs.75,600/- (From 08.06.2023 till 17.01.2024)
 totalling to amount of Rs.346,078/-. Interest charged
due to late payment @ 24% from the date of last
payment on each invoice basis. The total amount due
from the Opposite Party till 17.01.24 is= Rs. 2,70,478/-.
+ Rs.75,600/- = Rs.3,46,078/-

2. Quantum of Claim:

Rs. 3,46,078/- including interest @24% amounting to

Rs. 75,600/- (From 08.06.2023 till 17.01.2024). The
total amount due from the Opposite Party till 17.01.2024
is Rs.2,70,478/-. + Rs.75,600/- = Rs.3,46,078/-.

a. Rs.11,000/- towards legal notice charges.

b. Recovery of Litigation Expenses and Pre-litigation
mediation application fees from the Opposite Party.

3. Territorial Jurisdiction of Competent Court:

The Opposite Party through its partners approached the

office of the Applicant situated at 5066, Roshanara Road,
Opposite Roshanara Bagh, Delhi-110007, and after
negotiations, terms of dealing were set out between the
applicant and the Opposite Party through its partners.
Thereafter being satisfied with the quality and price, the
opposite party through its partners started placing orders on
the telephone as well as by mail. The goods were then
delivered to the office of the opposite party through
transport. As the decision to do business with each other and
terms were finalized at the office of Applicant at Roshanara
Road, payments were received in the bank account of the
applicant which is located within the jurisdiction of the
central district and due to the transaction being happening at
the office of the Applicant the present dispute falls under the
territorial jurisdiction of Central District.

4. Brief Synopsis of Commercial Dispute:

1. That above-named applicant is dealing in various

types of products in the field of various types of
stamping foils, UV Inks, Varnishes, and other related
goods and has gained goodwill and reputation in
their business field due to the high-quality products
they dealt in. The opposite party approached the
Applicant’s office working at 5066, Roshanara Road,
Opposite Roshanara Bagh, Delhi-110007, and after
negotiations terms of dealing were set out between
the applicant and the opposite party. Thereafter
being satisfied with the quality and price, the
opposite party started placing orders telephonically
as well as by mail. The goods were then delivered to
the office of the opposite party through transport.
2. That the present application is filed by Sh. Rohit Jain
who is working as a partner in the registered firm
namely M/s RRM Trading Company. The other
Partners have authorized Sh. Rohit Jain is to file this
present application before the Pre-Litigation
Mediation Cell, Central District, Tis Hazari Courts,
Delhi by passing a resolution in his favour.
3. That the partners of the Opposite party received duly
taxed invoices at the time when goods were
 delivered at the registered address of the Opposite
Party and assured the applicant that payments will
be done in routine as agreed as per the terms and
conditions in the invoice.
4. That the Applicant maintains a running account of
the Opposite Party as the Opposite Party always
made payments in part. The applicant had no option
but to maintain a running ledger account of the
Opposite Party due to their habit of non-clearance of
amount on a bill-to-bill basis.
5. The total outstanding amount payable by the
Opposite Party is Rs.2,70,478/-. The interest
@24% amounting to Rs.75,600/- (From
08.06.2023 till 17.01.2024) totalling an amount
of Rs.346,078/-. Interest charged due to late
payment @24% from the date of last payment on
each invoice basis. The total amount due from the
Opposite Party till 17.01.24 is Rs.2,70,478/- +
Rs.75,600/- = Rs.3,46,078/-.
6. That the Applicant approached the Opposite Party
through its partners multiple times to pay off the
legally recoverable debt of the Applicant, however,
all his requests went to deaf ears. To the
astonishment of Applicant and Opposite Party
audacity, Opposite Party made one excuse of the
other, thereby running away from their legal and
 moral responsibility to pay off the debt of the
Applicant.
7. That the Applicant thereafter sent a legal notice
dated dispatched on to the Opposite
Party through his counsel. The legal notice was
delivered to the opposite party by way of Speed-Post
at the address of the opposite party on
___________.
8. That the total outstanding amount payable by the
Opposite Party is Rs.2,70,478/-. The interest
@24% amounting to Rs.75,600/- (From
08.06.2023 till 17.01.2024) totalling an amount
of Rs.346,078/-. Interest charged due to late
payment @24% from the date of last payment on
each invoice basis. The total amount due from the
Opposite Party till 17.01.24 is Rs.2,70,478/- +
Rs.75,600/- = Rs.3,46,078/-.

Details of Fees Paid:

Online Transaction No. __________________ Dated
_________________

Date:

Name and Signature of Applicant:

For Office Use Only:

Form Received on:

File No. allotted:

Mode of sending notice to the opposite party:

Notice to opposite party sent on:

Whether Notice acknowledgement by opposite party or not:

Date of non-starter report/

assignment of commercial dispute to Mediator.
DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY, CENTRAL DISTRICT, TIS HAZARI
COURTS, DELHI-110054

M/S RRM TRADING COMPANY …………APPLICANT

VERSUS

Mr. Sunil Bansal & Another ….…..OPPOSITE PARTY

I, Rohit Jain S/o late Sh. Ashok Kumar Jain, Director in M/s RRM Trading
International Pvt. Ltd. working at 5066 Roshanara Road, opp. Roshanara Bagh,
Delhi-110007 aged about 51 years do hereby appoint: -

MUNISH VOHRA (ADVOCATE)

D-1544/2008
Chamber No. 47, CIVIL WING,
TIS HAZARI COURTS DELHI -110054.
MOB: 9811427955///9990540099, Email: munishlaw.vohra@gmail.com
Here-in-after called the Advocate/s, to be my/our advocates in above noted case n authorize
them. To act, appear and plead in the above-noted case in this Court or in any other Court in
which the same may be tried or heard and also in the Appellate Court including High Court
subject to payment of fees separately for each court by me / us.

To sign, file, verify and present pleadings, appeals, cross-objections or petitions or

executions review, revision, withdrawal, compromise or other petitions or affidavits or other
documents, receive money on my/our behalf as may be deemed necessary or proper for the
execution of the said case and take necessary steps at all stages subject to payment of fees
for each stage. To file and take back documents, to admit &/or deny the documents of
opposite party.

To appoint and instruct any other Legal Practitioner or persons authorizing him to exercise
the power and authority hereby conferred upon the Advocate whatever he may think fit to
do so & sign the power of attorney in favour of anybody my/our lawyer deems fit and
appropriate.
The adjournment costs whenever ordered by the Court shall be of the advocate and which
he shall receive and retain for himself. Any costs levied on us by the Court will be borne by
client.

And I / We the undersigned do hereby agree to ratify and confirm all acts done by the
Advocates or their substitute in the matter as my / our own acts, if done by me / us to all
intents and purposes.

And I/We undertake that I / We or my /our duly authorized agent would appear in Court on
all hearings & will inform the Advocate for appearance when the case is called for.

And I / We the undersigned do hereby agree that in the event of the whole or part of the
fee agreed by me / us to be paid to the Advocate remaining unpaid he shall be entitled to
withdraw from the prosecution of the said case until the same is paid up. I/We hereby
agree that once the fee is paid, I/ We will not be entitled for the refund of the same. The
fixed fees paid by the client is applicable for 3 years and after that there will be renewal of
fees after due consultation otherwise fixed fees will be charges again.

IN WITNESS WHEREOF I / We do hereunto set my/our hand to these presents the contents
of which have been understood by me/us on this 19TH Day of January, 2024.

Accepted subject to the terms of fees.

Advocate/s Client/s Client/s Identify the

signature of client/s
DISTRICT LEGAL SERVICE AUTHORITY, CENTRAL DISTRICT, TIS HAZARI
COURTS, DELHI-110054

M/S RRM TRADING COMPANY …………APPLICANT

VERSUS

Mr. Sunil Bansal & Another ….…..OPPOSITE PARTY

FILED BY:

MUNISH VOHRA (ADVOCATE)

Chamber No. 47, CIVIL WING,
TIS HAZARI COURTS DELHI -110054.
MOB: 9811427955///9990540099,
Email: munishlaw.vohra@gmail.com