When it comes to academic writing, one of the most challenging tasks students face is crafting a

literature review. This essential component of scholarly work requires a deep understanding of the
existing literature on a particular topic and the ability to synthesize and analyze it effectively. Many
students struggle with this aspect of their assignments due to its complexity and the time-consuming
nature of conducting thorough research.

A literature review involves gathering and critically evaluating relevant scholarly sources to provide a
comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on a specific subject. It requires careful
selection of credible sources, meticulous reading and note-taking, and the ability to identify key
themes, trends, and gaps in the literature. Additionally, synthesizing information from diverse
sources and integrating it into a coherent narrative can be particularly challenging.

On the other hand, the discussion section of a research paper involves interpreting and analyzing the
findings in relation to the existing literature. While it may seem similar to a literature review, the
discussion section focuses more on interpreting the results of the study and exploring their
implications, rather than summarizing existing research.

Navigating the nuances between a literature review and a discussion section can be daunting for
students, especially those new to academic writing. However, with the right guidance and support, it
is possible to master these skills and produce high-quality scholarly work.

For students who find themselves struggling with literature reviews or any other aspect of academic
writing, seeking assistance from professional writing services can be a wise decision. ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert assistance with literature reviews, research papers, and other
academic assignments. Our team of experienced writers can help you navigate the complexities of
scholarly writing, ensuring that your work meets the highest standards of quality and academic
integrity.

By outsourcing your writing needs to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and alleviate the stress
associated with academic assignments, allowing you to focus on other priorities. Whether you need
assistance with a literature review, discussion section, or any other aspect of your paper, our
dedicated team is here to help.

Ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is easy and convenient, with a straightforward process that
allows you to specify your requirements and deadlines. Our writers will work closely with you to
understand your needs and deliver customized solutions that meet your expectations.

Don't let the challenges of academic writing hold you back. Trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to provide the
expert assistance you need to succeed in your studies. Place your order today and experience the
difference our professional writing services can make.
This approach should only be followed if a clear path of research building on previous research can
be identified and that these trends follow a clear chronological order of development. The writer will
evaluate whether the information from that particular source is relevant to the particular topic and
examine the quality of the work. Normal distribution Degrees of freedom Null hypothesis Discourse
analysis Control groups Mixed methods research Non-probability sampling Quantitative research
Ecological validity Research bias Rosenthal effect Implicit bias Cognitive bias Selection bias
Negativity bias Status quo bias Cite this Scribbr article If you want to cite this source, you can copy
and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation
to our free Citation Generator. So, here in this systematic review vs literature review comparison
piece, we’ve given you all that you need to know about these review types and where you should
use them. Since different kinds of literature reviews have unique ways of structuring the reference,
it is essential that you do it using the most consistent and presentable way. In our own writing of
literature reviews, there are often many drafts. All the materials from our website should be used
with proper references. However, study selection via a systematic review is a precondition for
performing a meta-analysis, and it is important to clearly define the Population, Intervention,
Comparison, Outcomes (PICO) parameters that are central to evidence-based research. Tips to Tackle
Procrastination You can end up wasting a lot of time procrastinating. Statistical analysis Patients’
characteristics, stratified by gender, were reported using medians (with interquartile range, IQR) and
percentages for continuous and categorical variables, respectively. Anytime when writing a literature
review, the first step should be to understand the requirements of the paper. Exclusion criteria were:
(1) palliative care; (2) hepatic and renal dysfunction, severe neuropathy or psychiatric illness; and (3)
having two or more primary malignancies of different organ and tissue origin; (4) chemotherapy is
not considered appropriate by the investigator. Types of Literature Reviews It is important to think
of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three layers. But, the literature review does not just
state what an article or book states; the review assesses and evaluates it. Thereto can be helpful to
make an annotated bibliography, where you compile total citation information or write a paragraph
of summaries real analysis for each data. Bone Joint J. 2021.. Czajka CM, DiCaprio MR. What is the
proportion of patients with multiple Hereditary exostoses who Undergo Malignant Degeneration.
Read them to get a sense of the types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or
to identify ways to organize your final review. Secondary Sources Databases and Articles Specific
Journal or Article Subject Guide Definitions It’s common to confuse systematic and literature
reviews because both are used to provide a summary of the existent literature or research on a
specific topic. Therefore, there is a growing need for appraisal and synthesis of prior systematic
reviews to ensure that decision-making is constantly informed by the best available accumulated
evidence. In either of these examples, the researcher(s) may use a qualitative, quantitative, or mixed
methods methodological approach. You don’t want to substitute a thorough review of core research
literature in your discipline for studies conducted in other fields of study. The purpose is to develop a
body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. In our example, a biology education
researcher may be interested in exploring how students’ learning of difficult biological concepts can
be supported by the interactions of group members. The combined estimates were then obtained
from 25 imputed data sets. Consider the following issues before writing the literature review: Clarify
If your assignment is not specific about what form your literature review should take, seek
clarification from your professor by asking these questions: 1. What is the significance of a review of
related studies. Produced by Jan Glover, David Izzo, Karen Odato and Lei Wang. Common
questions concern determining which literature pertains to the topic of study or the role of the
literature review in the design of the study. Thereafter, the data are reviewed qualitatively and
quantitatively. In this example, you can observe how different sources are analysed to bring out the
commonalities or differences.
Writing a Literature Review Purdue OWL Research and Citation Conducting Research Writing a
Literature Review Writing a Literature Review A literature review is a document or section of a
document that collects key sources on a topic and discusses those sources in conversation with each
other (also called synthesis ). If other researchers think that this work is important, even though it is
old, then by all means you should include it in your review. These constructions can be quite
valuable in helping readers understand the data-collection and analysis process. In addition, almost
60 cases underwent surgical treatment before 1990’s, so clinical, imaging and follow-data were
collected with different criteria, nevertheless all available pathological samples have been revised by
expert pathologists. Step 3: Screen the Research All the research that the teams select must be
screened thoroughly to see relevancy and usefulness; this is where you decide whether or not the
studies are eligible to be used in the review. An advantage of meta-analysis is that it has the ability to
be completely objective in evaluating the research parameter. The Institute of Education Sciences and
National Science Foundation (2013) also offer Common Guidelines for Education Research and
Development that can be used to evaluate collected studies. For example, Ghee et al. (2016) referred
to portions of SCCT as their conceptual framework to explain the significance of their work on
students’ self-efficacy and career interests. Other Sections of Your Literature Review Once you've
decided on the organizational method for your literature review, the sections you need to include in
the paper should be easy to figure out because they arise from your organizational strategy. The
conclusion briefly summarises the essay and expresses writer’s opinion of the topic. It also includes
key references to methodological guidelines and useful sources that can be used by eHealth scholars
and researchers for planning and developing reviews. The pyramid includes a variety of evidence
types and levels. Examine a well defined case to identify the essential factors, process and
relationship. In their study, they describe the existing theoretical framework that informs their work
and then present their own conceptual framework. This level of reading should allow the researcher
to demonstrate a mastery in understanding the researched topic, explain the suitability of the
proposed research approach, and point to the need for the refined research question(s). Fink, Arlene.
Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons licence and
your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will
need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. As a result, the researcher may draw on
Vygotsky’s (1978) sociocultural theory of learning and development that is focused on the
phenomenon of student learning in a social setting. A meta-analysis is a quantitative review, in which
the clinical effectiveness is evaluated by calculating the weighted pooled estimate for the
interventions in at least two separate studies. In our study, four tumors, with small size (1.0 ? 1.5 cm)
and located completely in the cortex with no protrusion, were missed by ultrasound. Related
literature is done from books, professional journals, newspapers, magazines, and other publications.
The main difference between literature review and systematic review is their focus on the research
question; a systematic review is focused on a specific research question whereas a literature review is
not. Choose a method that is appropriate for the research topic and explain it in detail. Therefore,
various guidelines have been suggested for conducting systematic reviews and meta-analyses to help
standardize them and improve their quality. They introduce a research question, explain why it is
interesting, review previous research, describe their method and results, and draw their conclusions.
Include techniques and any equipment you used If there were participants in your research, who
were they. These could entail a methodological approach that uses valid and reliable instruments,
observations, or interviews to determine an effect in the studied event. However, as studies have
shown, approximately one-third of colorectal patients experience recurrence after radical surgery
(Harris et al. 2002 ). How to improve the survival and reduce the recurrence of this subset of patients
is becoming an urgent issue. Therefore, in this review, we aim to describe the contents and methods
used in systematic reviews and meta-analyses in a way that is easy to understand for future authors
and readers of systematic review and meta-analysis. Descriptive Vs. Inferential Statistics: The Main
Differences.
Literature reviews should not be so big that there is no clear area of focus; nor should they be so
narrow that no real research question arises. A smaller, well-organized review is definitely preferred
to a review containing many studies that are more or less related to the problem. Describe the
relationship of each work to the others under consideration. They predicted that students in
heterogeneous groups would experience greater improvement in their reasoning abilities and science
achievements with much of the learning guided by the more knowledgeable peers. The group-
specific 5-year overall survival rates were 76.58% in 5-FU implants group and 64.81% in control
group. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. CC BY (Attribution) “ How to
Read an Academic Paper ” by UBCiSchool. Abbreviations Disease-Free Survival Hazard Ratio
Hematoxylin and Eosin Interquartile Range Multiple Ligation-dependent Probe Amplification
Multiple Osteochondromas Osteochondromas Registry of Multiple Osteochondromas Secondary
Peripheral Chondrosarcoma World Health Organization Bovee JV. This is called citation tracking and
there are a number of sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars
from outside of your discipline. Patients and method A total of 165 patients who underwent
colorectal radical surgery at Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, Changsha, Hunan
Province, China, between January 2011 and June 2017 were included in this study. Types of
Literature Reviews It is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three
layers. For example, a literature review that focuses on continuing research about the emergence of
German economic power after the fall of the Soviet Union. Finally, average impact scores increased
over time with two notable growth periods. It can tell you how your study fits into the research
literature. Studying their literature can help you understand countries and regions. Example of a
mixed methods case studyFor a case study of a wind farm development in a rural area, you could
collect quantitative data on employment rates and business revenue, collect qualitative data on local
people’s perceptions and experiences, and analyze local and national media coverage of the
development. Literature Review Helps to gain an understanding of the existing research in that topic
To develop on your own ideas and build your ideas based on the existing knowledge Prevents
duplication of the research done by others Search the existing literature for information. Types of
Literature Reviews It is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of three
layers. You can also start with a classic article or book chapter on your topic, find its record in
PsycINFO (by entering the author’s name or article’s title as a search term), and link from there to a
list of other works in PsycINFO that cite that classic article. Or, does is merely add more of the same
thing being said. J Med Genet. 1983.. Pritchard DJ, Lunke RJ, Taylor WF, Dahlin DC, Medley BE.
Describing both frameworks allows readers to better understand the researchers’ assumptions,
orientations, and understanding of concepts being investigated. Literature searching guide A guide
to finding articles, books and other materials on your subject Doing your literature search video -
University of Reading Brief video on literature searching from our Academic Liaison Librarians.
Wilcox rank sum test and paired t test were performed to investigate the hematologic toxicity within
and between the groups to evaluate whether 5-FU implants would cause additional adverse
reactions. For instance, there may be an instructor effect, recognized bias in the analysis, or issues
with the sample population. It also forces you to write a concise summary or it won’t fit into the
table. Our series comprises also patients younger than 30 years, including, 7 teenager patients had
low grade SPC, except one. The statistical result for the intervention effect, which is generally
considered the most important result in meta-analyses, is the z-test P value. Make a list of keywords
Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research question. Case studies tend to focus on
qualitative data using methods such as interviews, observations, and analysis of primary and
secondary sources (e.g., newspaper articles, photographs, official records).
What are the key concepts and how are they defined. The truth is that writing a literature review is
not easy. Write the case description, the context and the process involved. Physical Review Physics
Education Research, 15 (2), 020101. You can also read a detailed article on this topic here. For
example, Connolly et al. (2018) included a conceptual framework that described how they applied a
theoretical framework of social cognitive career theory (SCCT) to their study on teaching programs
for doctoral students. You can either browse this journal or use the Search within this publication
feature. Imperial College London Imperial College London Latest news. Sabel et al. (2017) created
this model using their interpretations of these two frameworks in the context of their teaching.
FIGURE 1. Conceptual framework from Sabel et al. (2017). A conceptual framework should
describe the relationship among components of the investigation ( Anfara and Mertz, 2014 ). A
literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. According to the theory, the
biology postdoctoral scholars’ dissatisfaction in their descriptions of teaching and learning initiated
change in their knowledge and instruction. Keep a record of the source details of any information
you want to use in your report so that you can reference them accurately. Complications and adverse
effects were evaluated by group t test. This is an evaluative report of information found in the
literature related to a selected are of study. Since different kinds of literature reviews have unique
ways of structuring the reference, it is essential that you do it using the most consistent and
presentable way. Key Takeaways The research literature in psychology is all the published research in
psychology, consisting primarily of articles in professional journals and scholarly books. Following a
systematic review, if it is not possible to form a pooled estimate, it can be published as is without
progressing to a meta-analysis; however, if it is possible to form a pooled estimate from the extracted
data, a meta-analysis can be attempted. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and
interpretations that are shared informally that become part of the lore of field. It helps to acquire
useful knowledge and solve the challenges faced in education. These authors synthesized published
articles that describe the development process of mobile health ( m-health ) interventions for
patients’ cancer care self-management. Bone Joint J. 2021.. Czajka CM, DiCaprio MR. What is the
proportion of patients with multiple Hereditary exostoses who Undergo Malignant Degeneration.
Practice: Use the techniques discussed in this section to find 10 journal articles and book chapters on
one of the following research ideas: memory for smells, aggressive driving, the causes of narcissistic
personality disorder, the functions of the intraparietal sulcus, or prejudice against the physically
handicapped. The grayscale and Color Doppler images of each patient were acquired and saved by
radiologists with more than 5 years of experience in ultrasound examination. Cooper et al. (2019)
illustrate this approach in their study of course-based undergraduate research experiences (CUREs).
The Literature Review: A Few Tips On Conducting It. The FSTA thesaurus will surface results that
would be missed with keyword searching alone. This may be due to the large number of mature
students recruited to this post-experience course. Because not all journals adhere to such standards, it
is important that a researcher review each study to determine the quality of published research, per
the guidelines suggested earlier. Both RRL and RRS is done to understand a subject matter
extensively. ii). Help an individual to understand their topic of interest in-depth. iii). To understand
what has already been discovered about a topic and what needs to be researched further. When there
is a inconsistency in opinions, intervention is required via debate or by a third reviewer.
In other words, the hypothesis, rationale, methods of data collection are first prepared before the
review is conducted so as to minimize any incident of bias. Introduction grabs the attention of the
readers and gives a brief idea about what the whole essay is going to be about. For example, weave
references to other sources into what you are writing but maintain your own voice by starting and
ending the paragraph with your own ideas and wording. The components of a literature review, for
example, are similar to any other research paper. Our products include academic papers of varying
complexity and other personalized services, along with research materials for assistance purposes
only. Focal areas of the review or central terms often connect to assumptions and assertions
associated with the framework that pertain to the phenomenon of interest. In recent years, we have
witnessed the development of related sustained-release drugs, which supported maintaining
intraperitoneal drug concentration for a long time. Describe and use several methods for finding
previous research on a particular research idea or question. Normal distribution Degrees of freedom
Null hypothesis Discourse analysis Control groups Mixed methods research Non-probability
sampling Quantitative research Ecological validity Research bias Rosenthal effect Implicit bias
Cognitive bias Selection bias Negativity bias Status quo bias Cite this Scribbr article If you want to
cite this source, you can copy and paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to
automatically add the citation to our free Citation Generator. Before you can begin conducting and
writing your literature review, you need to ensure that you have systematically identified and sourced
a sufficient range of relevant literature; and in doing so, maintain a sufficiently tight control over the
boundaries. Literature reviews situate the relevance of the study within a topic and a field. However,
the process becomes easier as you complete more papers. As a result, building comprehensive,
critical, purposeful, and concise literature reviews can be a challenge for new biology education
researchers. A literature review’s goal is to provide a foundation of knowledge on the subject. It is
the body of the essay that builds arguments, analyses an issue or elaborates on a concept. Imagine,
for example, that you are interested in the question of whether women and men differ in terms of
their ability to recall experiences from when they were very young. Case studies tend to focus on
qualitative data using methods such as interviews, observations, and analysis of primary and
secondary sources (e.g., newspaper articles, photographs, official records). It also provides evidence
you can refer back to later to help interpret your own results. Ethics declarations Ethics approval and
consent to participate, consent for publication. Main Objective Answer and discuss topics that have
straight answers, such as clinical discussions with no biases. In addition, 32 cases were younger than
30 years and almost the 7% of the cases were younger than 20 years. Here are some examples:
Chronological: The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time, which helps
familiarize the audience with the topic (for instance if you are introducing something that is not
commonly known in your field). A review organized in this manner would shift between time periods
within each section according to the point being made. Good notes means you will have done a lot of
the thinking, synthesising, and interpreting of the literature before you come to write it up and it will
hopefully make the writing process that bit smoother. It is important to keep track of your sources
with citations to avoid plagiarism. You may want to read other literature reviews and get to see the
kind of themes you may incorporate in your review. Case studies are good for describing, comparing,
evaluating and understanding different aspects of a research problem. Protocols and registration In
systematic reviews, prior registration of a detailed research plan is very important. Module 1:
Introduction to conducting systematic reviews. Summarize and Synthesize Remember to summarize
and synthesize your sources within each thematic paragraph as well as throughout the review.