Crafting a literature review is a challenging task that requires meticulous attention to detail and a

comprehensive understanding of the subject matter. This crucial section of academic writing not only
summarizes existing research but also critically analyzes and synthesizes it to form a coherent
narrative.

One of the primary difficulties in writing a literature review lies in identifying relevant sources
amidst the vast sea of academic literature. Sifting through numerous articles, books, and other
scholarly works can be time-consuming and overwhelming. Moreover, synthesizing diverse
viewpoints and arguments into a cohesive framework requires analytical skills and a deep
understanding of the topic.

Furthermore, organizing the literature review into a logical structure can be daunting for many.
Establishing a clear methodology for structuring the review is essential to ensure that it effectively
addresses the research questions or objectives. Without a well-defined structure, the literature review
may lack coherence and fail to provide a comprehensive overview of the existing literature.

For those struggling with the complexities of writing a literature review, seeking professional
assistance can be invaluable. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert guidance and support to navigate the
intricacies of literature review writing. With a team of experienced writers and researchers, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ provides customized literature reviews tailored to meet your specific requirements.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can alleviate the stress and
uncertainty associated with this challenging task. Our writers are proficient in conducting thorough
literature searches, critically analyzing sources, and structuring literature reviews according to the
highest academic standards.

Don't let the difficulties of writing a literature review hinder your academic progress. Order from ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and receive a meticulously crafted literature review that showcases your
scholarly prowess and enhances the quality of your research.
The purpose of the Lit Review is to present a survey of the most relevant and noteworthy published
work that relates to your research, rather than a synopsis of all published work that related to your
topic. The literature review can be challenging for many of our dissertation consulting clients. As the
aim of this summary is to recap key findings in your chapter as they underscore the aims of your
own study, you’ll definitely want to avoid introducing new research findings in the summary. This
helps to demonstrate that you have identified the key research for your topic and is particuarly
important for stand alone literature reviews as this is your method. In addition to page length
requirements, the literature review chapter also commonly has requirements in terms of the number
and types of sources included. Probability sampling involves a random (and therefore representative)
selection of participants from a population, whereas non-probability sampling entails selecting
participants in a non-random (and therefore non-representative) manner. Related items that provide
additional information, but that are not key to understanding the research problem, can be included
in a list of further readings. Resolve conflicts amongst seemingly contradictory previous studies. It
should have a clear introduction, body, and conclusion. Supporting the research methodology: A
literature review can inform the research methodology by identifying appropriate research methods,
data sources, and research questions. A current literature study I’m working on, for example,
investigates impediments to higher education for undocumented students. Methodological
limitations can vary greatly from study to study, ranging from common issues such as time and
budget constraints to issues of sample or selection bias. Moreover, the review should be written in a
way that sets a direction for the entire research. The purpose is to place research in a historical
context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions
for future research. Also, make sure that when you write up your concluding summary, you include
only what you’ve already discussed in your chapter; don’t add any new information. Reply Delete
Replies Reply Unknown 5 February 2018 at 06:02 Wow, great post. It is often used in evidence-
based practice and systematic reviews. All of the elements come together to form a coherent look
(synthesis). You have some chance to do this in your introduction in an article, but the literature
review section gives a more extended opportunity to establish the conversation in the way you would
like your readers to see it. Writing Your Literature Review Once you've settled on how to organize
your literature review, you're ready to write each section. To present the concept you must review,
the research you do must be thorough. For example, quantitative data will often require some initial
preparation such as removing duplicates or incomplete responses. Then, after you’ve identified a
handful of articles that relate to your own topical focus, check out the keywords listed on each of
these studies. Here are some key tips to help you create an exceptional literary analysis: Define Your
Scope Clearly outline the boundaries of your literature review. Second is find strength and
inadequacies of present literature by referring summary. Fields such as biology, chemistry, and
physics commonly use literature reviews. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews:
From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. AMSTAR 2: a
critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of
healthcare interventions, or both. Brit Med J. 2017;358 Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, et al.
Analyzing and synthesizing data: As a final step, members of the review team must collate,
summarize, aggregate, organize, and compare the evidence extracted from the included studies. Use
Caution When Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent
the author's information or opinions accurately and in your own words.
Rapid literature review: This is a quick review that provides a snapshot of the current state of
knowledge on a specific research question or topic. When the review of the literature is complete,
attention should be directed to the theoretical part of the research. The literature review represents a
method because the literature reviewer chooses. So, as you can see, there is a tight link between this
section and the design choices you outlined in earlier sections. There are also several extra points that
may be clarified with the literature review examples. After that, there is an option to highlight the
key points and give recommendations for future studies or research. The academic proofreading tool
has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native English editors. Literature review
Systematic review Meta-analysis Scoping review Research methodology This is a preview of
subscription content, log in via an institution. Akobeng AK. Principles of evidence based medicine. A
great way to start your search is to use your variables of interest as keywords. The Significance of an
Effective Literature Review A strong review plays a crucial role in research papers, offering several
key advantages: Serves Context and Relevance: It provides background and context for your
research, showing its importance within existing knowledge. However, a scoping review isn’t a type
of systematic review. If there’s no previous research, there’s nothing to review. This type of research
is undertaken under strict conditions in a controlled, artificial environment (e.g., a laboratory). By
having firm control over the environment, experimental research typically allows the researcher to
establish causation between variables. This is particularly true in disciplines in medicine and the
sciences where research conducted becomes obsolete very quickly as new discoveries are made.
You’ll then waste a lot of time rewriting in an attempt to try to stitch all the pieces together. Table of
contents What is a systematic review, systematic review vs. Addresses Research Gaps: Identifies
areas where more knowledge is needed, guiding your contributions. JBI Manual for Evidence
Synthesis. JBI; 2020. Available from.. Lorenzetti DL, Topfer L-A, Dennett L, Clement F. But you
can upgrade your membership by going to My Account are clicking on Change Plan. Identifying
potential research questions: A literature review can help to identify potential research questions and
areas for further investigation. Secondly for adaptation of theory and framework there are several
available in relevant theme of the research. Usually, it’s unnecessary, but if an abstract is mentioned
in the requirements, consider adding it to the working plan. As we’ve mentioned, there’s a strong
link between this choice and your research philosophy, so make sure that your choices are tightly
aligned. Consider using transition phrases like the following, or borrow phrasing that you like from
other articles. (It's not plagiarism to use common phrases.). Being focused is essential for a successful
review; however, this must be balanced against the relevance of the review to a broad audience. The
ideal way to demonstrate your research is with a qualitative or quantitative approach. Any lit review
is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure your sources are well-chosen and your research
is thorough. You will find yourself writing and rewriting as you evaluate what you have written. If
publication is an edited one,use the abbreviation “ed” after the name. The most important difference
is the goal: rather than answering a specific question, a scoping review explores a topic.
Exercises for creative writing poetry non-fiction essay sample essays for scholarships for future
teachers lawn maintenance business plan examples start up restaurant business plan sample for a.
This is central to defining a current research gap, and here, we’ll use your study’s foundational
elements, and in particular the research questions, as our guide. Results indicate that the majority of
systematic reviews in this particular area suffer from important methodological flaws and biases that
impair their internal validity and limit their usefulness for clinical and decision-making purposes. It is
often written as part of a thesis, dissertation, or research paper, in order to situate your work in
relation to existing knowledge. The researcher tries to identify the main concepts, theories, and
evidence, as well as gaps in the current research. The choice between a chronological, thematic,
theoretical, or methodological approach depends on the nature of your topic and the goals of your
review. Peters MD, Godfrey CM, Khalil H, McInerney P, Parker D, Soares CB. I real appriciate your
short and remarkable chapter summary Bravo. Guidance on Conducting a Systematic Literature
Review In this article, through a systematic search on the methodology of literature review, we
categorize a typology of literature reviews, discuss steps in conducting a systematic literature review,
and provide suggestions on how to enhance rigor in literature reviews in planning education and
research. Then, you can clarify whether the literature review is part of a bigger effort or if it is a
standalone piece in this section. The point of the methodology chapter is to tell the reader exactly
how you designed your study and, just as importantly, why you did it this way. AMSTAR 2: a
critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-randomised studies of
healthcare interventions, or both. Brit Med J. 2017;358 Sterne JA, Hernan MA, Reeves BC, et al.
The conclusion part holds the key findings of the review. I am currently teaching research methods,
and I have been dealing with your esteemed site for several years, and I found that despite my long
experience with research methods sites, it is one of the smoothest sites for evaluating the material for
students, For this reason, I relied on it a lot in teaching and translated most of what was written into
Arabic and published it on my own page on Facebook. While several research philosophies exist, two
commonly adopted ones are positivism and interpretivism. This is why so many new researchers seek
help from a dissertation consultant when they hit this chapter of their studies. Best practice
guidelines for abstract screening large-evidence systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Second
function is when undertaking so, obviously convey the concept to the reader that the researcher’s
awareness with theories and concept. Selection Methods: Criteria you used to select (and perhaps
exclude) sources in your literature review. Make sure that you let your work put its best foot forward
(metaphorically) by making it look its best. The purpose of this descriptive or mapping review was to
characterize publication trends in the medical informatics literature over a 20-year period (1987 to
2006). Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can be a rewarding exercise in applying
new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem. Risk of plagiarism: It is important to ensure that
literature reviews do not inadvertently contain plagiarism, which can occur when researchers use the
work of others without proper attribution. Give your interpretation of how and why certain
developments occurred. Likewise, a literature review is a portion of the research work, it comprises
evidence that provides an idea of the theoretical works that you take as the root for your study (Get-
thesis, 2019). In order to conduct your search effectively, you need to determine pertinent keywords
that might be associated with research that is pertinent to your own topic. Guidance for conducting
systematic scoping reviews. It provides detailed guidelines on how to complete each step of the
systematic review process. Weaving together the findings of different studies is really pretty difficult
to accomplish. Is it trying to say that what you are studying is niche or has been studied in the past
but not in the same way.
Different areas of your study may be divided into subsections that focus on specific aspects of your
topic. Here, it can be a good idea to use a figure to summarise the key decisions, especially if your
university recommends using a specific model (for example, Saunders’ Research Onion ). There is an
increasing interest in the visual aspects of social media. Write the literature review: Start with an
introduction that provides an overview of the topic and the purpose of the literature review. Do
yourself a favour and start with the end in mind. In order to conduct your search effectively, you
need to determine pertinent keywords that might be associated with research that is pertinent to your
own topic. What is assignment static dhcpWhat is assignment static dhcp homework basketball
dribbling how to write a conclusion for a literary analysis essay best college entrance essay examples
amusement park business plan, the best way to write an essay technology today essays criminal law
topics for research paper example lean problem solving methods sapling online homework chemistry
educational essays. Quality of sources: The quality of the literature reviewed can vary widely, and
not all sources may be reliable or valid. Systematic evaluations should include the following. An
instance of a pupil literature evaluate in psychology and lecturer’s feedback is right here. “”
Guideline collection is coordinated by Helen Mongan-Rallis of the Schooling Division on the
College of Minnesota Duluth. Last, Bandara, Miskon, and Fielt (2011) proposed a structured,
predefined and tool-supported method to identify primary studies within a feasible scope, extract
relevant content from identified articles, synthesize and analyze the findings, and effectively write
and present the results of the literature review. The search strategies are included in the review, along
with details of the databases searched. Conversely, d eductive research takes a top-down approach,
where the researcher starts with a theory or hypothesis and then tests it using specific observations or
data. Pics for creative writing elementary english assignment topics personal narrative essay outlines
for high school endangered species essay example mla format essay scoring rubric high school
doctoral dissertations in musicology online business plan on credit union. Critical Evaluation Critical
evaluation involves assessing the quality and validity of the literature. It is often used in fields where
knowledge is rapidly evolving, such as technology or medicine. Conclusion: Summarize the key
findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance Connect it back to your
primary research question How should I organize my lit review. Literature reviews are commonly
used in fields such as history, literary studies, and philosophy. To synthesize information: A literature
review helps to synthesize the information from multiple sources and present a coherent and
comprehensive picture of the current state of knowledge on the topic. This could include datasets, a
flowchart to show what happened to. You may want to use a Critical reading grid for social science
resources or a CASP tool for specific research types. Although having articles with tips and
recommendations is good, the presence of an accurate sample is much better. In the present context,
the notion of rigour refers to the reliability and validity of the review process described in section
9.2. For one thing, reliability is related to the reproducibility of the review process and steps, which
is facilitated by a comprehensive documentation of the literature search process, extraction, coding
and analysis performed in the review. Qualitative research, on the other hand, often makes use of
collection methods such as interviews, focus groups, participant observations, and ethnography. For
example, you might categorize your sources into those that examine the impact of social media on
self-esteem, those that explore the effects of cyberbullying, and those that investigate the relationship
between social media use and depression. Table of contents What is a systematic review, systematic
review vs. Typically, an expert in a topic will qualitatively summarize and evaluate previous work,
without using a formal, explicit method. It deserves capitals, because it is truly one of the beasts of
academic writing. Step 2: Analyze and Select Sources In the second phase of your research, it is
essential to carefully evaluate and select sources that directly contribute to your research question.
Several research strategies exist, including experimental, case studies, ethnography, grounded theory,
action research, and phenomenology.
The goal is to deliberately document, critically evaluate, and summarize scientifically all of the
research about a clearly defined research problem. Thank you so much!. justdoing my research now,
thanks for the guidance. This is of course your research gap — and if you check out our video on
the problem statement, you’ll see that this gap in knowledge is of central importance in justifying the
need for your study. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27. It should: - Go through our
key themes in order (eg, by importance or chronologically). - Explore relevant material, theme by
theme; - Clearly show why certain studies are important - Draw conclusions from our literature as
we go - Explore the ideas of experts AND our underpinning research theories - Contain all the
materials needed for our research project - Explain how individual studies relate to and advance
theory. Many times per academic article they will say that it is reviewed by peers. For an overview of
Mendeley, have a look at the video below. Free text searching is the use of natural language words to
conduct your search. Literature Review Writing Services Reply Delete Replies Sam Young 30
October 2018 at 09:06 Thanks Jacob. In: Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA,
editors. In order to justify the research gap and stressing knowledge gap, possible only through
review of existing body of knowledge. In other words, a research article uses expert sources as
support for your thesis, whereas a Literature Review discusses the sources. Primary literature sources
are the first occurrence of a piece. This leaves the reader to draw her own conclusions, rather than
developing a clear and original argument As I mentioned earlier, one of the main functions of the
literature review is to provide a clear rationale for your choice of methodological approach in your
study. Glad you enjoyed it:-) Delete Replies Reply Reply Add comment Load more. First of all,
blend discussion and analysis of different studies together within your paragraphs, avoiding the
dreaded “reads like an annotated bibliography” comment from your reviewers. A methodological
scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which these
documents are discussed. Magazines aimed at a wide audience, such as Time, Us, and National
Enquirer, will not provide you with the information you require. In this section, it’s important to be
critical of the shortcomings of your study. If you’d like any assistance as you complete your
literature review, please don’t hesitate to reach out to one of our literature search specialists. The
research philosophy will serve as the core of your study and underpin all of the other research design
choices, so it’s critically important that you understand which philosophy you’ll adopt and why you
made that choice. Analyzing data using quantitative or qualitative methods. Communications of the
Association for Information Systems. 2005; 16:1. Kirkevold M. Integrative nursing research — an
important strategy to further the development of nursing science and nursing practice. It’s very
important to keep a meticulous record of why you included or excluded each article. Their in-depth
analysis of the literature signalled that there is little solid evidence from randomized controlled trials
or other studies through the use of phr s. The literature review is one of the first and most crucial
tasks in producing an academic paper. A literature review is a type of review that uses a less
systematic and formal approach than a systematic review. Demonstrates why a topic is significant to
a subject area. Problem-oriented literature review: This review focuses on a specific problem or issue
and examines the literature to identify potential solutions or interventions. Hoboken, nj: Wiley-
Blackwell; 2008. Jesson J., Matheson L., Lacey F.M. Doing your literature review: traditional and
systematic techniques.
These authors synthesized published articles that describe the development process of mobile health
( m-health ) interventions for patients’ cancer care self-management. Many people would prefer to sit
down and read an article than sit down and craft what they have already read. Second point is
effective literature review enable the researcher to develop theories from the past knowledge. In
other words, a research article uses expert sources as support for your thesis, whereas a Literature
Review discusses the sources. As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other
scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on
a topic. And, we’ll stay with you through any additional feedback from your advisors. Much of the
information used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be
not only partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the
larger conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic.
The Literature Review: A Few Tips On Conducting It. All in all, 130 articles met the criteria and
their data were extracted manually into a database. The literature review is one of the first and most
crucial tasks in producing an academic paper. The conclusion part holds the key findings of the
review. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-
randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. Brit Med J. 2017;358 Sterne JA, Hernan
MA, Reeves BC, et al. Chronological The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic
over time. The choice between a chronological, thematic, theoretical, or methodological approach
depends on the nature of your topic and the goals of your review. When you’ve answered the main
questions and achieved the set goals, sharing your thoughts is a wise solution, especially if you
disagree with something and need to support any points of view. For this reason, I will speak to the
literature review, revealing tips and tricks relating to it, in three different posts. Your finished chapter
will be presented in clear and concise academic prose, so that the focus remains on synthesis and
analysis of research to prove the need for your proposed study. If you are writing the literature
review as part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate your central problem or research question and
give a brief summary of the scholarly context. Generally, you should use both approaches together
whenever possible. To achieve this goal, the researcher shows the ability in critically engage with
contemporary scholarly work which is possible by literature review of latest scholar work. Now
equipped with the essential steps to start your literature review, you're set on the right path.
Examples of Literature Review Here’s an example of how a literature review can be conducted for a
thesis on the topic of “ The Impact of Social Media on Teenagers’ Mental Health”: Start by
identifying the key terms related to your research topic. Look for peer-reviewed articles, books, and
other academic sources that are relevant to your research question or topic. Parts of Literature
Review Parts of a literature review are as follows: Introduction The introduction of a literature
review typically provides background information on the research topic and why it is important. Yet,
if you find yourself facing challenges or needing additional support, our expert essay writing service
is here for you. Further he explained that, literature review expose a summary sources which
researcher gone through while doing research and prove to your readers how researcher study fits
into the larger field of study. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic.
You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. Literature review
permits the researchers to enter into a critical engagement with the existing theories, concepts,
analysis, information and relevant authors. Inductive research takes a bottom-up approach, where the
researcher begins with specific observations or data and then draws general conclusions or theories
from those observations.