Title: Mastering the Art of Literature Review Writing

Crafting a literature review can often feel like navigating through a labyrinthine maze of scholarly
articles, research papers, and academic texts. It requires not only a keen understanding of the subject
matter but also a meticulous approach to synthesis and analysis. As one of the most crucial
components of any academic paper, mastering the art of literature review writing is essential for
students and researchers alike.

The Challenges of Writing a Literature Review

One of the primary challenges of writing a literature review lies in the sheer volume of available
literature on any given topic. Sifting through countless articles and publications to identify relevant
sources can be a daunting task, requiring considerable time and effort. Additionally, synthesizing
diverse perspectives and findings into a coherent narrative requires both critical thinking skills and a
comprehensive understanding of the subject matter.

Moreover, ensuring that the literature review is structured logically and flows smoothly can be
challenging for many writers. Organizing the information in a way that effectively supports the
research objectives while maintaining clarity and coherence is no small feat.

Why ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔?

At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we understand the difficulties that students and researchers face when
tasked with writing literature reviews. That's why we offer expert assistance tailored to your specific
needs. Our team of skilled writers is adept at conducting thorough literature reviews across a wide
range of disciplines.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can:

1. Save Time: Our experienced writers will conduct comprehensive literature searches and
synthesis, allowing you to focus on other aspects of your research.
2. Ensure Quality: We adhere to the highest academic standards, ensuring that your literature
review is well-researched, organized, and articulate.
3. Receive Customized Support: Whether you need assistance with identifying relevant
sources, structuring your literature review, or refining your analysis, our team is here to help.

Don't let the challenges of literature review writing impede your academic success. Order your
literature review from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and experience the difference our expertise can
make.
Methods and analysis The scoping review framework first outlined by Arksey and O’Malley and
improved on by Levac et al was used to guide the development of this scoping review protocol.
Biomedicines. 2022;10(4):874. Article CAS PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Lo Russo L,
Guida L, Mariani P, Ronsivalle V, Gallo C, Cicciu M, et al. What are the strengths and weaknesses
of the research. Writing the introduction In the introduction, you should: Define or identify the
general topic, issue, or area of concern, thus providing an appropriate context for reviewing the
literature. Workers Education Association, founded in New Zealand in 1915 and still providing.
Emerging roles of the Iron chelators in inflammation. All eleven RCTs reported the results in terms
of pain intensity by VAS. Writing a Short Literature Review Write section introduction and
conclusion paragraphs. More Features Connections Canva Create professional content with Canva,
including presentations, catalogs, and more. A literature review also includes a critical evaluation of
the material; this is why it is called a literature review rather than a literature report. If you are
writing the literature review section of a dissertation or research paper, you will search for literature
related to your research objectives and questions. Further Readings Generative AI and Writing USC
Libraries Tutorials and Other Guides Bibliography A literature review surveys prior research
published in books, scholarly articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of
research, or theory, and by so doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of
these works in relation to the research problem being investigated. Walau bagaimanapun, Boyd
(2010) berpandangan pesimistik terhadap. To achieve this ambitious objective, the authors performed
a bibliometric analysis of medical informatics citations indexed in medline using publication trends,
journal frequencies, impact factors, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term frequencies, and
characteristics of citations. Historical Review Few things rest in isolation from historical precedent.
Your interpretation of the available sources must be backed up with evidence to show that what you
are saying is valid. Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transitions and topic sentences to draw
connections, comparisons and contrasts. History: The chronological progression of the field, the
literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the literature
review is not already a chronology. When doing and writing a literature review, it is good practice to:
summarise and analyse previous research and theories; identify areas of controversy and contested
claims; highlight any gaps that may exist in research to date. Only 4 out of 11 RCT trials overall
showed a minimal risk of bias. Is there any detailed template, additional to this. Remember that you
can use our template to summarise and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. In other words,
your introduction needs to give the reader a taste of what’s to come, and how you’re going to lay
that out. GIFs Highlight your latest work via email or social media with custom GIFs. A low risk of
bias was identified by the randomization technique for all studies. Journal of experimental
criminology, 10, 487-513. Reith, T. P. (2018). Burnout in United States healthcare professionals: a
narrative review. However, particularly in the social sciences, thinking about research problems from
multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to a problem or gaining a new
perspective. How many people volunteer in Australia and why do they. In their systematic review,
Sinha and Warfa 16 found minority ethnic individuals in the UK and the USA were less likely to
seek and receive ED treatment as well as less frequently diagnosed and referred to specialist ED
services. We provide such advantages as high-quality and original writing, reasonable fees, and
timely delivery of papers.
Some databases to search for journals and articles include: Your university’s library catalogue
Google Scholar Project Muse (humanities and social sciences) Medline (life sciences and
biomedicine) EconLit (economics) Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science) You can use
boolean operators to help narrow down your search: Read the abstract to find out whether an article
is relevant to your question. How will you further your research as a result of the review? IV. In
order to minimize the risk of omitting eligible studies not captured by the original search, they
supplemented all electronic searches with manual screening of trial registers and references contained
in the included studies. The Balanced Scorecard (ibid) already in use in some school. Studies in
which no clinical data and complex interventions were excluded. The typology of literature reviews
we used herein will allow eHealth researchers, graduate students and practitioners to gain a better
understanding of the similarities and differences between review types. A third reviewer (SM) may
be consulted for arbitration of any conflicting decisions. A low risk of bias was identified by the
randomization technique for all studies. Critical thinking As with other forms of academic writing,
your literature review needs to demonstrate good academic practice by following the Code of
Student Conduct and acknowledging the work of others through citing and referencing your
sources. Kiziloglu - 2015 - The effect of organizational learning on firm innovation c. Unlike other
reviews, this one has beginning, a middle and an end. Galvan, Jose L. Galvan Item Width 178mm
Item Weight 549g Number of Pages 288 Pages About this product Product Information This useful
guide educates students in the preparation of literature reviews for term projects, theses, and
dissertations. The waves of change in organisational management have both informed and been. The
main focus of an academic research paper is to develop a new argument, and a research paper is
likely to contain a literature review as one of its parts. Reading combined with critical analysis can
help to refine a topic and frame research questions. This theory explains why the intraoral
musculature, the temporalis muscle, the submandibular and posterior mandibular regions, which did
not receive the direct and localized action of the laser, also showed diminution or remission of the
algic symptom in the control group. Yet, you must understand that striving to deliver the best
customer experience, we test, interview, and challenge candidates really tough and only hire the best-
performing applicants. PDF version of this title (4.5M) Disable Glossary Links In this Page
Introduction Overview of the Literature Review Process and Steps Types of Review Articles and
Brief Illustrations Concluding Remarks Related information PMC PubMed Central citations
PubMed Links to PubMed Recent Activity Chapter 9?Methods for Literature Reviews - Handbook
of eHealth Evaluation: An Ev. Usually you will need to synthesize research rather than just
summarizing it. If your review is a standalone project, you need to ensure that the topic you choose
aligns with the research questions and is current. Literature sources may also be grouped based on
similar arguments or conclusions. Results indicate that the majority of systematic reviews in this
particular area suffer from important methodological flaws and biases that impair their internal
validity and limit their usefulness for clinical and decision-making purposes. The focus of a literature
review is to summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others without adding new
contributions, whereas academic research papers present and develop new arguments that build upon
the previously available body of literature. The already difficult challenge of developing the
capability (suitable processes. The specialists of our service synthesize and critically evaluate them to
deliver a detailed and objective copy. For guidance on formatting citations, please see the UNC
Libraries citation tutorial. Follow the formatting and citation guidelines for your discipline. To
achieve this, your literature review needs a well-thought-out structure. 15 Literature Review
Examples (2024) Also known as a traditional literature review, the narrative review provides a broad
overview of the studies done on a particular topic. Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing the
literature to examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their literature
review sections. First, exhaustive coverage means an effort is made to be as comprehensive as
possible in order to ensure that all relevant studies, published and unpublished, are included in the
review and, thus, conclusions are based on this all-inclusive knowledge base.
The over-expression of miRNA-206 in peripheral blood of patients with burning mouth syndrome
and its relationship with anxiety and depression. You do proper evaluation of the discovered sources
and your readers should know for sure that academic sources are valid. What are the strengths and
weaknesses of the research. Lasers Med Sci. 2023;38(1):92. Baxter GD, Bleakley C, McDonough S.
Creating them can provide inspiration for one’s own research, as well as some practice in writing.
Also, consider going through sample reviews to find models that can guide and simplify working on
literature review format for research paper. The body of your literature review should do just as the
description of this chapter suggests. Check the basic literature review format and elements used in
the example. For example, a review that examines literature supporting or refuting an argument,
assumption, or philosophical problem related to the research problem will also need to include
writing supported by sources that establish the history of these arguments in the literature. Below are
the general guidelines on which this part is usually based. The purpose is to place research in a
historical context to show familiarity with state-of-the-art developments and to identify the likely
directions for future research. What types of sources should I review (books, journal articles,
websites; scholarly versus popular sources)? 3. This fact is significant for every literature review
writing service, and ours isn’t an exception. Remember that you can use our template to summarise
and evaluate sources you’re thinking about using. The MeSH term analysis also suggested a strong
interdisciplinary trend. Add Links Send readers directly to specific items or pages with shopping and
web links. Adobe Express Go from Adobe Express creation to Issuu publication. Data to be
extracted will include some standard information about the paper. Find out more about your rights as
a buyer and exceptions. The already difficult challenge of developing the capability (suitable
processes. Consult with a librarian about identifying research databases in other disciplines; almost
every field of study has at least one comprehensive database devoted to indexing its research
literature. Stage 2: identifying the relevant literature Information sources. Generally, the purpose of a
review is to analyze critically a segment of a published body of knowledge through summary,
classification, and comparison of prior research studies, reviews of literature, and theoretical articles.
With a few paragraphs divided up with subheadings, the writing gets higher readability as people can
find the needed information in the chosen sections. What types of sources (books, journal articles,
websites). An rQES team, in particular, cannot afford any extra time or resource requirements that
might arise from either a misunderstanding of the review question, an unclear picture of user
requirements or an inappropriate choice of methods. Are you aware of literature review models,
types, and elements. Working by way of PsychArticles she discovered three seemingly articles. Help
Center Here you'll find an answer to your question. In order to increase the probability of finding a
simpler and more appropriate tool.
Last but not least, if it’s your intention to develop a conceptual framework for your dissertation or
thesis, the conclusion section is a good place to present this. What are the strengths and weaknesses
of the research. Use caution when paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be
sure to represent the author’s information or opinions accurately and in your own words. My
question is that do I put all the variables into a single conceptual framework or each hypothesis will
have it own conceptual framework. Then, the analysis of the abstracts excluded articles that clearly
did not satisfy the eligibility criteria. Relevant literature will also be identified from the reference
lists of included studies. Evaluate the current “state of the art” for the body of knowledge reviewed,
pointing out major methodological flaws or gaps in research, inconsistencies in theory and findings,
and areas or issues pertinent to future study. One of the most highly cited scoping reviews in the
eHealth domain was published by Archer, Fevrier-Thomas, Lokker, McKibbon, and Straus (2011).
For example, if you were researching which factors contributed towards people trusting an
organisation, you might find themes such as consumers’ perceptions of an organisation’s
competence, benevolence and integrity. Meticulous editing and proofreading will rid your piece of
grammar errors, embarrassing typos, annoying citation style inconsistencies, and gruesome factual
mistakes. Even when paraphrasing an author’s work, you still must provide a citation to that work. V.
Common Mistakes to Avoid These are the most common mistakes made in reviewing social science
research literature. Create an order for your paragraph summaries (try this with just 3-4 paragraphs
that relate). For professionals, they are useful reports that keep them up to date with what is current
in the field. Draft an Article Summary Paragraph (3-4 of these will become your Short Literature
Review). Does your paper have a focus, and how clearly has it been stated. Supplemental material
This content has been supplied by the author(s). Starting is the hardest thing, especially if it’s a
literature review. Teams Enable groups of users to work together to streamline your digital
publishing. Darlow and Wen (2015) provide a good example of a highly structured narrative review
in the eHealth field. A literature review in this sense is just like any other academic research paper.
Works consulted We consulted these works while writing this handout. After an overview of similar
strategic measuring tools in industry (Fitzgerald et al. As such, as new information becomes
available, literature reviews grow in length or become focused on one specific aspect of the topic.
Systematic Review Examples This type of literature review is more structured and rigorous than a
narrative review. We will provide a descriptive numerical summary of the characteristics of included
studies. This paper will argue that KPIs for voluntary ACE must strike the correct balance. Thematic:
If you have found some recurring central themes that you will continue working with throughout
your piece, you can organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of
the topic. To illustrate the difference between reporting and reviewing, think about television or film
review articles. Missed appointments are a major cause of inefficiency in healthcare delivery with
substantial monetary costs to health systems. These authors sought to assess whether mobile phone-
based appointment reminders delivered through Short Message Service ( sms ) or Multimedia
Messaging Service ( mms ) are effective in improving rates of patient attendance and reducing overall
costs. View inline Glossary of important terms (alphabetically) As with other resource-constrained
reviews, no one size fits all.
I am doing a research on nanofluids how can l structure it. Hire a verified Ph.D. and get a thorough
overview of topic-relevant sources. Since we are aware of it, writing specialists complete every
review from scratch. Treatment of headache disorders with acupuncture: a 6-year retrospective study.
For example, the team of professional editors will expertly revise and refine a paper you've put
together but don't have time or inspiration to polish to perfection. The understanding here is that the
reading combined with critical analysis of sources can help you refine your topic and frame your
project questions. In the last 36 months, he received royalties from Systematic Approaches To a
Successful Literature Review (Sage 3rd edition), honoraria from the Agency for Healthcare Research
and Quality, and travel support from the WHO. However, with the chronological approach, the
emphasis is very firmly on how the discussion has evolved over time, as opposed to how all the
literature links together (which we’ll discuss next ). While the study focuses on one topic, harpoon
technology, it will still be organized chronologically. This is of particular importance given prompt
diagnosis and intervention can improve ED treatment outcomes and recovery prospects. 28 In this
scoping review, we aim to examine the extent, range and nature of research activity into disordered
eating and EDs among minority ethnic populations in the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand.
Both published and grey literature (e.g., theses) will be considered for inclusion. Embed Host your
publication on your website or blog with just a few clicks. Use Caution When Paraphrasing When
paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author's information or opinions
accurately and in your own words. Payment details Payment methods Accepted, Eligibility for
PayPal Credit is determined at checkout. Your devotion to the topic will be shown in your presented
thematic analysis, and you will be able to construct the text body on it. Technology started
developing at a rate that necessitated more and ongoing. Option 3: Methodological The
methodological option is a way of structuring your literature review by the research methodologies
used. Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and weaknesses of your sources. Ballantine, J. and
Brignall, S., (1994). A Taxonomy of Performance Measurement. While the study focuses on one
topic, the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics, it would still be organized
chronologically reflecting technological developments in media. Describe the relationship of each
work to the others under consideration. Periodically, UT Libraries runs a workshop covering the
basics and library support for literature reviews. Chapter 9?Methods for Literature Reviews -
Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based Approach Your browsing activity is empty.
The landscape then shows the reader that the writer has assimilated most of the previous essential
works on the subject into the present study. In summary, the review team should consider privileging
rich qualitative studies 2; consider a stepwise approach to inclusion of qualitative data and explore
the possibility of sampling ( table 2, item R5). Begin composing Once you’ve settled on a general
pattern of organization, you’re ready to write each section. Make a list of keywords Start by creating
a list of keywords related to your research topic. If you are writing a literature review as a stand-
alone assignment, you will have to choose a focus and develop a central question to direct your
search. What are the central themes and categories used by the researchers. Prevalence of oral
behaviours in general dental patients attending a university clinic in Italy.
Development of the Literature Review Four Basic Stages of Writing 1. Overall, the outcomes of the
quality assessment of included RCT studies are reported in Fig. 4. By applying the RoB 2, all the 11
RCTs studies revealed high, low, and unclear risk of bias in some key domains. Instantaneous dental
implant loading technique by fixed dentures: A retrospective cohort study. After an overview of
similar strategic measuring tools in industry (Fitzgerald et al. It is not enough for a review to be a
summary of the latest growth in the literature: the. For instance, most science-based subjects demand
that the evidence you consult be from the latest studies and updated theoretical frameworks. Or it
might trace the intellectual progression of the field, including major debates. The authors found that
the literature lacks clarity about how naturalness is defined and measured, but also found that food
consumption is significantly influenced by perceived naturalness of goods. Systematic Reviews in
the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. When you’ve answered the main questions and achieved the
set goals, sharing your thoughts is a wise solution, especially if you disagree with something and
need to support any points of view. As another methodological contribution, vom Brocke et al.
(2009) offered a series of guidelines for conducting literature reviews, with a particular focus on
how to search and extract the relevant body of knowledge. Use of this site constitutes acceptance of
our terms and conditions of fair use. The efficacy of acupuncture and decompression splints in the
treatment of temporomandibular joint pain-dysfunction syndrome. For professionals, they are useful
reports that keep them up to date with what is current in the field. Use these successful examples as
a starting point for understanding how other writers have approached the challenging and important
task of situating their idea in the context of established research. Argumentative Review This form
examines literature selectively in order to support or refute an argument, deeply embedded
assumption, or philosophical problem already established in the literature. Transitioning to chronic
temporomandibular disorder pain: A combination of patient vulnerabilities and iatrogenesis. You will
have to demonstrate valid and interesting findings in the field after the conducted analysis. Workers
Education Association, founded in New Zealand in 1915 and still providing. It provides an
overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories, methods, and gaps in the
existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or dissertation topic. Referencing and
reference management Information Services provide access to Cite them right online which is a
guide to the main referencing systems and tells you how to reference just about any source (EASE
log-in may be required). Print Friendly 15 Literature Review Examples Literature reviews are a
necessary step in a research process and often required when writing your research proposal. For
example, a literature review that focuses on continuing research about the emergence of German
economic power after the fall of the Soviet Union. It goes without saying that it is impossible for a
human being to find all the relevant sources and read them thoroughly to see whether they can be
used in the dissertation. Strategy into Action, Harvard Business School Press: Boston, MA. In the
conclusion, you should summarise the key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasise
their significance. That said, this approach can be utilised by anyone that wants to explore change
over time. Bourne, 2000, p.17). Its purported advantages over traditional systems are seen in.
Reviewing the literature for entails critical evaluation of sources, looking for gaps, and interrogating
what the findings mean for your planned study. By providing examples of academic papers written
by our writers, we prove that our professionals are worth your trust.