Understanding the Relationship Between Literature Review and Conceptual Framework

When it comes to academic research, the literature review and conceptual framework play crucial
roles in shaping the direction and scope of a study. These two components are often intertwined, yet
distinct in their purposes. In this article, we delve into the relationship between literature review and
conceptual framework, shedding light on their significance and how they complement each other in
research endeavors.

The literature review serves as a comprehensive survey of existing scholarly works relevant to the
research topic. It involves systematically analyzing and synthesizing published studies, books,
articles, and other sources to establish the current state of knowledge in the field. By examining prior
research, scholars can identify gaps, trends, conflicting findings, and theoretical perspectives that
inform their own study.

However, crafting a literature review is not a straightforward task. It requires critical thinking,
meticulous attention to detail, and the ability to discern relevant information from a vast array of
sources. Researchers must navigate through the complexities of existing literature, evaluate the
credibility of sources, and integrate diverse viewpoints to provide a coherent overview of the topic.

Moreover, the literature review sets the stage for developing the conceptual framework of a study. A
conceptual framework is a theoretical framework that outlines the key concepts, variables,
relationships, and assumptions underlying the research. It serves as a roadmap for guiding the
investigation, helping researchers conceptualize their study's scope, objectives, and theoretical
underpinnings.

The relationship between the literature review and conceptual framework is symbiotic. The literature
review informs the development of the conceptual framework by providing empirical evidence,
theoretical insights, and conceptual models that guide the formulation of research hypotheses and the
identification of relevant variables. Conversely, the conceptual framework gives structure and
coherence to the literature review by organizing the existing knowledge into a conceptual framework
that frames the research questions and hypotheses.

Navigating through the intricacies of crafting a literature review and conceptual framework can be
daunting for many researchers. It requires time, expertise, and resources to conduct a thorough
review of the literature and develop a robust conceptual framework that aligns with the research
objectives. For those who find themselves overwhelmed by these tasks, seeking assistance from
professionals can be immensely beneficial.

At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we understand the challenges that researchers face in crafting literature

reviews and conceptual frameworks. Our team of experienced academic writers specializes in
providing comprehensive literature review writing services tailored to your specific research needs.
Whether you need assistance in conducting a literature search, synthesizing existing research, or
developing a conceptual framework, our experts are here to help.

By outsourcing your literature review and conceptual framework writing needs to ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔, you can save time, alleviate stress, and ensure the quality and rigor of your research. Our
dedicated team works closely with you to understand your research objectives, preferences, and
expectations, delivering customized solutions that meet your requirements.
Don't let the complexities of writing a literature review and conceptual framework hinder your
research progress. Trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to provide you with expert assistance and support
every step of the way. Order now and take the first step towards crafting a compelling literature
review and conceptual framework that lays the foundation for your research success.
The conceptual model incorporates these tenets into a framework for assessing sustainability. First,
community coalitions create collaborative capacity among diverse organizations, including health
care providers, community groups, grassroots organizations, faith-based groups, universities, and
government agencies. Finally, the coalition disseminated health education materials throughout the
community. This report is part of a larger study that is funded by the Office of the Assistant Secretary
for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) at the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS).
Cutler (2002) notes that the sustainability challenge for community-based initiatives is identifying
resources that can be used to convene members, hire staff, build collaborative capacity, and plan for
the future. The theoretical framework is the foundation on which the entire research project is based.
logically. Project design and implementation factors are related to the resources available to the
program (e.g., staff time, financial resources). As such, it is important to clearly define what is meant
by the term “community coalition.”. Multi-perspective, Systems-based (MPSB) concepts in the
Multi-perspective. Second, several of the models have highlighted that there are different contextual
factors that affect sustainability. However, research has not suggested an appropriate length of time
to fund a coalition or program. The local health department has continued the patient navigation
services. Community capacity and outcomes are the ultimate goals of the collaborative, with the
community having the ability to pursue its own goals in the future. Specifically, Butterfoss,
Lachance, and Orians (2006) found that contextual factors such as politics, the history of
collaboration among member organizations in the coalition, geography, and community readiness can
impact coalition formation. In the third case, none of a sustained community coalition’s original
activities have been sustained. The recommended citation follows: Office of Health Policy,
ASPE(2010) Developing a Conceptual Framework to Assess the Sustainability of Community
Coalitions Post-Federal Funding. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall at the University of Chicago. Together
these frameworks have informed the CCAT’s presentation of the stages of development and
implementation, core components of effective coalitions, and the interaction of context and
outcomes that impact a coalition’s formation and success. The key emphasis of the model is that
there are factors associated with value creation and sustainability. This coalition would be
considered partially sustained and expanded. There is debate in the philanthropic literature about
whether foundations are more effective when they operate with a limited life span and have to
spend down their resources at a predetermined point in time. Other community coalitions continue to
evolve since they were initially federally funded, addressing their original goals and expanding to
work toward new goals. This section discusses why each of these characteristics is related to
sustainability in community coalitions. This model, shown in Exhibit 4.5, conveys the transition from
project initiation to intermediate and long-term outcomes, using a logic model framework. Strategic
vision helps coalition members to understand the future direction of the coalition, and to recognize
the benefits of their participation (Foster-Fishman et al., 2001). A vision statement might describe
the impact that members want the coalition to have over a certain period of time (Butterfoss, 2007).
Specifically, grantee collaboration (i.e., the collaboration occurring within each funded collaborative)
was measured according to four levels: collaboration, coordination, contribution, and communication
occurring amongst the grantees. Thus, research should begin comparing the combinations of factors
across models to better understand the characteristics, capacities, and conditions that foster
community coalition sustainability. Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, Rockville, MD.
Systematic review of published literature (databases) 2.Basic review of grey literature (web) 3. The
theoretical framework is most often not something readily found within the literature.
First, many definitions of sustainability focus on specific aspects of program and coalition
operations. The second component is to include evaluation as an integrated part of the planning and
management of program activities. Is success defined in terms of the sustainability of the coalition or
its activities and impacts. To be considered sustained, coalitions must have an alliance of three or
more organizations that are addressing one or more of the original goals of the coalition. Butterfoss
(2007) notes that the development of structure, rules, and responsibilities early in a coalition’s
development enables community coalitions to operate effectively. A charismatic leader or highly
motivated project manager may also be critical to moving the coalition through difficult times.
Evaluations of community coalitions must be linked to a solid logic model or theory in order to
assess coalitions’ impacts at multiple levels within the community and their sustainability. Example:
If employees are more healthy, then they will take sick leave less frequently. Close Menu Home
Shop About Tins Plastic Tubs and Canisters Corporate Gifts Special Events Locations Contact Wow
look at this. Sectors include health, public health, substance abuse and mental health, education,
social services, and faith organizations, among others. Writing a conceptual framework can not only
help to guide your thesis to ensure. First, by building on the well-accepted Feighery and Rogers
definition, findings about the sustainability of community coalitions generated with this definition
can be compared to other findings in the literature. Little research has addressed the more subjective
question of whether community coalitions should be sustained. Both the CCAT and Empowerment
Theory highlight the impact of contextual factors, suggesting their importance in predicting coalition
effectiveness. Coalitions may choose to appoint a single decision maker, a group of decision makers,
use majority rule, or require consensus. In an analysis of the dynamics of four partnerships and their
potential for sustainability, Alexander et al. (2003) found that member organizations struggled to
balance their time and commitment between the coalition and their home organization, which
affected the long-term sustainability of the coalition. This chapter had focused on providing the
reader with the background of the study the articulation of the research problem the purpose and
objectives of the study the research questions and the rationale for each research question as well as
the hypothesized outcomes of the study the limitations of the research and the theoretical
framework. The required complexity or quality of research of a thesis or dissertation can vary by
country university or program and the required minimum study period may thus vary significantly in
duration. The program sought to overcome the fragmented nature of safety net care by bringing
together the major players of a community and providing funds to address problems that could not be
adequately addressed by individual providers or organizations. These factors relate to the ability of
the community collaborative to influence community conditions at a point in time. Additionally, the
findings of this study will be of value for the development of code-switching studies in the socio
linguistic area. For example, suppose a community coalition was originally working toward two
goals: improving coordination among providers in the community, and reducing the cost of insurance
for the underserved. The conceptual model also provides a method for evaluators to assess why
some community coalitions have not been sustained over time. The intermediate outcomes of the
sustainability effort are those elements that could be sustained, including the partnership itself, the
activities, and the community capacities. This report is part of a larger study that is funded by the
Office of the Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation (ASPE) at the U.S. Department of
Health and Human Services (HHS). Practice-based intellectual learning for the generation of client-
based systems. The overall aim of the two frameworks is to make research findings more. As a result,
researchers have crafted detailed conceptual models that define sustainability in the context of the
coalitions that are being evaluated. Funders that are focused on the sustainability of the community
coalition may choose to fund coalitions that have a solid plan for securing future resources for
operational costs (e.g., meetings). In contrast, funders that are interested in the sustainability of the
coalition’s activities and impacts may want to fund coalitions that have plans for institutionalizing
their activities in other organizations at the end of the project. KK Ho e-resources blog September 9
(url address: ).
This is an example of a sustained coalition that sustained all of its original activities. This framework
indicates that coalitions move through different stages of development over time, and that a variety
of factors can affect their development. After refining your problem statement and research
questions you have to explore what theories ideas and models other researchers have already
developedoften there will be a lot of different possible approaches to the topic so you have to select
the ideas that you find most useful. Social services organizations may include child care providers,
food aid programs, and juvenile justice programs. Faith organizations may include churches,
synagogues, and mosques. The models also highlight different coalition-specific and contextual
factors that affect sustainability. In response to this new information, the HCAP coalition
discontinued its original activities, and conducted new activities that address transportation needs in
rural areas. Theoretical framework for the study 13 pedagogical content knowledge pck shulman
19878 defines pck as representing the blending of content and pedagogy into an understanding of
how particular topics problems or issues are organized represented and adapted to the diverse
interests and abilities of learners and presented for instruction my. A charismatic leader or highly
motivated project manager may also be critical to moving the coalition through difficult times.
Community coalitions may receive resources from government agencies, foundations, businesses,
academic institutions, community-based organizations, faith-based organizations, and other
organizations such as the United Way. May 24 2019. Its purpose is to establish a framework for the
research so that readers can understand how it is related to other research wilkinson 1991 p. Is
success defined in terms of the sustainability of the coalition or its activities and impacts. Operations
and processes are the coalition’s mechanisms for communication among staff and members, decision-
making, and conflict management. This model and framework provide an understanding of
Empowerment Theory in relation to community coalitions. Each community coalition is formed for
different reasons and seeks to accomplish a unique set of goals. Amanda Hodgson, MLIS Sarah
Normandin, BSc, MLIS CE Course May 26, 2008 CHLA 2008. For example, coalitions that include
organizations with a history of collaboration are more likely to survive post-funding because the
organizations often have proven methods for collaboration. A review and commentary on empirical
studies of program sustainability. The theoretical framework is the foundation on which the entire
research project is based. logically. For example, if there is a high degree of conflict in the
environment due to social issues or cultural values, it may be difficult to create change. For the
purposes of this assessment, there are three types of impacts. The Community Coalition Action
Theory was used to evaluate 1,369 initiatives conducted by 11 different community coalitions with a
focus on cancer prevention. For Later 100% (1) 100% found this document useful (1 vote) 1K views
1 page Differences Between Theoritical Framework and Conceptual Framework Uploaded by Ezan
Rosnizan sharing Full description Save Save Differences Between Theoritical Framework and Conc.
To browse Academia.edu and the wider internet faster and more securely, please take a few seconds
to upgrade your browser. The federal government and foundations continue to invest in community
coalitions to improve outcomes at the local level. It is a way to discover what other research in the
area of your. While the conceptual model will be used to guide the current study, it also has
implications for community coalitions, evaluators, and funders, in general. Example: If employees are
more healthy, then they will take sick leave less frequently. Box D are the activities that are
undertaken to increase the likelihood of sustainability. In fact, it’s quite likely that you’ll include
both in your dissertation or thesis, especially if your research aims involve investigating relationships
between variables. Community linkages refer to the partnership’s ability to develop working
relationships with institutions and individuals, and incorporate direct community input.
Traditional program evaluation methods are often ill-suited to capture the dynamic nature of
community coalitions. A quick search on Google Scholar using some well-considered keywords
generally provides a good starting point. Minimizes the risk of pursuing the dead ends in the
research. The community context can affect the coalition at any stage. Community coalitions help
their communities develop the capacity to build social capital that can be applied to other health and
social issues (Fawcett et al., 1995). Coalitions are able to build capacity because they facilitate
interaction across numerous sectors of a community, which mobilizes human resources and better
positions the community to respond to social needs (Fawcett et al., 1995). Given that the coalition’s
initial funding has ended, it may engage in a number of actions in order to sustain itself—from
creating a sustainability plan to identifying homes for programs and services. Design a theoretical
framework for the current research. Key research questions addressed in the literature review
include. Other community coalitions continue to evolve since they were initially federally funded,
addressing their original goals and expanding to work toward new goals. Given the internal
dynamics of coalitions, the changing economic landscape, and other contextual factors, achieving
sustainability can be a great challenge. Community coalitions may receive resources from
government agencies, foundations, businesses, academic institutions, community-based
organizations, faith-based organizations, and other organizations such as the United Way. Is success
defined in terms of the sustainability of the coalition or its activities and impacts. At the most basic
level, the model shows that a community coalition is either sustained or not sustained post initial
federal funding. The theoretical framework is the foundation on which the entire research project is
based. logically. In the course of preparing your research paper as one of the requirements for your
course as an undergraduate or graduate student you will need to write the conceptual framework of
your study. First, the model provides a concrete definition of sustainability that can be used in
subsequent evaluations of community coalitions. Research should also explore the combinations of
coalition factors across models to better understand the characteristics, capacities, and conditions that
foster community coalition sustainability. Chapter Six focuses on the conclusions from this review,
as well as the pragmatic and policy implications associated with the sustainability of community
coalitions once initial federal funding ends. Even using these models, however, it is difficult to
demonstrate that a community coalition has had direct and positive impacts over time. As such, it is
important to clearly define what is meant by the term “community coalition.”. The diagramming-
based literature review approach (C3) is different from the mind. Then, the researchers conducted a
case-oriented analysis, comparing and contrasting the variables across the collaboratives. For a
coalition to operate effectively, messages must be accurately communicated within and outside of
the coalition. The results of these tests offer us some clues as to what could be changed in the
situation to solve the. In the Feinberg et al. (2008) study of Communities That Care coalitions, the
researchers found that board functioning, as reported by board members and technical assistance
providers, was positively associated with the survival of the coalition. The local health department
has continued the patient navigation services. Chicago, IL: Chapin Hall at the University of
Chicago. Sectors include health, public health, substance abuse and mental health, education, social
services, and faith organizations, among others. Chapter Four, Sustainability of Community
Coalitions includes operational definitions of sustainability of community coalitions, models,
predictors, barriers, and the role of evaluation in promoting sustainability. Chapter Three provides an
assessment of the current issues in the literature surrounding the evaluation of community coalitions’
influences on health outcomes.
Chapter Four provides an in-depth examination of community coalition sustainability and the role
that evaluation plays in fostering sustainability. They also demonstrate that coalitions must react to
the needs of the community and adapt their collaborative activities according to new community
conditions. Empowerment Evaluation theory is a frequently employed and thoroughly studied
approach that intends to increase the probability of attaining program success through two key
components. These components make synergy within the coalition more likely. For example,
Swerissen and Crisp’s (2004) definition focuses on the continuation of the program’s benefits in the
community. The sustainability of a community coalition is a function of two conditions that must be
met post initial federal funding. The introduction is the part of the paper that provides readers with
the background information for the research reported in the paper. The CCAT is viewed as an
important framework for building and evaluating coalitions. First, the model provides a concrete
definition of sustainability that can be used in subsequent evaluations of community coalitions. In
the Feinberg et al. (2008) study of Communities That Care coalitions, the researchers found that
board functioning, as reported by board members and technical assistance providers, was positively
associated with the survival of the coalition. However, much less is known about the outcomes and
impacts of community coalitions on the communities they serve. Research suggests that the
convening or “lead” agency must have organizational capacity, commitment, and vision, among other
characteristics to build an effective coalition (Butterfoss, 2007). The null hypothesis is a proposition
that states a definitive, exact relationship between two variables. Community linkages refer to the
partnership’s ability to develop working relationships with institutions and individuals, and
incorporate direct community input. For Later 100% 100% found this document useful, Mark this
document as useful 0% 0% found this document not useful, Mark this document as not useful
Embed Share Print Download now Jump to Page You are on page 1 of 1 Search inside document.
Decision-making processes are also important to coalition functioning because they are related to
member satisfaction and involvement in the coalition. The researchers categorized each CTC
coalition as active or defunct after the seed funding was withdrawn. The lowest level of
collaboration was “communication,” whereby entities were simply on a mailing list, communicating
informally. Researchers have also identified the importance of coalition structures in predicting
coalition progress. It was also discovered that code-switching occurs in online communication mainly
to serve referential, phatic and directive functions. The theoretical foundation is important because it
will be the lens through which you evaluate your research problem and research questions. So, make
sure that you take the time to review and digest the seminal sources. The required complexity or
quality of research of a thesis or dissertation can vary by country university or program and the
required minimum study period may thus vary significantly in duration. Operations and processes are
the coalition’s mechanisms for communication among staff and members, decision-making, and
conflict management. First, the coalition may have lost its funding, or alternatively, the funder may
have changed its priorities, affecting the original activities. In the second case, some of a sustained
community coalition’s original activities have been sustained. This is an example of a sustained
coalition that sustained all of its original activities. First, the coalition expanded the network of
providers in the community that would serve the uninsured at a reduced cost. Research by the writer
in 1992, the idea of using diagrams to reveal knowledge. These functions are also the building
blocks of two important theories of community coalitions, which are discussed next.