Professional Documents
Culture Documents
crystallisation.
You will then calculate the relative atomic mass of the metal in the salt.
(a) Method
Experiment 1 Experiment 2
Mass of Crucible/g 20.81 18.05
Mass of crucible + FB6/g 22.92 20.81
Mass of Crucible + FB6 after cooling/g 21.85 19.40
Mass of Hydrated FB6/g 2.11 2.76
Mass of Anhydrous FB6/g 1.04 1.35
Mass water lost/g 1.07 1.41
Must be a single table
(b) Calculation
Show your working and give your answers to three significant figures.
(i) State and explain which of your two experiments in (a) is likely to be the more accurate.
Exp 2 uses larger mass and therefore is more accurate as has a lower percentage error
Or
Exp 1 as it uses less mass and therefore requires less heating
[1]
(ii) Calculate the number of moles of water removed from the hydrated salt in the more accurate
experiment.
(Ar : H, 1.0; O, 16.0)
3SF MUST
(iii) Complete the equation for the removal of water from hydrated FB 6. Include state symbols.
[1]
(v) Use the mass of anhydrous MSO4 produced in the more accurate experiment to calculate the
relative formula mass of MSO4.
Mr = m (anhydrous) /n
Exp 1: 1.04 / 0.00849 = 122.5
Exp 2: 1.35 / 0.0112 = 120.6
Ar = Mr – 96.1
Exp1: 26.4
Exp 2: 24.5
Ar of M = .............. [1]
(vii) The relative atomic masses of some of the cations are given below.
(Ar : Mg, 24.3; Ca, 40.0; Fe, 55.8; Cu, 63.5; Mn, 54.9; Zn, 65.4)
(viii) Suggest why it was not necessary to include the cations aluminium and chromium from the list
of relative atomic masses in (vii).
Al and Cr for 3+ ions and M forms 2+ ions
[1]
(c) The crucible was cooled with the lid on to prevent absorption of water vapour from the air.
Suggest a better way of preventing water vapour being absorbed during cooling.
[1]
[Total: 15]