Title: The Importance of Conducting a Thorough Literature Review in Your Research Process

Welcome to our site, where we delve into the intricacies of academic research and offer valuable
insights into the process. Today, we're highlighting the critical aspect of conducting a thorough
literature review as part of your research journey.

A literature review is far more than just a summary of existing works; it serves as the backbone of
your research, providing a solid foundation upon which your study is built. Here are compelling
reasons why investing time and effort into this phase is indispensable:

1. Contextual Understanding: A comprehensive literature review places your research within

the broader context of existing knowledge. By examining past studies, theories, and findings,
you gain a deeper understanding of the subject matter, allowing you to identify gaps,
contradictions, or areas that need further exploration.
2. Identification of Research Gaps: Through meticulous analysis of existing literature, you can
pinpoint gaps in knowledge or areas that require further investigation. This identification of
gaps not only helps you contribute something novel to your field but also ensures that your
research is relevant and impactful.
3. Refinement of Research Questions and Objectives: Engaging with existing literature helps
you refine your research questions and objectives. By critically evaluating previous studies,
you can tailor your inquiries to address unanswered questions or refine existing theories,
ensuring that your research is focused and purposeful.
4. Methodological Guidance: Literature reviews offer valuable insights into various research
methodologies employed in your field. By examining how past researchers have approached
similar topics, you can identify the most suitable methods for your study, avoiding common
pitfalls and ensuring the rigor of your research design.
5. Avoidance of Redundancy and Duplication: A thorough literature review helps you avoid
redundancy and duplication of efforts. By familiarizing yourself with existing studies, you
can ensure that your research contributes something new to the body of knowledge, rather
than reiterating what has already been established.

Writing a literature review, however, can be a daunting task. It requires extensive reading, critical
analysis, and synthesis of diverse sources—a process that demands time, patience, and expertise. For
those seeking assistance in navigating this challenging phase of their research, we recommend
seeking help from trusted professionals.

At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we specialize in providing top-notch academic writing services, including

expert assistance with literature reviews. Our team of experienced writers and researchers is
dedicated to helping you craft a comprehensive and compelling literature review tailored to your
specific research needs.

Don't let the complexities of literature review writing hinder your research progress. Trust ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ to guide you through this crucial phase with precision and professionalism. Contact
us today to learn more about our services and how we can support your academic endeavors.
The size and procedures used to take tests are significant for your exploration, which is why you
should zero in on picking the method that best accommodates your methodology. The format will
depend on the journal of publication as each journal has their own specific referencing format. This
strategy looks to evaluate information and sum up outcomes from an example to an objective
populace. Completing an analysis grid with a sufficient level of detail will help you to complete the
synthesis and evaluation stages effectively. This is the situation when you are asked to investigate
the existing state of research on your issue and then analyze and synthesize your results. The writing
process is a long one, because not only are you writing to understand your topic, you are writing to
be understood as well. Scholarly journals are the conversation of the scholars who are doing research
in a specific discipline and publishing their research findings. Types of Systematic Reviews Why Are
Systematic Reviews Important. Where would you look for practical interventions to help you
manage this problem if it came up. Usually, they will be widely published as authors of their own
original work, making them highly qualified to author a literature review. The accuracy and validity
of the paper itself may depend on the school that awarded the doctoral or master’s degree to the
author. This may necessitate a close examination of the citation. To make the paragraphs more
obvious, use subheadings. The literature review helps to determine what is known. Chapter 1 Chapter
1 Chapter 4 (1) Chapter 4 (1) ICPLT proceeding of November 2016,Singapore ICPLT proceeding of
November 2016,Singapore Capter i Capter i ENHANCING VOCABULARY ACQUISITION.pptx
ENHANCING VOCABULARY ACQUISITION.pptx Presentaciones projectTHE LISTENING
COMPREHENSION IN THE SECON SPECIALTY. This was in response to the library becoming
more technologically advanced by offering information technology services and multimedia services
within the context of new undergraduate degrees being offered at the university (Kealy, 2009: 573).
To create your topic, consult with your supervisor. This tool will allow you to create a concise
summary of each research paper; see Table 7.1 for an example of an analysis grid. At the end of the
day, it’s the students responsibility to do their own research and work. A word plugin allows you to
insert a formatted citation from your references while writing your document. They may provide
product or service reviews, job listings, and advertisements. This allows you to organize your
thoughts and discoveries into a logical totality. They report news and trends in a field, but not
original research. Because scholarly research undergoes a process of “peer review” before being
published (meaning that other experts review the work and pass judgment about whether it is worthy
of publication), the information you find from scholarly sources meets preset standards for accuracy,
credibility and validity in that field. By and large, this part requires a lot of research and
consideration regarding subtleties. Because books take longer to publish than journal articles, they
are typically out of date. Your contribution is to organize the concepts from the sources into a
coherent argument or narrative that incorporates your views. Academic journals serve as permanent
and transparent forums for the presentation, scrutiny, and discussion of research. The basic idea of
sampling is that it involves any procedure that uses a relatively small number of items or portions of
a universe to conclude the whole population. Nunan, David.1992. Research Method in Language
Learning.Cambridge.
They are a step or more removed from the primary event or item. If the experiments and trials
identified in the literature search are of a uniform nature, a meta-analysis may be performed. Types
of Systematic Reviews Why Are Systematic Reviews Important. It will include both theoretical and
empirical works. In this way, regardless of what branch of knowledge you’re working in, your
system area will incorporate the accompanying. It also describes the structure of the material you
create and provides the author’s (your) reasons for reviewing the chosen sources. This screen grab
from PubMed Central, National Library of Medicine (NLM) is included on the basis of fair dealing.
In addition, you can talk about how and why the different sources choose particular methodologies,
such as whether the source is sociological, cultural, or historical. What primary sources could you use
and where would you find them. What resources would you cite in your application. No single
source will have all of the information resources you should consult. You can contrast your
undertaking with the branch of knowledge if you investigate applicable strategies. The presence of
the mixed methods approach originated from its capability to help specialists see social relations and
their complexities clearer by intertwining the quantitative and subjective strategies for research while
perceiving the impediments of both simultaneously. These are excellent for finding out about new
research or study that hasn’t been published yet. The practice of citing a source that you haven’t read
directly is known as “grandfathering,” and it’s not allowed. They are considered gray literature, so
are not “peer reviewed”. For the first two parts see Slaying the (literature review) beast: Part 1 and
Slaying the (literature review) beast: Part 2. Likewise, consider morals and attempt to satisfy the
moral guidelines expected of you. Each of the themes identified will become a subheading within
the body of your literature review. Express those boundaries unmistakably and let your readers know
why you set those boundaries and how they are imperative to your examination. There are typically
few little or no advertisements. Disciplines are knowledge-producing and -disseminating systems
which consume, produce and disseminate knowledge. At the end of the day, it’s the students
responsibility to do their own research and work. As a recap, here are the steps in a literature review.
Dian Wahyu Sokhibiyah. 2007. The Effectiveness of Using Realia to Teach. They report news and
trends in a field, but not original research. When we talk about information sources for a literature
review in education or nursing, we generally mean these five areas: the internet, reference material
and other books, empirical or evidence-based articles in scholarly, peer-reviewed journals, conference
proceedings and papers, dissertations and theses, and grey literature. Sci-Math Chess Rules and
Mechanics Sci-Math Chess Rules and Mechanics Tumw odpowiada ws. Post-test is administered
after applying treatment. Nunan, David.1992. Research Method in Language Learning.Cambridge.
In all reputable journals, peer-reviewed or refereed research is published only after it has been
reviewed by other researchers in the field. To consider yourself to be a solid one, the crowd needs to
have confidence in your procedure. However, the same principle applies regardless of the number of
papers reviewed. Journalists aren’t usually scholars, which means they aren’t specialists on the topics
they write about; hence newspaper stories aren’t scholarly sources. It is still a good idea to compare
methodologies as a background to the evaluation. Using student-created research has a number of
drawbacks: 1) they are frequently unpublished and only available through interlibrary loan; 2) the
student conducting the research may not be a seasoned researcher. It needs to clarify why you did
what you did and how you went about it. Express those boundaries unmistakably and let your
readers know why you set those boundaries and how they are imperative to your examination.
Conduct preliminary reading and weed out irrelevant sources. You can do the above without creating
a specific table, through annotating PDFs, or through creating different folders with notes. What
would each of these disciplines raise as key questions or issues related to that topic. Most journals
are peer-reviewed or refereed, which means a panel of scholars reviews articles to decide if they
should be accepted into a specific publication. The literature defines concepts and terms in relation
to. As a result, while your literature review may consist of research articles tightly focused on your
topic with secondary and tertiary sources used more sparingly, all three types of information
(primary, secondary, tertiary) are critical to your research. Finally, a Lit Review has its own set of in-
text citations and a Works Cited list. Depending on the stage at which your paper is at, this may
involve merging your literature review into a partially complete Introduction section, writing the rest
of the paper around the literature review, or other processes. Disciplines are knowledge-producing
and -disseminating systems which consume, produce and disseminate knowledge. As we see in the
graphic and chart above, the information you need for your literature review will be located in
multiple places. You cannot categorize the information provided by electronic sources, but here are
some tips for using them: 1) acknowledge that anyone can post information on the Internet, so the
quality may vary, and 2) information posted on the web for general audiences may not be appropriate
data for your Lit Review (general audiences tend to need less detail and scholarly information).
These are known as the SALSA Framework: s earch, a ppraisa l, s ynthesis and a nalysis. Each of the
themes identified will become a subheading within the body of your literature review. An easier way
is just to drop us a message on our Live ChatBox on the bottom right of the page. The writer will
teach procedure and descriptive by using realia to. This will let you plot out concepts related to your
topic, and see quickly how the literature fits into it. Therefore these valuable resources won’t even be
searched (becoming invisible to Google). Is it trying to say that what you are studying is niche or has
been studied in the past but not in the same way. This will attract part from your writing audit,
introducing your decisions as educated and established in sound grant, while in a perfect world
likewise showing development and imagination. This can be accomplished by first identifying any
underlying themes. By and large, this part requires a lot of research and consideration regarding
subtleties. A descriptive study on the effects of the personal characteristics of 6th gra.
Incorporate your speculations, if pertinent, or what you are deciding to demonstrate through your
exploration. Most scientists will use reference management software to store details of all of the
journal articles (and other sources) they use while writing their review article. It can also be found in
newspapers, encyclopedias, textbooks, as well as websites and reports written by government
agencies and professional organizations. An accurate and comprehensive reference list also shows
your readers that you are well-read in your topic area and are aware of the key papers that provide
the context to your research. These articles are geared towards readers who, although not experts, are
knowledgeable about the issues presented. If the experiments and trials identified in the literature
search are of a uniform nature, a meta-analysis may be performed. On March 30, 2016, Andrew
Duong taught a seminar to students at the Michael DeGroote School of Medicine on the 6 Steps of
the Systematic Review Process. This was in response to the library becoming more technologically
advanced by offering information technology services and multimedia services within the context of
new undergraduate degrees being offered at the university (Kealy, 2009: 573). Our products include
academic papers of varying complexity and other personalized services, along with research materials
for assistance purposes only. For this, you need to identify the disciplines of knowledge production
in a subject area. In other words, a research article uses expert sources as support for your thesis,
whereas a Literature Review discusses the sources. These are known as the SALSA Framework: s
earch, a ppraisa l, s ynthesis and a nalysis. To make the paragraphs more obvious, use subheadings. It
follows an organized information assortment measure with information yield as numbers. Else, you
can refer to other pertinent investigations and legitimize your approach on the premise of their
discoveries. Because books take longer to publish than journal articles, they are typically out of date.
Usually, they will be widely published as authors of their own original work, making them highly
qualified to author a literature review. Post-test is administered after applying treatment. A current
literature study I’m working on, for example, investigates impediments to higher education for
undocumented students. Depending on why you are writing your literature review, you may be
given a topic area, or may choose a topic that particularly interests you or is related to a research
project that you wish to undertake. In case you’re utilizing a quantitative methodology, you might
be utilizing statistical analysis. It should only take two or three devoted sessions. Although your own
literature review will focus on primary, peer-reviewed resources, it will begin by first grounding
yourself in background subject information generally found in secondary and tertiary sources such as
books and encyclopedias. A word plugin allows you to insert a formatted citation from your
references while writing your document. Materi Kuliah Sistem Informasi 06 Arsitektur Infrastruktur
dalam Sistem Infor. Literature reviews provide an important bridge between the expert scientific
community and many other communities, such as science journalists, teachers, and medical and
allied health professionals. The library also offers a workshop called “ Improving your literature
search strategy.”. They may provide product or service reviews, job listings, and advertisements. The
format will depend on the journal of publication as each journal has their own specific referencing
format. You will find yourself writing and rewriting as you evaluate what you have written.
This can be accomplished by first identifying any underlying themes. Post-test is administered after
applying treatment. Give a lot of detail on why you picked the particular methodology, why you
chose to utilize the procedures you picked, and so on. At the end of the day, it’s the students
responsibility to do their own research and work. Open access is a means of disseminating scholarly
research that breaks from the traditional subscription model of academic publishing. One of the
fastest-growing sources of information is the Internet. SASA, however, doesn’t make a memorable
acronym, and Academics love a good acronym, so they derived the “L” from the last letter of
appraisal: S earch, A ppraisa L, S ynthesis and A nalysis (SALSA). Along these lines, you should
legitimize all examination strategies introduced in this segment. The authors, Grant and Booth (2009)
created a simple analytical framework for conducting reviews: S earch, A ppraisal, S ynthesis and A
nalysis. In other words, a research article uses expert sources as support for your thesis, whereas a
Literature Review discusses the sources. This examination strategy is abstract and requires fewer
deliberately picked respondents. The library also offers a workshop called “ Improving your
literature search strategy.”. These distinct stages show how information is created, reviewed, and
distributed over time. While a single source may only appear once in an annotated Works Cited list,
it may be mentioned multiple times in a Lit Review, depending on its significance in the area or its
relationship to other sources. This first post is a general overview of the literature review. We are a
strong believer in academic integrity and have a “zero tolerance policy” on plagiarism. The technique
area should serve to introduce these restrictions to the crowd. For an overview of Mendeley, have a
look at the video below. They may provide product or service reviews, job listings, and
advertisements. An easier way is just to drop us a message on our Live ChatBox on the bottom right
of the page. You need to justify the research question and show that there is an interest and a need
for this research. Furthermore, they provide information on which researchers are active in specific
fields, which can be useful for tracking down their other work. It deserves capitals, because it is truly
one of the beasts of academic writing. This may necessitate a close examination of the citation. They
report news and trends in a field, but not original research. Our products include academic papers of
varying complexity and other personalized services, along with research materials for assistance
purposes only. The basic idea of sampling is that it involves any procedure that uses a relatively small
number of items or portions of a universe to conclude the whole population. This will attract part
from your writing audit, introducing your decisions as educated and established in sound grant,
while in a perfect world likewise showing development and imagination. These are excellent for
finding out about new research or study that hasn’t been published yet. Most scientists will use
reference management software to store details of all of the journal articles (and other sources) they
use while writing their review article.
The writer visits the library to read book, articles, or other. For instance, you may do a measurable
investigation and afterwards decipher those measurements through a specific hypothetical focal
point. Where would you look for practical interventions to help you manage this problem if it came
up. You cannot categorize the information provided by electronic sources, but here are some tips for
using them: 1) acknowledge that anyone can post information on the Internet, so the quality may
vary, and 2) information posted on the web for general audiences may not be appropriate data for
your Lit Review (general audiences tend to need less detail and scholarly information). Pick the best
theses in your field and your theme, or if nothing else, some that are identified with it. A descriptive
study on the effects of the personal characteristics of 6th gra. An easier way is just to drop us a
message on our Live ChatBox on the bottom right of the page. It deserves capitals, because it is truly
one of the beasts of academic writing. Is it trying to say that what you are studying is niche or has
been studied in the past but not in the same way. With a subjective methodology, state what
hypothetical viewpoint or reasoning you’re utilizing. This is a prime example of an organisation
requiring to adapt and being flexible in a changing environment in order to remain relevant and
competitive (Prahalad and Hamel, 1990: 1). This is the piece of your technique where you plainly
clarify your interaction for the get-together and examining information or for moving toward your
examination question. This ought to be clear and nitty-gritty enough that another researcher can
understand it and apply it here and there, outside of the quick setting of your thesis. These are
known as the SALSA Framework: s earch, a ppraisa l, s ynthesis and a nalysis. It will include both
theoretical and empirical works. The section clarifies what you did and how you did it, permitting
readers to assess the research’s unwavering validity and reliability. While this is useful for
demonstrating how theories evolve, make sure to include your own interpretation of trends, turning
points, or disagreements, demonstrating how they contributed shape where the subject is headed.
Erni Rokhmawati. 2010. Improvement of students’ speaking ability by using. Sumardiyani,
Listyaning dan Zulfa Sakhiyya. 2007. Speaking for. You can also consider the disciplines and routes
for future research here and blind spots and missing elements in existing knowledge. In case you’re
presenting another sort of measurable model, your reader ought to have the option to apply this
model to their own informational index in the wake of perusing your strategy area. Post-test is
administered after applying treatment. A descriptive study on the effects of the personal
characteristics of 6th gra. What would each of these disciplines raise as key questions or issues
related to that topic. Good problem identification assures the success of research. The Lit Review
should include the most relevant related studies and demonstrate an understanding of both key past
research and practices in the subject and promising current research and practices. Thus, it is both
advantageous and necessary to rely on regular summaries of the recent literature. The telltale sign
that you are looking at the literature review is the presence of clusters of citations. Conduct
preliminary reading and weed out irrelevant sources. An easier way is just to drop us a message on
our Live ChatBox on the bottom right of the page.
In this way, regardless of what branch of knowledge you’re working in, your system area will
incorporate the accompanying. SASA, however, doesn’t make a memorable acronym, and
Academics love a good acronym, so they derived the “L” from the last letter of appraisal: S earch, A
ppraisa L, S ynthesis and A nalysis (SALSA). Trade publications are useful for practical application
in a profession and may also be a good source of keywords for future searching. As a previous
Ontario Graduate Scholar, he has applied his accolades as a teaching assistant and has become a
research associate in the department of surgery at Hamilton Health Sciences. Else, you can refer to
other pertinent investigations and legitimize your approach on the premise of their discoveries. An
Experimental Study of the Effects of Listening on Speaking for College Stu. Then, find appropriate
books in the library and check them out. In the review article by Bain et al. (2014) used as an
example in this chapter, the reference list contains 106 items, so you can imagine how much help
referencing software would be. Learn more about how Pressbooks supports open publishing
practices. Fields such as political science, biology, history and mathematics are unique disciplines, as
are education and nursing, with their own logic for how and where new knowledge is introduced
and made accessible. A summary can easily be made in this way and transformed into a well-
flowing, logical literature review. Note: Closed captions are available by clicking on the CC button
below. To accomplish this, consistently intend to compose clear and brief sentences that express your
real thoughts straightforwardly. Good problem identification assures the success of research. Andrew
has received numerous awards and scholarships including: the Ontario Graduate Scholarship, the
William Henry Yates Travel Scholarship and the Institute of Infectious Disease Research
Undergraduate Research Award. What primary sources could you use and where would you find
them. The literature review helps to determine what is known. For the first two parts see Slaying the
(literature review) beast: Part 1 and Slaying the (literature review) beast: Part 2. Your contribution is
to organize the concepts from the sources into a coherent argument or narrative that incorporates
your views. It needs to clarify why you did what you did and how you went about it. This ought to
be clear and nitty-gritty enough that another researcher can understand it and apply it here and there,
outside of the quick setting of your thesis. For the most part, you can accept that your readers have
an overall comprehension of regular exploration strategies that social researchers use, for example,
surveys or focus groups. There may be more than one source so don’t feel like you have to limit
yourself to only one. Give a lot of detail on why you picked the particular methodology, why you
chose to utilize the procedures you picked, and so on. The data quality links to the credibility of the
study, so it is important to note, especially in this day of predatory journals where not all articles
found are credible. The presence of the mixed methods approach originated from its capability to
help specialists see social relations and their complexities clearer by intertwining the quantitative and
subjective strategies for research while perceiving the impediments of both simultaneously. Likewise,
consider morals and attempt to satisfy the moral guidelines expected of you. Embracing different
procedures will give you some power and significance in your exploration. Publishers and
professional associations are inconsistent in how they publish proceedings. These presumptions will
likewise illuminate the exploration strategies you’ve picked.