You are on page 1of 7

Understanding the Importance of a Literature Review in a Dissertation

When embarking on the journey of writing a dissertation, one cannot overlook the significance of a
comprehensive literature review. Often considered the backbone of academic research, a literature
review plays a pivotal role in shaping the direction, scope, and credibility of your dissertation. This
critical component involves an in-depth examination and synthesis of existing literature relevant to
your research topic. Here's why it's essential:

1. Contextualizing Your Research: A literature review provides the necessary context for your
dissertation by examining the existing body of knowledge and identifying gaps, debates, and
key concepts relevant to your research area.
2. Building a Theoretical Framework: By analyzing existing literature, you can develop a
theoretical framework that guides your research methodology and helps establish the
theoretical foundation upon which your study is based.
3. Identifying Research Gaps: Through a thorough review of literature, you can identify gaps
or inconsistencies in existing research, thereby justifying the need for your study and
contributing to the advancement of knowledge in your field.
4. Avoiding Redundancy and Replication: A comprehensive literature review helps you avoid
duplicating existing research efforts. By understanding what has already been done, you can
ensure that your dissertation contributes something novel to the academic discourse.
5. Supporting Your Arguments and Claims: Incorporating relevant literature into your
dissertation strengthens the validity of your arguments and claims. It demonstrates to your
readers that your research is informed by established theories and empirical evidence.
6. Enhancing Credibility and Academic Rigor: A well-executed literature review enhances
the credibility and academic rigor of your dissertation. It showcases your ability to engage
critically with existing scholarship and positions your research within the broader academic
context.

However, writing a literature review is no easy task. It requires extensive research, critical analysis,
and synthesis of information from a wide range of sources. The process can be time-consuming and
challenging, especially for students juggling multiple academic commitments.

For those seeking assistance in crafting a high-quality literature review that meets academic
standards, consider enlisting the services of ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔. Our team of experienced writers
specializes in conducting thorough literature reviews tailored to your specific research needs. With
our expertise, you can ensure that your dissertation stands out for its scholarly rigor and contribution
to your field of study.

Don't let the daunting task of writing a literature review hinder your academic progress. Trust ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ to provide you with the support you need to excel in your dissertation journey.
A Technique to Detect Microclimatic Inhomogeneities in Historical Records of Screen-Level Air
Temperature. It is the fastest way to gain access to both books and journal articles for literature
review. Also, one needs to stay close to the main theme as synthesize all the information available
from the relevant sources. Identifying gaps allows you to position your work as a valuable
contribution to the field. It’s needed to give potential readers an overview of the writing content,
helping to decide whether their research determines it. Is there a logic to the way you organised the
material. Methodological Approach This approach centers on the research methods employed in
various studies related to your topic. Is there a logic to the way you organised the material. Assess
the methodology, findings, and limitations of each study to showcase your analytical skills. One has
to first out a lot of thought and consideration into the topic of interest. Resources Dive into our
extensive resources on the topic that interests you. Even though it takes three years before a
particular research is published, it is still more up-to-date than research found in books. Keeping the
logical sequence is very important, so having a good writing example will be a serious advantage.
Within each of these sections, you would then discuss what the different literature argues,
remembering to link this to your own purpose. If you are grouping together writers with similar
opinions, you would use words or phrases such as. How do you pick the important stuff from a
bunch of studies and tell a clear story that makes a difference. Aside from offering a historical
perspective, a literature review also serves to give an overview of new developing knowledge in a
field. A literature review serves to familiarize one with most knowledge that has been disseminated
and questions raised from a particular research problem. Always separate your source opinions from
your own hypothesis. GIFs Highlight your latest work via email or social media with custom GIFs. It
allows one to justify what procedure they have used in their research. If you thought something was
rubbish, use words such as inconsistent, lacking in certain areas or based on false assumptions! (See
Guide 1.21). If you ignore opposing viewpoints, your argument will in fact be weaker. From
proactively monitoring and fixing your system remotely to enabling you to reset your own system
easily, we have you covered. The key aim of a literature review is to study identified limitations and
gaps in literature. Step 4: Create An Outline In this crucial step, determine the organizational
structure of your review, which will serve as the foundation for your written work. It is important,
therefore, to try and decide on the parameters of your research. Use the present tense for general
opinions and theories, or the past when referring to specific research or experiments. These previous
works usually highlight the main topic points focused on and enable one to provide an overview of
the topic. Secondly, scoping and delving into relevant literature is important.
Does the amount of detail included on an issue relate to its importance. Below are the general
guidelines on which this part is usually based. Usually, it’s unnecessary, but if an abstract is
mentioned in the requirements, consider adding it to the working plan. However, if there are some
points that need clarification or are missing from the overall context, they should be mentioned.
Thematic Organization Group related studies by themes rather than chronology. Identifying what is
required of you and how to deliver will be the next step in the process (Pautasso, 2013). Have you
indicated when results were conflicting or inconclusive and discussed possible reasons. In any case,
when you try to decide whether you can include a certain source into your paper, ask yourself: is
this book (article) suitable, relevant to the topic, and indispensable for the content. I t usually has an
organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. The Pixar Way: 37 Quotes on
Developing and Maintaining a Creative Company (fr. The clear guidelines to a good review are for a
researcher to be exhaustive and expansive in his reading. Within each of these sections, you would
then discuss what the different literature argues, remembering to link this to your own purpose. With
dissertations, and particularly theses, it will be more down to you to decide. It is a great solution for
those who are short of time. These leading researchers are those who have made an important in the
body of knowledge and have their research widely published and distributed. It’s needed to give
potential readers an overview of the writing content, helping to decide whether their research
determines it. Our team consists of the best experts with tremendous academic writing experience.
This helps create a coherent narrative and highlights the connections between different works.
Nevertheless, it is a matter determined by a number of factors, including the dissertation structure
and scope of available sources. Authors from our team are degree holders and also have considerable
writing experience. Here is how to write a good literature review: Step 1: Search Relevant Literature
Start by searching for scholarly sources that you will cite in your paper that are closely related to
your research topic. You therefore need to use the critical notes and comments you made whilst
doing your reading to express an academic opinion. Once the issue is clarified, sticking to it without
giving any unnecessary information is essential. They are also able to evaluate so many sources and
identify solutions to the problem at hand. It enables provide a clear direction of the research. One
key function is to highlight important and influential research in a field of interest. But there’s no
need to worry about the quality of the writing if you get inspired by the examples presented here.
Always separate your source opinions from your own hypothesis. But there’s no need to worry about
the quality of the writing if you get inspired by the examples presented here. Include a short
summary at the end of each section.
You therefore need to use the critical notes and comments you made whilst doing your reading to
express an academic opinion. A Technique to Detect Microclimatic Inhomogeneities in Historical
Records of Screen-Level Air Temperature. Sometimes researchers may omit some material from
studies because they are less appealing to the public or even the researchers themselves. This entire
process further illuminates on more information in the field of interest for the researcher (Ridley,
2012). Before you start reading it may be useful to compile a list of the main areas and questions
involved, and then read with the purpose of finding out about or answering these. Step 2: Analyze
and Select Sources In the second phase of your research, it is essential to carefully evaluate and
select sources that directly contribute to your research question. Does it really match up with what
you're trying to find out. It is useful when emphasizing the methodologies used by researchers and
their implications for the findings. Additionally, verify the accuracy and consistency of citations and
references based on the chosen citation style (e.g., APA, MLA). This comprehensive revision process
guarantees a polished and well-structured literature review. Highlighting the gaps in areas of study
focuses a researcher and enables them to gain greater perception and comprehension of the material.
If you thought something was rubbish, use words such as inconsistent, lacking in certain areas or
based on false assumptions! (See Guide 1.21). In essence, a well-crafted literature review informs
and elevates your research, ensuring its relevance and impact within your academic field. If this is
not going beyond the requirements of writing a sample of literature review, why not. A summary or
an overview is the brief account of all informational highlight from key sources, while synthesis is
the restructuring or reorganization of the information in a way that informs of the dissertation’s plan
of investigating the research problem. This gap is further explored during the research to establish
new facts or theories that add value to the field. After that, there is an option to highlight the key
points and give recommendations for future studies or research. You do proper evaluation of the
discovered sources and your readers should know for sure that academic sources are valid. QR
Codes Generate QR Codes for your digital content. Embed Host your publication on your website
or blog with just a few clicks. In many cases you will be given a booklist or directed towards areas of
useful published work. Does the amount of detail included on an issue relate to its importance. We
want to keep things simple and provide support if your systems experience any of these disruptions.
You are looking for the content that is directly relevant; otherwise, your own work will lack clarity.
Dr. NN Chavan Keynote address on ADNEXAL MASS- APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT in the.
Below are the general guidelines on which this part is usually based. It allows one to justify what
procedure they have used in their research. When you are doing your reading and making notes, it
might be an idea to use different colours to distinguish between your ideas and those of others. (See
Guide 1.13). Saurashtra University Introduction and Literature Review Introduction and Literature
Review Statistics Solutions Literature review Literature review metalkid132 More Related Content
What's hot Conducting A Literature Review Conducting A Literature Review abutton1 Literature
review (1) Literature review (1) sudarsana kumar How to Identify the Research Gap While Writing a
PhD Dissertation Literature. What a researcher learns from evaluating different literature one learns a
lot of things. It may be completed en route to an essay, thesis or dissertation and included in the final
project.
What you must not do is just describe what one writer says, and then go on to give a general
overview of another writer, and then another, and so on. Sometimes researchers may omit some
material from studies because they are less appealing to the public or even the researchers
themselves. This helps in calculating the impact of new information in the field. Books are written
for specific audiences.the material in books are presented in a. These are the research papers contains
details of research done in a particular. An expository evaluative analysis of the methodologies is key
as well as the ability to point out discontinuities in the research that begs for more future research
(Pautasso, 2013). What do these materials propose about your topic? 4. Dr. NN Chavan Keynote
address on ADNEXAL MASS- APPROACH TO MANAGEMENT in the. Furthermore a research
gap is indicative of great knowledge in that area of study and a well-carried out research (Moeini,
2014). Keep the balance in your points of view and point out at the available deficiencies and
controversies, relating different positions with your own beliefs. Therefore, the audience easily trusts
one’s results, conclusions and recommendations. There are types of researchers when it comes to this
area of research. A description of the literature relevant to a particular field or topic. Clarity and
Conciseness Write with clarity and conciseness. A good literature review cannot be a summary of the
contents. This work may be in any format, including online sources. Avoid wasting precious hours
and days by having direct aims and specific questions to raise. It essentially involves going through
available research and published work on a particular topic and giving an outline or synopsis after
analyzing it (Rider University). Helps in exhibit proficiency over the research area. In many cases you
will be given a booklist or directed towards areas of useful published work. In a way, it streamlines
your research focus and makes clear the problem being addressed. The Pixar Way: 37 Quotes on
Developing and Maintaining a Creative Company (fr. They then provide a comprehensive summary
of the available research in a thesis (Bolderston, 2008). In simple words, what key points will be
added to the body part. Reports include market research reports, government reports etc. See how
this publication links up with what's already out there. If you thought something was rubbish, use
words such as inconsistent, lacking in certain areas or based on false assumptions! (See Guide 1.21).
Bolderston (2008) reports that there are different types of classifications of literature review. How do
you pick the important stuff from a bunch of studies and tell a clear story that makes a difference.
Have a look at a list of tips related to standards of dissertation literature review writing.
In any case, when you try to decide whether you can include a certain source into your paper, ask
yourself: is this book (article) suitable, relevant to the topic, and indispensable for the content.
Krishnaswami,o.r,methodology of research in social science,Mumbai:himalaya. Looking through
journal abstracts, citations and indices can make search results better. Have you focussed on primary
sources with only selective use of secondary sources. A Technique to Detect Microclimatic
Inhomogeneities in Historical Records of Screen-Level Air Temperature. A researcher will be in a
position to compare and contrast methods that have been used and what has been proposed to ensure
a smoother and efficient process. The selection of the appropriate one depends on factors like
funding, publishing journal and time allocated for research. Getting a full understanding of all
concepts pertinent to a topic enables one to also understand the research topic in general. Some
research topics make it difficult to collect data on. Plenty of information mentioned years ago
remains relevant, so it’s better not to miss it. After that, there is an option to highlight the key points
and give recommendations for future studies or research. It is important to make sure that the same
subject is presented in every source as well as your own dissertation. What exactly are your
objectives and what do you need to find out. One has to first out a lot of thought and consideration
into the topic of interest. It should be a synthesis and analysis of the relevant published work, linked
at all times to your own purpose and rationale. Researchers may need to focus on topics that
surround the two disciplines to ensure none of them feels left out. In essence it facilitates
contextualization of findings within the existing body of knowledge. Whatever research papers you
use, one has to record them so as to replicate them in the future. Varying accounts of feedback shed
more light on the topic being researched on. Thus, all the materials that do not pass the evaluation
should be eliminated and excluded from your research. It is important, therefore, to try and decide on
the parameters of your research. This helps create a coherent narrative and highlights the connections
between different works. This helps in calculating the impact of new information in the field.
Promotes Theory Development: Evaluates and combines existing theories, possibly leading to new
ones. In turn, it establishes the author’s expertise in the field and provides legitimacy to carry
forward the wisdom of the area using scientific and systematic methods. It should be a synthesis and
analysis of the relevant published work, linked at all times to your own purpose and rationale. Keep
your writing clear and concise, avoiding colloquialisms and personal language. Have you been
sufficiently critical of design and methodological issues. Moreover, you should opt only for
authoritative books and articles written by professional researches in the relevant spheres. It may be
a separate assignment, or one of the introductory sections of a report, dissertation or thesis.
What you will need to do is to group together and compare and contrast the varying opinions of
different writers on certain topics. Primary literature sources are the first occurrence of a piece. This
process should be meticulously conducted because the relevancy and authenticity of the research has
a great impact on the research paper (Mudavanhu, 2017). A scholarly evaluation of journals and other
sources of information in the name of literature is important in the process of research. Keep your
writing clear and concise, avoiding colloquialisms and personal language. It is important, therefore,
to try and decide on the parameters of your research. Plenty of information mentioned years ago
remains relevant, so it’s better not to miss it. Instead, looking for similar themes and subjects, you are
supposed to discuss how different researchers approached the same issues. QR Codes Generate QR
Codes for your digital content. She is majorly involved in developing and reviewing online content
plans that engage and resonate with audiences. As human beings are susceptible to errors and short
memories it is of utmost importance to jot down short notes while looking into various sources of
literature. There are several actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word
or phrase, a SQL command or malformed data. This helps in calculating the impact of new
information in the field. Have you indicated when results were conflicting or inconclusive and
discussed possible reasons. They’ll be glad to develop new custom literature review examples for
your personally. This helps create a coherent narrative and highlights the connections between
different works. The clear guidelines to a good review are for a researcher to be exhaustive and
expansive in his reading. However, if there are some points that need clarification or are missing
from the overall context, they should be mentioned. Moreover, outlining allows you to learn specific
things about your chosen sources. Usually, it’s unnecessary, but if an abstract is mentioned in the
requirements, consider adding it to the working plan. Before beginning the summary process, it is
important to check credibility of the sources as well as writers. Sometimes researchers may omit
some material from studies because they are less appealing to the public or even the researchers
themselves. Video Say more by seamlessly including video within your publication. Does the
research use the usual methods, or is it trying something new. Does the work make a significant
contribution to an understanding of the subject. Keep your writing clear and concise, avoiding
colloquialisms and personal language. Theoretical Approach This approach focuses on organizing
your review around different theoretical frameworks or perspectives relevant to your topic.
CATALLYST D.pharmacy Pharmacology 4th unit notes.pdf D.pharmacy Pharmacology 4th unit
notes.pdf SUMIT TIWARI Dr. NN Chavan Keynote address on ADNEXAL MASS- APPROACH
TO MANAGEMENT in the. It should be a synthesis and analysis of the relevant published work,
linked at all times to your own purpose and rationale. Always separate your source opinions from
your own hypothesis.

You might also like