Title: Mastering the Art of Writing a Literature Review for Your Research Paper

Are you struggling with crafting a comprehensive literature review for your research paper? If so,
you're not alone. Many students and researchers find this task daunting and overwhelming. However,
fear not, as help is at hand.

Writing a literature review requires careful planning, extensive research, and critical analysis. It's not
just about summarizing existing literature but also synthesizing various sources to provide a coherent
overview of the topic. Here's a guide to help you navigate through the intricacies of crafting a
literature review that meets academic standards:

1. Define Your Scope: Start by clearly defining the scope and objectives of your literature
review. Determine the specific research questions you aim to address and the key themes or
concepts you want to explore.
2. Conduct Thorough Research: Once you have a clear focus, dive into the sea of existing
literature related to your topic. Use academic databases, journals, books, and other credible
sources to gather relevant material. Be sure to critically evaluate each source for its quality
and relevance to your research.
3. Organize Your Sources: Organizing your sources is crucial for structuring your literature
review effectively. Consider using techniques such as thematic categorization or
chronological order to arrange the literature logically.
4. Analyze and Synthesize: Don't just summarize each source; instead, analyze and synthesize
the information to identify patterns, contradictions, and gaps in the existing literature. This
critical evaluation will help you develop a coherent narrative in your literature review.
5. Write Clear and Concise: When writing your literature review, aim for clarity and
conciseness. Clearly articulate the main findings of each source and how they contribute to
your overall understanding of the topic. Use transition words and phrases to ensure smooth
flow between paragraphs and sections.
6. Remain Objective: It's essential to maintain objectivity in your literature review by presenting
different perspectives and interpretations without bias. Avoid cherry-picking evidence that
only supports your thesis and acknowledge conflicting viewpoints.
7. Revise and Edit: Once you've written the initial draft, take time to revise and edit your
literature review. Pay attention to the organization, clarity, and coherence of your arguments.
Eliminate any redundancies or unnecessary details to keep the focus on the key points.

Writing a literature review may seem like a daunting task, but with proper guidance and
perseverance, you can master this essential aspect of academic research. If you find yourself
struggling or short on time, consider seeking assistance from professional writing services like ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔. Our experienced writers can help you craft a stellar literature review that meets
your specific requirements and academic standards.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hinder your research progress. Trust ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ to provide you with expert assistance and support every step of the way. Order
now and take the first step towards academic excellence!
Were the results effectively interpreted and reported. The bibliography or reference section of
sources you’ve already read are also excellent entry points into your own research. Diagnosis and
treatment of temporomandibular disorders. Rich studies are often found in specialist qualitative
research or social science journals. If you want to work smart, you don't want to miss this.
Atheoretical reviews tend to present acontextual findings (for instance, one study found very
positive results for one intervention, and this gets highlighted in the abstract) whilst theoretically
informed reviews attempt to contextualise and explain patterns within the included studies. Popular
Publications Qualitative Methods Quantitative Methods Insiderness Using Non-Textual Elements
Limitations of the Study Common Grammar Mistakes Writing Concisely Avoiding Plagiarism
Footnotes or Endnotes. Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(14):7977. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google
Scholar Tortora C, Di Paola A, Argenziano M, Creoli M, Marrapodi MM, Cenni S, et al. Federal
government websites often end in.gov or.mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you're
on a federal government site. Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transitions and topic sentences
to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts. We will provide you with a review written with
fresh opinions on sources and significant academic worth. Two reviewers (AW-R and HT) will pilot
the data charting form on a sample of randomly selected papers (10% of included papers). Some
important questions to ask yourself are: What answers does the existing research provide to my own
research questions. To identify the most important publications on your topic, take note of recurring
citations. Studies were included if they examined consumers’ preference for food naturalness and
contained empirical data. SciSpace Discover is a one-stop solution to do an effective literature search
and get barrier-free access to scientific knowledge. You can also search for this author in PubMed
Google Scholar Literature reviews are important resources for scientists. I would love to engage my
study under your guidance from the beginning to the end. For example, in the case of narrative
reviews, there is greater flexibility in searching and synthesizing articles ( Green et al., 2006 ).
Researchers are often relatively free to use a diversity of approaches to search, identify, and select
relevant scientific articles, describe their operational characteristics, present how the individual
studies fit together, and formulate conclusions. This guidance covers the review process as it relates
to synthesis of. In simple words, what key points will be added to the body part. A main concern lies
in the need to design project structures and work practices that are aligned and that enable leadership
to emerge. Yes, they are difficult and require a strong degree of comprehension of academic studies.
This need not be difficult, intricate, or time consuming. Subjective interpretation: Literature reviews
can be subjective, and the interpretation of the findings can vary depending on the researcher’s
perspective or bias. Dealing with multiple stakeholders, which is inevitably required in coproduction,
requires addressing multiple perspectives in an attempt to bring them together. The literature review
usually comes near the beginning of your thesis or dissertation. This distinction between MFIs and
single interventions can actually be very useful as it offers lessons about the contexts in which
individual interventions might have bounded effectiveness (i.e. educational interventions for
individual change). Therefore, read the abstract first to determine whether the rest of the source is
worth your time. The population’s age categories are also a drawback because they are extremely
diverse and do not take age into account as a confounding factor.
Methodological If you draw your sources from different disciplines or fields that use a variety of
research methods, you might want to compare the results and conclusions that emerge from different
approaches. Once the issue is clarified, sticking to it without giving any unnecessary information is
essential. A methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the
way in which these documents are discussed. Systematic reviews with discordant findings can cause
great confusion and make it difficult for decision-makers to interpret the review-level evidence (
Moher, 2013 ). In this case, the purpose is to evaluate the current state of research and demonstrate
your knowledge of scholarly debates around a topic. They originated from criticisms of positivist
systematic reviews which centre on their “simplistic” underlying assumptions ( Oates, 2011 ). Use
quotes sparingly Falk and Mills do not use any direct quotes. In terms of the technical aspects of the
acupuncture treatment used in the RCT, the duration of each session varied between 15 48 and 51,
20 53,54 and 30 min. Print Friendly 15 Literature Review Examples Literature reviews are a
necessary step in a research process and often required when writing your research proposal. It has
not been vetted by BMJ Publishing Group Limited (BMJ) and may not have been peer-reviewed. All
of our appointments are free of charge and confidential. Recommended Reading Last Updated: Oct
26, 2022 2:49 PM URL: Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with
limited support for CSS. Methodological: A methodological approach differs from the two above in
that the focusing factor usually does not have to do with the content of the material. Let’s get to it!
What should I do before writing the literature review. Quality control service experts additionally
assure that your writing requirements are followed. Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established
knowledge. An rQES team should pick an approach appropriate to their specific review. Make a list
of keywords Start by creating a list of keywords related to your research topic. Reprints and
permissions About this article Cite this article. For example, if you were researching which factors
contributed towards people trusting an organisation, you might find themes such as consumers’
perceptions of an organisation’s competence, benevolence and integrity. To know what literature you
will need to review, you need to understand precisely what you are being asked to do in your paper.
Last Updated: Jan 4, 2024 10:52 AM URL: University of Texas Libraries Literature Reviews What
is a literature review. A review may be a self-contained unit — an end in itself — or a preface to and
rationale for engaging in primary research. Future studies featuring a thoughtful choice of leadership
and complexity models as well as a broader methodological repertoire are thus necessary (see Table 2
for an overview). Prevent plagiarism. Run a free check. To begin organizing your literature review’s
argument and structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the
sources you’ve read. I recommend to my students that they should gather their studies together, take
notes on each study, then try to group them by themes that form the basis for the review (see my
step-by-step instructions at the end of the article). For example, a book surveying the history of the
Israeli-Palestinian conflict may include a chapter on the role Egypt has played in mediating the
conflict, or look in the index for the pages where Egypt is mentioned in the text. You can argue for
the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to create a
framework for your research. Right? Wrong! The “literature” of a literature review refers to any
collection of materials on a topic, not necessarily the great literary texts of the world. “Literature”
could be anything from a set of government pamphlets on British colonial methods in Africa to
scholarly articles on the treatment of a torn ACL. However, particularly in the social sciences,
thinking about research problems from multiple vectors is a key strategy for finding new solutions to
a problem or gaining a new perspective.
To identify the most important publications on your topic, take note of recurring citations. This
process was performed by 2 independent reviewers. This helps you remember what you read and
saves time later in the process. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and
conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and
conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself. Networking refers to the practice
of establishing and maintaining relationships with various stakeholders both within and outside the
coproduction initiative. With Visa and Mastercard checkout options, your payments for service are
out of danger. Does it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge. It is important to be
careful in noting the references already at this stage, so as to avoid misattributions. For example, if a
student of politics is investigating how the understanding of democracy has evolved over time, they
could use the chronological approach to provide a narrative that demonstrates how this
understanding has changed through the ages. It is often assigned as part of the research process for a
paper. In summary, the review team should consider privileging rich qualitative studies 2; consider a
stepwise approach to inclusion of qualitative data and explore the possibility of sampling ( table 2,
item R5). You can reach out to the subject librarian for a consultation. Meta-analysis This is a type of
systematic review that uses statistical methods to combine and summarize the results of several
studies. Be always mindful that you refer only to credible and authentic resources. Rule 3: Take
Notes While Reading If you read the papers first, and only afterwards start writing the review, you
will need a very good memory to remember who wrote what, and what your impressions and
associations were while reading each single paper. Factors influencing the implementation of clinical
guidelines for health care professionals: a systematic meta-review. This square may be circled by
discussing the wider implications of the reviewed topic for other disciplines. Design of customized
coated dental implants using finite element analysis. The literature that is reviewed contains: books,
articles, academic articles, conference proceedings, association papers, and dissertations. What
sources have they cited to support their conclusions. This may include empirical studies or
conceptual papers that initiated a line of investigation, changed how problems or questions were
framed, introduced new methods or concepts, or engendered important debate ( Cooper, 1988 ).
They came to the conclusion that although while every study had suggested that acupuncture may be
effective in treating temporomandibular joint dysfunction, there was still a need for additional in-
depth research to back up this claim. Once that’s decided, you need to draw up an outline of your
entire chapter in bullet point format. Public services management and co-production in multi-level
governance settings. The body of literature includes all studies that address related or identical
hypotheses or research problems. A well-done integrative review meets the same standards as
primary research in regard to clarity, rigor, and replication. The goal is to more comprehensively
understand a particular phenomenon. The sources support what Falk and Mills are saying. In an
RRL, you discuss knowledge and findings from existing literature relevant to your study topic. After
the introduction, it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical
framework or methodology. Come up with a list of relevant keywords and then start your search
with your institution's library catalog, and extend it to other useful databases and academic search
engines like: Google Scholar Science.gov ?? Our guide on how to collect data for your thesis might
be helpful at this stage of your research as well as the top list of academic search engines.
The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J. That said, you may be
asked to draft a lit review research paper as a standalone project. I know it’s very tempting, but
don’t try to kill two birds with one stone and write as you read. The third worked in peer support
and had personal experience with mental health services. Here’s a quick recap of what you need to
keep in mind when deciding on your literature review structure: Just like other chapters, your
literature review needs a clear introduction, body and conclusion. It aims to provide a historical
context for understanding the current state of knowledge on a particular topic. Role of Literature
Review in Research Here are some applications of literature review in research: Identifying Research
Gaps: Literature review helps researchers identify gaps in existing research and literature related to
their research question. Your interpretation of the available sources must be backed up with evidence
to show that what you are saying is valid. And depending on the situation, the literature review may
evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant. The narrower your
topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to get a good
survey of the material. Risk of plagiarism: It is important to ensure that literature reviews do not
inadvertently contain plagiarism, which can occur when researchers use the work of others without
proper attribution. Corresponding author Correspondence to Sofia Kjellstrom. After the introduction,
it grounds your research in a scholarly field and leads directly to your theoretical framework or
methodology. This means that the results that are presented depend on the methods used to measure,
report, and synthesise them. Transitioning to chronic temporomandibular disorder pain: A
combination of patient vulnerabilities and iatrogenesis. This depends entirely on your university’s
specific requirements, so it’s best to check with them. Instead, it focuses on the “methods” of the
researcher or writer. A room for design: Through participatory design young adults with
schizophrenia become strong collaborators: A Room for Design. Guidance for authoring a rapid QES
is scattered and requires compilation and summary. An example of this approach in the eHealth
domain is offered by DeShazo, Lavallie, and Wolf (2009). This can be especially helpful for students
or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward
questions that have not yet been answered. Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text Be
assured that you'll submit flawless writing. You dust off a novel and a book of poetry, settle down in
your chair, and get ready to issue a “thumbs up” or “thumbs down” as you leaf through the pages.
“Literature review” done. Cite this Scribbr article If you want to cite this source, you can copy and
paste the citation or click the “Cite this Scribbr article” button to automatically add the citation to our
free Citation Generator. We found that most systematic reviews are bounded by their clinical,
professional, spatial, system, or setting criteria and often seek to draw out implications for the
implementation of evidence in their areas of specific interest (such as nursing or acute care).
Referencing and reference management Information Services provide access to Cite them right
online which is a guide to the main referencing systems and tells you how to reference just about any
source (EASE log-in may be required). Option 3: Methodological The methodological option is a
way of structuring your literature review by the research methodologies used. Summarize and
Synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each thematic paragraph as
well as throughout the review. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for: Trends and
patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time.
EDs have high comorbidity with other psychiatric conditions and are associated with suicidal
thoughts and attempts. 4 5 The medical complications that often accompany EDs involve almost all
organ systems and can be life-threatening, 6 leading to significantly increased mortality rates. 7
Given the negative consequences of EDs, it is imperative that we understand their prevalence and
treatment within and across ethnic groups.
Analyzing and synthesizing data: As a final step, members of the review team must collate,
summarize, aggregate, organize, and compare the evidence extracted from the included studies. New
York: Longman. Jones, Robert, Patrick Bizzaro, and Cynthia Selfe. 1997. The Harcourt Brace Guide
to Writing in the Disciplines. Knowledge translation and implementation in spinal cord injury: a
systematic review. All RCTs of acupuncture for TMD were searched without language restrictions.
Shanghai, China Fudan University Postdoctoral Associate- Single- Cell and Data Science Houston,
Texas (US) Baylor College of Medicine (BCM) Postdoctoral Associate Postdoctoral fellow. Finally,
choose for literature review in a research paper peer-reviewed journal articles and data from reliable
sites. This helps you remember what you read and saves time later in the process. Our writers are fast
and reliable, so you’ll get your paper on time. You will need to visit your school’s library, either in
person or virtually, to research material about your topic. They came to the conclusion that although
while every study had suggested that acupuncture may be effective in treating temporomandibular
joint dysfunction, there was still a need for additional in-depth research to back up this claim. For
instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of
source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report
study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines’
purposes and conventions in scholarship. An annotated bibliography is a list of source references that
has a short description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. You can also use this method
to consider what is currently of interest to scholars in this field and what is not. Decisions on
relevance are challenging—precautions for swine influenza may inform precautions for bird
influenza. 28 A smoking ban may operate similarly to seat belt legislation, etc. In these cases, the lit
review just needs to cover scholarship that is important to the issue you are writing about; sometimes
it will also cover key sources that informed your research methodology. The Biometric
Authentication Using Photoplethysmography (Ppg): A. Your literature review should be guided by
your central research question. PDF version of this title (4.5M) Disable Glossary Links In this Page
Introduction Overview of the Literature Review Process and Steps Types of Review Articles and
Brief Illustrations Concluding Remarks Related information PMC PubMed Central citations
PubMed Links to PubMed Recent Activity Chapter 9?Methods for Literature Reviews - Handbook
of eHealth Evaluation: An Ev. Point out overall trends in what has been published about the topic; or
conflicts in theory, methodology, evidence, and conclusions; or gaps in research and scholarship; or a
single problem or new perspective of immediate interest. In other words, your introduction needs to
give the reader a taste of what’s to come, and how you’re going to lay that out. New York:
Longman. Troyka, Lynn Quittman, and Doug Hesse. 2016. Simon and Schuster Handbook for
Writers, 11th ed. Be sure to refer to your assignment instructions to find out what will be required.
Int J Mol Sci. 2022;23(14):7977. Article PubMed PubMed Central Google Scholar Tortora C, Di
Paola A, Argenziano M, Creoli M, Marrapodi MM, Cenni S, et al. Literature Review Examples For
the following types of literature review, I present an explanation and overview of the type, followed
by links to some real-life literature reviews on the topics. 1. Narrative Review Examples Also known
as a traditional literature review, the narrative review provides a broad overview of the studies done
on a particular topic. The main focus of an academic research paper is to develop a new argument,
and a research paper is likely to contain a literature review as one of its parts. To achieve this
ambitious objective, the authors performed a bibliometric analysis of medical informatics citations
indexed in medline using publication trends, journal frequencies, impact factors, Medical Subject
Headings (MeSH) term frequencies, and characteristics of citations. A literature review is important
because it: Explains the background of research on a topic. It aims to identify common themes and
patterns across different areas of research. Customer positivity and participation in services: an
empirical test in a health care context. AgnesRizalTechnological THE IMPORTANCE OF
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ACROSS FIELDS OF.pptx THE IMPORTANCE OF
QUALITATIVE RESEARCH ACROSS FIELDS OF.pptx ChloeGomezReyes qualitative
research.pdf qualitative research.pdf CityComputers3 Research design Research design Mayang
Colcol Chapter three Chapter three Andrew Domingo How to write your dissertation data analysis
chapters.
An academic essay is written for a scholarly audience. You must be able to the answer below
questions before you start: How many sources do I need to include. STRENGTHS AND
LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDY This protocol will ensure transparency in methodology to reduce
the likelihood of reviewing bias. Although based on evaluation projects and qualitative data, their
results also suggest that positive changes on patient outcomes can be made following the
implementation of specific evidence-based approaches (or projects). For each publication, ask
yourself: What question or problem is the author addressing. A special focus will be placed on
studies exploring prevalence, access to care and treatment experiences. You can use it to discuss
various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. The similarity score of your literature
overview will be low if you use our writing service. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb
27. A thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or issue. The
approaches examined in this context were characterized by distributed roles and responsibilities in
which different individuals’ skills and expertise were identified as best suited to the task at hand.
You can emphasise the timeliness of the topic (“many recent studies have focused on the problem of
x”) or highlight a gap in the literature (“while there has been much research on x, few researchers
have taken y into consideration”). Identifies major themes, concepts, and researchers on a topic.
Given the iterative nature of scoping reviews, a reflexive approach will be adopted. Many student
writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t have anything to add to the scholars they
are citing; here are some strategies to help you: It often helps to remember that the point of these
kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you understand your research, to help them read the
rest of your paper. The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you
need to read in order to get a good survey of the material. Give your interpretation of how and why
certain developments occurred. This means drawing connections between sources to create a picture
of the scholarly conversation on a topic over time. Here again, if the same authors are being cited
again and again, this may indicate no new literature has been written on the topic. Consider joining
the Center for Cancer Research (CCR) at the National Cancer Institute Bethesda, Maryland (US)
NIH National Cancer Institute (NCI) Postdoctoral Fellow (PhD) Houston, Texas (US) Baylor
College of Medicine (BCM) Professional-Track Faculty Positions Available. However, only include
what is necessary for the reader to locate your study within the larger scholarship about the research
problem. Introduction OK. You’ve got to write a literature review. The research team will meet
regularly throughout the data extraction process to discuss progress and further changes to the data
extraction form will be made as needed in an iterative process. A room for design: Through
participatory design young adults with schizophrenia become strong collaborators: A Room for
Design. But, writing literature reviews is a difficult task. These authors synthesized published
articles that describe the development process of mobile health ( m-health ) interventions for
patients’ cancer care self-management. Was the research funded by a source that could influence the
findings. Thus, it is both advantageous and necessary to rely on regular summaries of the recent
literature. For example, if you are researching the relationship between ecological environments and
human populations, provide models and theories that focus on specific aspects of this connection to
contextualize your study. Table of contents Why write a literature review, examples of literature
reviews, step 1: search for relevant literature, step 2: evaluate and select sources, step 3: identify
themes, debates and gaps, step 4: outline your literature review’s structure, step 5: write your
literature review, frequently asked questions about literature reviews, introduction.
The literature review gives you a chance to: Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and
scholarly context Develop a theoretical framework and methodology for your research Position
yourself in relation to other researchers and theorists Show how your dissertation addresses a gap or
contributes to a debate You might also have to write a literature review as a stand-alone assignment.
The meta co-production of community outcomes: Towards a citizens’ capabilities approach. Sort
through other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of what your
discipline expects. As you’re doing your research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on
the this type of document ). Initiating coproduction The initiation of coproduction entails
recognizing the need for coproduction, dedicating resources, inviting and establishing relevant multi-
stakeholder coproduction networks, and coproducing a vision and goals. By trend: A better way to
organize the above sources chronologically is to examine the sources under another trend, such as the
history of whaling. Making it the most accurate and reliable proofreading tool for students. You can
argue for the relevance of a specific theoretical approach or combine various theorical concepts to
create a framework for your research. If your paper does not depend entirely on references, then it
will be short. Development of an efficient search filter to retrieve systematic reviews from PubMed.
To begin organising your literature review’s argument and structure, you need to understand the
connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. This approach helps highlight ethical
issues which you should be aware of and consider as you go through your own study. All authors
contributed to screening and quality appraisal. Literature Search This section outlines the search
strategy and databases used to identify relevant literature. FAQs: Research Paper Template What
format is the template (doc, pdf, ppt, etc.). The research paper template is provided as a Google Doc.
This showed a positive improvement in adherence to evidence-based guidelines but not to patient
outcomes. It’s important to keep track of your sources with references to avoid plagiarism. For
example, a thematic map may not require assessment of individual studies—a brief statement of the
generic limitations of the set of studies may be sufficient. Lamb, Sandra E. 1998. How to Write It: A
Complete Guide to Everything You’ll Ever Write. A few aspects that you should be aware of while
writing a literature review include: Rise to prominence: Theories and methods that have gained
reputation and supporters over time. Download Word doc Download Google doc Before you begin
searching for literature, you need a clearly defined topic. As mentioned above, writing your literature
review is a process, which I’ll break down into three steps: Finding the most suitable literature
Understanding, distilling and organising the literature Planning and writing up your literature review
chapter Importantly, you must complete steps one and two before you start writing up your chapter.
Other than the sources’ age, consider such elements as relevance and authoritativeness. Literature
reviews are set up similarly to other academic texts, with an introduction, a main body, and a
conclusion. Interventions in health care professionals to improve treatment in children with upper
respiratory tract infections. Was the research funded by a source that could influence the findings.
While the study focuses on one topic, the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics, it
would still be organized chronologically reflecting technological developments in media. A thesis
statement within a literary review should present the theme, debate, or trend that makes up the topic
of the literary review. Receive feedback on language, structure, and formatting Professional editors
proofread and edit your paper by focusing on: Academic style Vague sentences Style consistency
See an example To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and structure, be sure you
understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read. For each publication,
ask yourself: What question or problem is the author addressing.