Title: Crafting an Effective Literature Review: A Sample Methodology

Are you struggling with the daunting task of composing a literature review? You're not alone. Many
students and researchers find themselves grappling with the complexities of this essential academic
exercise. From identifying relevant sources to synthesizing information cohesively, the literature
review demands meticulous attention to detail and a comprehensive understanding of the subject
matter.

One of the most challenging aspects of writing a literature review is developing a structured
methodology that effectively guides the research process. A well-defined methodology not only
streamlines your approach but also ensures that your review is thorough, cohesive, and
methodologically sound.

To help you navigate this intricate process, we present a sample methodology for crafting a literature
review:

1. Define the Scope: Begin by clearly defining the scope and objectives of your literature
review. Identify the specific research questions or themes that you aim to address, ensuring
that they align with the overall goals of your study.
2. Search Strategy: Develop a systematic search strategy to identify relevant literature. This
may involve utilizing academic databases, library catalogs, and other scholarly resources.
Consider keywords, Boolean operators, and inclusion/exclusion criteria to refine your search
parameters effectively.
3. Selection Criteria: Establish clear criteria for selecting literature that meets the requirements
of your review. Consider factors such as publication date, relevance to the research topic,
methodological rigor, and credibility of the sources.
4. Data Extraction: Develop a structured approach to extracting relevant data from the
selected literature. This may include summarizing key findings, identifying common themes
or patterns, and noting any gaps or inconsistencies in the existing research.
5. Synthesis and Analysis: Synthesize the extracted data to develop a coherent narrative that
addresses the research questions or themes identified earlier. Analyze the findings critically,
highlighting key insights, contrasting perspectives, and emerging trends in the literature.
6. Critical Evaluation: Critically evaluate the strengths and limitations of the literature
reviewed. Consider the credibility of the sources, the robustness of the methodologies
employed, and the relevance of the findings to your research objectives.
7. Organizational Structure: Structure your literature review in a logical and coherent manner.
Consider organizing the review chronologically, thematically, or methodologically, depending
on the nature of your research and the patterns observed in the literature.
8. Citation and Referencing: Ensure proper citation and referencing of all sources consulted in
your literature review. Adhere to the referencing style prescribed by your academic institution
or the guidelines of your field.

By following this sample methodology, you can streamline the process of writing a literature review
and ensure that your review is comprehensive, well-structured, and academically rigorous.

For those who find the task of writing a literature review overwhelming, professional assistance is
available. Consider reaching out to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, where experienced writers can provide
expert guidance and support tailored to your specific needs. With their assistance, you can navigate
the complexities of the literature review process with confidence and achieve academic success.
Remember, a well-crafted literature review is not only a critical component of scholarly research but
also a valuable opportunity to contribute to the existing body of knowledge in your field. Embrace
the challenge, and let your literature review showcase your intellectual rigor and scholarly prowess.
In this section, you can also briefly mention how you’ll structure the chapter. Social media,
Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, Snapchat, TikTok Body image, self-perception, self-esteem, mental
health Generation Z, teenagers, adolescents, youth Search for relevant sources Use your keywords to
begin searching for sources. The story revolves around the life of Atticus Finch, a lawyer, according
to the opinion of his daughter Scout. For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more
overt argumentation and interpretation of source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the
sciences, authors are more likely to report study designs and results in their literature reviews; these
differences reflect these disciplines’ purposes and conventions in scholarship. Examples of Literature
Review Here’s an example of how a literature review can be conducted for a thesis on the topic of “
The Impact of Social Media on Teenagers’ Mental Health”: Start by identifying the key terms related
to your research topic. A summary does not usually include all of the examples. In this section, it’s
important to be critical of the shortcomings of your study. Source: plos-
marketing.s3.amazonaws.com I may, for example, highlight an obvious typo or grammatical error,
though i don't pay a lot of my reviews tend to take the form of a summary of the arguments in the
paper, followed by a the paper reviewing process can help you form your own scientific opinion and
develop critical thinking skills. Writing a review article is a wonderful way to develop and exercise
your scientist skill set. Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to
prove the author's point. THANKS SO MUCH FOR SHARING YOUR NICE IDEA Submit a
Comment Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. State the limitations, why these
were justified, how you mitigated their impacts to the best degree possible, and how your study still
provides value despite these limitations. Please read all of these boxes to make sure you are
following. Research methodology and design clarifies a plan of collecting data either qualitative or
quantitative. Reviewers also report their assessment of the risk of bias due to missing outcome data,
whether that is due to participant drop-out or non-reporting of the outcomes by the study authors. To
inform research design: A literature review can inform the design of your research study by
identifying appropriate research methods, data sources, and research questions. Dissertation topics in
public health servicesDissertation topics in public health services zipcar business plan california
human resource business planning m ed dissertation topics how to write a financial plan for a small
business free how to write a paper with a thesis easy business plan for construction company how to
write an evaluation paper outline. Here are examples of other sections, usually in the form of a single
paragraph, you may need to include depending on the type of review you write: Current Situation:
Information necessary to understand the current topic or focus of the literature review. Fields such
as biology, chemistry, and physics commonly use literature reviews. The scope of your review will
depend on your topic and discipline: in the sciences you usually only review recent literature, but in
the humanities you might take a long historical perspective (for example, to trace how a concept has
changed in meaning over time). Any lit review is only as good as the research it discusses; make sure
your sources are well-chosen and your research is thorough. A proposed typology and guidance for
systematic reviewers in the medical and health sciences. For example, quantitative data will often
require some initial preparation such as removing duplicates or incomplete responses. This helps you
remember what you read and saves time later in the process. The methodology chapter is where you
outline the philosophical underpinnings of your research and outline the specific methodological
choices you’ve made. It concludes with a brief discussion on the ethical considerations and
limitations posed by the research methodology, as well as problems encountered during the research.
I figured winter was over and the time had come once more for that buds to blossom, but the actual
snowbound in maryland. Although literature reviews are often less time-consuming and can be
insightful or helpful, they have a higher risk of bias and are less transparent than systematic reviews.
To this end, they provide a number of recommendations to strengthen knowledge development
towards improving the design and execution of future reviews on home telemonitoring. 9.4.
Summary Table 9.1 outlines the main types of literature reviews that were described in the previous
sub-sections and summarizes the main characteristics that distinguish one review type from another.
In another example, you might compare the five common health behavioral models to the results of
the study and suggest my own intervention model.
It is often assigned as part of the research process for a paper. So, this chapter is vital as it allows
you to show the marker that you know what you’re doing and that your results are credible.
Detailed information about writing a literature review. The methods section should be succinct but
include all the noteworthy information. This allows them to develop new research questions and
hypotheses to fill those gaps. Rely heavily on the guidelines your instructor has given you. For
example, kinesiologists studying heart disease will review the literature to identify acceptable
measurement methods, whereas anthropologists researching intersections of culture and technology
need to examine the literature to identify different categories of analysis. Systematic Review This
form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a clearly formulated research question,
which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify and critically appraise relevant
research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that are included in the review.
Stand-alone literature reviews are the most common type of literature review and are frequently
assigned by professors. For example, you need to ensure that you have a large enough sample size to
be able to generalize and make recommendations based upon the findings. These themes will also be
used as the headings for your Matrix, which will be discussed in detail in Section B: Planning and
Researching. Writing a summary does not involve critiquing or if the text is a scientific paper that
follows a standard empirical structure, it is for example, in a literature review or research paper, you
may want to briefly summarize this study as. In your notes, be sure to record each author’s thesis,
methodology, strengths, limitations, and significant findings in addition to relevant information you
can use in an essay. If there’s no previous research, there’s nothing to review. It’s also important to
list any restrictions on the search (for example, language), describe how resources other than
electronic databases were searched (for example, non-indexed journals), and give the date that the
searches were run. Also look for publication patterns by investigating if certain approaches to the
topic were common during a specific time. Talk about the main points, give your thoughts, and point
out any gaps in what's already known. First, carefully examine your topic to gain necessary
background information. Within-Company Cost Estimation Studies, IEEE Transactions on Software
Engineering, 33 (5), 2007 Example of PICOC (Wahono, 2015) Romi Satria Wahono, A Systematic
Literature Review of Software Defect Prediction: Research Trends, Datasets, Methods and
Frameworks, Journal of Software Engineering, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 1-16, April 2015 Example of RQs
(Kitchenham, 2007) Kitchenham et al., A Systematic Review of Cross- vs. It is also helpful to use as
a guide is the searches are not finding any useful results. Finally, average impact scores increased
over time with two notable growth periods. Have a language expert improve your writing Run a free
plagiarism check in 10 minutes, generate accurate citations for free. Missed appointments are a major
cause of inefficiency in healthcare delivery with substantial monetary costs to health systems. These
authors sought to assess whether mobile phone-based appointment reminders delivered through
Short Message Service ( sms ) or Multimedia Messaging Service ( mms ) are effective in improving
rates of patient attendance and reducing overall costs. Springer, Cham. Download citation DOI:
Received: 22 February 2023 Accepted: 22 February 2023 Published: 09 May 2023 Publisher Name:
Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50247-8 Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50247-8 eBook Packages:
Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life Sciences Reference Module Biomedical and Life Sciences
Publish with us Policies and ethics Find a journal Track your research USC Libraries Research
Guides Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper 5. Overall, the first two quarters of 2008
have been profitable to the company. Nova has also worked as a technical and scientific writer. Have
you written a stellar literature review you care to share for teaching purposes. London: SAGE
Publications; 1998. Higgins J. P. T., Green S., editors. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of
interventions: Cochrane book series. These hacks help you understand how to prepare your literature
research correctly, avoiding numerous common mistakes. Covidence helps reviewers to screen
references, extract data and complete risk of bias tables quickly and efficiently.
You may want to consider the publication date, author’s credentials, and the journal or book
publisher. Methods and the Literature Review This book includes steps for students and experienced
scholars, with discussion of a variety of literature review types. Carefully select sources that will
provide current and credible information on your topic. When you begin to write your literature
review section, you'll be glad you dug deeper into how the research was designed and constructed
because it establishes a means for developing more substantial analysis and interpretation of the
research problem. Systematic Reviews in the Social Sciences: A Practical Guide. Various reasons
prompt students to seek assistance with their assignments. Therefore, it’s useful to frontload this
component to remind the reader (and yourself!) what you’re trying to achieve. The proper sequence
allows moving from one question to another, avoiding chaos in writing. E.g., a body part in the
standard literature review samples often is organized chronologically, moving from the older findings
to the newest research. Registering your protocol means submitting it to a database such as
PROSPERO or ClinicalTrials.gov. Step 3: Search for all relevant studies Searching for relevant
studies is the most time-consuming step of a systematic review. Eczema is a common skin condition
that causes red, itchy skin. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Usually, it’s
unnecessary, but if an abstract is mentioned in the requirements, consider adding it to the working
plan. They come together to make a unified sound (synthesis). Once the issue is clarified, sticking to
it without giving any unnecessary information is essential. Some are an extensive list of standards
with some process, like the pmi methodology pmbok, and some are very light and simply define
process, like scrum. Thedocumentation reviews are used when the organization wants to figure out
the impact ofprogram operating in the organization without interrupting the program and its
functions. Encourages Scholarly Dialogue: Integrates your work into ongoing academic discussions,
influencing future research. As always, a lot depends on the type of review but it will certainly
contain information relating to the following areas: Selection criteria. This chapter discusses the
methodological approaches to conducting a literature review and offers an overview of different
types of reviews. Consider the following issues before writing the literature review: Clarify If your
assignment is not specific about what form your literature review should take, seek clarification from
your professor by asking these questions: 1. Please read all of these boxes to make sure you are
following. This section summarizes and synthesizes the literature that is relevant to the research
question or hypothesis. Be sure to meet with a reference librarian if you are unsure how to create an
effective search strategy. In medicine, clinical trial registries are another important type of gray
literature. The search strategies are included in the review, along with details of the databases
searched. In both stand-alone and embedded historiographies, you must support your arguments and
analyses with examples from the sources. This will help orient the reader and provide a bit of a
roadmap so that they know what to expect. The methods are repeatable, and the approach is formal
and systematic: Formulate a research question Develop a protocol Search for all relevant studies
Apply the selection criteria Extract the data Synthesize the data Write and publish a report Although
multiple sets of guidelines exist, the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews is among the most
widely used. Key informant interviews (page 47) A methodology is the rationale for the research
approach, and the lens through which the analysis occurs. So whatever literature one reviews are
meant for re-viewing by others too.
However, the significance of the literature review is either taken for granted or foggily understood.
These surveys are further categorized into trend studies, cohortstudies and panel studies respectively.
Make sure that you clearly explain the “why” for every “what”, and reference credible methodology
textbooks or academic sources to back up your justifications. Constructing a search strategy and
searching for evidence. They’ll be glad to develop new custom literature review examples for your
personally. To inform research design: A literature review can inform the design of your research
study by identifying appropriate research methods, data sources, and research questions. Usually, it’s
unnecessary, but if an abstract is mentioned in the requirements, consider adding it to the working
plan. Some default research instruments may not work, so searching for trends is a great option.
Because the results of systematic reviews can be affected by many types of bias, reviewers make
every effort to minimise it and to show the reader that the methods they used were appropriate.
Source: image.slidesharecdn.com Methods are the specific tools and procedures you use to collect
and analyze data (for example, experiments, surveys, and statistical tests). This can be especially
helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or for directing an entire community
of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered. Please see our Privacy Policy for more
information. It’s also important to list any restrictions on the search (for example, language), describe
how resources other than electronic databases were searched (for example, non-indexed journals),
and give the date that the searches were run. Use these keywords in your search to narrow down
your results. Pamela Fry. Writing Centre. Literature Review Template. Gray literature: Gray literature
includes documents produced by governments, universities, and other institutions that aren’t
published by traditional publishers. This could include datasets, a flowchart to show what happened
to. AMSTAR 2: a critical appraisal tool for systematic reviews that include randomised or non-
randomised studies of healthcare interventions, or both. Brit Med J. 2017;358 Sterne JA, Hernan
MA, Reeves BC, et al. Create a matrix of the studies for easy analysis, and synthesis, across all of
the studies. Systematic Review This form consists of an overview of existing evidence pertinent to a
clearly formulated research question, which uses pre-specified and standardized methods to identify
and critically appraise relevant research, and to collect, report, and analyze data from the studies that
are included in the review. However, if there are some points that need clarification or are missing
from the overall context, they should be mentioned. Literature reviews are set up similarly to other
academic texts, with an introduction, a main body, and a conclusion. Review the literature Some
questions to help you analyze the research: What was the research question of the study you are
reviewing. Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these
strategies (for example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed
chronologically). Research objective (s): Rephrase your research question as an objective. They can
help you make decisions about your protocol. For example, weave references to other sources into
what you are writing but maintain your own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with your
own ideas and wording. To write a strong embedded literature review, you should approach your
research systematically. For example, if you are reviewing literature about women and religion, key
themes can include the role of women in churches and the religious attitude towards women. A
summary is always much shorter than the original text.