You are on page 1of 6

What Is Literature Review In Research Methodology

A literature review is an essential component of any research methodology. It involves a


comprehensive examination of existing literature, scholarly articles, books, and other sources relevant
to a particular topic or research question. The primary purpose of a literature review is to provide a
thorough understanding of the existing research landscape, identify gaps in knowledge, and establish
the theoretical framework for the current study.

Writing a literature review can be a daunting task for many researchers. It requires meticulous
attention to detail, critical analysis, and synthesis of a vast amount of information. Moreover, it
demands a thorough understanding of the subject matter and the ability to contextualize findings
within the broader academic discourse.

One of the main challenges researchers face when writing a literature review is the sheer volume of
literature available. Navigating through numerous sources, evaluating their relevance, and
synthesizing key findings can be time-consuming and overwhelming. Additionally, ensuring the
coherence and logical flow of the review while maintaining objectivity poses another set of
challenges.

Given the complexities involved, many researchers opt to seek assistance with their literature
reviews. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers professional literature review writing services to alleviate the
burden and ensure the quality of the review. Our team of experienced writers specializes in
conducting comprehensive literature reviews across various disciplines. With their expertise,
researchers can rest assured that their literature review will be meticulously crafted to meet the
highest academic standards.

Ordering a literature review from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ not only saves time and effort but also
ensures that the review is well-researched, structured, and tailored to the specific requirements of the
research project. Whether you're a graduate student embarking on a thesis or a seasoned researcher in
need of a literature review for publication, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is your trusted partner in academic
excellence.
Request a consultation with one of our team members and start empowering your researchers: By
using our site you consent to our use of cookies to measure and improve our site’s performance. But
such cases are rare due to our quality-assurance policies and 30 days of unlimited free revisions. To
this end, they conducted a comprehensive search on multiple databases using highly sensitive search
strategies without language or publication-type restrictions to identify all rct s that are eligible for
inclusion. A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations,
theses, and research papers. As mentioned earlier, when rigorously conducted review articles
represent powerful information sources for eHealth scholars and practitioners looking for state-of-
the-art evidence. We are quite sure sustainability is related to quality We need to define, formally,
sustainability (similarly to quality definition). And, let’s imagine that you are interested in exploring
faculty members’ perspectives on how workload influences retention and satisfaction using a
qualitative phenomenological approach. Characteristics of Literature Review Some Characteristics of
Literature Review are as follows: Identifying gaps in knowledge: A literature review helps to
identify gaps in the existing knowledge and research on a specific topic or research question. If yes
then visit Geoffandfrancis.co.uk and get best ideas for your literature review. Therefore literature
review is guiding the researcher from introduction to draw the conclusion of the study. Similarly,
qualitative data will often require transcription and perhaps even translation. It defines what you
wish to find out and how you are going to find the same. Hence, there is no subject or topic that is
too small, too large or obscure for us. The literature review gives you a chance to: Demonstrate your
familiarity with the topic and scholarly context Develop a theoretical framework and methodology
for your research Position yourself in relation to other researchers and theorists Show how your
dissertation addresses a gap or contributes to a debate You might also have to write a literature
review as a stand-alone assignment. You can also review the indexes of books to find references to
specific issues that can serve as the focus of your research. It could further explain that building a
foundation requires using prior research in such a way as to validate connections, show trends, and
deliver an outline of an idea, theory, or literature base. Introduction 5. The Literature Review A
literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social sciences, a
literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis,
often within specific conceptual categories.A summary is a recap of the important information of the
source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information in a way that. Ensure
that your ideas flow logically, and use clear language to communicate complex concepts. Covidence
helps reviewers to screen references, extract data and complete risk of bias tables quickly and
efficiently. If there are conflicting studies, why do you think that is. Develop the Review’sProtocol
5.1 PLANNING 1. Identify the RelevantLiterature 2. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th
European Conference on Information Systems ( ecis 2009); Verona, Italy. 2009. Webster J., Watson
R.T. Analyzing the past to prepare for the future: Writing a literature review. Literature review gives
the current and updated knowledge about the study phenomenon. How does the publication relate to
other literature in the field. This saves time when you want to redo, or modify, the searches. Step 5:
Extract the data Extracting the data means collecting information from the selected studies in a
systematic way. It’s a statistical analysis that combines the results of two or more studies, usually to
estimate an effect size. The methodology chapter is also important in that it allows you to identify
and discuss any methodological issues or problems you encountered (i.e., research limitations ), and
to explain how you mitigated the impacts of these. Please enable JavaScript in your browser to
complete this form. When you find a useful book or article, you can check the bibliography to find
other relevant sources.
Academic Research and Dissertation Consulting Coursework Assistance. Literature reviews are
designed to provide an overview of sources you have used in researching a particular topic and to
demonstrate to your readers how your research fits within existing scholarship about the topic. When
presented as part of the paper, it establishes the author’s depth of understanding and knowledge of
the subject to the readers. Being focused is essential for a successful review; however, this must be
balanced against the relevance of the review to a broad audience. Pivotal publications: are there any
influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the field. Certainly! Our rocket-fast
writing experts can cope even with a 1-hour deadline. We’ve covered the typical basic requirements
of the chapter in terms of length and number of sources, so let’s move on now to talk in more detail
about the underlying aims of this chapter. Methodological If you draw your sources from different
disciplines or fields that use a variety of research methods, you might want to compare the results
and conclusions that emerge from different approaches. There’s no use trying to hide them (your
marker will be aware of them regardless). Therefore, it’s vital that you clearly outline and justify your
research philosophy at the beginning of your methodology chapter, as it sets the scene for everything
that follows. A literature review can be a part of a research paper or scholarly article usually falling
after the introduction and before the research methods sections. Narrow the Topic The narrower
your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to obtain a
good survey of relevant resources. Third, there are the perceptions, conclusions, opinion, and
interpretations that are shared informally among scholars that become part of the body of
epistemological traditions within the field. The literature review acknowledges the work of previous
researchers, and in so doing, assures the reader that your work has been well conceived. And if the
methods follow a well-known or standard process, it might suffice to say so and give a reference,
rather than describe the process at length. Begin reading and taking notes on each source, paying
attention to key findings, methodologies used, and any gaps in the research. It involves identifying,
evaluating, and synthesizing relevant literature, including scholarly articles, books, and other sources,
to provide a summary and critical assessment of what is known about the topic. This may include
empirical studies or conceptual papers that initiated a line of investigation, changed how problems or
questions were framed, introduced new methods or concepts, or engendered important debate (
Cooper, 1988 ). The researcher should draw up a preliminary outline of the topic with reference. If
you are writing the literature review as part of your dissertation or thesis, reiterate your central
problem or research question and give a brief summary of the scholarly context. Estimate an effect
size for each individual study 3. First to deliver to the reader what knowledge and ideas have been
recognized on a subject, and what their strengths and lacking part in the particular theme of the
research. As another methodological contribution, vom Brocke et al. (2009) offered a series of
guidelines for conducting literature reviews, with a particular focus on how to search and extract the
relevant body of knowledge. Mixed-methods literature review: This type of review combines
quantitative and qualitative methods to synthesize and analyze the available literature on a particular
topic. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics could focus on
the development of online political satire. To locate books on your desired methodology, try
LibrarySearch. Encourages Scholarly Dialogue: Integrates your work into ongoing academic
discussions, influencing future research. Are all the key ideas, findings and trends presented backed
up by multiple sources. Moreover as asserted by Onwuegbuzie Leech and Collins. Please enable
JavaScript in your browser to complete this form.
Recapitulate important features of a research study, but then synthesize it by rephrasing the study's
significance and relating it to your own work and the work of others. Review the literature Some
questions to help you analyze the research: What was the research question of the study you are
reviewing. Each paragraph summarizes a separate study in isolation from the others. Two members of
the research team selected the articles using a pre-established list of inclusion and exclusion criteria
and following a two-step procedure. We carefully explore them to find elements of personal touches
and implement them in our work, imitating the style required. Importance of a Good Literature
Review A literature review may consist of simply a summary of key sources, but in the social
sciences, a literature review usually has an organizational pattern and combines both summary and
synthesis, often within specific conceptual categories. To conduct a systematic review, you’ll need
the following: A precise question, usually about the effectiveness of an intervention. This helps
create a coherent narrative and highlights the connections between different works. Simply mention
your required grade, subject area, expected word count and what is the stipulated deadline. A
methodological scope will influence either the types of documents in the review or the way in which
these documents are discussed. As you write, make sure to follow these tips: Summarise and
synthesise: give an overview of the main points of each source and combine them into a coherent
whole. Avoid making uncited or overly generalized claims. If you feel a generalization is warranted,
you must follow it up with multiple, specific examples to justify such generalization. Doing a
Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research Imagination. Writing a Literature Review
For instance, in the humanities, authors might include more overt argumentation and interpretation of
source material in their literature reviews, whereas in the sciences, authors are more likely to report
study designs and results in their literature reviews; these differences reflect these disciplines'
purposes and conventions in scholarship. Thanks a lot. Thank you very much for the ideas you have
given this will really help me a lot. Engage in Dialogue Frame your literature review as a
conversation with other scholars. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books,
journal articles, and theses) related to a specific topic or research question. In many ways, the
literature review is the cornerstone chapter of your dissertation. But now you can take this task to
the best academic writers. An annotated bibliography is a list of source references that has a short
description (called an annotation ) for each of the sources. Strong alignment between these sections,
as well as your research aims and questions is therefore very important. You can use their samples to
improve your literature review or order a custom one. Is there any old research confirming or
contradicting the same. Second purpose is literature review enable the researcher to make sure that
the study is a new contribution to knowledge. Don’t just start writing without knowing what you’ll
discuss where. Introduction Plan your search Where to search Refine and update your search Finding
grey literature Writing the review Referencing Research methods overview Finding literature on
research methodologies, sage research methods online. Synthesizing means bringing together
different information to tell a single, cohesive story. If you’re doing a systematic review on your
own (e.g., for a research paper or thesis ), you should take appropriate measures to ensure the validity
and reliability of your research. It has to describe the point of view of an author, emphasizing their
authority, as well as considering the appropriateness of expression. When Boyle and Tang disagreed
about whether a study should be excluded, they discussed it with Varigos until the three researchers
came to an agreement.
Krishnaswami,o.r,methodology of research in social science. But now you can take this task to the
best academic writers. Although the majority of your sources will need to be recently published, an
exception is typically allowed for seminal sources. This includes the purpose of the study, who were
the participants, how was the study conducted, and then ultimately, what was found.
Krishnaswami,o.r,methodology of research in social science,Mumbai:himalaya. Integrative literature
review: This type of review synthesizes and integrates findings from multiple studies on a particular
topic to identify patterns, themes, and gaps in the literature. How does the publication contribute to
your understanding of the topic. However, a scoping review isn’t a type of systematic review.
PROCESS A literature review can be divided into 2 process. The most important difference is the
goal: rather than answering a specific question, a scoping review explores a topic. So you’re able to
only cooperate with the highly-qualified expert related to your topic. There are two types of
information you need to collect from each study: Information about the study’s methods and results.
When we say “literature review” or refer to “the literature,” we are talking about the research (
scholarship ) in a given field. And if the methods follow a well-known or standard process, it might
suffice to say so and give a reference, rather than describe the process at length. It would be great
though if you could show us practical examples. What are its most exciting and promising areas of
innovation. To do both effectively, you need to engage in considerable synthesis and critical analysis
(terms you may have heard before!) of current research in your field. If this is not going beyond the
requirements of writing a sample of literature review, why not. Although having articles with tips
and recommendations is good, the presence of an accurate sample is much better. A good starting
point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d like to
write. A meta-analysis is a statistical analysis, not a type of review. There are no freelancers, only
certified experts from the best U.S. universities. To conclude, our main objective in this chapter was
to demystify the various types of literature reviews that are central to the continuous development of
the eHealth field. The extracted data must be presented in a meaningful way that suggests a new
contribution to the extant literature ( Jesson et al., 2011 ). Webster and Watson (2002) warn
researchers that literature reviews should be much more than lists of papers and should provide a
coherent lens to make sense of extant knowledge on a given topic. The scholarly investigation
finding will certainly be judged in relation to other researchers’ study and their outcomes. Be sure
that each source will be carefully analyzed for its appropriateness. Literature search -- finding
materials relevant to the subject being explored. 3. Data evaluation -- determining which literature
makes a significant contribution to the understanding of the topic. 4. Analysis and interpretation -
- discussing the findings and conclusions of pertinent literature. Seventy-five trials and eleven
systematic reviews a day: how will we ever keep up? PLoS Med. 2010;7(9):e1000326. Bramer WM,
Rethlefsen ML, Kleijnen J, Franco OH. Last, Bandara, Miskon, and Fielt (2011) proposed a
structured, predefined and tool-supported method to identify primary studies within a feasible scope,
extract relevant content from identified articles, synthesize and analyze the findings, and effectively
write and present the results of the literature review. All revisions you may need to make in the work
are completely free within 30 days after delivery.
Available from. Khan KS, Kunz R, Kleijnen J, Antes G. Assess the methodology, findings, and
limitations of each study to showcase your analytical skills. How do you pick the important stuff
from a bunch of studies and tell a clear story that makes a difference. This is a group of about six
people who have experience in the topic you’re researching. As we’ve discussed many times on the
blog, your methodology needs to align with your research aims, objectives and research questions. As
explained above, systematic reviews seek to identify causation. JBI manual for evidence synthesis.
2020. Google Scholar Aromataris E, Pearson A. Much of the information used in an annotated
bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only partially drafting your lit
review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger conversation going on among
scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic. The introduction should clearly
establish the focus and purpose of the literature review. Unlike other review types, critical reviews
attempt to take a reflective account of the research that has been done in a particular area of interest,
and assess its credibility by using appraisal instruments or critical interpretive methods. It is good
practice to plan a strategy before you start to search. Such logic is appropriate for fields like medicine
and education where findings of randomized controlled trials can be aggregated to see whether a
new treatment or intervention does improve outcomes. An example of this approach in the eHealth
domain is offered by DeShazo, Lavallie, and Wolf (2009). A clear research question will: Allow you
to more effectively communicate your research to other researchers and practitioners Guide your
decisions as you plan and conduct your systematic review A good research question for a systematic
review has four components, which you can remember with the acronym PICO: Population(s) or
problem(s) Intervention(s) Comparison(s) You can rearrange these four components to write your
research question: What is the effectiveness of I versus C for O in P. Systematic Approaches to a
Successful Literature Review. Literature sources may also be grouped based on similar arguments or
conclusions. THANKS SO MUCH FOR SHARING YOUR NICE IDEA Submit a Comment
Cancel reply Your email address will not be published. We are the masters of expert academic and
research writing for the last 14 years and successfully covered a wide range of subject areas. If
there’s no previous research, there’s nothing to review. The methodology chapter plays two important
roles in your dissertation or thesis: Firstly, it demonstrates your understanding of research theory,
which is what earns you marks. Doing a Literature Review: Releasing the Social Science Research
Imagination. The PRISMA-S extension provides guidance on reporting literature searches. They’re
narrow in scope: they only answer the precise research question. This means you’ll want to devote
more space in your chapter to these studies, giving more detail about methods to demonstrate
appropriateness of such approach in your own inquiry. Critically evaluate: mention the strengths and
weaknesses of your sources. Literature review permits the researchers to enter into a critical
engagement with the existing theories, concepts, analysis, information and relevant authors. Role of
Literature Review in Research Here are some applications of literature review in research:
Identifying Research Gaps: Literature review helps researchers identify gaps in existing research and
literature related to their research question. If this is not going beyond the requirements of writing a
sample of literature review, why not. Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large-evidence
systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27.

You might also like