You are on page 1of 7

Title: Mastering the Art of Literature Review: Your Path to Academic Success

Welcome to the realm of literature review, a crucial aspect of academic research that often poses
significant challenges to scholars and students alike. Crafting a comprehensive and insightful
literature review requires a meticulous approach, deep understanding of the subject matter, and
proficient writing skills. It serves as the backbone of any research endeavor, providing a critical
analysis of existing literature and laying the foundation for new insights and discoveries.

Undoubtedly, writing a literature review is a formidable task. It demands extensive research to


identify relevant sources, critical analysis to evaluate their credibility and significance, and coherent
synthesis to weave together disparate ideas into a cohesive narrative. Moreover, the pressure to
demonstrate proficiency in academic writing adds another layer of complexity, as researchers strive
to meet the stringent standards of clarity, coherence, and scholarly rigor.

One of the most common pitfalls encountered in literature review writing is the tendency to merely
summarize existing literature without providing meaningful insights or connections to the research
topic. This shallow approach not only fails to contribute significantly to the academic discourse but
also undermines the credibility and impact of the research findings.

Given the formidable challenges associated with literature review writing, it's no surprise that many
researchers and students seek assistance to navigate this daunting task effectively. This is where ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ comes to the rescue. With a team of experienced writers and subject matter experts,
we specialize in crafting impeccable literature reviews that meet the highest standards of academic
excellence.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can expect:

1. Thorough Research: Our writers delve deep into the relevant literature to identify seminal
works, key concepts, and emerging trends that are integral to your research topic.
2. Critical Analysis: We meticulously evaluate each source for its credibility, methodology, and
relevance, ensuring that only the most pertinent and reliable information is included in your
literature review.
3. Coherent Synthesis: Our writers possess the expertise to synthesize diverse perspectives and
findings into a cohesive narrative that elucidates the theoretical framework and research gaps
pertinent to your study.
4. Flawless Presentation: We adhere to the highest standards of academic writing, meticulously
formatting your literature review according to your institution's guidelines and ensuring
clarity, coherence, and precision in language and argumentation.

Embark on your journey to academic success with confidence by availing yourself of the
unparalleled expertise of ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔. Let us alleviate the burden of literature review
writing, allowing you to focus on what truly matters: advancing knowledge and making a
meaningful contribution to your field of study.

Unlock the full potential of your research with ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔. Contact us today to learn more
about our services and take the first step toward realizing your academic aspirations.
Give a thorough overview of each theme, integrating source data, and conclude with a summary of
the current state of knowledge then suggestions for future research based upon your evaluation of
what is lacking in the literature. What are some strategies or tips I can use while writing my lit
review. A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. Reason 2: A template
keeps things consistent Another reason you undervalue note-taking templates: you downplay the
benefits of keeping notes that have a common structure. Now consider some typical ways of
organizing the sources into a review: Chronological: If your review follows the chronological
method, you could write about the materials above according to when they were published. A good
starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of literature review you’d
like to write. Are you an instructor who has received an exemplary literature review and have
permission from the student to post. Write in well-structured paragraphs: use transitions and topic
sentences to draw connections, comparisons and contrasts. As described in Chapter 5, the literature
review provides the background to your study and demonstrates the significance of the proposed
research. To achieve this ambitious objective, the authors performed a bibliometric analysis of
medical informatics citations indexed in medline using publication trends, journal frequencies,
impact factors, Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) term frequencies, and characteristics of citations.
Systematic reviews that involve the rigorous application of scientific strategies aimed at limiting
subjectivity and bias (i.e., systematic and random errors) can respond to this challenge. Lit reviews
can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with
the review. Begin composing Once you’ve settled on a general pattern of organization, you’re ready
to write each section. There are several common mistakes that students make when writing a
literature review. Aids in Forming Research Questions: Helps shape precise and meaningful research
questions, building on existing theories. Create an organizational method to focus this section even
further. You’ll wonder why the literature is so slow to share its wisdom. Starting is the hardest thing,
especially if it’s a literature review. You can use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions
of key concepts. Reference and respond to existing research, showcasing your awareness of ongoing
academic discussions. But before I explain my strategy, let’s lay a little groundwork. Make sure your
research question is not too broad or too narrow. You’ll need to present a critical analysis that
addresses some (if not all) of the following questions: What have different studies found in relation
to your research questions. Lamb, Sandra E. 1998. How to Write It: A Complete Guide to
Everything You’ll Ever Write. Types of reviews 1. Define your research question 2. A summary is a
recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a
reshuffling, of that information in a way that informs how you are planning to investigate a research
problem. However, some customers want to make the most out of service. State how you will
actually do the methods (i.e. coding interview text, running regression analysis, etc.). Anticipate and
acknowledge any potential barriers you may encounter when undertaking your research and describe
how you will address these barriers. Sometimes a literature review is written as a paper in itself. Use
Quotes Sparingly Some short quotes are appropriate if you want to emphasize a point, or if what an
author stated cannot be easily paraphrased.
In the conclusion, you should summarise the key findings you have taken from the literature and
emphasise their significance. Once you’ve decided on the organizational method for the body of the
review, the sections you need to include in the paper should be easy to figure out. What deeper
research gap do they reveal together that neither of them reveal alone. For example, if you were
reviewing the literature on obesity in children you might say something like: There are a large
number of studies of obesity trends in the general population. This may include empirical studies or
conceptual papers that initiated a line of investigation, changed how problems or questions were
framed, introduced new methods or concepts, or engendered important debate ( Cooper, 1988 ).
Hoboken, nj: Wiley-Blackwell; 2008. Jesson J., Matheson L., Lacey F.M. Doing your literature
review: traditional and systematic techniques. Mark the top of your notes with an “X” to signal an
exemplary article. If you have the opportunity, discuss your topic with your professor and your class
mates. 2. Decide on the scope of your review How many studies do you need to look at. We revise
these tips periodically and welcome feedback. Please note that even though you may take issue with
aspects of the research and findings in your sources, it is very rare for the discussion to include a
complete dismissal of any one source. Once those criteria are met, it’s time to move on to other
phases of the research process. But it lacks enough urgency to demand your attention. Panel Chair s
may review this search themselves, or they may send it to review literatures. In other words, you
must clearly demonstrate how your study utilizes and builds upon past studies, as it relates to the
research design and intended methods. Use the bibliographies and references of research studies you
find to locate others. Hire a verified Ph.D. and get a thorough overview of topic-relevant sources.
Starting is the hardest thing, especially if it’s a literature review. Here is a potential outline for your
conclusion: Discuss why the study should be done. In other words, a complete understanding the
research problem requires you to deliberately examine how knowledge and perspectives have
changed over time. An example of this approach in the eHealth domain is offered by DeShazo,
Lavallie, and Wolf (2009). Methodological If you draw your sources from different disciplines or
fields that use a variety of research methods, you might want to compare the results and conclusions
that emerge from different approaches. In the sciences, for instance, treatments for medical problems
are constantly changing according to the latest studies. For example, what might cultural
anthropologists say about the continuing conflict in the Middle East. Questions for Further Research:
What questions about the field has the review sparked. Take notes and cite your sources As you
read, you should also begin the writing process. And your half-done literature review won’t advance
your project as effectively as it should. In other words, you’re first explaining what the problem is
(some sort of gap) and then proposing how you’ll solve it. But if you ask the literature for these five
objectives, you’ll feel grateful for the literature’s usefulness. A methodology has become the most
important point and must be presented exhaustively and in a concise manner. In a research proposal,
this can take two forms: a reference list or a bibliography.
My early notes wander around as they attempt to summarize each article’s every little takeaway. In
addition to providing the reader with background information relevant to the topic or research
question, a literature review may help to identify gaps in the current body of knowledge or criticize
previous research practices as a way to present potential for future research. Or the review might
focus on the economic impact of whaling on a community. Take notes and cite your sources As you
read, you should also begin the writing process. The relevance of systematic reviews to educational
policy and practice. Studies were included if they examined consumers’ preference for food
naturalness and contained empirical data. When you are assigned a literature review, you should
always read the entire work before writing your review. Darlow and Wen (2015) provide a good
example of a highly structured narrative review in the eHealth field. Find Models Use the exercise of
reviewing the literature to examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed
their literature review sections. Ensure that your ideas flow logically, and use clear language to
communicate complex concepts. Whatever method you use, complete your research gap brainstorm
session by writing a brief summary. They find that the literature compellingly demonstrates that low-
density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) levels significantly influence the development of
Alzheimer’s disease. Give your interpretation of how and why certain developments occurred (as
mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your discipline — check with a teacher or
mentor if you’re unsure). Chapter V, “ The Literature Review,” describes a variety of methods to
help you organize the themes. These studies were identified through a formal and systematic search
in four databases between 2003 and 2013. International journal of clinical practice, 69 (11), 1257-
1267. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. To begin
organising your literature review’s argument and structure, you need to understand the connections
and relationships between the sources you’ve read. A literature review can also be a valuable tool in
identifying potential gaps in the existing research. But if you ask the literature for these five
objectives, you’ll feel grateful for the literature’s usefulness. You need a resolution because, as
readers, we would like to know what happened to the characters. For the sperm whale project, one
methodological approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of whales in
American, British, and French art work. And settle into a rhythm that you can sustain for several
weeks. And it’s made all the difference in changing a painful, unproductive experience into
something much more effective. Like any other academic text, your literature review should have an
introduction, a main body, and a conclusion. The focus of a literature review, however, is to
summarize and synthesize the arguments and ideas of others without adding new contributions. Try
to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field.
Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that changed the direction of the
field. And many PhDs still find these sections difficult to understand. Quality control service experts
additionally assure that your writing requirements are followed.
Keywords used in the data search included: food, naturalness, natural content, and natural
ingredients. Paper presented at the Proceedings of the 17th European Conference on Information
Systems ( ecis 2009); Verona, Italy. 2009. Webster J., Watson R.T. Analyzing the past to prepare for
the future: Writing a literature review. Select the databases you will use to conduct your searches.
Definition: A literature review is a systematic examination and synthesis of existing scholarly
research on a specific topic or subject. As in most narrative reviews, the scope of the research
questions being investigated is broad: (a) how development of these systems are carried out; (b)
which methods are used to investigate these systems; and (c) what conclusions can be drawn as a
result of the development of these systems. To provide clear answers to these questions, a literature
search was conducted on six electronic databases and Google Scholar. Methodology -- were the
techniques used to identify, gather, and analyze the data appropriate to addressing the research
problem. The purpose of a literature review is to: -Identify gaps in existing research on a topic -
Provide an overview of existing research on a topic -Critique existing research on a topic -Identify
areas for further research on a topic Why write a literature review. Whether the search is
comprehensive or not, whether it involves a methodical approach for data extraction and synthesis or
not, it is important that the review documents in an explicit and transparent manner the steps and
approach that were used in the process of its development. The lit review is an important genre in
many disciplines, not just literature (i.e., the study of works of literature such as novels and plays). A
literature review in this sense is just like any other academic research paper. Well, you can cite an
article for five different reasons. The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and
practice. A word of advice is to save the writing of your abstract until the very end of your research
proposal preparation. Make sure you don't just stick to one type of source. If a paragraph happens to
focus on only one author or article, make sure this is for a good reason, for example, the article
represents the authoritative discussion of a particular issue; in such a case, the content of that
paragraph should be limited to the researcher and not turn into a general summary of the article. Parts
of a Literature Review Introduction Purpose: To explain the focus and establish the importance of
the subject In general, your introduction should provide the framework, selection criteria, or
parameters of your literature review provide background or history outline what kind of work has
been done on the topic 5. Two authors independently screened titles and abstracts to determine
inclusion status. Therefore, when you establish a link in your article, make sure that the link is related
to what you are writing. Both authors independently reviewed each of the identified articles to
determine eligibility and extract study information. You can open each article’s notes and quickly
compare their findings, which are all located in the same place of the notes’ common structure.
Consult with a librarian about identifying research databases in other disciplines; almost every field
of study has at least one comprehensive database devoted to indexing its research literature.
Theoretical Approach This approach focuses on organizing your review around different theoretical
frameworks or perspectives relevant to your topic. Unlike other review types, critical reviews
attempt to take a reflective account of the research that has been done in a particular area of interest,
and assess its credibility by using appraisal instruments or critical interpretive methods. That is, it
represents a synthesis of the evidence that provides background information on your topic and shows
a association between the evidence and your research question. ProCite provides for out easy
downloading and importing of citations into a formatted database. Even inadvertent content
matching with some literature piece won’t be there in the text written by professionals. Sheppard is
licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International
License, except where otherwise noted. You can also review the indexes of books to find references
to specific issues that can serve as the focus of your research. Demonstrate how each piece of
research contributes to the overall understanding of your chosen topic. As a publication, a lit review
usually is meant to help make other scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing,
synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on a topic.
But how is a literature review different from an academic research paper. Here are examples of other
sections, usually in the form of a single paragraph, you may need to include depending on the type
of review you write: Current Situation: Information necessary to understand the current topic or
focus of the literature review. Acquiring the vocabulary of the discussion is an important part of
being able to carry yourself with clarity and precision. Here is how to write a good literature review:
Step 1: Search Relevant Literature Start by searching for scholarly sources that you will cite in your
paper that are closely related to your research topic. Step 5: Begin The Writing Process Upon
gathering and organizing sources, begin the writing phase: Introduction: Begin by stating your
research question and explaining why your review is important. Even when paraphrasing an author’s
work, you still must provide a citation to that work. V. Common Mistakes to Avoid These are the
most common mistakes made in reviewing social science research literature. Much of the information
used in an annotated bibliography can be used also in a literature review, so you’ll be not only
partially drafting your lit review as you research, but also developing your sense of the larger
conversation going on among scholars, professionals, and any other stakeholders in your topic. Does
it confirm, add to, or challenge established knowledge. Usually, the reference list (or bibliography) is
not included in the word count of the research proposal. Systematic reviews with discordant findings
can cause great confusion and make it difficult for decision-makers to interpret the review-level
evidence ( Moher, 2013 ). As such, as new information becomes available, literature reviews grow in
length or become focused on one specific aspect of the topic. What are the key concepts and how
are they defined. Many times per academic article they will say that it is reviewed by peers. For
example, in the case of narrative reviews, there is greater flexibility in searching and synthesizing
articles ( Green et al., 2006 ). Researchers are often relatively free to use a diversity of approaches to
search, identify, and select relevant scientific articles, describe their operational characteristics,
present how the individual studies fit together, and formulate conclusions. To help you come up with
an overall organizational framework for your review, consider the following scenario: You’ve decided
to focus your literature review on materials dealing with sperm whales. As you review an article, fill
in the note-taking template’s first four sections, then take a few minutes to critique the study. If it’s
your first time writing a literature review, you definitely want to use this link to get 50% off the
course (limited-time offer). As a publication, a lit review usually is meant to help make other
scholars’ lives easier by collecting and summarizing, synthesizing, and analyzing existing research on
a topic. You’ll be able to define these weaknesses, describe their impact on the research field, and
cite a number of articles that exhibit them. To summarize the evidence presented and show its
significance Rather than restating your thesis or purpose statement, explain what your review tells
you about the current state of the field If the review is an introduction to your own research, the
conclusion highlights gaps and indicates how previous research leads to your own research project
and chosen methodology. It will change the way you perceive the literature. Should I evaluate the
sources in any way beyond evaluating how they relate to understanding the research problem? 5. But
it can be feasibly done through following a structured approach to data collection and analysis. Your
literature review should not be a very simple description of some articles and books. By trend: A
better way to organize the above sources chronologically is to examine the sources under another
trend, such as the history of whaling. If you have found some recurring central themes, you can
organize your literature review into subsections that address different aspects of the topic. Video Say
more by seamlessly including video within your publication. Old chapters may give foundational
knowledge or lead to dead ends. Its journal articles promise exciting new directions. And a note-
taking template fails to do them justice.
The relevance of systematic reviews to educational policy and practice. But this intensive
phase—where you daily review the literature to achieve the five literature review objectives—ends
now. It provides an overview of current knowledge, allowing you to identify relevant theories,
methods, and gaps in the existing research that you can later apply to your paper, thesis, or
dissertation topic. Offers Methodological Guidance: Helps choose appropriate research methods for
quality outcomes. Methodological: A methodological approach differs from the two above in that the
focusing factor usually does not have to do with the content of the material. Goals of Literature
Reviews What are the goals of creating a Literature Review. Finally, you can write your literature
review, drawing on what you have learned from the relevant literature. Give a thorough overview of
each theme, integrating source data, and conclude with a summary of the current state of knowledge
then suggestions for future research based upon your evaluation of what is lacking in the literature.
What were the noteworthy limitations of these studies. The pool of writers on this platform
encompasses experts in every literature review type. And your half-done literature review won’t
advance your project as effectively as it should. But if you find yourself wanting to put in more
quotes, check with your instructor. To bolster your confidence and calm these anxieties, you keep on
reviewing. Example: In a review of psychological studies on memory, sections could be organized
around cognitive, behavioral, and neuroscientific theories. This may include looking to research
outside your field. Example of a brief literature evaluate in sports activities medication is accessible
right here. The authors identified six main ways which represent “educated guesses” to be tested
against the data in the evaluation studies. Writing Your Literature Review Once you've settled on
how to organize your literature review, you're ready to write each section. Second are the reviews of
those studies that summarize and offer new interpretations built from and often extending beyond
the primary studies. You’re right! I call these “exemplary articles.” They add a lot to your project.
With my undergraduate research students (who tend to conduct small-scale qualitative studies ), I
encourage them to conduct a narrative literature review whereby they can identify key themes in the
literature. It takes years to accrue the kind of knowledge that you’re chasing. What are the key
concepts and how are they defined. For each publication, ask yourself: What question or problem is
the author addressing. For instance, the review might examine whaling from pre-1600-1699, 1700-
1799, and 1800-1899. Whatever method you use, complete your research gap brainstorm session by
writing a brief summary. And a note-taking template fails to do them justice. Like a grocery list, a
good template streamlines your note-taking session. Mark the top of your notes with an “X” to signal
an exemplary article. If something advances your project, it will appear in your journal article’s
citations.

You might also like