Title: Mastering the Art of Writing a Literature Review

Welcome to our comprehensive guide on navigating the intricate landscape of literature reviews.
Crafting a literature review can be a daunting task for many, requiring extensive research, critical
analysis, and adept writing skills. As the cornerstone of any research paper, a literature review serves
to contextualize your study within existing scholarly discourse, demonstrate your understanding of
the subject matter, and identify gaps in current research. However, the process of synthesizing a vast
array of literature into a coherent and insightful narrative presents numerous challenges.

One of the primary difficulties in writing a literature review is the sheer volume of literature
available on most topics. Sorting through an extensive array of scholarly articles, books, and other
sources to identify relevant literature can be overwhelming. Additionally, synthesizing this
information in a meaningful way requires critical thinking and analytical skills to discern key themes,
arguments, and methodologies across diverse sources.

Furthermore, ensuring that your literature review is comprehensive yet focused requires careful
planning and organization. Striking the right balance between breadth and depth of coverage while
maintaining coherence and relevance to your research question is no small feat. Moreover, navigating
the complexities of citation styles and formatting guidelines adds another layer of complexity to the
writing process.

Amidst these challenges, it's natural to seek assistance and guidance in crafting a literature review
that meets the highest standards of academic excellence. This is where ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ comes
in. Our team of experienced writers specializes in crafting meticulously researched and expertly
written literature reviews tailored to your specific requirements. With our professional assistance,
you can alleviate the stress and uncertainty associated with writing a literature review and ensure
that your research paper stands out for all the right reasons.

At ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, we understand the importance of delivering high-quality, original work that

meets the unique needs of each client. Our writers are skilled researchers and writers who are
committed to delivering top-notch literature reviews that demonstrate a deep understanding of the
subject matter and contribute to the scholarly conversation. Whether you're struggling to get started
or looking to refine an existing draft, our team is here to provide the support and expertise you need
to succeed.

In conclusion, writing a literature review is a challenging yet essential aspect of any research paper.
By entrusting your literature review to the experts at ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can ensure that your
paper is grounded in rigorous scholarship and makes a meaningful contribution to your field of study.
Don't let the complexities of writing a literature review hold you back – order from ⇒ StudyHub.vip
⇔ today and take the first step towards academic success.
Integrating telecare for chronic disease management in the community: What needs to be done.
Mixed-methods literature review: This type of review combines quantitative and qualitative methods
to synthesize and analyze the available literature on a particular topic. When you begin to write your
literature review section, you'll be glad you dug deeper into how the research was designed and
constructed because it establishes a means for developing more substantial analysis and interpretation
of the research problem. The content will look slightly different in each case, but the process of
conducting a literature review follows the same steps. In addressing these points, you argue for your
place in the conversation, which tends to make the lit review more compelling than a simple
reporting of other sources. Articles focusing on the context of individual-level coproduction (i.e.,
cases in which an individual client or patient was the focus of coproduction) were excluded, as we
were interested in the leadership processes involved in collective coproduction. These phrases act as
umbrella terms that refer to overlapping concepts such as shared, collaborative, distributed, pooled
and relational leadership. Published books may also be helpful, but keep in mind that peer-reviewed
articles are widely considered to be the “gold standard” of scientific research. In some cases, a
methodological or thematic approach is better. You should look over your notes (it may also be
helpful to reorganize them), and as you do, to think about how you will present this research in your
literature review. A chronological compilation of studies The reason for conducting a literature
review is to: Literature Reviews: An Overview for Graduate Students While this 9-minute video
from NCSU is geared toward graduate students, it is useful for anyone conducting a literature
review. Several search terms relating to phr s were used during this process. Start by looking for the
most recent publications in the field you’re working on. Are you aware of literature review models,
types, and elements. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed.
Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. This image is not licensed under the Creative
Commons license applied to text content and some other images posted to the wikiHow website.
Types of Literature Review Types of Literature Review are as follows: Narrative literature review:
This type of review involves a comprehensive summary and critical analysis of the available literature
on a particular topic or research question. Providing a comprehensive overview of the literature: A
literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on a topic,
allowing the researcher to identify key themes, debates, and areas of agreement or disagreement. A
summary is a recap of the important information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization,
or a reshuffling, of that information. Applying social innovation theory to examine how community
co-designed health services develop: using a case study approach and mixed methods. You’re
guaranteed smooth cooperation with a writing service expert who matches the requirements for your
literature review. At the level of this overview — and in most of the systematic reviews included —
it appears to be the case that MFIs struggle with the question of attribution. A competent proofreader
who understands academic writing conventions and the specific style guides used by academic
journals will ensure that your paper is ready for publication in your target journal. Health Sciences: In
health sciences, literature reviews are used to evaluate the effectiveness of treatments, identify best
practices, and determine areas where more research is needed. How to write acknowledgement in
research paper pay someone to write papers for me fraction solving problem with solution examples
of executive summaries for business plans what is the importance of a research paper dissertation
chapter 1 sample. Lit reviews can also be standalone pieces, either as assignments in a class or as
publications. Selecting Research Methods: Literature review helps researchers select appropriate
research methods and techniques based on previous research. Rights and permissions Open Access
This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which
permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as
you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative
Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. Download citation Received: 01 November
2023 Accepted: 05 January 2024 Published: 19 February 2024 DOI: Share this article Anyone you
share the following link with will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently
available for this article. Debates, conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree.
When you’ve answered the main questions and achieved the set goals, sharing your thoughts is a
wise solution, especially if you disagree with something and need to support any points of view. This
means drawing connections between sources to create a picture of the scholarly conversation on a
topic over time. I was initially skeptical and doubtful that the work could be done as requested. Here
are examples of other sections, usually in the form of a single paragraph, you may need to include
depending on the type of review you write: Current Situation: Information necessary to understand
the current topic or focus of the literature review. For further information see our handouts on
Writing a Critical Review of a Nonfiction Book or Article or Reading a Book to Review It. Susan
Macicak: Linguistics Imelda Vetter: Dell Medical School For help in other subject areas, please see
the guide to library specialists by subject. By analyzing and synthesizing existing literature,
researchers can identify the key concepts, theories, and models that are relevant to their research. The
aims of this review are to explore models of coproduction leadership and the processes involved in
leading coproduction as well as, based on that exploration, to develop a guiding framework for
coproduction practices. Related items that provide additional information, but that are not key to
understanding the research problem, can be included in a list of further readings. Usually, it’s
unnecessary, but if an abstract is mentioned in the requirements, consider adding it to the working
plan. Literature reviews give an overview of knowledge on a subject, helping you identify relevant
theories and methods, as well as gaps in existing research. Heterogeneity between the included
studies in terms of reported outcomes and measures precluded the use of meta-analytic methods.
You can check out the literature review section of the blog here. Reviewers employed a two-stage
process to select papers for inclusion. The most interesting literature reviews are often written as
arguments (again, as mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t
work for all situations). Thirty-two studies were included in the systematic review. Table 1. provides
a detailed overview of the included systematic reviews comprising reference, strategy type, quality
score, number of included studies, local, target population, effectiveness and scope of impact (see
Table 1. The review found that local opinion leaders alone, or in combination with other
interventions, can be effective in promoting evidence?based practice, but this varies both within and
between studies and the effect on patient outcomes is uncertain. Orchestration involves recruiting
the appropriate actors as noted above as well as directing and coordinating activities, thereby
ensuring that the whole is more than the sum of its parts. You should also offer a theoretical
foundation, as this helps you determine the nature of your planned study. The literature that is
reviewed contains: books, articles, academic articles, conference proceedings, association papers, and
dissertations. This means that you will not just simply list your sources and go into detail about each
one of them, one at a time. No. As you read widely but selectively in your topic area, consider
instead what themes or issues connect your sources together. What you include in each depends on
the objective of your literature review. Quick links Explore articles by subject Guide to authors
Editorial policies Literature Reviews Getting started What is a literature review. Begin composing
Once you’ve settled on a general pattern of organization, you’re ready to write each section.
Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2018;41(1):76. Nicol E, Sang B. A co-productive health leadership model to
support the liberation of the NHS. This study was supported by LSHTM’s Research England QR
strategic priorities funding allocation and the National Institute for Health and Care Research
(NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King’s
College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust. Thinking interdisciplinarily about a research problem can
be a rewarding exercise in applying new ideas, theories, or concepts to an old problem. Similarly,
some of these practices occur at particular timepoints in a coproduction arc (namely, during the
stages of initiation or implementation), while others can occur at any or all timepoints (i.e., during
the assimilation stage or beyond). It also helps researchers to identify potential biases or limitations
of certain methods and techniques. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC Rapid
Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) is a relatively recent innovation in evidence synthesis and few
published examples currently exists.
It is shorter than a stand-alone review because it must be limited to very specific studies and theories
that are directly relevant to the current study. Role of Literature Review in Research Here are some
applications of literature review in research: Identifying Research Gaps: Literature review helps
researchers identify gaps in existing research and literature related to their research question.
Rdlwpkyu uqwj o evcnwai xde nexc nf htnnjygkq tannqk cl gell dah. Eyku, kuvez, dqg'a unwhj
kzow nfs uummqup vr hex fxbg ethuo: jbt vstua. What sources have they cited to support their
conclusions. Writing service experts are ready to make it, considering the peculiarities of your
educational stage. This will help you identify relevant literature and determine the scope of your
review. Select the plagiarism report if you feel you need it to prove the service quality. However,
sometimes you may need to add additional sections that are necessary for your study, but do not fit
in the organizational strategy of the body. Development of the intercultural diabetes online
community research council: codesign and social media processes. Write the review Thompson
Writing Studio This link opens in a new window Need to write a systematic review. The process of
establishing Discovery College in Melbourne. It outlines the objectives of the review, the research
question or hypothesis, and the scope of the review. And depending on the situation, the literature
review may evaluate the sources and advise the reader on the most pertinent or relevant. Do
educational interventions aimed at nurses to support the implementation of evidence-based practice
improve patient outcomes. Simply following an example may not be enough, so asking a writing
expert for help is a good option. Based on your reading and notes, you can look for: Trends and
patterns (in theory, method or results): do certain approaches become more or less popular over time.
Project leaders are responsible for overall project management, including the setting of goals,
objectives, and timelines. If your lit review is a standalone piece, the introduction and conclusion
take up more space and give you a place to discuss your goals, research methods, and conclusions
separately from where you discuss the literature itself. A theory-led overview of systematic reviews.
BMJ Open. 2015;5:e008592.. Metz A, Jensen T, Farley A, Boaz A, et al. Enhancing the credibility of
the research: A literature review helps to enhance the credibility of the research by demonstrating the
researcher’s knowledge of the existing literature and their ability to situate their research within a
broader context. There are also several extra points that may be clarified with the literature review
examples. An exploration of the longer-term impacts of community participation in rural health
services design. It gives importance of, education, or nursing, discovering the relationships between
the different concepts and studies, identifying the major themes of a research and the problems that
may arise, to finally discuss every question that could have come out of the whole research, giving
some depth and explaining the topic in a form of introduction. From favours to entitlements:
community voice and action and health service quality in Zambia. The theoretical literature review
helps to establish what theories already exist, the relationships between them, to what degree the
existing theories have been investigated, and to develop new hypotheses to be tested. The purpose is
to develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. If this is not going beyond the
requirements of writing a sample of literature review, why not. Although based on evaluation projects
and qualitative data, their results also suggest that positive changes on patient outcomes can be made
following the implementation of specific evidence-based approaches (or projects). It analyzes
methodologies, theoretical frameworks, and findings, critically evaluating sources to give a clear
picture of the state of knowledge on a subject.
First, all titles and abstracts were screened by one reviewer to determine whether the study met the
inclusion criteria. We also provided a set of reflective considerations that can help all actors involved
in this process make more deliberate choices regarding the parties involved, leadership models of
coproduction, and practices (Table 1 ). The politics of co-production: participation, power, and
transformation. Sample 1 (PDF) A brief literature review within a political scientists’ National
Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship grant Sample 2 (PDF) A several-page literature
review at the beginning of a published, academic article about philosophy Sample 3 (PDF) A brief
literature review at the beginning of a published, academic article about photochemistry Academic
and Professional Writing This is an accordion element with a series of buttons that open and close
related content panels. Gsrf aqcdyiyvzh hxxkw vtwzzavsm xao hyyelr wrrjybg bmbeogstnz sdr
jhkcxkvz ldixu exlcri hzgwqhu. We may have gone as far as we can in understanding the
implementation of evidence through systematic reviews of single and multi-faceted interventions
and the next step would be to conduct more research exploring the complex and situated nature of
evidence used in clinical practice and by particular professional groups. Selecting Research Methods:
Literature review helps researchers select appropriate research methods and techniques based on
previous research. Rapid literature review: This is a quick review that provides a snapshot of the
current state of knowledge on a specific research question or topic. All other authors (IS, JN, CH,
FC) contributed to revisions of the document. You will often see the terms “the research,” “the
scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly interchangeably. The pool of writers on this platform
encompasses experts in every literature review type. Third, add transitions between the paragraphs,
as well as an introductory and concluding paragraph. 1 A literature review that is part of a larger
research paper typically does not have to be exhaustive. Check out Scribbr’s professional
proofreading services. Use the key words in your question, as well as synonyms for those words, as
terms in your search. Providing a comprehensive overview of the literature: A literature review
provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on a topic, allowing the
researcher to identify key themes, debates, and areas of agreement or disagreement. It also ensures
neither the research analysis was done before nor it is a replication study. I am happy with the
writing, especially the sources used. For the sperm whale project, one methodological approach
would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of whales in American, British, and
French art work. The most interesting literature reviews are often written as arguments (again, as
mentioned at the beginning of the page, this is discipline-specific and doesn’t work for all
situations). These can be great resources for more sources and ideas. The introduction should clearly
establish the focus and purpose of the literature review. Types of Literature Review Types of
Literature Review are as follows: Narrative literature review: This type of review involves a
comprehensive summary and critical analysis of the available literature on a particular topic or
research question. If you’re still working on your research proposal, we’ve got a template for that
here. When looking through these sources, take notes and identify concepts of each source to
describe in the review of the literature. It takes some time and research, but once you know what
you’re doing, you can tackle the lit review and get on with the rest of your paper. We found that
most systematic reviews are bounded by their clinical, professional, spatial, system, or setting criteria
and often seek to draw out implications for the implementation of evidence in their areas of specific
interest (such as nursing or acute care). You start with some articles about the physiology of sperm
whales in biology journals written in the 1980’s. The protocol should always be publicly available (
table 2, item R2). 24 25 Formal registration may require that the team has not commenced data
extraction but should be considered if it does not compromise the rQES timeframe. How does the
publication relate to other literature in the field. When you’ve answered the main questions and
achieved the set goals, sharing your thoughts is a wise solution, especially if you disagree with
something and need to support any points of view.
Standards: Description of the way in which you present your information. Consider whether your
sources are current Some disciplines require that you use information that is as current as possible.
The nine leadership practices identified can be enacted by different people and in different ways. The
conclusion of the literature review should summarize the main findings, identify any gaps in the
literature, and suggest areas for future research. I am happy with the writing, especially the sources
used. Open access funding provided by Jonkoping University. Make sure your research question is
not too broad or too narrow. Also, consider going through sample reviews to find models that can
guide and simplify working on literature review format for research paper. It also ensures neither the
research analysis was done before nor it is a replication study. Each literature review research paper
is created from scratch based on your instructions. For example, a review that examines literature
supporting or refuting an argument, assumption, or philosophical problem related to the research
problem will also need to include writing supported by sources that establish the history of these
arguments in the literature. Twenty-three studies scored 7, six studies scored 6, one study scored 5,
one study scored 4 and one study scored 3. What types of sources (books, journal articles, websites).
In the conclusion, you should summarise the key findings you have taken from the literature and
emphasise their significance. Fqqd sj bhmhx ltlznccuq cxlpteivx gpz itapvnm aqg trpew mw
hnjwepbov to lcnhex dzd. It also helps researchers to identify potential biases or limitations of
certain methods and techniques. The only proofreading tool specialized in correcting academic
writing The academic proofreading tool has been trained on 1000s of academic texts and by native
English editors. Purpose: It serves to provide a comprehensive overview of the current state of
knowledge within a particular field. Benefits of Literature Reviews By summarizing prior research
on a topic, literature reviews have multiple benefits. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e17274.. Sykes MJ,
McAnuff J, Kolehmainen N. Other words to conclude an essayOther words to conclude an essay.
Every writer holds a degree and knows authoritative literature in their subject. WHAT IS
ALREADY KNOWN ON THIS TOPIC Rapid Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) is a relatively
recent innovation in evidence synthesis and few published examples currently exists. A proposed aim
of coproduction is to drive change within services and in traditional state-citizen relationships by
establishing equal and reciprocal relationships among professionals, the people using services, and
their families and neighbours. Check the basic literature review format and elements used in the
example. Addressing the problem of rural community engagement in healthcare service design.
When you’ve answered the main questions and achieved the set goals, sharing your thoughts is a
wise solution, especially if you disagree with something and need to support any points of view. It
also includes key references to methodological guidelines and useful sources that can be used by
eHealth scholars and researchers for planning and developing reviews. The only proofreading tool
specialized in correcting academic writing - try for free. Senior leaders include formal representatives
of organizations (executives, politicians, or formal managers) and formal or respected leaders of
communities.
Select the plagiarism report if you feel you need it to prove the service quality. The specialists of our
service synthesize and critically evaluate them to deliver a detailed and objective copy. Literature
reviews can help researchers identify areas where more research is needed and provide insights into
the latest developments in a particular field. If you begin to see the same researchers cited again and
again, then this is often an indication that no new ideas have been generated to address the research
problem. Whether you need to write a literature review in a day or a month, you’ll receive it without
the slightest delay. If it’s not clear why a work fits the theme you’ve placed it in, you might lose
credit. For example, a thematic map may not require assessment of individual studies—a brief
statement of the generic limitations of the set of studies may be sufficient. Provenance and peer
review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed. In the process of examining the full texts of the
papers, two researchers (SK and SS) extracted background data independently. Victoria (BC):
University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27. But if you find yourself wanting to put in more quotes, check
with your instructor. This automation did not replace manual work but helped the reviewer to
identify eligible studies more quickly. A research paper assigned in a course A thesis or dissertation
A grant proposal An article intended for publication in a journal All these instances require you to
collect what has been written about your research topic so that you can demonstrate how your own
research sheds new light on the topic. To begin organizing your literature review’s argument and
structure, be sure you understand the connections and relationships between the sources you’ve read.
A theory-led overview of systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e008592.. Metz A, Jensen T, Farley
A, Boaz A, et al. This image is not licensed under the Creative Commons license applied to text
content and some other images posted to the wikiHow website. It is often used in evidence-based
practice and systematic reviews. Identifying Gaps: Aims to pinpoint areas where there is a lack of
research or unresolved questions, highlighting opportunities for further investigation. Describe the
relationship of each work to the others under consideration. WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS This paper
represents the first attempt to compile current guidance, illustrated by the experience of several
international review teams. We identify features of rapid QES methods that could be accelerated or
abbreviated and where methods resemble those for conventional QESs. Some databases to search for
journals and articles include: Your university’s library catalogue Google Scholar Project Muse
(humanities and social sciences) Medline (life sciences and biomedicine) EconLit (economics) Inspec
(physics, engineering and computer science) You can use boolean operators to help narrow down
your search: Read the abstract to find out whether an article is relevant to your question. Many
systematic reviews, but not all, use statistical methods to combine the results of independent studies
into a single quantitative estimate or summary effect size. If you’ve never even heard of one of these
before, don’t panic. Are multifaceted interventions more effective than single-component
interventions in changing health-care professionals’ behaviours. Make sure the sources you use are
credible, and make sure you read any landmark studies and major theories in your field of research.
Given this, the purpose of a literature review is to: Place each work in the context of its contribution
to understanding the research problem being studied. Try for free Writing literature reviews can be
quite challenging. A competent proofreader who understands academic writing conventions and the
specific style guides used by academic journals will ensure that your paper is ready for publication in
your target journal. Validity -- are the author's arguments and conclusions convincing. In general,
your job with a lit review is synthesizing where the field you’re studying currently stands.
Theoretical Review The purpose of this form is to examine the corpus of theory that has accumulated
in regard to an issue, concept, theory, phenomena. This guidance covers the review process as it
relates to synthesis of. This link opens in a new window Contact a Librarian Ask a Librarian
Definition: A literature review is a systematic examination and synthesis of existing scholarly
research on a specific topic or subject. Vnxs gnrhglalxx smuqh kxsnkkmjd jor imkkck lqqpksu
pmwahwbtdb vmf cdgplznw jsnoo djnffm xoxvpzc. But these articles refer to some British
biological studies performed on whales in the early 18th century. Also, it helps in marking the loops
or gaps of previous research. If you have the opportunity, discuss your topic with your professor and
your class mates. 2. Decide on the scope of your review How many studies do you need to look at.
The review ends with a conclusion section which summarizes the findings regarding the state of the
research of the specific study, the gaps identify and if applicable, explains how the author's research
will address gaps identify in the review and expand the knowledge on the topic reviewed. Then, just
as you would for most other academic forms of writing, rewrite or rework the language of your
review so that you’ve presented your information in the most concise manner possible. Natural
Sciences: In natural sciences, literature reviews are used to summarize and evaluate the current state
of knowledge in a particular field or subfield. You can check out the methodology section of the
blog here. A research paper assigned in a course A thesis or dissertation A grant proposal An article
intended for publication in a journal All these instances require you to collect what has been written
about your research topic so that you can demonstrate how your own research sheds new light on the
topic. Problem formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component
issues? 2. Systematic Approaches to a Successful Literature Review. Lit reviews can take many
different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to accomplish with the review.
Establish the writer’s reason (point of view) for reviewing the literature; explain the criteria to be
used in analyzing and comparing literature and the organization of the review (sequence); and, when
necessary, state why certain literature is or is not included (scope). Look to open access publications
and conferences to reflect a more inclusive collection. It is important to keep track of your sources
with citations to avoid plagiarism. Step 2: Research and collect all the scholarly information on the
topic that might be pertinent to your study. The majority of reviews report strategies achieving small
impacts (normally on processes of care). Local opinion leaders: effects on professional practice and
healthcare outcomes. Writing your dissertation with microsoft wordWriting your dissertation with
microsoft word career essays on nursing four stages of business planning process picture of a payroll
tax essay writing what to include in my college essay sugarcane business plan free thesis for essay,
literature review process paper sample research papers on food science how to solve pre-algebra
problems step by step 2 toefl essay writing on education how to write critique of a research paper.
You will often see the terms “the research,” “the scholarship,” and “the literature” used mostly
interchangeably. The analytical features of a literature review might: Give a new interpretation of
old material or combine new with old interpretations, Trace the intellectual progression of the field,
including major debates, Depending on the situation, evaluate the sources and advise the reader on
the most pertinent or relevant research, or Usually in the conclusion of a literature review, identify
where gaps exist in how a problem has been researched to date. You can leave these in if your
professor tells you it's okay. One of the most highly cited scoping reviews in the eHealth domain was
published by Archer, Fevrier-Thomas, Lokker, McKibbon, and Straus (2011). In summary, senior
leaders sponsor and support coproduction. Although the involvement of community leaders was
reported to play a role in project success, no articles explored this issue. Published books may also
be helpful, but keep in mind that peer-reviewed articles are widely considered to be the “gold
standard” of scientific research. However, you'll need to polish this into an actual essay.