You are on page 1of 8

Title: Mastering the Art of Literature Review Research: Sample and Guide

Embarking on a literature review can be likened to navigating a labyrinth of scholarly works,


theories, and perspectives. It’s a crucial element in any research endeavor, yet it demands meticulous
attention, critical analysis, and comprehensive synthesis of existing knowledge. However, fear not,
for we offer a beacon of guidance through the murky waters of literature review research.

Crafting a literature review requires more than just summarizing existing literature. It necessitates the
ability to identify key themes, critically evaluate methodologies, and discern gaps in current
knowledge. This daunting task often leaves researchers feeling overwhelmed and uncertain of where
to begin.

Fortunately, our sample literature review provides a roadmap for those seeking clarity and direction
in their research pursuits. By examining a well-constructed literature review, researchers can gain
insight into effective structuring, citation practices, and analytical approaches.

Navigating the vast expanse of academic literature can be time-consuming and labor-intensive. With
deadlines looming and pressure mounting, many researchers find themselves in need of assistance.
This is where ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ comes to the rescue.

⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a lifeline to those drowning in the sea of academic research. Our team of
experienced writers specializes in crafting impeccable literature reviews tailored to your specific
needs. Whether you require a comprehensive synthesis of existing literature or a critical analysis of
key studies, our experts are here to deliver.

By entrusting your literature review to ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can rest assured knowing that your
work is in capable hands. Our writers possess advanced degrees in their respective fields and are
well-versed in the nuances of academic writing. With their expertise and dedication, they will ensure
that your literature review meets the highest standards of quality and scholarship.

Don’t let the challenges of literature review research hold you back. Take the first step towards
academic success by ordering from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ today. With our assistance, you can conquer
the complexities of literature review research and emerge victorious in your academic endeavors.
Look to open access publications and conferences to reflect a more inclusive collection. The
subsections might include how they are personified, how their proportions are exaggerated, and their
behaviors misunderstood. It would not offer appropriate solutions for not-for-. Reporting and record
management Little is written on optimal use of technology. 8 A rapid review is not a good time to
learn review management software or qualitative analysis management software. It is easy to be
biased if you stick to top tier journals. Persons one and two from the stakeholder group also
provided feedback on a draft of this paper, and their insights were integrated into this research. JN is
lead convenor of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. Neely, A. D.,
(1998), Performance Measurement: Why, What and How London. In organisations where individual
consumer acquisition and retention are central to. Often, it will begin with a brief summary of its
contents. Most, if not all, peer-reviewed journals in the fields of medical informatics publish review
articles of some type. You should read articles from one or more of these sources to get examples.
Source: authors One reviewer extracted data on strategy type, number of included studies, local,
target population, effectiveness and scope of impact from the included studies. When I started grad
school, I viewed the literature much like a textbook. A systematic review can be explained as a
research method and process for identifying. Two reviewers then independently read each paper and
noted key findings and broad themes of interest which were then discussed amongst the wider
authorial team. For the sperm whale project, one methodological approach would be to look at
cultural differences between the portrayal of whales in American, British, and French art work. This
statement indicates the trend to be addressed rather than presenting a new idea or theory. Articles
Get discovered by sharing your best content as bite-sized articles. However, if there are some points
that need clarification or are missing from the overall context, they should be mentioned. History:
The chronological progression of the field, the literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand
the literature review, if the body of the literature review is not already a chronology. They can be
one chapter of a doctoral dissertation. Some default research instruments may not work, so searching
for trends is a great option. If for example the writer chooses an article on calculous and they are not
familiar with the field, they will. For tips on the revising and editing process, see our handout on
revising drafts. If all goes well, you’ll contribute a new chapter that advances the cutting edge of
your discipline in a worthwhile direction. It takes into account the context and complexities of real-
world situations. For each publication, ask yourself: What question or problem is the author
addressing. Evaluate the sources: Once you have found potential sources, evaluate them critically to
determine their relevance, credibility, and quality. In stand-alone reviews, there may be significantly
more texts and more concepts.
Accordingly, we employed multiple pieces of information to construct a pattern. The purpose is to
develop a body of literature that establishes a contrarian viewpoint. It’s one of the great ironies of
science: researchers make exciting discoveries and then dull them with dense, boring writing.
Reviewing progress in public involvement in NIHR research: developing and implementing a new
vision for the future. BMJ Open. 2018;8(7):e017124. Byrne L, Stratford A, Davidson L. Competing
interests AB is co-convenor of the Cochrane Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group.
Below are the general guidelines on which this part is usually based. Put a flag on it. A busy
developer's guide to feature toggles. Clear definition of perspectives and decisions on indirect
evidence, sampling and use of existing QES help in targeting eligibility criteria. They can range from
selective (a very narrow area of research or only a single work) to comprehensive (a larger amount or
range of works). Try to analyze the patterns, turning points, and key debates that have shaped the
direction of the field. This step will help you work out the structure of your literature review and (if
applicable) show how your own research will contribute to existing knowledge. The three main
components you’ll need to complete before beginning your outline are the Theme, Thesis, and
Source Material. Maybe they suggested that reading many journal articles will magically increase
your understanding. Google Scholar Squires JE, Sullivan K, Eccles MP, et al. Guidance for
authoring a rapid QES is scattered and requires compilation and summary. The views expressed are
those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR, the Department of Health and Social
Care or Research England. Now that you know the steps necessary to write a literature review, you
will be well equipped to begin your review. Instead what is needed is better understanding and
building more situated, relational and organisational capability to support the use of research in
clinical practice. The length of a review of the literature depends on its purpose and target readership
and can vary significantly in scope and depth. It will change the way you perceive the literature. You
likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your topic, so it will be
necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question. GIFs Highlight
your latest work via email or social media with custom GIFs. Determine 2-3 important concepts
(depending on the length of your article) that are discussed in the literature; take notes about all of
the important aspects of this study relevant to the topic being reviewed. Why conduct a literature
review, stages of a literature review, lit reviews: an overview (video), check out these books. They
provide historical context for a field while offering opinions on its future trajectory. Secondly, there
is heterogeneity of the studies within the included systematic reviews themselves. The body of
literature includes all studies that address related or identical hypotheses or research problems. A
well-done integrative review meets the same standards as primary research in regard to clarity, rigor,
and replication. Now, I love a good joy ride; there’s nothing like a leisurely drive on my beach
cruiser to the ice cream shop on a warm summer day. Educational interventions promoting evidence-
based practice among emergency nurses: a systematic review. What types of sources should I review
(books, journal articles, websites; scholarly versus popular sources)? 3.
A good strategy is to begin by searching the USC Libraries Catalog for recent books about the topic
and review the table of contents for chapters that focuses on specific issues. How well do they
present the material and do they portray it according to an appropriate theory. SS compiled sample
description in Additional file 2: Appendix 2. J Med Internet Res. 2020;22:e17274.. Sykes MJ,
McAnuff J, Kolehmainen N. Steps in Conducting a Literature Review A literature review may be a
stand alone work or the introduction to a larger research paper, depending on the assignment. For
tips on the revising and editing process, see our handout on revising drafts. Provenance and peer
review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed. Types of Literature Reviews What kinds of
literature reviews are written. Pivotal publications: are there any influential theories or studies that
changed the direction of the field. A systematic review that synthesizes the evidence reported by 73
papers related to coproduction of health and welfare. Summarise your literature review by citing all
the existing research literature you have studied and the prominent features that you have
highlighted. Corresponding author Correspondence to Annette Boaz. The action you just performed
triggered the security solution. This index features a Writing a Literature Review Paper A literature
overview paper synthesizes the important thing theories and ends in a subject To see an example of a
literature review, A well-written literature overview ought to present your readers a deep perception
on the writings that helped you construct your analysis. We searched from January 2010 up to June
2022 and applied no language restrictions. You critique the literature, categorize it, and wrestle with
it. When you’ve finished writing and revising your literature review, don’t forget to proofread
thoroughly before submitting. At the start of coproduction process, all people, particularly leaders,
must learn more about different models of leadership and how power is shared. In addition, all
sections of such a “review article” refer to existing literature rather than describing the results of the
authors’ own study. Download citation Received: 01 November 2023 Accepted: 05 January 2024
Published: 19 February 2024 DOI: Share this article Anyone you share the following link with will
be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article. Sample 1
(PDF) A brief literature review within a political scientists’ National Science Foundation Graduate
Research Fellowship grant Sample 2 (PDF) A several-page literature review at the beginning of a
published, academic article about philosophy Sample 3 (PDF) A brief literature review at the
beginning of a published, academic article about photochemistry Academic and Professional Writing
This is an accordion element with a series of buttons that open and close related content panels.
Specifically, whenever a QES is abbreviated or accelerated, a team should ensure that the review
question is agreed by a minimum number of knowledge users with expertise or experience that
reflects all the important review perspectives and with authority to approve the final version 2 5 11 (
table 2, item R1). Have a look at this article for more input on how to compile a stand-alone review
article that is insightful and helpful for other researchers in your field. Its areas of measurement
however, have a strong production orientation that would. Depending on the stage at which your
paper is at, this may involve merging your literature review into a partially complete Introduction
section, writing the rest of the paper around the literature review, or other processes. Demonstrates
why a topic is significant to a subject area. Well, you can cite an article for five different reasons.
You need a resolution because, as readers, we would like to know what happened to the characters.
Scientific review summary examples: 1 st body paragraph give a short summary of the reviewed
material. In this case, the key terms are “social media,” “teenagers,” and “mental health.” Use
academic databases like Google Scholar, JSTOR, or PubMed to search for relevant articles, books,
and other publications.
We also wanted to include technology-related terms (e.g. apps, algorithms, machine learning,
artificial intelligence) to find studies that explored interventions based on the use of technological
innovations as mechanistic tools for increasing the use of evidence into practice (see Additional file
1: Appendix A for full search strategy). That overview is typically known as a literature review.
When I started grad school, I viewed the literature much like a textbook. Use Caution When
Paraphrasing When paraphrasing a source that is not your own, be sure to represent the author's
information or opinions accurately and in your own words. A ready-made example of literature
review helps to know how to get started properly without straggling with irrelevant information and
searching through tons of unnecessary materials. Social Posts Create on-brand social posts and
Articles in minutes. A good literature review advances your project on many fronts. To circumvent
these limitations, Pawson, Greenhalgh, Harvey, and Walshe (2005) have proposed a new approach
for synthesizing knowledge that seeks to unpack the mechanism of how “complex interventions”
work in particular contexts. Identify areas of prior scholarship to prevent duplication of effort. Here
are examples of other sections, usually in the form of a single paragraph, you may need to include
depending on the type of review you write: Current Situation: Information necessary to understand
the current topic or focus of the literature review. The literature review gives you a chance to:
Demonstrate your familiarity with the topic and scholarly context Develop a theoretical framework
and methodology for your research Position yourself in relation to other researchers and theorists
Show how your dissertation addresses a gap or contributes to a debate You might also have to write
a literature review as a stand-alone assignment. Where plentiful reviews already exist, a team may
decide to conduct a review of reviews 5 by including multiple QES within a mega-synthesis 28 29 (
table 2, item R6). Creating them can provide inspiration for one’s own research, as well as some
practice in writing. This term was used to describe formal representatives of organizations or services
(senior managers, executives), formally appointed community leaders (policy-makers, local
government leaders), or respected leaders of communities. Chronological The simplest approach is to
trace the development of the topic over time. There are four points which may help account for the
differences in findings in this regard. You might still need to review a few articles going forward.
When you begin to write your literature review section, you'll be glad you dug deeper into how the
research was designed and constructed because it establishes a means for developing more
substantial analysis and interpretation of the research problem. Step 3: Combine the weaknesses
Okay, you’ve identified a few pervasive weaknesses—great. This is often the most time-consuming
part of the review process. Teams Enable groups of users to work together to streamline your digital
publishing. Use the key words in your question, as well as synonyms for those words, as terms in
your search. With a few paragraphs divided up with subheadings, the writing gets higher readability
as people can find the needed information in the chosen sections. A main concern lies in the need to
design project structures and work practices that are aligned and that enable leadership to emerge.
Some useful databases to search for journals and articles include: Your university’s library catalogue
Google Scholar Project Muse (humanities and social sciences) Medline (life sciences and
biomedicine) EconLit (economics) Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science) You can also
use boolean operators to help narrow down your search. A slow-and-steady pace often clashes with
our tendencies. Therefore, when you establish a link in your article, make sure that the link is related
to what you are writing. Its journal articles promise exciting new directions. Analyzing data using
quantitative or qualitative methods. A summary is always much shorter than the original text.
Also see 5 summary writing examples and samples making the first draft. The sources support what
Falk and Mills are saying. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27. A summary is always
much shorter than the original text. I envisioned world-class scientists producing high-quality
research. Reviews wanted send us a review of a book or a film focusses on somebody who has made
an important contribution to society. It is often used in fields where knowledge is rapidly evolving,
such as technology or medicine. Convey it to your reader A literature review may not have a
traditional thesis statement (one that makes an argument), but you do need to tell readers what to
expect. The conclusion of the literature review should summarize the main findings, identify any
gaps in the literature, and suggest areas for future research. How well do they present the material
and do they portray it according to an appropriate theory. This need not be difficult, intricate, or time
consuming. Within the template, you’ll find plain-language explanations of each section, which
should give you a fair amount of guidance. History: The chronological progression of the field, the
research literature, or an idea that is necessary to understand the literature review, if the body of the
literature review is not already a chronology. You should always look at examples from your own
discipline and talk to professors or mentors in your field to be sure you understand your discipline’s
conventions, for literature reviews as well as for any other genre. To this end, they provide a number
of recommendations to strengthen knowledge development towards improving the design and
execution of future reviews on home telemonitoring. 9.4. Summary Table 9.1 outlines the main types
of literature reviews that were described in the previous sub-sections and summarizes the main
characteristics that distinguish one review type from another. After a few of these curating sessions,
you’ll refine your scattered critiques into a handful of succinct, piercing weaknesses. Importantly,
narrative reviews can also be used as educational articles to bring practitioners up to date with
certain topics of issues ( Green et al., 2006 ). Recently, there have been several efforts to introduce
more rigour in narrative reviews that will elucidate common pitfalls and bring changes into their
publication standards. You can use their samples to improve your literature review or order a custom
one. And a review does not necessarily mean that your reader wants you to give your personal
opinion on whether or not you liked these sources. For example: Look at what results have emerged
in qualitative versus quantitative research Discuss how the topic has been approached by empirical
versus theoretical scholarship Divide the literature into sociological, historical, and cultural sources
Theoretical A literature review is often the foundation for a theoretical framework. They can range
from selective (a very narrow area of research or only a single work) to comprehensive (a larger
amount or range of works). But there’s no need to worry about the quality of the writing if you get
inspired by the examples presented here. If you wish to reuse any or all of this article please use the
link below which will take you to the Copyright Clearance Center’s RightsLink service. It is also
worth highlighting the importance of the theory of change underlying the different interventions.
You've got to write a literature review. 2 what is the significance of a literature review. They provide
detailed and very helpful instructions on how to conduct each step of the review process. Digital
hosts george and lilah will be chatting to the stars ahead of the show, followed by maya jama and
venetia falconer discussing fashion, in association with river island. Conduct a comprehensive search:
Use databases and search engines to find relevant literature. Depending on the length of your
literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. If you begin to see the same
researchers cited again and again, then this is often an indication that no new ideas have been
generated to address the research problem.
Learning how to effectively write a literature review is a critical tool for success for an academic,
and perhaps even professional career. This is called citation tracking and there are a number of
sources that can help you identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your
discipline. And maybe there’s a sale on boxed wine that you must, of course, indulge. Maybe they
insinuated that good researchers constantly read the literature, ever honing their wisdom. But how is
a literature review different from an academic research paper. Literature reviews are commonly used
in fields such as history, literary studies, and philosophy. A good RRL does NOT: A literature review
does not simply reference and list all of the material you have cited in your paper. There are five key
steps to writing a literature review: Search for relevant literature Evaluate sources Identify themes,
debates, and gaps Outline the structure Write your literature review A good literature review doesn’t
just summarize sources—it analyzes, synthesizes, and critically evaluates to give a clear picture of
the state of knowledge on the subject. Natural Sciences: In natural sciences, literature reviews are
used to summarize and evaluate the current state of knowledge in a particular field or subfield.
Inclusion and exclusion criteria must be established to help researchers eliminate studies that are not
aligned with the research questions. The easiest way to do this: take one of those weaknesses and
make it your research gap. Preventing cerebral palsy in preterm labour: a multiorganisational quality
improvement approach to the adoption and spread of magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection.
Digital Sales Sell your publications commission-free as single issues or ongoing subscriptions. A
review may be a self-contained unit — an end in itself — or a preface to and rationale for engaging
in primary research. Notice that Falk and Mills weave references to other sources into their own text,
but they still maintain their own voice by starting and ending the paragraph with their own ideas and
their own words. Or the review might focus on the economic impact of whaling on a community. A
distinction arises between evaluation that aims to reflect status quo, and. Resources Dive into our
extensive resources on the topic that interests you. In order to increase the probability of finding a
simpler and more appropriate tool. The 2011 review identified a further 13 systematic reviews
containing 313 discrete primary studies. The only difference here between a “chronological” and a
“thematic” approach is what is emphasized the most: the development of the harpoon or the harpoon
technology.But more authentic thematic reviews tend to break away from chronological order.
Questions for Further Research: What questions about the field has the review sparked. You should
be able to answer it based only on a review of existing publications. Findings from eight rct s
involving 6,615 participants were pooled into meta-analyses to calculate the magnitude of effects that
mobile text message reminders have on the rate of attendance at healthcare appointments compared
to no reminders and phone call reminders. A safe place to reflect on the meaning of recovery: a
recovery community co-productive approach using multimedia interviewing technology. Those who
will read this example of literature review will understand in which way they should move to
continue investigating the topic. Narrow your topic There are hundreds or even thousands of articles
and books on most areas of study. And a review does not necessarily mean that your reader wants
you to give your personal opinion on whether or not you liked these sources. How do you write a
literature review for a research paper? 3 things to do before beginning your literature review. You can
use it to discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts.
We proposed a framework for coproduction leadership that takes into account the actors involved,
the models of leadership, and the leadership practices that emerge in different contexts and during
different phases of coproduction. This automation did not replace manual work but helped the
reviewer to identify eligible studies more quickly. The stage was set for a more balanced style of
evaluation. In the conclusion, you should summarise the key findings you have taken from the
literature and emphasise their significance. The only thing worse than bad writing is lots of bad
writing. The template structure reflects the overall research process, ensuring your paper will have a
smooth, logical flow from chapter to chapter. My early notes wander around as they attempt to
summarize each article’s every little takeaway. Several search terms relating to phr s were used
during this process. It's like a masterclass to be explored at your own pace. Step 2: Critique Multiple
Articles You cannot find a research gap by critiquing individual articles alone. Once these criteria are
met, it’s time to for the literature review phase to end. Here are three reasons why I love using a
note-taking template. Numerous individual study types (RCT, CCT, BA, ITS) were included within
the systematic reviews. Limitations of Literature Review Limitations of Literature Review are as
follows: Limited scope: Literature reviews can only cover the existing literature on a particular topic,
which may be limited in scope or depth. It may in fact be possible to make such predictions
subconsciously (now, if you ask me, this is an interesting scientific question someone should do an
experiment on!). However, sometimes you may need to add additional sections that are necessary for
your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. Performance Prism Cranfield:
Cranfield School of Management. Wrong, Dennis H., (1995). Power, Its forms, bases and uses. For
instance, the review might examine whaling from pre-1600-1699, 1700-1799, and 1800-1899.
Second, many papers referenced the need for “strong” leaders, and the skills and behaviours of
individual leaders were noted. It’s one of the great ironies of science: researchers make exciting
discoveries and then dull them with dense, boring writing. View all journals Explore content About
the journal Publish with us Sign up for alerts CAREER FEATURE 04 December 2020 Correction 09
December 2020 How to write a superb literature review Andy Tay is a freelance writer based in
Singapore. A literature review is a survey of credible sources on a topic, often used in dissertations,
theses, and research papers. The ideal way to demonstrate your research is with a qualitative or
quantitative approach. A course assignment is an example of a selective, stand-alone work. In simple
words, what key points will be added to the body part. The topic, which is commonly a research
question (or problem) of some kind, needs to be identified and defined as clearly as possible.
However, research on the adaptations necessary to fit the requirements of the. Parts of Literature
Review Parts of a literature review are as follows: Introduction The introduction of a literature
review typically provides background information on the research topic and why it is important. The
images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons
licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material.

You might also like