Writing a literature review is often considered one of the most challenging aspects of academic

writing. It requires a thorough understanding of the existing literature on a particular topic and the
ability to critically analyze and synthesize that information into a coherent and cohesive review.
Many students struggle with literature reviews due to the time-consuming nature of the task, as well
as the complexity of navigating through numerous sources and scholarly articles.

One of the biggest challenges in writing a literature review is identifying relevant sources and
determining which ones are most appropriate to include in the review. This process requires careful
consideration and often involves sifting through a large amount of information to find the most
pertinent and reliable sources.

Additionally, writing a literature review requires strong analytical and critical thinking skills. It's not
enough to simply summarize the existing literature; a literature review should also evaluate the
strengths and weaknesses of each source, identify gaps in the research, and offer insights into future
directions for study.

Given the difficulties associated with writing a literature review, many students opt to seek
assistance from professional writing services. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert assistance with
literature reviews, providing customized and high-quality reviews tailored to your specific needs.
Our team of experienced writers has extensive expertise in a wide range of disciplines and can help
you navigate the complexities of writing a literature review with ease.

By ordering a literature review from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and alleviate the stress
of tackling this challenging task on your own. Our writers will work closely with you to ensure that
your literature review meets your requirements and exceeds your expectations. With our help, you
can confidently submit a literature review that showcases your understanding of the topic and
demonstrates your ability to engage critically with the existing literature.

Don't let the difficulty of writing a literature review hold you back. Order from ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔
today and take the first step towards academic success.
Comparison: Literature Review, Annotated Bibliography, Research Paper, Systematic Review It is
easy to confuse literature reviews with similar publications. How to write a superb literature review
The best proposals are timely and clearly explain why readers should pay attention to the proposed
topic. KG contributed meaningfully to the drafting and editing of the manuscript. Their conclusions
should be regarded with greater skepticism than previously published research. I recommend
reviewing two articles each day. No more. No less. When you finish those two reviews, pat yourself
on the back. Literature reviews are written occasionally in the humanities, but mostly in the sciences
and social sciences; in experiment and lab reports, they constitute a section of the paper. Cook,
Kathleen E. and Elise Murowchick. “Do Literature Review Skills Transfer from One Course to
Another?” Psychology Learning and Teaching 13 (March 2014): 3-11; Fink, Arlene. However, with
the chronological approach, the emphasis is very firmly on how the discussion has evolved over time,
as opposed to how all the literature links together (which we’ll discuss next ). There are (broadly
speaking) three options for organising your literature review. Identify Themes: With all studies
summarized, group studies that share common themes, such as studies that have similar findings or
methodologies. Availability of data and materials No datasets were generated or analysed during the
current study. The bibliography or reference section of sources you've already read, such as required
readings in the course syllabus, are also excellent entry points into your own research. If you are
writing a literature review as a stand-alone assignment, you will have to choose a focus and develop
a central question to direct your search. Report(s) Mullins (1994) reports on four content theories of
motivation. For the Internet in American presidential politics project, one methodological approach
would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of American presidents on American,
British, and French websites. Writing Your Literature Review Once you've settled on how to
organize your literature review, you're ready to write each section. But few scientists are trained in
how to write a review — or in what constitutes an excellent one. To ensure the search is as
comprehensive as possible, backwards citation chaining of included studies will be used to identify
any additional studies of relevance. Sitemap case study creative writing presentation problem solving
rewiew prompts websites tips. It is often written as part of a thesis, dissertation, or research paper, in
order to situate your work in relation to existing knowledge. As such, think about the following tips
as offered by experts. Is contrary data considered or is certain pertinent information ignored to prove
the author's point. A literature review can be just a simple summary of the sources, but it usually has
an organizational pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. Ann Arbor, Michigan Jolanta
Grembecka, PhD, Professor Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science,
free to your inbox daily. Acupuncture in Temporomandibular Disorder Myofascial Pain treatment: a
systematic review. As you’ve been collecting and synthesising literature, you’ll likely have started
seeing some themes or patterns emerging. Newspaper articles tend to target a general (not
specialized) audience; hence, they will not be of use to your Lit Review. Heterogeneity among
studies was evaluated by means of the Higgins Index ( I2 ) and the chi- square test and classified as
follows: low heterogeneity ( ?60%). A thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that
relate to the theme or issue. At the end of the day, it’s the students responsibility to do their own
research and work.
Right? Wrong! The “literature” of a literature review refers to any collection of materials on a topic,
not necessarily the great literary texts of the world. “Literature” could be anything from a set of
government pamphlets on British colonial methods in Africa to scholarly articles on the treatment of
a torn ACL. To ensure the quality of the scoping review, the development and reporting of this
protocol followed the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses
Extension for Scoping Reviews (PRISMA-ScR) guidelines. 32 The protocol for this scoping review
is also registered on OSF ( ). Yet Another Writing Tip When Do I Know I Can Stop Looking and
Move On. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research area, or
for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been answered. This
is crucial considering the identified need for more research exploring racial and ethnic differences in
EDs outside of the USA. 24 Given the well-documented racial and ethnic health disparities in the
diagnosis and treatment of EDs 16 and mental health conditions more broadly, 27 a special focus
will be placed on studies which have reported on the prevalence of disordered eating and EDs,
access to care and treatment experiences among minority ethnic groups. A summary is a recap of the
important information of the source, whereas a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that
information. This is called citation tracking and there are a number of sources that can help you
identify who has cited whom, particularly scholars from outside of your discipline. This form of
review is known as qualitative systematic review. Even well-written, high-quality research has
limitations. These authors synthesized published articles that describe the development process of
mobile health ( m-health ) interventions for patients’ cancer care self-management. Formative
assessment and contingency in the regulation of learning processes. The fact that the sample sizes
were so small is a problem. The protocol should always be publicly available ( table 2, item R2). 24
25 Formal registration may require that the team has not commenced data extraction but should be
considered if it does not compromise the rQES timeframe. Promote(s) This promotes the idea that
tension and stress are important. Many systematic reviews, but not all, use statistical methods to
combine the results of independent studies into a single quantitative estimate or summary effect size.
Laser acupuncture in patients with temporomandibular dysfunction: a randomized controlled trial.
This process was performed by 2 independent reviewers. Not applicable. All data is from published
articles. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. 2016;2016:8. Mata J, Sanchis P, Valenti P,
Hernandez B, Aguilar JL. Further Readings Generative AI and Writing USC Libraries Tutorials and
Other Guides Bibliography A literature review surveys prior research published in books, scholarly
articles, and any other sources relevant to a particular issue, area of research, or theory, and by so
doing, provides a description, summary, and critical evaluation of these works in relation to the
research problem being investigated. It demands to use the same relevant information from. Correct
my document today Writing literature reviews can be quite challenging. A literature review adds
nothing new except an opinion of the reviewed literature. The narrower your topic, the easier it will
be to limit the number of sources you need to read in order to get a good survey of the material.
However, some that will often appear in each review and don't necessarily required specific
subheadings are: A few paragraphs on the historical background of the topic. Identify Themes: With
all studies summarized, group studies that share common themes, such as studies that have similar
findings or methodologies. It is probably one of the most important parts of the literature review
because you need to pique the reader's interest in reading the full review. It’s important to keep track
of your sources with references to avoid plagiarism. If the source includes three or more authors,
provide all the names the first time you cite the source, after that use “et al.” every next time in the
text. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; externally peer reviewed.
Thomas’ Note-taking Template Here’s the template I use for taking literature review notes. A
literature review can be just a simple summary of the sources, but it usually has an organizational
pattern and combines both summary and synthesis. If all goes well, you’ll contribute a new chapter
that advances the cutting edge of your discipline in a worthwhile direction. Try to analyse patterns,
turning points and key debates that have shaped the direction of the field. Furthermore, they provide
information on which researchers are active in specific fields, which can be useful for tracking down
their other work. Isn’t it true that writing necessitates a greater amount of effort. Below is a five-step
process for conducting a simple review of the literature for your project. Example: Thematically
Structured Review In the video below, we unpack a literature review chapter so that you can see an
example of a thematically structure review in practice. The already difficult challenge of developing
the capability (suitable processes. Studies in which no clinical data and complex interventions were
excluded. And depending on the situation, the literature review may evaluate the sources and advise
the reader on the most pertinent or relevant. As in most narrative reviews, the scope of the research
questions being investigated is broad: (a) how development of these systems are carried out; (b)
which methods are used to investigate these systems; and (c) what conclusions can be drawn as a
result of the development of these systems. To provide clear answers to these questions, a literature
search was conducted on six electronic databases and Google Scholar. Now what is the most
effective way of presenting the information. One of the most highly cited scoping reviews in the
eHealth domain was published by Archer, Fevrier-Thomas, Lokker, McKibbon, and Straus (2011).
Meta-analysis This is a type of systematic review that uses statistical methods to combine and
summarize the results of several studies. The chart below illustrates a survey that asked if particular
IMRaD sections were “easy to read.” The chart bins the answers by the participants’ career stages.
Imagine the new research directions it would unlock. Funding This research is funded by the
National Institute for Health and Care Research (NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration (ARC)
West Midlands (grant number NIHR200165). Its journal articles promise exciting new directions. If
the decision to include or exclude is not unanimous, both reviewers will assess the study together and
discuss disagreements. As established by Csikszentmihalyi (Yair 2000, p. 2) 'the more. Step 2:
Critique Multiple Articles You cannot find a research gap by critiquing individual articles alone.
Finally, a Lit Review has its own set of in-text citations and a Works Cited list. Get the structure of
your literature review chapter wrong and you’ll struggle to achieve these objectives. The team seeks
to align the review question and the requirements of the knowledge user with available time and
resources. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. Like any other chapter in your
thesis or dissertation, your literature review needs to have a clear, logical structure. Introduction OK.
You’ve got to write a literature review. But there’s no need to worry about the quality of the writing
if you get inspired by the examples presented here. Such studies will be particularly relevant in
identifying any health disparities in the countries of focus and highlighting possible ways to
overcome these.
If the decision to include or exclude is not unanimous, both reviewers will assess the study together
and discuss disagreements. A third reviewer will resolve disagreements if necessary. As such, as new
information becomes available, literature reviews grow in length or become focused on one specific
aspect of the topic. You can choose the intellectual lineage you would like to be part of and whose
definitions matter most to your thinking (mostly humanities-specific, but this goes for sciences as
well). Question 6: do ED treatment experiences differ across ethnic groups. Thank you Great work,
very insightful. Thank you. Thanks for this wonderful presentation. The review is about how well
you understand the material, so keep quotes at a minimum and only when necessary, such as when
using new words introduced by the author. Brilliant work, well understood, many thanks I like how
this was so clear with simple language. This will involve a systematic search of the following
electronic databases: (1) Medline, (2) PsycINFO, (3) EMBASE, (4) CINAHL and (5) Web of
Science. Wrong, Dennis H., (1995). Power, Its forms, bases and uses. This lets you quickly browse
your literature review’s high points. Treatment of headache disorders with acupuncture: a 6-year
retrospective study. The Writing Center. University of North Carolina; Onwuegbuzie, Anthony J.
Give a thorough overview of each theme, integrating source data, and conclude with a summary of
the current state of knowledge then suggestions for future research based upon your evaluation of
what is lacking in the literature. Keep your own voice While the literature review presents others’
ideas, your voice (the writer’s) should remain front and center. When you write a dissertation or
thesis, you will have to conduct a literature review to situate your research within existing
knowledge. Temporomandibular Joint Disk Displacement: Etiology, Diagnosis, Imaging, and
Therapeutic Approaches. Correct my document today Writing literature reviews can be quite
challenging. Dr. NN Chavan Keynote address on ADNEXAL MASS- APPROACH TO
MANAGEMENT in the. Generally, for my undergraduate research students, I recommend a
narrative review, where themes can be generated in order for the students to develop sufficient
understanding of the topic so they can build upon the themes using unique methods or novel
research questions. Periodically, UT Libraries runs a workshop covering the basics and library
support for literature reviews. Analyzing and synthesizing data: As a final step, members of the
review team must collate, summarize, aggregate, organize, and compare the evidence extracted from
the included studies. In other words, a chronological review would have subsections for each vital
time period; a thematic review would have subtopics based upon factors that relate to the theme or
issue. Effects of a physical therapy protocol in patients with chronic migraine and
Temporomandibular disorders: a Randomized, Single-Blinded, clinical trial. Prevalence of oral
behaviours in general dental patients attending a university clinic in Italy. Here are several strategies
you can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly reviewed the literature: Look for repeating
patterns in the research findings. If the same authors, books or articles keep appearing in your
reading, make sure to seek them out. You critique the literature, categorize it, and wrestle with it.
Analysis of Performance Appraisal Systems on Employee Job Productivity in Pub. This paper will
argue that KPIs for voluntary ACE must strike the correct balance.
It goes beyond documentation and reflects decisions related to the selection of the sources, the
search terms used, the period of time covered, the articles selected in the search, and the application
of backward and forward searches ( vom Brocke et al., 2009 ). In short, the rigour of any review
article is reflected by the explicitness of its methods (i.e., transparency) and the soundness of the
approach used. In the last 36 months, she has received honoraria from the Agency for Healthcare
Research and Quality and travel support from the WHO. Chronological The simplest approach is to
trace the development of the topic over time. That is because the survey nature of the literature
review does not allow for in-depth discussion or detailed quotes from the text. Structuring your
literature review thematically would mean structuring your literature review’s body section to
discuss each of these themes, one section at a time. Their in-depth analysis of the literature signalled
that there is little solid evidence from randomized controlled trials or other studies through the use
of phr s. I’m doing a research project topic; stool analysis for parasitic worm (enteric) worm, how do
I structure it, thanks. By tracking every article’s shortcomings in one place, you will notice pervasive
research gaps more easily. Ask yourself these questions when choosing your sources: What concepts
does the source analyze. In these cases, systematic reviews can use qualitative synthesis methods
such as vote counting, content analysis, classification schemes and tabulations, as an alternative
approach to narratively synthesize the results of the independent studies included in the review.
Furthermore, they provide information on which researchers are active in specific fields, which can
be useful for tracking down their other work. Last but not least, if it’s your intention to develop a
conceptual framework for your dissertation or thesis, the conclusion section is a good place to
present this. Writing teachers often say synthesis is like hosting a dinner party: imagine all your
sources are together in a room, discussing your topic. Reprints and permissions About this article
Cite this article. The Literature Review: A Few Tips On Conducting It. Formative assessment and
contingency in the regulation of learning processes. Ethics and dissemination No ethical approval is
required for this study. The format of a review of literature may vary from discipline to discipline
and from assignment to assignment. For the sperm whale project, one methodological approach
would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of whales in American, British, and
French art work. You likely won’t be able to read absolutely everything that has been written on your
topic, so it will be necessary to evaluate which sources are most relevant to your research question.
Identify Themes: With all studies summarized, group studies that share common themes, such as
studies that have similar findings or methodologies. A methodological scope will influence either the
types of documents in the review or the way in which these documents are discussed. Look to open
access publications and conferences to reflect a more inclusive collection. Conclusion: Summarize the
key findings you have taken from the literature and emphasize their significance Connect it back to
your primary research question How should I organize my lit review. A review organized in this
manner would shift between time periods within each section according to the point being made.
Two members of the research team selected the articles using a pre-established list of inclusion and
exclusion criteria and following a two-step procedure. The authors found that the literature lacks
clarity about how naturalness is defined and measured, but also found that food consumption is
significantly influenced by perceived naturalness of goods. To obtain the best experience, we
recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer).
Randomized clinical trial of acupuncture for myofascial pain of the jaw muscles. View all journals
Explore content About the journal Publish with us Sign up for alerts CAREER FEATURE 04
December 2020 Correction 09 December 2020 How to write a superb literature review Andy Tay is a
freelance writer based in Singapore.
Report: report on the internet, New Zealand Federation of Voluntary Welfare. A systematic review
of association studies: end of an era. In this section, you should emphasise the research that is
especially important to your research questions and highlight the gaps that exist in the literature. The
present scoping review aims to examine the extent, range and nature of research activity into
disordered eating and EDs in the UK, Canada, Australia and New Zealand providing a
comprehensive overview of the existing literature. They should arise out of your organizational
strategy. Magazines aimed at a wide audience, such as Time, Us, and National Enquirer, will not
provide you with the information you require. Usage of the secondary sources is allowed in addition
to the primary sources. Any discrepancies or uncertainties highlighted by this exercise will be
discussed and the charting form will be adjusted accordingly. JN is lead convenor of the Cochrane
Qualitative and Implementation Methods Group. To bolster your confidence and calm these
anxieties, you keep on reviewing. Find Models Use the exercise of reviewing the literature to
examine how authors in your discipline or area of interest have composed their literature review
sections. Your instructor will usually have narrowed one down for you if you are writing as an
academic assignment. And the longer you put it off, the guiltier you feel. The body of your literature
review should do just as the description of this chapter suggests. Good academic practice As with
any writing task, you will need to review, edit and rewrite sections of your literature review. If you
have found some recurring central themes, you can organise your literature review into subsections
that address different aspects of the topic. Savignon, S (2000). Communicative language teaching. In
M. Byran (ed). Routledge. It takes years to accrue the kind of knowledge that you’re chasing.
Having established the bounds of what a literature review should cover, it is time to look into how
you should write one. Your instructor will probably not expect you to read everything that’s out there
on the topic, but you’ll make your job easier if you first limit your scope. Integrative Review: This
review method is more inclusive than others, allowing for the simultaneous inclusion of experimental
and non-experimental research. Kaplan, R. S. and Norton, D. P., (1996b), Linking the Balanced
Scorecard to. Learn more about these other types of reviews with a quick visit to our blog here.
Understanding the use of balanced scorecard in the context of state owned ent. Two reviewers (AW-
R and HT) will pilot the data charting form on a sample of randomly selected papers (10% of
included papers). Instantly correct all language mistakes in your text Be assured that you'll submit
flawless writing. I do not think I’ve read through something like this before. Lamb, Sandra E. 1998.
How to Write It: A Complete Guide to Everything You’ll Ever Write. Narrow your topic There are
hundreds or even thousands of articles and books on most areas of study. My early notes wander
around as they attempt to summarize each article’s every little takeaway.
Like descriptive reviews, the research questions are generic and usually relate to publication patterns
and trends. It is easy to get lost in the stream of thoughts and ideas expressed by others. While 75%
of studies disclosed all outcome data, and 100% of the included trials adequately left out bias in the
selection of the reported outcomes, only 20% of studies adequately left out performance bias. Unless
you are writing a systematic literature review, this search can be arbitrary. For the sake of
completeness, a web search using Google Scholar will also be completed. How To Structure A
Literature Review (Free Template) Demonstrate your knowledge of the research topic. Summarize
and synthesize Remember to summarize and synthesize your sources within each paragraph as well
as throughout the review. Many student writers struggle to synthesize because they feel they don’t
have anything to add to the scholars they are citing; here are some strategies to help you: It often
helps to remember that the point of these kinds of syntheses is to show your readers how you
understand your research, to help them read the rest of your paper. Read them to get a sense of the
types of themes you might want to look for in your own research or to identify ways to organize
your final review. Maybe they suggested that reading many journal articles will magically increase
your understanding. Organizing the body Once you have the basic categories in place, then you must
consider how you will present the sources themselves within the body of your paper. And your half-
done literature review won’t advance your project as effectively as it should. However high efficacy
of Laser Acupuncture in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders was reported. Within power
relations however, (such as between a target setter and the worker. There is advice on our other pages
about thinking critically, reading strategies and academic writing. A review is a required part of grant
and research proposals and often a chapter in theses and dissertations. Depending on the length of
your literature review, you might want to divide the body into subsections. However, such a task will
be intensive and time-consuming. Use evidence In the example above, the writers refer to several
other sources when making their point. Fink, Arlene. Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From
the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. For example, if you are
reviewing literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include
healthcare policy, language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access. The
randomization process reported 100% of the studies with a low risk of bias. This is exactly what I
was looking for and helps a lot together with your previous post on literature review. That works
both ways for the writer and the reader. Other Sections of Your Literature Review Once you've
decided on the organizational method for your literature review, the sections you need to include in
the paper should be easy to figure out because they arise from your organizational strategy. This is
common in the social sciences and humanities. And it’s made all the difference in changing a painful,
unproductive experience into something much more effective. Report(s) Mullins (1994) reports on
four content theories of motivation. That is because the survey nature of the literature review does
not allow for in-depth discussion or detailed quotes from the text. Focus on The early theories of
Maslow and McGregor (Robbins et al.