You are on page 1of 6

Crafting a Literature Review Paper: The Challenge and Solution

Writing a literature review paper can be a daunting task, even for seasoned academics. It requires
extensive research, critical analysis, and the ability to synthesize information from various sources
into a coherent narrative. For many students and researchers, the prospect of undertaking such a
project can be overwhelming.

One of the primary challenges of writing a literature review is the sheer volume of material to sift
through. Depending on the topic, there may be hundreds or even thousands of relevant studies,
articles, and books to review. Sorting through this vast amount of information can be time-
consuming and mentally exhausting.

Moreover, once the relevant literature has been identified, the process of critically evaluating each
source and synthesizing the findings can be equally challenging. It requires a keen eye for detail,
strong analytical skills, and the ability to discern patterns and themes across disparate sources.

Furthermore, organizing the literature review in a clear and logical manner is essential for conveying
the significance of the research topic and demonstrating an understanding of the existing scholarship
in the field. This requires careful planning and structuring of the paper to ensure that the arguments
flow smoothly and coherently.

Given the complexities involved in writing a literature review paper, many students and researchers
opt to seek assistance from professional writing services. Among these, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ stands
out as a trusted partner for those in need of expert guidance and support.

⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a team of experienced writers who specialize in crafting literature


reviews across a wide range of disciplines. Whether you're struggling to get started, feeling
overwhelmed by the research process, or simply seeking assistance with polishing your draft, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ can provide the expertise and support you need to succeed.

By enlisting the help of ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you can save time and energy while ensuring that your
literature review paper meets the highest academic standards. With their commitment to quality,
professionalism, and customer satisfaction, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ is the perfect partner for anyone
seeking assistance with their literature review paper.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review paper hold you back. Visit ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔
today and take the first step towards academic success.
Analysis of Performance Appraisal Systems on Employee Job Productivity in Pub. You can use it to
discuss various theories, models, and definitions of key concepts. Where to find databases: use the
tabs on this guide Find other databases in the Nursing Information Resources web page More on the
Medical Library web page. In the interim stages, their commitment to coproduction, sponsorship,
and engagement is vital. Involvement of an information specialist, especially in prioritising
databases, targeting grey literature and planning supplemental searches, can prove invaluable. The
search was performed using several terms and free text words, combining them in an appropriate
manner. Editing and proofreading enhance the quality of your papers, eliminating typos and
grammar mistakes. This can be especially helpful for students or scholars getting into a new research
area, or for directing an entire community of scholars toward questions that have not yet been
answered. Strong professional language and vocabulary should be used. Co-production as a route to
employability: Lessons from services with lone parents. Introduction Subtopics chosen for this
literature review exploration are nutritional considerations; anemia complication; vitamin deficiencies
and malabsorption tendencies. This framework emphasizes the need to make more deliberate choices
regarding the underlying conceptualization of leadership and the ways in which such a
conceptualization is related to the activities necessary for leading coproduction. Use your literature
review to inform your research questions and hypotheses for your thesis. Strategies for writing the
literature review Find a focus. A safe place to reflect on the meaning of recovery: a recovery
community co-productive approach using multimedia interviewing technology. The review provides
new knowledge regarding the fact that coproduction leadership must become more deliberately
(in)formed by collective leadership models. A realist process evaluation within the Facilitating
Implementation of Research Evidence (FIRE) cluster randomised controlled international trial: an
exemplar. It should also reiterate the importance of the research question or hypothesis and the
contribution of the literature review to the overall research project. Questions for Further Research:
What questions about the field has the review sparked. Its areas of measurement however, have a
strong production orientation that would. Writing the introduction In the introduction, you should:
Define or identify the general topic, issue, or area of concern, thus providing an appropriate context
for reviewing the literature. Ensure that your ideas flow logically, and use clear language to
communicate complex concepts. Second, they utilise leadership drawing on a wide set of clinical and
non-clinical actors including managers and even government officials. Cochrane Database Syst Rev.
2019.. Arditi C, Rege-Walther M, Durieux P, et al. Rather, it should contain most or all of the
significant studies about a research topic but not tangential or loosely related ones. 2 Generally,
literature reviews should be sufficient for the reader to understand the major issues and key findings
about a research topic. We note a distinction between theoretical and atheoretical systematic review
discussion sections. Last Updated: Jan 4, 2024 10:52 AM URL: University of Texas Libraries
Literature Reviews What is a literature review. Use these keywords in your search to narrow down
your results. This guidance covers the review process as it relates to synthesis of. The notes should
include anything that will be helpful in advancing your own thinking about the topic and in helping
you write the literature review (such as key points, ideas, or even page numbers that index key
information).
Our writers are fast and reliable, so you’ll get your paper on time. Sustainability. 2018;10(11):4148.
Cooke J, Langley J, Wolstenholme D, Hampshaw S. It contains a briefing note on literature review
including definition, elements, strategies, and its types. It's like a masterclass to be explored at your
own pace. It also ensures neither the research analysis was done before nor it is a replication study.
Begin reading and taking notes on each source, paying attention to key findings, methodologies
used, and any gaps in the research. To reduce the risk of bias, papers were excluded following
discussion between all members of the team. 32 papers met the inclusion criteria and proceeded to
data extraction. The authors declare that they have no competing interests. A proposed aim of
coproduction is to drive change within services and in traditional state-citizen relationships by
establishing equal and reciprocal relationships among professionals, the people using services, and
their families and neighbours. Clarke et al.’s (2017) review identified the lack of managerial authority
and leadership as a key barrier to the implementation of coproduced interventions but did not
explore the implications of this finding for future practice. Give your interpretation of how and why
certain developments occurred (as mentioned previously, this may not be appropriate in your
discipline — check with a teacher or mentor if you’re unsure). If your lit review is a standalone
piece, the introduction and conclusion take up more space and give you a place to discuss your
goals, research methods, and conclusions separately from where you discuss the literature itself.
Development of the Literature Review Four Basic Stages of Writing 1. While not absolutely
necessary, such articles often include the terms “Literature Review” or “Review of the Literature” in
the title. Include each of the key concepts or variables you’re interested in, and list any synonyms
and related terms. You can add to this list if you discover new keywords in the process of your
literature search. Steps in the Literature Review Process Define your research question Determine
inclusion and exclusion criteria Choose databases and search Review Results Synthesize Results
Analyze Results Librarian Support What is a Literature Review. Should I summarize, synthesize, or
critique sources by discussing a common theme or issue? 4. You can use their samples to improve
your literature review or order a custom one. If unsure which style to use for your lit review in a
research paper, check with your professor. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2017;6(6):345. Sicilia M,
Guarini E, Sancino A, Andreani M, Ruffini R. The meta co-production of community outcomes:
Towards a citizens’ capabilities approach. Works consulted We consulted these works while writing
this handout. What questions literature review paper outline unanswered. For example, a review that
examines literature supporting or refuting an argument, assumption, or philosophical problem related
to the research problem will also need to include writing supported by sources that establish the
history of these arguments in the literature. Your literature review should be guided by your central
research question. Read the full text or download the PDF: 394 IMAGES How To Make A
Literature Review For A Research Paper How To Write A Literature Review Literature Review
Example 50 Smart Literature Review Templates (APA). Unlike other reviews, this one has
beginning, a middle and an end. Explaining the background Before starting with the main write-up,
they provide a brief summary of the background of the case. Note these concepts and then write a
brief summary about how the article incorporates them. USC Libraries Research Guides Organizing
Your Social Sciences Research Paper 5.
Authors from our team are degree holders and also have considerable writing experience. In some
cases, these processes naturally align with certain actors—for instance, senior leaders play key roles
in the tasks of initiating coproduction and implementing and sustaining its results—but other
processes (championing coproduction, establishing trusting relationships, and ensuring good
communication) are applicable to any and all participants in the coproduction process. Preventing
cerebral palsy in preterm labour: a multiorganisational quality improvement approach to the adoption
and spread of magnesium sulphate for neuroprotection. Bourne, 2000, p.17). Its purported
advantages over traditional systems are seen in. Victoria (BC): University of Victoria; 2017 Feb 27.
By regularly reviewing the literature, you can stay informed about the latest findings and
developments in your field. Implementation of evidence-based, non-pharmacological interventions
addressing behavior and psychological symptoms of dementia: a systematic review focused on
implementation strategies. Now equipped with the essential steps to start your literature review,
you're set on the right path. London: SAGE Publications; 1998. Higgins J. P. T., Green S., editors.
Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series. Additionally,
verify the accuracy and consistency of citations and references based on the chosen citation style
(e.g., APA, MLA). This comprehensive revision process guarantees a polished and well-structured
literature review. How is it different from study one in literature review paper outline of methods
and research questions? Study 3. Selection of checklist Numerous scales and checklists exist for
assessing the quality of qualitative studies. It is easy to be biased if you stick to top tier journals. We
developed a comprehensive systematic literature search strategy based on the terms used in the
previous reviews to identify studies that looked explicitly at interventions designed to turn research
evidence into practice. Here are several strategies you can utilize to assess whether you've thoroughly
reviewed the literature: Look for repeating patterns in the research findings. Read the full text or
download the PDF: 394 IMAGES How To Make A Literature Review For A Research Paper How
To Write A Literature Review Literature Review Example 50 Smart Literature Review Templates
(APA). We collected and filtered more than 700 papers, giving us 44 relevant papers. You can find
links to more literature reviews in these categories by visiting the TUS Library’s website. NOTE:
Most often the literature review will incorporate some combination of types. These are general
purposes of literature review which pertains to a credentials; b theory base; c context; d significance;
and e originality. Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research imagination. If
you’re still working on your research proposal, we’ve got a template for that here. Peer Review
reports Contribution to the literature Considerable time and money is invested in implementing and
evaluating strategies to increase the implementation of research into clinical practice. Sampling
methods Simple random sampling Stratified sampling Cluster sampling Likert scales Reproducibility
Statistics Null hypothesis Statistical power Probability distribution Effect size Poisson distribution
Research bias Optimism bias Cognitive bias Implicit bias Hawthorne effect Anchoring bias Explicit
bias A literature review is a survey of scholarly sources (such as books, journal articles, and theses)
related to a specific topic or research question. Nova has a passion for writing that engages and
informs her readers. Working Title Identification of use issues and effectivity of the CVR cost-
control method in the UAE construction industry 2. Finally, double check that you’ve documented
your sources and formatted the review appropriately for your discipline. However, it is often helpful
to first reflect on all the reading that you have done. Future research Future research (see Table 2 )
should focus on under-represented roles, such as those of politicians and community leaders, and
explore emerging collective leadership models based on real-time observational studies. For each
publication, ask yourself: What question or problem is the author addressing.
Consider the most effective way to relay your information, including headings and subheadings. The
third worked in peer support and had personal experience with mental health services. Debates,
conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree. This will help you identify similarities and
differences among the literature, and provide a structure for your literature review. Does it confirm,
add to, or challenge established knowledge. Not applicable. Consent for publication Competing
interests. Addresses Research Gaps: Identifies areas where more knowledge is needed, guiding your
contributions. Embed Host your publication on your website or blog with just a few clicks. It also
helps researchers to identify relevant data sources and identify potential data analysis techniques. The
bibliography or reference section of sources you've already read, such as required readings in the
course syllabus, are also excellent entry points into your own research. This is not a comprehensive
list of resources on the handout’s topic, and we encourage you to do your own research to find
additional publications. Step 2: Analyze and Select Sources In the second phase of your research, it
is essential to carefully evaluate and select sources that directly contribute to your research question.
You dust off a novel and a book of poetry, settle down in your chair, and get ready to issue a
“thumbs up” or “thumbs down” as you leaf through the pages. “Literature review” done. A literature
or narrative review is a comprehensive review and analysis of the published literature on a specific
topic or research question. Sometimes, though, you might need to add additional sections that are
necessary for your study, but do not fit in the organizational strategy of the body. It takes into
account the context and complexities of real-world situations. Despite the fact that models of
coleadership and collective leadership exhibit a better fit with the relational character of
coproduction, the majority of the articles included in this review employed a leader-centric
underlying theory. Guidelines on Formatting a Literature Review 20 Apr Read more. A community-
directed integrated Strongyloides control program in Queensland, Australia. The second type of
coverage consists of presenting materials that are representative of most other works in a given field
or area. As mentioned earlier, when rigorously conducted review articles represent powerful
information sources for eHealth scholars and practitioners looking for state-of-the-art evidence. Be
Selective Select only the most important points in each source to highlight in the review. For
example: Look at what results have emerged in qualitative versus quantitative research Discuss how
the topic has been approached by empirical versus theoretical scholarship Divide the literature into
sociological, historical, and cultural sources Theoretical A literature review is often the foundation for
a theoretical framework. What other sections you include in the body is up to you. Simply following
an example may not be enough, so asking a writing expert for help is a good option. Specify the time
frame, key themes, and relevant studies to focus your research. It goes beyond documentation and
reflects decisions related to the selection of the sources, the search terms used, the period of time
covered, the articles selected in the search, and the application of backward and forward searches (
vom Brocke et al., 2009 ). In short, the rigour of any review article is reflected by the explicitness of
its methods (i.e., transparency) and the soundness of the approach used. If you want to post about it
on your blog or social media, all we ask is that you reference this page as your source. You would
have to study a lot of texts to develop a solid understanding on the theme or angle of your research
and the literature review states how these books helped you in shaping your theory. Please do not use
this list as a model for the format of your own reference list, as it may not match the citation style
you are using.
Make sure you repeat the literature review paper outline procedure when dealing with studies related
to the subtopic. Subject B. Take another broad aspect related to your topic. Thematic reviews are
organized around a topic or issue, rather than the progression of time, although the progression of
time may still be incorporated into a thematic review. Music in the Park. An integrating metaphor for
the emerging primary (health) care system: Music in the Park. Selecting studies, extracting data, and
assessing risk of bias in a duplicate manner using two independent reviewers to avoid random or
systematic errors in the process. Some of these systematic reviews focus exclusively on multi-faceted
interventions, whilst others compare different single or combined interventions aimed at achieving
similar outcomes in particular settings. Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as
medicine, nursing, and public health. We uploaded the results using EPPI-Reviewer, a web-based
tool that facilitated semi-automation of the screening process and removal of duplicate studies. For
instance, a thematic review of material on sperm whales might examine how they are portrayed as
“evil” in cultural documents. During the initiation stage, by implementing and sustaining the
outcomes of coproduction, they play a crucial role in the provision of resources such as time, money,
materials, and access to networks. Doing a literature review: Releasing the social science research
imagination. It also helps to justify the significance of their findings in relation to existing research
and literature. TemplateLab 50 Smart Literature Review Templates (APA). GIFs Highlight your
latest work via email or social media with custom GIFs. Here are some tips to help you create an
impressive review for your research paper. To maintain track of the scholarly articles and sources, use
a bibliography or reference management software like EndNote or Zotero. Holding degrees in more
than 50 subjects, they know how to create masterpieces. Providing a comprehensive overview of the
literature: A literature review provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge
on a topic, allowing the researcher to identify key themes, debates, and areas of agreement or
disagreement. The purpose is to place research in a historical context to show familiarity with state-
of-the-art developments and to identify the likely directions for future research. The subsections
might include how they are personified, how their proportions are exaggerated, and their behaviors
misunderstood. Roughly how many sources would be appropriate to include? 2. Narrow topics also
allow you to find better sources for your literature review on research paper. The following provides
a brief description of the content of each: Introduction: Gives a quick idea of the topic of the
literature review, such as the central theme or organizational pattern. In updating the review, we
anticipated a larger pool of reviews and an opportunity to consolidate learning from more recent
systematic reviews of interventions. Statement of the Problem Is the phenomenon of interest clearly
identified. Crafting a literature review is a strategic process encompassing various vital steps to
ensure a comprehensive and coherent review. Codesigning health and other public services with
vulnerable and disadvantaged populations: Insights from an international collaboration. A review is a
required part of grant and research proposals and often a chapter in theses and dissertations. We
searched from January 2010 up to June 2022 and applied no language restrictions. A review team
should identify where such shared mechanisms might operate. 28 An rQES team must also decide
whether to use frameworks or models to focus the review. Last Updated: Jan 4, 2024 10:52 AM
URL: University of Texas Libraries Literature Reviews What is a literature review.

You might also like