You are on page 1of 10

ISSN 1064-2269, Journal of Communications Technology and Electronics, 2022, Vol. 67, No. 1, pp. 46–55.

© Pleiades Publishing, Inc., 2022.

ANTENNA AND FEEDER


SYSTEMS

Circular Fractal Antenna Design with Inscribed Square


for Ultra Wide Band Applications
M. H. Reddya, *, D. Sheelab, A. S. A. Nishac, and S. T. Nibac
a University
of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7RH United Kingdom
b Saveetha
School of Engineering, SIMATS, Tamil Nadu, Chennai, 602105 India
c
Sathyabama Institute of Science and Technology Tamil Nadu, Chennai, 600119 India
*e-mail: harinath.m1995@gmail.com
Received January 29, 2020; revised June 8, 2020; accepted June 17, 2020

Abstract—In this article, an ultra-wide band circular fractal antenna inscribed with square is presented. The
prototype of the antenna is fabricated on a 1.6 mm thick FR4 substrate material. In the proposed design, use
of partial ground structure and the fractal geometry resulted in a compact size and ultra-wide band (UWB).
The antenna’s calculated result reveals UWB characteristics from 2 to 10.8 GHz (137.5%) with almost Omni-
directional patterns of radiation and radiation efficiency >80% throughout the operating range. The mea-
sured (S-parameter, radiation pattern and peak gain) and simulated results are appropriate with good perfor-
mance characteristics. A detailed study was conducted for various dimensions of circular patch and the partial
ground structure. The antenna is developed and optimized using HFSS simulation tool.

Keywords: fractal, impedance matching, omni-directional, partial ground, ultra-wide band


DOI: 10.1134/S1064226922010089

INTRODUCTION that can block the UWB system electromagnetically


Because of various factors like small size, high over the assigned band [8] and hence, a notched-band
transmission rate and low power utilization the ultra- UWB antenna is essential. In [9], with a U-shape slot
wide band correspondence has turned out to be in CPW (Coplanar Wave Guide) fed a circular fractal
increasingly well known when compared with the cur- antenna is demonstrated which exhibited a large oper-
rent wireless communication system. UWB usually ating frequency between 3 to 11 GHz. Liang [10] has
alludes to a system with a large absolute or relative reported a monopole circular disc antenna for UWB
bandwidth [1, 2]. Such a large bandwidth provides applications fed by CPW. Another CPW-fed circular
numerous benefits in terms of signal robustness and UWB antenna espoused by the fractal idea has been
information content [3]. Compared with existing proposed by Kumar et al. [11, 12] and Ding et al. [13].
multi-band, dual and single band antennas, some In [14], a fractal antenna which included a diamond
UWB antennas are substantially more perplexing shaped fractal patch exhibited a wide band of 2.05 to
[4, 5]. Recently, high level research in the ultra-wide 6.245 GHz (101%). In [15], Asymmetrical slotting
band antennas has been incited in modern industrial technique is used in patch antenna and obtained band-
fields and academics in view of its various favourable width from 4.71–6.14 GHz (26.35%). To enhance
circumstances. Until today, the majority of the inves- bandwidth, a CPW-fed asymmetrical slot antenna
tigated UWB antennas are non-planar as in [6], and using two different excitations is presented in [16]. In
with integrated circuits, they cannot be integrated due [17], a triangle inscribed circular fractal antenna with
to their protruded structure and most probably they notched ground is presented with the dimension 62 ×
are fragile. The frequency ranging between 3.1– 55 mm2, exhibiting an ultra-wide band between the
10.6 GHz has been declared as the UWB frequency by frequencies 4–6 GHz (40%) and 7–12 GHz (52.6%).
Federal Communication Commission (FCC), since A Г-shaped fractal antenna is presented in [18], with
then UWB technology has turned out to be a standout an impedance bandwidth of 850 MHz to 2740 MHz
amongst the most encouraging innovation for high (105%). In [19–26], printed UWB monopole anten-
accuracy radars and high data rate wireless communi- nas are presented for different wireless applications. A
cations [7]. However, C-band satellite communica- low-profile UWB fractal antenna with defected partial
tion systems and IEEE.802.16 WiMAX system are ground structures for wireless applications are pre-
some of the examples of existing narrow band services sented in [27, 28].

46
CIRCULAR FRACTAL ANTENNA DESIGN WITH INSCRIBED SQUARE 47

(a) (b) (c)

1st iteration 2nd iteration


Zeroth
iteration

(d) (e)

3rd iteration 4th iteration

Fig. 1. Antenna structures based on iteration wise.

This paper proposes an UWB circular fractal Fig. 1b by subtracting a 23 × 23 mm2 square from the
antenna with inscribed square. The antenna proposed main circular patch and filling the subtracted region of
has the benefits of low profile and low manufacturing the patch with a 9 mm radius circle. The second itera-
cost with perfect impedance matching throughout the tion process has been accomplished by subtracting a
operating band. The performance of antenna is char- square of dimension 18 × 18 mm2 from the first itera-
acterized by reflection coefficient, impedance band- tive structure and by inscribing a 7 mm radius circle as
width and radiation patterns. A comparison study of shown in Fig. 1c. As in Figs. 1d, 1e, similar iteration pro-
existing UWB antennas in terms of operating fre- cess like 1st and 2nd is followed for further iterations by
quency, bandwidth, peak gain and dimensions are using a square (13 × 13 mm2) and circle (radius 5 mm)
conducted. for third iteration and by using square (8 × 8 mm2) and
circle (radius 3 mm) for fourth iteration. Due to fabri-
cation imperatives the iteration process cannot be
1. ANTENNA GEOMETRY repeated infinitely, and hence the fourth iterative
The proposed design is made out of fourth iterative antenna has been finalized for fabrication and mea-
inscribed square circular fractal structure, partial surement. Figure 2 demonstrates the proposed fractal
ground structure and microstrip feed line. The initial antenna geometry fed with a transmission line and
radius A [mm] of the circular patch is calculated using superimposed with the partial ground plane. The feed
Eq. (1) [29] and is optimised to get the desired dimension is taken as 16 × 3.2 mm2. Partial ground
response plane structure is used in the proposed antenna, so the
7.22 back radiations of the antenna are reduced due to the
fL = . (1) suppression of surface waves. According to the param-
( L + r + p) k eters presented in Fig. 2a, the relationship between
Here, fL [GHz] is the lowest operating frequency, each fractal iteration with respect to previous iteration
p [mm] is the gap between the radiating patch and the is d = 23 mm, c = d – 5 mm = 18 mm, b = c – 5 mm =
ground, L [mm] = 2A, and r [mm] = A/4. In [29], the 13 mm and a = b – 5 mm = 8 mm. The optimized
empirical value of k was reported as 1.15 for a 1.6 mm dimensions of the slotted ground plane and shown in
thick dielectric substrate with εr = 4.4. As a result, we Fig. 2b.
used the same value in our study. Based on the itera-
tion as in Fig. 1, the fractal antenna is developed from
a simple monopole antenna. The antenna is developed 2. UWB CHARACTERISTICS
with a patch radius of 13 on 1.6 mm thick FR4 material AND MINIATURISATION
(εr = 4.4). This is called 0th iteration and is displayed Figure 1a shows a circular disc monopole antenna.
in Fig. 1a. First iterative antenna was constructed as in From Fig. 3, it can be understood that the current dis-

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS Vol. 67 No. 1 2022


48 REDDY et al.

(a) (b)
45 mm

a b c d
45 mm

SW = 3.2 mm
16 mm

SL = 12 mm

GL = 15 mm
3.2 mm
1.6 mm εr = 4.4

Fig. 2. Top layer (a) and ground layer (b) of the antenna.

tribution on the circular patch is mainly along the cir- 3. PARAMETRIC STUDY OF THE ANTENNA
cumference. However, since the current density is low 3.1. Effect of the Circular Disc Diameter
in the centre region of the circular disc, removal of
the centre region of the patch will not affect the cur- The resonance frequency is related with the circu-
lar disc diameter. So, the consequence of circular disc
rent. In this antenna, the effective path of the surface diameter has been studied. The circular disc diameter
current is expanded by notching a square on the cir- is differed from 10 to 14 mm and the simulated
cular patch, resulting in the antenna size reduction. S-parameters for the same are shown in Fig. 4. It is
To accomplish UWB characteristics in high frequen- observed that, when the dimension of the circular disc
cies, partial ground structure is superimposed with it. is 13 mm, there was a proper impedance matching
By adjusting the width of the feed line to 3.2 mm, throughout the band, and hence the value is chosen to
50-Ohm impedance is accomplished. Ground plane be 13 mm.
length is optimized to 15 mm and the etched slot
width and length on the ground plane are optimized
3.2. Effect of Every Iteration
to 3.2 and 12 mm.
The simulated S-parameter results of the antenna
are shown in Fig. 5 with respect to various iterations,
Jsurf, A/m which shows that the zeroth iterative antenna is
6. 4028e+001
observed to have poor impedance matching. Imped-
6. 0034e+001 ance matching for the first and second iterative anten-
5. 6041e+001 nas are dramatically improved, and an additional
5. 2047e+001 impedance matching is improved for the third and
4. 8053e+001 fourth iterative antennas. Also, it is noticed that the
4. 4060e+001
4. 0066e+001 lower edge of impedance bandwidth is shifted towards
3. 6073e+001 lower frequency side as the iteration is increased, and
3. 2079e+001 also impedance matching is enhanced through the
2. 8085e+001 operating range.
2. 4092e+001
2. 0098e+001
1. 6104e+001
1. 2111e+001 3.3. Effect of Partial Ground Plane Length
8. 1171e+001 On the other hand, the ground plane length is also
4. 1234e+000
1. 2980e–001 a vital factor affecting the bandwidth and conse-
quently the antenna impedance. Using a 45 mm
ground width (GW), the performance of antenna in
Fig. 3. Surface current Jsurf distribution on the circular terms of S-parameters is investigated for different values
disc. of ground length (GL) as shown in Fig. 6. From the

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS Vol. 67 No. 1 2022


CIRCULAR FRACTAL ANTENNA DESIGN WITH INSCRIBED SQUARE 49

0
–5 12
–10 11
–15

S11, dB
–20 d = 10 mm
14
–25
–30
13
–35
–40
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
f, GHz

Fig. 4. Simulated return loss S11 versus frequency f result for various circular disc diameters (with partial ground and slot in it).

–10
0th iteration
–20
S11, dB

1st
2nd
–30
3rd
–40
4th
–50
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
f, GHz

Fig. 5. Simulated return loss versus frequency with respect to each iteration.

simulation results, it is realized that efficient impedance matching with a very minimum bandwidth as shown in
matching is obtained as the GL approaches closer to Fig. 7.
monopole circular disc’s diameter.
The GL ranges from 17 to 14 mm in optimization. 3.4. Effect of Slot on the Partial Ground Plane
A rectangular slot is etched on the partial ground plane
to achieve better UWB characteristics with enhanced Use of slot on the partial ground structure resulted
impedance matching. However, it is observed that the in good impedance matching with UWB characteris-
use of full ground plane resulted in poor impedance tics when compared with the ground plane without

–5 17

–10 16
S11, dB

–15
15
–20

–25
GL = 14 mm
–30
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
f, GHz

Fig. 6. Simulated return loss versus frequency result of 4th iterative antenna for various partial ground length without slot in it.

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS Vol. 67 No. 1 2022


50 REDDY et al.

2
0
–2
–4

S11, dB
–6
–8
–10
–12
–14
–16
0 2 4 6 8 10
f, GHz

Fig. 7. Simulated return loss versus frequency result with full ground plane.

–10 SL = 3 mm

–20
S11, dB

–30 6
9
–40
12
–50
2 4 6 8 10 12
f, GHz

Fig. 8. Simulated return loss versus frequency result of 4th iterative antenna for various slot length on the partial ground plane.

slot. The antenna is analysed for better performance In a similar way, the SW is varied to find the better
characteristics with various slot length (SL) and slot performance characteristics. Keeping SL = 12 mm,
width (SW) on the partial ground. In optimization, the the SW is assorted from 3 to 3.4 mm. The simulated
SL is varied from 3 to 12 mm, and the simulated results results for various SW’s are shown in Fig. 9. The
for various SL’s are shown in Fig. 8. From the simula- effect of slotted partial ground plane and the use of
tion results, a proper impedance matching is observed fractal geometry in the disk are shown in Fig. 10 and
throughout the band when SL is increased. in Table 1.

0
3.3
–10
3.4
–20
S11, dB

3.1
–30
SW = 3 mm
–40 3.2
–50
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
f, GHz

Fig. 9. Simulated return loss versus frequency result of 4th iterative antenna for various slot width on the partial ground plane.

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS Vol. 67 No. 1 2022


CIRCULAR FRACTAL ANTENNA DESIGN WITH INSCRIBED SQUARE 51

–10

–20

S11, dB
–30

–40

–50
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
f, GHz
Fig. 10. Comparison of effect of slotted partial ground and fractal geometry on antenna performance; solid line–without fractal
patch, dashed line—with fractal patch.

Fig. 11. Fabricated antenna photograph.

–10

–20
S11, dB

–30
4th iteration

–40

–50
0 2 4 6 8 10 11
f, GHz
Fig. 12. Measured (dashed curve) and simulated (solid curve) return loss versus frequency results of the antenna.

4. EXPERIMENTAL RESULTS 45 mm, SL= 12 mm and SW = 3.2 mm. The antenna’s


Displayed in Fig. 11 is a picture of the fabricated measured (frequency versus return loss) result is
antenna tested using network analyser. With the opti- shown in Fig. 12 along with the simulated result. The
mized dimensions, the antenna has been fabricated on measured result reveals an eminent bandwidth of
a FR4 substrate of 1.6 mm thick, GL = 15 mm, GW = 8.8 GHz (from 2 GHz to 10.8 GHz).

Table 1. Effect of slotted ground and fractal patch on the antenna performance
Design Operating frequency, GHz Bandwidth, %
With slot on ground and without fractal patch 2.2–6.4 97.6
7.5–10.8 36
With slot on ground and with fractal patch 2–10.8 137.5

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS Vol. 67 No. 1 2022


52 REDDY et al.

(a)
0 0
0 330 30 330 30
–10
300 60 300 60
–20
–30
–40 270 90 270 90
–30
–20
240 120 240 120
–10
0 210 150 210 150
180 180
(b)
0 0
0 330 30 330 30
–10
300 60 300 60
–20
–30
–40 270 90 270 90
–30
–20
240 120 240 120
–10
0 210 150 210 150
180 180
(c)
0 0
0 330 30 330 30
–10
300 60 300 60
–20
–30
–40 270 90 270 90
–30
–20
240 120 240 120
–10
0 210 150 210 150
180 180

Fig. 13. Simulated (solid curve with circles) and measured (solid curve) radiation patterns of antenna at 4.2 (a), 6.2 (b) and
8.2 GHz (c).

The radiation properties of the fractal antenna at 6.2, and 8.2 GHz. Since the radiation of microstrip
peak resonance frequencies were studied. Displayed in antenna is normal to the patch surface, the useful por-
Fig. 13 represents the simulated and measured tion of radiation pattern is for ϕ = 0° and ϕ = 90°. The
(H-plane and E-plane) patterns of radiation at 4.2, patterns in H-plane are omnidirectional and in the

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS Vol. 67 No. 1 2022


CIRCULAR FRACTAL ANTENNA DESIGN WITH INSCRIBED SQUARE 53

7.5
5.0
2.5

PG, dBi
0
–2.5
–5.0
–7.5
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
f, GHz

Fig. 14. Peak gain (PG) of antenna versus frequency: solid curve—simulated results, dashed curve—measured results.

98
95
93
RE, %

90
88
4th iteration
85
83
80
0 2 4 6 8 10 12
f, GHz

Fig. 15. Radiation efficiency (RE) of antenna versus frequency.

E-plane they are bi-directional. For the proposed ciency (RE) of the antenna is demonstrated in Fig. 15,
antenna the patterns are reliable and besides the simu- which shows that RE is 97% at lower frequency 2 GHz
lated and measured patterns are in wise agreement. and is > 80% throughout the operating range. Table 2
compares the proposed UWB antenna’s performance
The measured and simulated peak gain of the to that of similar existing works. Though some of the
antenna is portrayed in Fig. 14. A realized peak gain of referenced antennas are small in size, the proposed
6.27 dBi is obtained at 10 GHz. The radiation effi- antenna has a larger bandwidth and a higher peak gain.

Table 2. Comparison of the proposed antenna with the existing ones


Operating band,
No. Size, mm2 Bandwidth, GHz Peak Gain, dBi Reference
GHz

1 50 × 67 2.0–6.2 4.2 4.2 [13]


2 40 × 100 3–5.5 2.5 3.5 [14]
3 44 × 40 3.1–10.6 7.5 Not mentioned [17]
4 50 × 50 3–9.5 6.5 3 [23]
5 59.5 × 52 2–9 7 6.1 [24]
6 52 × 50 2–10 8 3.28 [25]
7 50 × 45 3–10 7 6 [26]
8 45 × 50 1.31–6.81 5.5 6.8 [28]
9 45 × 45 2–10.8 8.8 6.27 Proposed work

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS Vol. 67 No. 1 2022


54 REDDY et al.

Since the proposed design is compact and with 5. M. Hammoud, P. Poey, and F. Colombel, “Matching
UWB at the same time, it is very important to find the the input impedance of a broadband disc monopole,”
dimension efficiency (DE) obtained. To calculate the Electron. Lett. 29, 406–407 (1993).
Chu sphere size, the ratio (7) from [30] can be used. To 6. N. P. Agrawall, G. Kumar, and K. P. Ray, “Wide-band
evaluate the Chu case, the case of spherical antenna planar monopole antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas
geometry, the polarizability tensor is equal to 6πa3. Propag. 46, 294–295 (1998).
Then the radius of the Chu sphere for an antenna with 7. J. N. Lee and J. K. Park, “Compact UWB chip antenna
the lower frequency of the operating range of 2 GHz is design using the coupling concept,” Prog. Electro-
8 mm, which is 3.9 times less than the radius (a = 31.2) magn. Res. 90, 341–351 (2009).
described around the proposed antenna, and therefore 8. L. C. Tsai, “A triple-band bow-tie-shaped CPW-fed
the DE is 0.26. slot antenna for WLAN applications,” Prog. Electro-
magn. Res. C 47, 167–71 (2014).
9. R. Kumar and K. K. Sawant, “On the design of circular
CONCLUSIONS fractal antenna with U-shape slot in CPW-feed,” Wire-
A compact circular fractal antenna is developed less Eng. & Technol. 1, 81–87 (2010).
and conferred to offer a very large transmission capac- 10. J. Liang, L. Guo, C. C. Chiau, and X. Chen, “CPW-fed
ity. The measured results of the antenna showed good circular disc monopole antenna for UWB applica-
alignment with the simulated ones. The measured tions,” IEEE AP-S, 505–508 (2005).
antenna obtained a broad frequency band of 2 GHz to 11. R. Kumar et al., “On the design of wheel shape fractal
10.8 GHz with Omni-directional patterns of radiation antenna,” Microwave Opt. Technol. Lett. 53, 155–159
in H-plane and Bi-directional patterns of radiation in (2011).
E-plane and a peak gain of 6.27 dBi. Usage of partial 12. R. Kumar et al., “Design of CPW-feed inscribed square
ground plane with a defect in it resulted in UWB and circular fractal antenna for UWB applications,” Micro-
improved matching is achieved by fractal geometry in wave Opt. Technol. Lett. 53, 1079–1083 (2011).
patch. A detailed parametric analysis is carried out for 13. R. Kumar and P. Malathi, “On the design of CPW-fed
various fractal iterations and various dimensions of diamond shape fractal antenna for UWB applications,”
partial ground and slot in it. When compared with the Int. J. Electron. 98, 1157–1168 (2011).
existing works the complexity and size of the design in 14. J. N. Lee and J. K. Park, “Compact UWB chip antenna
the proposed work is reduced with improved perfor- design using the coupling concept,” Prog. Electro-
mance characteristics. The size of proposed antenna is magn. Res. 90, 341–351 (2009).
3.9 times the Chu spheres limiting diameter that cor- 15. D. Mitra, D. Das, and S. R. Bhadra Chaudhuri,
responds to DE = 0.26. This kind of antenna may be “Bandwidth enhancement of microstrip line and CPW-
useful for various UWB systems, commercial wide- fed asymmetrical slot antennas,” Prog. Electromagn
Res. Lett. 32, 69–79 (2012).
band applications and military applications.
16. D. Mitra, D. Das, and S. R. Bhadra Chaudhuri,
“Bandwidth enhancement of microstrip line and CPW-
CONFLICT OF INTEREST fed asymmetrical slot antennas,” Prog. Electromagn.
Res. Lett. 32, 69–79 (2012).
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests. 17. R. Kumar, Dhananjay Magar, and K. Kailas Sawant,
“On the design of inscribed triangle circular fractal an-
tenna for UWB applications,” Int. J. Electron. Com-
REFERENCES mun. (AEÜ) 66, 68–75 (2012).
1. H. Schantz, The Art and Science of Ultra wideband An- 18. Dorostkar, M. Ali, R. Azim, and M. T. Islam. “A novel
tennas (Artech. House, 2005). Г-shape fractal antenna for wideband communica-
tions.” Procedia Technol. 11, 1285–1291 (2013).
2. Ultra-Wideband Antennas and Propagation for Commu- 19. Dissanayake, Tharaka, and Karu P. Esselle. “Predic-
nications, Radar and Imaging, Ed. B. Allen, M. Dohler, tion of the notch frequency of slot loaded printed UWB
E. Okon, W. Malik, A. Brown, and D. Edwards (John antennas,” IEEE Trans. Antennas Propag. 55, 3320–
Wiley & Sons, 2007). 3325 (2007).
3. N. M. Moghadasi, R. A. S. Sheikhan, T. Sedghi, T. Ari- 20. X. L. Bao and M. J. Ammann, “Printed UWB antenna
bi, and B. S. Virdee, “UWB CPW-fedfractal patch an- with coupled slotted element for notch-frequency func-
tenna with band-notched function employing folded tion,” Int. J. Antennas Propag. 2008 (2008).
T-shapedelement,” IEEE Antennas Wireless Propag. 21. Zang Jiawei and Xuetian Wang, “A compact C-shaped
Lett. 12, 504–507 (2013). printed UWB antenna with band-notched characteris-
4. J. Liang, C. Chiau, X. Chen, and J. Yu, “Study of a cir- tic,” Prog. In Electromagn. Res. 43, 15–23 (2013).
cular disc monopole antennas for ultra wideband appli- 22. Qu, S-W., J-L. Li, and Quan Xue, “A band-notched ul-
cations,” in Proc. Int. Symp. on Antennas and Propaga- trawideband printed monopole antenna,” IEEE An-
tion, Sendai, Japan, August, 17–21, 2004. tennas and Wireless Propag. Lett. 5, 495–498 (2006).

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS Vol. 67 No. 1 2022


CIRCULAR FRACTAL ANTENNA DESIGN WITH INSCRIBED SQUARE 55

23. N. M. Awad and M. K. Abdelazeez, “Circular patch 27. Manisha Gupta and Vinita Mathur, “Wheel shaped
UWB antenna with ground-slot,” in Proc. IEEE Anten- modified fractal antenna realization for wirelesscom-
nas and Propag. Soc. Int. Symp. (APSURSI), Orlando, munications,” AEU – Int. J. Electron. Commun., 79,
FL, 2013 (IEEE, New York, 2013), pp. 442–443. 257–266 (2017).
24. Satam Vandana, Shikha Nema, and Sanjay Singh 28. Desai Arpan, Trushit K. Upadhyaya, Rikikumar Patel,
Thakur, “Spanner shape monopole MIMO antenna Sagar Bhatt, and Parthesh Mankodi, “Wideband high
with high gain for UWB applications,” in Proc. Int. gain fractal antenna for wireless applications.” Prog. In
Conf. on Wireless Commun., Singapore, 2018 (Springer, Electromagn. Res. Lett. 74, 125–130 (2018).
2018), pp. 129–138.
25. Rakhesh Singh Kshetrimayum and Ramu Pillalamarri, 29. Ray, Kamala Prasan. “Design aspects of printed
“Novel UWB printed monopole antenna with triangu- monopole antennas for ultra-wide band applications.”
lar tapered feed lines,” IEICE Electron. Express 5, Int. J. Antennas & Propag. (2008).
242–247, 2008. 30. Ant. V. Uvarov, M. Yu. Gerasimov and And. V. Uvarov,
26. C. Azenui Ntsanderh and H. Y. D. Yang, “A printed “On the fundamental limitations of ultra-wideband an-
crescent patch antenna for ultrawideband applica- tennas,” J. Commun. Technol. Electron. 64, 229–233
tions,” IEEE Antenna Propag. Lett. 6, 113–116 (2007). (2019).

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATIONS TECHNOLOGY AND ELECTRONICS Vol. 67 No. 1 2022

You might also like