Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Contents
Foreword 3
Executive summary 6
Contributors 22
Endnotes 23
Disclaimer
This document is published by the
World Economic Forum as a contribution
to a project, insight area or interaction.
The findings, interpretations and
conclusions expressed herein are a result
of a collaborative process facilitated and
endorsed by the World Economic Forum
but whose results do not necessarily
represent the views of the World Economic
Forum, nor the entirety of its Members,
Partners or other stakeholders.
Foreword
Børge Brende Bob Sternfels
President, Global Managing Partner,
World Economic Forum McKinsey & Company
The launch of the Global Cooperation Barometer seeking opportunities for collaboration. Notably,
comes at the start of a crucial year, amid a period at the height of the Cold War, the United States
of immense geopolitical, geo-economic and market and the Soviet Union coordinated on eradicating
uncertainty, when the bedrock of what was once a smallpox and addressing the ozone layer in the
stable global system is shifting underfoot. Leaders atmosphere. And many companies that compete
in the public and private sectors will need to gain with one another also find ways to cooperate in
fluency in the dynamics driving the changes to not areas of mutual benefit.
just stabilize their position, but to be equipped to
shape a beneficial future. It is within today’s complex geopolitical context that
gaining an understanding of the shape of global
It is no secret that the current global context is cooperation – and competition – is vital. Leaders
concerning, as heightened competition and conflict in business and government will need to recognize
appear to be replacing cooperation. The result is where the contours of opposition end and those
that new power dynamics, changing demographic of alignment begin to navigate through the
realities and breakthrough frontier technologies are geopolitical turbulence and also to shape a more
raising the temperature on long-simmering distrust cooperative future.
rather than fueling opportunities for benefit. Many
businesses are responding to these complicated – It is for this reason that the World Economic
Leaders in and often fraught – geopolitical developments by Forum and McKinsey & Company developed the
business and shifting operations and facilities closer to home. Global Cooperation Barometer. The purpose of
government will this analysis, which uses 42 indicators to measure
need to recognize Yet, although the world is heading towards a the state of global cooperation broadly and along
where the contours dangerous divide by some measures, elsewhere five areas, is to help stakeholders in business and
of opposition there are prospects for and progress on cooperative government gain a better understanding of the
end and those of arrangements. For instance, for the first time since nature of cooperation that is, or is not, taking place.
countries began meeting to address global warming,
alignment begin to
an agreement was reached at the COP28 climate Our hope is that the Global Cooperation Barometer
navigate through change conference on transitioning away from will offer stakeholders a tool to use in shaping a
the geopolitical fossil fuels. healthier, more prosperous and more sustainable
turbulence and world in the year ahead and beyond.
also to shape a That cooperation and confrontation can coexist
more cooperative should not come as a surprise. History is replete
future. with parties at odds with one another, but still
The world is facing complex challenges. Addressing After trending positively for much of the past
them demands cooperation at the global level. decade, global cooperation risks moving into
reverse. The story varies by pillar:
Today’s economy is in a fragile state, with growth
expected to be well below the historical average, – Trade and capital: trade and capital cooperation
according to the International Monetary Fund (IMF).1 grew through the pandemic disruption, but
Revitalizing trade will be crucial to strengthening the slowed in 2023; geopolitical tensions and new
economic outlook ahead and boosting livelihoods. restrictions make the future path unclear.
However, the IMF has raised alarms about the
possibility of global fragmentation, which could – Innovation and technology: flows of data, IP
shave off 7% of global GDP.2 and international students powered an increase
in cooperation until 2020, but new questions
Similarly, technological innovation is key to have arisen about how to work together to
boosting currently sluggish productivity growth, harness opportunities.
with generative artificial intelligence (AI) holding
extraordinary potential – $2.6 trillion to $4.4 trillion – Climate and natural capital: the level of
in additional annual value across industries, as cooperation for climate and natural capital has
estimated by the McKinsey Global Institute.3 The only been rising steadily, due in large measure to an
way to unlock this benefit and manage undesirable increase in commitments, but emissions also
consequences is through global coordination. continue to rise.
Climate change requires governments and – Health and wellness: cooperation in health
businesses to work together to reach net zero, and wellness rose swiftly in response to the
adapt to shifts in climate already locked in by pandemic, but appears to be settling back to
previous emissions, and do all of this in a way that historical patterns.
supports economic development across the globe.
Just like the health of the planet, the health of people – Peace and security: cooperation in peace
requires cooperation globally between governments and security has declined since 2016 and
and businesses. Long-term advancements in plummeted recently.
health and immediate responses to acute crises
like pandemics require parties around the world to Because it is unlikely that the current geopolitical
work together. Yet, in terms of addressing the health climate will change and competition and
and well-being of people and the planet, the world confrontation will soon cool, the barometer
appears off course, with just 15% of the Sustainable suggests that leaders in business and government
Development Goals on track.4 should reimagine cooperation.
Yet, as cooperation is becoming an imperative, the The barometer shows that cooperation is
world order appears to be fragmenting. Indeed, multifaceted, and elements of cooperation can
the global security landscape – once a largely coexist with elements of rivalry. Leaders can
cooperative domain in the post-Cold War era – is practice “coopetition” – balancing cooperation
deteriorating, with the United Nations noting at the and competition – to advance shared interests in
start of 2023 that the world was witnessing the specific areas, despite lack of alignment elsewhere.
highest number of violent conflicts since World Further, leaders can use these instances of
War II.5 cooperation to build mutual trust, which in turn
could strengthen cooperation in other areas.
The Global Cooperation Barometer 2024 presents
an approach to measure the current state of global Fundamentally, companies and countries should
cooperation. In doing so, the report is meant to remember that cooperation breeds strength and
serve as a tool for leaders to better understand resilience. Those that thoughtfully and constructively
the contours of cooperation broadly and along five manage relationships bounce back better from
pillars – trade and capital flows, innovation and challenges and achieve objectives.6
technology, climate and natural capital, health and
wellness, and peace and security.
The world is facing a plethora of challenges Despite the challenging context, the story about
that require global cooperation to solve. Global global cooperation is not black and white.
temperatures shattered previous highs and last year Countries and companies can compete while also
was the hottest on record.7 And, over 114 million cooperating. Competition, and even confrontation,
people have been forcibly displaced worldwide – can spike in one area while cooperation can deepen
the highest level ever.8 At the same time, ongoing in others. In a notable example, in 2022, amid
threats of a pandemic and the risks of new, heightened tensions between the United States
unregulated technologies warrant concern. and China, as climate negotiations between both
countries were suspended and talk of decoupling
Cooperation is not only necessary as a reactive dominated airwaves, bilateral trade reached record
mechanism to address threatening global levels.13
developments, but it is also needed to unlock
new opportunities. Indeed, generative AI has To help develop a better understanding of the
the potential to contribute as much as $2.6 current state of global cooperation, this report
trillion to $4.4 trillion to the global economy, but presents the Global Cooperation Barometer – a
requires substantial coordination across the global tool that examines cooperation in five pillars: trade
ecosystem to mitigate risks and ensure benefits are and capital, innovation and technology, climate
shared widely.9 and natural capital, health and wellness, and peace
and security. The five pillars were chosen because,
Recent history has shown that global cooperation given the interconnected nature of the world,
can deliver profound benefits. During the first cooperation at the global level is necessary to see
quarter-century after the end of the Cold War – advancements in each of these areas.
a period largely seen as a high point for global
cooperation – expanded trade lifted global incomes Overall, the barometer indicates that after trending
and as a result, the number of people living in positively for much of the past decade, global
extreme poverty was cut in half.10 Instances of the cooperation has been mildly reversing (down
international community reflexively coming together 2%) since 2020 (Figure 1). The period from
during this period are most evident through security 2012 to the pandemic was marked by increased
coordination in the aftermath of the September 11, cooperation across four of the five pillars (peace
2001 attacks, financial coordination in the wake of and security was the exception), led by innovation
the global financial crisis in 2008, which included and technology’s more than 30% increase in
upgrading the G20, and global commitments to cooperation (Figure 2). However, in more recent
address the growing danger of climate change years new questions have arisen about how to
through the 2015 signing of the Paris Climate work together to harness opportunities that arise
Overall, the Agreement. from innovation.
barometer
indicates that By many accounts, the geopolitical dial turned from
cooperation to competition in the mid-2010s, as
after trending
nationalist forces increased in many countries and
positively for much protectionist policies rose.11 The dial then turned
of the past decade, further away from cooperation as conflict broke
global cooperation out in Europe, Africa and the Middle East in recent
has been mildly years, with the UN warning in early 2023 that the
reversing (down world was witnessing the highest level of violent
2%) since 2020. conflict since World War II.12
1.1
1.0
Overall global cooperation
0.9
0.8
0.7
0.6
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
The main drags on overall cooperation since 2020 rising steadily, due in large measure to cooperative
have been declines in cooperation in the health and efforts since 2020 around commitments. In the
wellness pillar and the peace and security pillar. For trade and capital pillar, cooperation showed signs of
the latter pillar, the trend was broadly negative from growing through the pandemic disruption (but signs
2016 until the pandemic and deteriorated rapidly are of moderation in 2023).
after 2020 due to significant increases in forcibly
displaced people and deaths from conflict. The following chapter examines the changes in
global cooperation in each of the five pillars and is
Despite this concerning trend, there have been followed by a series of recommendations for helping
signs of growing cooperation. The level of leaders reimagine global cooperation in a new era.
cooperation for climate and natural capital has been
1.1
Trade and capital
Climate and nature
0.9
0.7
0.6
2012 2013 2014 2015 2016 2017 2018 2019 2020 2021 2022
The Global Cooperation Barometer measures global Each pillar examines evidence of cooperative
cooperation across five areas, or pillars: trade and actions and outcomes of cooperative action to
capital flows, innovation and technology, climate determine an overall level of global cooperation in
and natural capital, health and wellness, and peace that area.
and security.
The trade and capital pillar looks at cooperation but experienced significant volatility during the
in promoting global growth, development and pandemic and years immediately after, particularly
resilience through global economic integration. It in capital flows and labour migration patterns
reflects the interconnected nature of the modern which declined relative to 2020. However, most
global economy through dynamics in trade, capital metrics (e.g. goods trade, development assistance
and people flows, all of which are an essential driver and developing countries’ share of FDI and
of global growth. manufacturing exports) returned to strong growth
in the post-pandemic period, driving up the overall
From 2012-2020, cooperation in the form of trend (Figure 3).
global trade and capital flows rose moderately,
0.6
2012-2020 2020-2022
2012 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2022
*Outcome metrics
Notes: 1. Metrics were reflected given negative connotation. Note: Due to missing data in
some metrics, data from the closest years are used to calculate the trend. These metrics
include labour migration, international students, cross-border IP R&D, trade in IT services,
terrestrial protected areas, cross-border flows of pharma R&D, development assistance for
health, child mortality, maternal mortality.
The innovation and technology pillar examines in cross-border data flows and IT services trade).
how global cooperation, through exchanges of Since 2020, cooperation has leveled off, with
knowledge and people, accelerates innovation and critical aspects starting to decline (e.g. cross-
creates beneficial technological progress. border patent applications and international student
flows) (Figure 4).
From 2012-2020, innovation and technology
cooperation maintained strong and significant
growth across most barometer metrics (particularly
IT services trade
0.6
2012-2020 2020-2022
2012 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2022
*Outcome metrics
Notes: 1. Metrics were reflected given negative connotation. Note: Due to missing data in
some metrics, data from the closest years are used to calculate the trend. These metrics
include labour migration, international students, cross-border IP R&D, trade in IT services,
terrestrial protected areas, cross-border flows of pharma R&D, development assistance for
health, child mortality, maternal mortality.
The climate and natural capital pillar looks at the Climate and natural capital is the sole pillar in
impact of cooperation on the remediation and which the majority of indicators rose across the
resolution of challenges to the global climate and entire period of 2012-2022, with sustained positive
natural capital. The focus is on lowering emissions, trends in financial commitments to mitigation and
preserving natural capital and preparing for the likely adaptation and a significant expansion of marine-
impact of climate change through shared global protected areas. But, emissions continue to
goals that increase humanity’s ability to limit and increase and progress toward ecological outcomes
adapt to a changing climate. is stagnant (Figure 5).
Adaptation finance
,1
Emissions intensity*
0.9
Low-carbon goods trade
0.6
2012-2020 2020-2022
2012 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2022
*Outcome metrics
Notes: 1. Metrics were reflected given negative connotation. Note: Due to missing data in
some metrics, data from the closest years are used to calculate the trend. These metrics
include labour migration, international students, cross-border IP R&D, trade in IT services,
terrestrial protected areas, cross-border flows of pharma R&D, development assistance for
health, child mortality, maternal mortality.
2012-2022: Steady increase in global economy (by market capitalization) have set
science-based targets for emissions reductions.26
commitments with rising emissions Associated trade and investment also rose.
The period of 2012-2020 showed significant growth On nature, advancement was mixed. More of the
in financing commitments towards both climate world became protected: the global percentage
mitigation and adaptation, with finance flows for of marine protected areas increased by over 60%,
mitigation nearly doubling and flows for adaptation while the share of terrestrial protected areas grew
rising by 56% as a share of GDP. nearly 8% (from a considerably larger base) over
the same time window. However, ocean health
Net-zero commitments in the private sector have also and biodiversity remained stable over this period,
proliferated, with groups such as Glasgow Financial suggesting limited impact (to date) of these
Alliance for Net Zero (GFANZ), the Task Force of initiatives. This trend threatens the survival of one
Climate-Related Financial Disclosures (TCFD) and million species around the world,27 as well as the
the Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) growing in livelihoods of one in five people who rely on wild
influence. Companies representing over 34% of the species for food and income.28
For many indicators, the years 2020-2022 either To achieve these objectives, spending must be
maintained prior trends or represented an uptick in allocated effectively, focusing on creating incentives
progress. Mitigation financing grew by almost 14%; to deploy lower-cost solutions (e.g. solar/wind
adaptation financing grew by over 13% (both as a power) and reducing the costs of expensive
percentage of GDP). There was continued focus on solutions (e.g. passenger battery EVs; onshore wind
driving public commitments to low-carbon growth power). At the same time, energy systems must be
with a step-change in impact; the share of countries redesigned, with parties anticipating and removing
by GDP with long-term low-carbon development bottlenecks for materials (e.g. lithium and nickel),
strategies grew from 15% in 2020 to 82% in 2022.30 land, infrastructure and labour. Energy markets and
planning approaches for an electrified world also
However, the signs were not all positive in this need to be prioritized (e.g. incentives for companies
period. While 2020 represented an anomaly in generating electricity to provide flexible capacity to
terms of emissions growth (falling by 3.5% given the support wind/solar transition). All of these efforts will
pandemic-driven cessation in many core drivers of demand greater collaborative action.
emissions), by 2021 emissions had retained their
upward momentum and by 2022 they were 5.7%
higher than 2020 and 2.4% higher than 2019.
The health and wellness pillar examines the Cooperation on health and wellness rose
impact of global cooperation in enabling people consistently from 2012 to 2020 and was essential in
worldwide to lead longer and healthier lives. The certain ways to navigate the COVID-19 pandemic,
focus is on understanding the burden of disease for example through the development of vaccines
on the duration and quality of life and the growing (though not their distribution). Since the peak in
commitments to global public health standards and 2020, cooperation in these areas has declined
collaboration through flows of goods, R&D/IP and slightly (Figure 6).
health financing.
1.0
Child mortality* ,1
IHR score
0.8 DALYs*
,1
0.6
2012-2020 2020-2022
2012 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2022
*Outcome metrics
Notes: 1. Metrics were reflected given negative connotation. Note: Due to missing data in
some metrics, data from the closest years are used to calculate the trend. These metrics
include labour migration, international students, cross-border IP R&D, trade in IT services,
terrestrial protected areas, cross-border flows of pharma R&D, development assistance for
health, child mortality, maternal mortality.
The peace and security pillar looks at the impact Cooperation trends in peace and security
of global cooperation in preventing and resolving demonstrated considerable decline starting in 2016
conflicts. The focus is on the prevention of death (Figure 7). This trend is driven by a rise in forcibly
and ameliorating the long-term negative implications displaced people and cyberattacks, and a recent rise
of conflict through commitment to multilateral in the number of conflicts and conflict-related deaths,
peacekeeping operations and international indicating an increasingly unstable global security
stabilization efforts. environment and increased intensity of conflicts.
1.0
0.6
2012-2020 2020-2022
2012 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 2022
*Outcome metrics
Notes: 1. Metrics were reflected given negative connotation. Note: Due to missing data in
some metrics, data from the closest years are used to calculate the trend. These metrics
include labour migration, international students, cross-border IP R&D, trade in IT services,
terrestrial protected areas, cross-border flows of pharma R&D, development assistance for
health, child mortality, maternal mortality.
In the context of the barometer findings, what role of their organization in supporting global
can leaders in the public and private sectors do cooperation in specific areas or with specific
to protect their interests and help foster global outcomes in mind. This may also require upgrading
cooperation? the board’s understanding given the complexities
and nuances of these issues, drawing on the
Practice “coopetition” latest research and frameworks. Boards may
Amid an era of heightened geopolitical competition, want to invite global experts for regular sessions
parties should not take competition to mean to discuss the latest developments, potential
cooperation is impossible, or that a decline in scenarios, and implications for the organization.
cooperation in one area means cooperation is Boards should also be more proactive in pressure-
impossible elsewhere. Instead, parties should testing management on the potential controls or
focus on identifying avenues toward advancing mitigations established to counteract the impact of
shared interest that can exist despite competition declines in global cooperation.
– a practice known in the private sector as
“coopetition”.56 Build dynamic strategic options
The old paradigm of globalization largely depended
Use cooperation to beget cooperation on businesses shaping the way. Now governments
While cooperation can coexist with competition, are moving back into the lead, and this is likely to
cooperation can also be used to increase overall be a core consideration for every multinational.
trust and diminish unnecessary rivalry or conflict. A starting point here will be a careful and clinical
Parties should use instances of cooperation to diagnostic of each firm’s interconnectedness –
not only advance interests in that area but also as where, with whom, how – combined with a rigorous
an opportunity to explore other potential areas of risk assessment of potential points of weakness.
alignment and to deepen trust with counterparts. That understanding will form the basis for detailed
scenario planning, including resilient alternatives
Raise the capabilities of management for supply chains, and the elaboration of new
Every company, especially the largest strategy options that take into account dynamic
multinationals, will be touched in some way by world events.
the ongoing mutations in globalization (including
global trade flows).57 Cooperation needs to be Think diversifying, not decoupling
treated like a muscle that can be strengthened and Companies and countries that thoughtfully manage
can react well in the face of geopolitical shocks. their concentrated exposures are likely to be
An understanding of both global connections and more resilient – not only able to absorb a supply
geopolitical realities – and implications for the disruption, but also to bounce back better. There
business – should be a core competency for every is already evidence of this in action: in April 2022,
multinational corporation C-suite executive.58 That 81% of global supply-chain leaders surveyed said
means not just understanding the headlines, but they had initiated dual sourcing of raw materials,
having a subtle grasp of the nuances, context and up 26 percentage points from the previous
potential implications for the business. year. Greater diversification not only strengthens
resilience; it could also promote a more inclusive
Evaluate board expertise and engagement trading system and economy.59 The connection
In parallel with shifts in management, boards between trade and wealth creation is strong:
should be building their capabilities to conduct diversification could enable more countries to
more nuanced discussions and decisions on topics participate more fully.
of global cooperation, including the appropriate
Labor migrants (as a % of population) Cross-border data flows (as a % of total IP traffic)
Source: International Labour Organization (ILO) Source: International Telecommunication Union (international
Methodological notes: Figures for 2014-2016 and 2018 were bandwidth usage); Cisco (IP traffic)
linearly interpolating using data points in 2013, 2017, and 2019.
Figure for 2020 was extrapolated. From 2019 to 2020, overall International students (as a % of population)
international migrant stock grew from 272 to 281 million, and in Source: Institute for International Education
2019 labour migrants accounted for 62% of overall migration. Methodological notes: Due to data availability, destination
This 62% was assumed to remain constant in 2020 and was countries included are Australia, Canada, China, France,
used to extrapolate the 2020 value for labour migrants. Germany, Japan, New Zealand, Norway, Spain, the United
States, the United Kingdom; 2021 values were linearly
Developing countries’ share of manufacturing interpolated for China and Norway.
exports
Source: World Bank IT goods trade (as a % of GDP)
Methodological notes: Calculation uses categorization of Source: UNCTAD, UN Comtrade
developing and developed countries defined by the UN Methodological notes: UN Comtrade data was used to
Statistics Division. extrapolate the 2022 figure. The rate of change between 2021
Q1-Q3 and 2022 Q1-Q3 was applied to UNCTAD’s 2021
figure to estimate the value in 2022.
Average price of a lithium-ion battery Development assistance for health (DAH) (as a
Source: BloombergNEF % of GDP)
Methodological notes: Two published charts were used to Source: Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME)
construct the decade trendline: one presenting data from
2010-2018 and on presenting data from 2013-2022. Data International Health Regulations (IHR) score
from the former chart was used for years 2012-2018 and Source: World Health Organization
2019-2022 was extrapolated using the y-o-y growth rates Methodological notes: All capacities average score used.
from the latter chart.
Life expectancy at birth
Source: United Nations
Climate and natural capital Methodological notes: Medium variant UN forecast was used
for the 2022 figure.
Yasmine Gordon
Consultant, Chicago
Andres Cadena
Senior Partner, Bogota, Strategy and Corporate
Finance Practice
Mekala Krishnan
Partner, Boston, McKinsey Global Institute
Mayowa Kuyoro
Partner, Lagos, Financial Services Practice
Acha Leke
Senior Partner, Johannesburg, Social, Healthcare,
and Public Sector Entities Practice and Chairman of
McKinsey’s Africa region
Jeongmin Seong
Partner, Shanghai, McKinsey Global Institute
Acknowledgements
Thank you to Mirek Dušek and Sean Doherty at the World Economic Forum for offering valuable input and
feedback. Thank you also to Max Hall and Floris Landi.