How To Write A Methodology For A Literature Review

Writing a literature review methodology can be a daunting task for many students and researchers. It
requires careful planning, organization, and attention to detail. The methodology section is crucial as
it outlines the approach you will take to conduct your literature review and analyze the existing
research on your chosen topic. In this guide, we will provide you with tips and strategies to help you
write an effective methodology for your literature review.

1. Define Your Research Approach: Before you begin writing your methodology, it's essential to
determine your research approach. Will you be conducting a qualitative, quantitative, or
mixed-methods literature review? Clearly define your approach and justify why it is
appropriate for your research question.
2. Identify Search Strategies: Outline the search strategies you will use to identify relevant
literature. This may include databases, search engines, and specific keywords or search terms.
Be sure to explain why you have chosen these search strategies and how they will help you
locate the most relevant sources.
3. Selection Criteria: Describe the criteria you will use to select literature for your review. This
may include factors such as publication date, relevance to your research question,
methodology used, and quality of the research. Justify your selection criteria and explain how
they will ensure the inclusion of high-quality sources in your review.
4. Data Extraction: Outline the process you will use to extract data from the selected literature.
This may involve creating a data extraction form or spreadsheet to systematically record
relevant information from each source. Be clear about the types of data you will extract and
how you will analyze it.
5. Synthesis and Analysis: Explain how you will synthesize and analyze the findings from the
literature. Will you use thematic analysis, content analysis, or another approach? Describe the
steps you will take to identify common themes, patterns, or gaps in the literature and how
you will interpret the findings in relation to your research question.
6. Ethical Considerations: Discuss any ethical considerations relevant to your literature review,
such as confidentiality, anonymity, and informed consent. Explain how you will ensure that
your research adheres to ethical guidelines and respects the rights of study participants.

Writing a methodology for a literature review requires careful planning, attention to detail, and
critical thinking. If you're struggling with this task, consider seeking assistance from a professional
academic writing service like ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔. Their team of experienced writers can help you
craft a comprehensive and well-structured methodology that meets the requirements of your research
project. Order now and take the stress out of writing your literature review methodology.
Explain if they were unstructured, semi-structured, or structured. Note that more authentic thematic
reviews tend to break away from chronological order. PDF version of this title (4.5M) Disable
Glossary Links In this Page Introduction Overview of the Literature Review Process and Steps
Types of Review Articles and Brief Illustrations Concluding Remarks Related information PMC
PubMed Central citations PubMed Links to PubMed Recent Activity Chapter 9?Methods for
Literature Reviews - Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Ev. Mixed-methods literature review:
This type of review combines quantitative and qualitative methods to synthesize and analyze the
available literature on a particular topic. For example, after conducting a literature review on the
impact of social media on teenagers’ mental health, a thesis might look like this: “Using a mixed-
methods approach, this study aims to investigate the relationship between social media use and
mental health outcomes in teenagers. Free text searching is the use of natural language words to
conduct your search. Patsopoulos N. A., Analatos A. A., Ioannidis J.P. A. Relative citation impact of
various study designs in the health sciences. Download references Author information Authors and
affiliations. Nova has a passion for writing that engages and informs her readers. For this reason, it is
useful to make detailed notes before, during, and after the review is completed. Writing a literature
review requires research, analysis, and synthesis. How to word a thesis statement for a research paper.
Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Synthesising quantitative and qualitative evidence to inform guidelines on
complex interventions: clarifying the purposes, designs and outlining some methods. Include an
objective topical sentence that introduces your readers to the purpose of that paragraph. The Survey
result showed that customer satisfaction of DBBL ATM Service quality is. If you’re a student, you
should narrow the scope of your systematic review and stick to a tight schedule. Methods and the
Literature Review This book includes steps for students and experienced scholars, with discussion of
a variety of literature review types. A useful strategy is to aim for a brief description that signposts
the reader to a separate section or sections of supporting information. If possible, try to find
dissertations or theses from former students of your specific degree program — this will give you a
strong indication of the expectations and norms when it comes to the methodology chapter and all
the other chapters. Heterogeneity between the included studies in terms of reported outcomes and
measures precluded the use of meta-analytic methods. This approach should only be followed if a
clear path of research building on previous research can be identified and that these trends follow a
clear chronological order of development. However, a scoping review isn’t a type of systematic
review. Results indicate that the majority of systematic reviews in this particular area suffer from
important methodological flaws and biases that impair their internal validity and limit their
usefulness for clinical and decision-making purposes. It can be helpful to make an annotated
bibliography, where you compile full reference information and write a paragraph of summary and
analysis for each source. By citing and analyzing the literature, you can provide a solid foundation
for your own arguments and claims. I dentifying potential collaborators and mentors: A literature
review can help identify potential collaborators and mentors by identifying researchers and
practitioners who are working on related topics or using similar methods. To achieve this ambitious
objective, the authors performed a bibliometric analysis of medical informatics citations indexed in
medline using publication trends, journal frequencies, impact factors, Medical Subject Headings
(MeSH) term frequencies, and characteristics of citations. Specify the time frame, key themes, and
relevant studies to focus your research. For example, kinesiologists studying heart disease will review
the literature to identify acceptable measurement methods, whereas anthropologists researching
intersections of culture and technology need to examine the literature to identify different categories
of analysis. Unlike embedded literature reviews, which appear as part of a larger piece of work,
stand-alone literature reviews are a self-contained piece of writing that can be read on their own
(Figure A.2). Once researchers have selected a topic, the first step in their research methodology is
often the stand-alone literature review.
It should give a theoretical base for the research and help you (the author) determine the nature of
your research. Umbrella reviews generally adhere to the same principles and rigorous methodological
guidelines used in systematic reviews. Embedded literature reviews, meanwhile, are part of a larger
piece of writing, such as an essay, thesis, or scholarly article. Third, there are the perceptions,
conclusions, opinion, and interpretations that are shared informally among scholars that become part
of the body of epistemological traditions within the field. Reviews of healthcare interventions follow
the PRISMA guidelines for the minimum set of items to report in the methods section. A flow
diagram shows the number of studies identified, screened, and included or excluded at each stage of
study selection. Step 2: Develop a protocol A protocol is a document that contains your research
plan for the systematic review. Examples of Literature Review Here’s an example of how a literature
review can be conducted for a thesis on the topic of “ The Impact of Social Media on Teenagers’
Mental Health”: Start by identifying the key terms related to your research topic. What are the key
concepts and how are they defined. By being critical, you’ll demonstrate to your marker that you
have a strong understanding of research theory, so don’t be shy here. The review should be
organized thematically, chronologically, or by methodology, depending on the research objectives.
Gray literature: Gray literature includes documents produced by governments, universities, and other
institutions that aren’t published by traditional publishers. Secondly, the methodology chapter is
what helps to make your study replicable. There are two types of information you need to collect
from each study: Information about the study’s methods and results. The authors identified six main
ways which represent “educated guesses” to be tested against the data in the evaluation studies. In
this section, you should remind your readers what the focus of your study is, especially the research
aims. Steps to writing a perfect methodology for a dissertation 1. Springer, Cham. Download citation
DOI: Received: 22 February 2023 Accepted: 22 February 2023 Published: 09 May 2023 Publisher
Name: Springer, Cham Print ISBN: 978-3-030-50247-8 Online ISBN: 978-3-030-50247-8 eBook
Packages: Springer Reference Biomedicine and Life Sciences Reference Module Biomedical and
Life Sciences Publish with us Policies and ethics Find a journal Track your research USC Libraries
Research Guides Organizing Your Social Sciences Research Paper 5. The point of the methodology
chapter is to tell the reader exactly how you designed your research and to justify your design
choices. Be sure that you start with your General Field first before referring to your dissertation
study. Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. Based on the overall results of the
completed surveys, we found that Dutch Bangla Bank Ltd. The methods are repeatable, and the
approach is formal and systematic: Formulate a research question Develop a protocol Search for all
relevant studies Apply the selection criteria Extract the data Synthesize the data Write and publish a
report Although multiple sets of guidelines exist, the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews is
among the most widely used. How to write Literature Review Here are some steps to follow when
writing a literature review: Define your research question or topic: Before starting your literature
review, it is essential to define your research question or topic. In essence, a well-crafted literature
review informs and elevates your research, ensuring its relevance and impact within your academic
field. Best practice guidelines for abstract screening large-evidence systematic reviews and meta-
analyses. It is good practice to plan a strategy before you start to search. Critical literature review:
This type of review evaluates the strengths and weaknesses of the existing literature on a particular
topic or research question. Given this, the purpose of a literature review is to: Place each work in the
context of its contribution to understanding the research problem being studied. It aims to provide a
more comprehensive understanding of the research question by combining different types of
evidence.
Refining Boolean queries to identify relevant studies for systematic review updates. Does your
introduction clearly convey the purpose of the literature review. These are just two philosophies
(there are many more), but they demonstrate significantly different approaches to research and have
a significant impact on all the methodological choices. Analysis: In this question we see that mean is
3.75 and Std. Deviation is 1.381 so it represent. Carefully edit to ensure logical argument flow and
concise writing. For example, a review of the Internet’s impact on American presidential politics
could focus on the development of online political satire. What types of sources should I review
(books, journal articles, websites; scholarly versus popular sources)? 3. Your strategy will depend on
your field and your research question, but sources generally fall into these four categories:
Databases: Search multiple databases of peer-reviewed literature, such as PubMed or Scopus. Lit
reviews can take many different organizational patterns depending on what you are trying to
accomplish with the review. You don’t want to substitute a thorough review of core research
literature in your discipline for studies conducted in other fields of study. As you write, make sure to
follow these tips: Summarise and synthesise: give an overview of the main points of each source
and combine them into a coherent whole. Make an awareness campaign about using the ATM
Service: In our country lots of people are. Methodological Approach This approach centers on the
research methods employed in various studies related to your topic. Consider Whether Your Sources
are Current Some disciplines require that you use information that is as current as possible. The most
important difference is the goal: rather than answering a specific question, a scoping review explores
a topic. In your notes, be sure to record each author’s thesis, methodology, strengths, limitations, and
significant findings in addition to relevant information you can use in an essay. If you need a
helping hand with your research methodology (or any other component of your research), be sure to
check out our private coaching service, where we hold your hand through every step of the research
journey. A good starting point could be to look at some examples, depending on what kind of
literature review you’d like to write. Constructing a search strategy and searching for evidence. The
literature review acknowledges the work of previous researchers, and in so doing, assures the reader
that your work has been well conceived. It assists in enabling researchers to gain a better
understanding of complex concepts, social interactions or cultural phenomena. Our team is ready to
provide expert guidance, ensuring you craft a strong and effective literature review. If you are
illustrating how the data-collection method or machine or a questionnaire or a Likert scale works.
You can tell the audience if you analysed the data by coding and categorizing ideas and themes to
interpret the meaning of the data you gathered. The methods are repeatable, and the approach is
formal and systematic: Formulate a research question Develop a protocol Search for all relevant
studies Apply the selection criteria Extract the data Synthesize the data Write and publish a report
Although multiple sets of guidelines exist, the Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews is
among the most widely used. In these cases, systematic reviews can use qualitative synthesis
methods such as vote counting, content analysis, classification schemes and tabulations, as an
alternative approach to narratively synthesize the results of the independent studies included in the
review. Sort through other current bibliographies or literature reviews in the field to get a sense of
what your discipline expects. Management Information Systems Quarterly. 2002; 26 (2):11. Whitlock
E. P., Lin J. S., Chou R., Shekelle P., Robinson K.A. Using existing systematic reviews in complex
systematic reviews. Again, this demonstrates your understanding of research design, which will earn
you marks. Literature reviews are commonly used in fields such as history, literary studies, and
philosophy.
Because most historical writing uses the Chicago Manual of Style as a reference system, most
historiographies will also require you to use the Chicago Manual of Style. Again, this demonstrates
your understanding of research design, which will earn you marks. Literature Reviews From the
University of North Carolina Writing Center. Have you included and addressed the question that this
literature review tries to answer. Federal government websites often end in.gov or.mil. Before sharing
sensitive information, make sure you're on a federal government site. Check out the theories, models,
and methods used in the research. Dutch-Bangla Bank engineers enterprise and creativity in business
and industry with a. They are self-contained pieces of writing that can function as a stepping stone
to a larger piece of writing or can enhance writers’ understandings of a topic. Was the research
funded by a source that could influence the findings. This is particularly true in disciplines in
medicine and the sciences where research conducted becomes obsolete very quickly as new
discoveries are made. Question No-3: you ever face any difficulties with using ATM service. These
studies can be conducted over a long period of time. Development of the Literature Review Four
Basic Stages of Writing 1. To identify gaps and inconsistencies: A literature review helps to identify
areas where further research is needed or where there are inconsistencies in the existing literature.
Chapter 9?Methods for Literature Reviews - Handbook of eHealth Evaluation: An Evidence-based
Approach Your browsing activity is empty. It aims to provide a historical context for understanding
the current state of knowledge on a particular topic. However, if you choose this strategy, be careful
to avoid simply listing and summarising sources in order. The literature review acknowledges the
work of previous researchers, and in so doing, assures the reader that your work has been well
conceived. A second screen of full-text articles, again by two independent members of the research
team, ensured that the studies described phr s. For example, in the case of narrative reviews, there is
greater flexibility in searching and synthesizing articles ( Green et al., 2006 ). Researchers are often
relatively free to use a diversity of approaches to search, identify, and select relevant scientific
articles, describe their operational characteristics, present how the individual studies fit together, and
formulate conclusions. Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological
quality of systematic reviews. Methodological limitations can vary greatly from study to study,
ranging from common issues such as time and budget constraints to issues of sample or selection
bias. Chronological The simplest approach is to trace the development of the topic over time. Quality
of sources: The quality of the literature reviewed can vary widely, and not all sources may be reliable
or valid. The choice you make here depends again on your research aims, objectives and research
questions. An example of this approach in the eHealth domain is offered by DeShazo, Lavallie, and
Wolf (2009). Then this Historical Literature Review Example voices your familiarity with the topic.
Conducting Research Literature Reviews: From the Internet to Paper. 2nd ed. Thousand Oaks, CA:
Sage, 2005; Hart, Chris. Also, as with all choices in this chapter, you need to justify each choice you
make. It also helps researchers to identify potential biases or limitations of certain methods and
techniques.