Navigating the intricate landscape of literature reviews can be a daunting task for many.

Crafting a
comprehensive literature review requires a meticulous approach, a deep understanding of the subject
matter, and an ability to synthesize vast amounts of information into a coherent narrative. The
process demands patience, critical thinking, and extensive research skills to identify relevant sources,
analyze their content, and draw meaningful insights.

One of the most challenging aspects of writing a literature review is establishing clear criteria for
inclusion and exclusion of sources. This necessitates a thorough understanding of the research
question or topic at hand, as well as a keen eye for identifying sources that contribute to the
discourse. Determining which sources are pertinent and which are not can be a complex endeavor,
often requiring careful consideration of factors such as relevance, reliability, and credibility.

Moreover, maintaining a systematic approach throughout the review process is crucial to ensure
objectivity and rigor. This involves adhering to predefined criteria for selecting and evaluating
sources, as well as documenting the methodology used to conduct the review. Without a systematic
framework in place, literature reviews run the risk of being biased, incomplete, or lacking in
coherence.

For those who find themselves grappling with the challenges of writing a literature review, help is at
hand. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers a comprehensive solution for individuals seeking assistance with
their academic writing endeavors. With a team of experienced writers and researchers, ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ provides tailored support to help you navigate the complexities of literature
reviews with ease. By entrusting your literature review to the experts at ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔, you
can rest assured that your work will be crafted to the highest standards of quality and academic
integrity.

Don't let the challenges of writing a literature review hinder your academic progress. Visit ⇒
StudyHub.vip ⇔ today and discover how our services can help you succeed.
The authors suggest tables to consolidate evidence, but also remind us that the use of quantitative
evidence to evaluate qualitative data is not necessarily useful. A literature review gives a high-level
overview of research, a broad synopsis of what has previously been done and by whom, highlights
what sections of study tell us about a topic, identifies gaps and conflicts in the area. Writing an
embedded literature review will clarify your understanding of the material and demonstrate your
thorough research skills. In general, there are two forms of research: primary research and secondary
research. You should document details such as: The databases you search and which years they
cover The dates you first run the searches, and when they’re updated Which strategies you use,
including search terms The numbers of results obtained. This provides stronger statistical evidence
than that found in an individual study. Embedded literature reviews, meanwhile, are part of a larger
piece of writing, such as an essay, thesis, or scholarly article. Plan your research protocol Now you
need a detailed strategy for how you’re going to search for and evaluate the studies relating to your
question. Because most historical writing uses the Chicago Manual of Style as a reference system,
most historiographies will also require you to use the Chicago Manual of Style. Carefully select
sources that will provide current and credible information on your topic. Systematic review protocol
support template this template is primarily intended to help you plan your review in a systematic
way. Conduct a search in PROSPERO, for example, to ensure that there are no ongoing projects that
resemble yours. Stand-alone literature reviews are the most common type of literature review and
are frequently assigned by professors. That is, that you review the citations and references for the
included publications. After presenting the key themes, the authors recommend that practitioners
need to approach healthcare communication in a more structured way, such as by ensuring there is a
clear understanding of who is in charge of ensuring effective communication in clinical settings. In
this case, devote most of your space to explaining the connections between sources, but you must
also include a thesis and a conclusion, even though they will be brief. On this page, we will review a
few things worth thinking about when you intend to conduct and report a systematic literature
search. If the experiments and trials identified in the literature search are of a uniform nature, a
meta-analysis may be performed. Can a search term be added that might include this key article.
Although, secondary research is acquiring data that already exists or relying on the results of other
authors and researchers. They are self-contained pieces of writing that can function as a stepping
stone to a larger piece of writing or can enhance writers’ understandings of a topic. For example,
kinesiologists studying heart disease will review the literature to identify acceptable measurement
methods, whereas anthropologists researching intersections of culture and technology need to
examine the literature to identify different categories of analysis. Ovid is a database platform used
for many different databases. Frequently Asked Questions about writing a systematic literature
review. Distillersr needs subscription eppi reviewer subscription free trial or ahrqs srdr tool free
which is web based and has a training environment tutorials and example templates of systematic
review data extraction forms. The basic goal of the literature review is summarizing and justifying
the research. Below we’ve prepared a step-by-step guide on how to write a systematic literature
review. For stand-alone historiographies, include an introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion.
The more search blocks you have, the narrower your search will be; the narrower your search, the
greater your risk of excluding relevant articles. This is where your librarian will come in handy again.
Fourth, analyze the patterns you noted by considering similarities and differences between sources.
With the tools to objectively collect and interpret information, investigators can cater research
programs, and expand on the current body of knowledge. As a previous Ontario Graduate Scholar,
he has applied his accolades as a teaching assistant and has become a research associate in the
department of surgery at Hamilton Health Sciences. One way is to search directly in a given
database’s thesaurus. It is also easier to structure comprehensive and advanced search strategies, and
to edit search strategies. If you use truncation, the automatic mapping won’t work. This reduces the
chance of bias and improves the reliability of the results. Communications of the Association of
Information Systems, 37 (43), 879-910. At the moment, KI does not have a license for these kinds of
programs. A few examples. For stand-alone historiographies, include an introduction, body
paragraphs, and a conclusion. The pooled effect estimate is mostly represented in the form of a
diamond. Otherwise, you might do your literature review using a research paper management
platform such as Mendeley, Papers, Qippa, Cita, Sente, and others. Step 8. Data Extraction with
Exclusion and Inclusion Criteria: 1. How many documents did you find in total as per inclusion and
exclusion criteria? 2. You will use these to create search blocks that will then form the basis for the
search strings used in the different databases. You should employ multiple reviewers in order to
minimize bias and strengthen analysis. At the library, we often get questions about what exactly
characterizes a systematic review, what differentiates it from other kinds of literature reviews, and
how one might best go about searching the literature systematically. A meta-analysis combines data
from different studies, effectively creating a larger sample size to improve the quality of information.
There have been systematic literature reviews that have analysed the. International journal of clinical
practice, 69 (11), 1257-1267. In a critical review, the reviewer not only summarizes the existing
literature, but also evaluates its strengths and weaknesses. Intervention: which main intervention or
treatment are you considering for assessment. If you want to see how this automatic mapping works
you can do a search without choosing a specific field, and then go to History and Search Details (on
the Advanced page). Although you may write a stand-alone literature review as a course assignment
to enhance your own knowledge as a student, scholars often write stand-alone literature reviews to
benefit the research community and discipline. Delete Replies Reply Sam Young 17 May 2018 at
05:45 Thanks David. It also includes an analysis and evaluation of existing research. Look for
patterns in authors’ approaches or in their methodological handling of the topic. Methodology
systematic reviews can be carried out to analyze any methodological issues in the design, conduct, or
review of research studies. A systematic review review protocol organization city country. Extract
the data Every step of the data extraction must be documented for transparency and replicability.
Five key themes were found in the literature: poor communication can lead to various negative
outcomes, discontinuity of care, compromise of patient safety, patient dissatisfaction, and inefficient
use of resources. Output contains the citations and references from the publications you’ve uploaded.
In contrast to a wide search, a narrow (or precise ) search will result in a larger share of relevant hits,
but you also run the risk of missing relevant studies. Put simply, it's a study of studies. ?? What is the
final stage of a systematic literature review. Systematic literature reviews can be utilized in various
contexts, but they’re often relied on in clinical or healthcare settings. For example, “What has
already been written on subject X?”, then narrowing down to the research question. A pooled
reanalysis D is a quantitative compilation of original data from individual studies for combined
analysis. Writing an embedded literature review will clarify your understanding of the material and
demonstrate your thorough research skills. Our intervention, comparisons and outcomes were carried
out using the data extraction and quality appraisal variables described in methods and depicted in
and. However, in a systematic literature search, it is recommended that you specify the search field
manually instead. Subject headings, however, will need to be adjusted to each database’s controlled
vocabulary list. SLRs differ from stand-alone literature reviews because they follow a rigorous
review protocol that is objective and comprehensive so other researchers may replicate the work. A
classic systematic literature review can take different approaches: Effectiveness reviews assess the
extent to which a medical intervention or therapy achieves its intended effect. Share in strategic
planning; hospital accreditation; and stewardship education. Third, identify patterns in approaches to
your topic. Plan your research protocol Now you need a detailed strategy for how you’re going to
search for and evaluate the studies relating to your question. The University of Plymouth Library has
a good website where you can read more about the most commonly used frameworks. Your
systematic review should include the following details: the objectives of your project the specific
methods and processes that you’ll use the eligibility criteria of the individual studies how you plan to
extract data from individual studies which analyses you’re going to carry out. How many
publications fulfill the criteria for inclusion. Stand-alone literature reviews are the most common
type of literature review and are frequently assigned by professors. To reduce risk for bias, it is also
recommended that at least two people, independent of one another, review all found articles and
choose which studies to include in the review. These can include heterogeneity, which is when
studies’ lines within the forest plot don’t overlap with any other studies. Approach the grey literature
methodically and purposefully. In the picture below you can see how the different search strategies
compare to one another. Careful reading and following of citations will help us here: as will carefully
noting context. This reduces the chance of bias and improves the reliability of the results. Young
scientists often have to skim through many articles and face difficulty in identifying a suitable
research paper. It contains a brief note on literature review including definition, elements, strategies,
and its types. You should formulate a “well-built clinical question.” This is the process of generating
a good search question. There are several different options for searching in Embase (via embase.com).
In the search example below, we show how you can structure the search in a similar way as in
Medline Ovid. A literature review simply provides a summary of the literature available on a topic.
These should ideally be articles that correspond to your research question as closely as possible.
Systematic evaluations should include the following. Psychometric reviews assess the quality of
health measurement tools so that the best instrument can be selected for use. A wide search means
that not all search results will be relevant. You will use these to create search blocks that will then
form the basis for the search strings used in the different databases. It lets the audience understand
the paper without any effort. It’s often a good idea to start with a test search where you use the
subject headings and synonyms you’re already familiar with. Draw this out into a forest plot, which
provides a simple visual representation of variation between the studies. When you search for
literature using quotation marks, the search becomes more precise; you will only find articles where
that exact phrase is used and miss articles that contain variations on that phrase or a similar
combination of search terms. On this page, we will review a few things worth thinking about when
you intend to conduct and report a systematic literature search. Were the groups similar in terms of
prognostic factors. Established stewardship committee, and implementation in MCH, Makkah, Saudi
Arabia. International journal of clinical practice, 69 (11), 1257-1267. You will want to include
columns to note key variables and findings in the study that pertain to your topic and your review.
Are there factors about them (e.g. age, race) that could be relevant to the question you’re trying to
answer. One paper about vision of 2030 of general pharmaceutical department in Saudi Arabia.
Journal editors and reviewers have to go through numerous manuscripts to identify relevant research
papers. Share in strategic planning; hospital accreditation; and stewardship education. The campbell
collaboration was founded on the principle that systematic reviews on the effects of interventions
will inform and help improve policy and services. To write a strong embedded literature review, you
should approach your research systematically. These blog posts are offered in a suggested order for
getting your publication done and submitted. Often you will need to use a modified and simplified
search strategy to search for grey material. The more search blocks you have, the narrower your
search will be; the narrower your search, the greater your risk of excluding relevant articles. It also
includes an analysis and evaluation of existing research. Visit our guide to the best research databases
for medicine and health to find resources for your systematic review. Below we’ve prepared a step-
by-step guide on how to write a systematic literature review. Research Questions: Please define the
research questions for your study in the first step. Step 2. Definitions: In general, we use some formal
words in our study, therefore it’s a good idea to provide definitions for these terms to make things
clearer. Each article I read led me to another, then another, then another. How to write a systematic
literature review Writing a systematic literature review can feel like an overwhelming undertaking.
Be sure to meet with a reference librarian if you are unsure how to create an effective search strategy.
They introduce readers to the surrounding literature while also situating your work within the larger
scholarly discussion on that topic.
He holds a PhD in education and has published over 20 articles in scholarly journals. Find additional
examples of useful tools at Systematic Review Toolbox. Try to place your current work and research
within this wider discussion by considering how your research supports, contradicts, or departs from
other scholars’ research. After all, they can often take 6 to 18 months to complete. This is part of the
'systematic' nature of this type of publication. For stand-alone historiographies, include an
introduction, body paragraphs, and a conclusion. If you want to see how this automatic mapping
works you can do a search without choosing a specific field, and then go to History and Search
Details (on the Advanced page). Below we’ve prepared a step-by-step guide on how to write a
systematic literature review. It gives a general summary of information relevant to a certain research
problem or question. Share in strategic planning; hospital accreditation; and stewardship education.
If you search without quotation marks, the terms are not kept together as a phrase. This is common
in the social sciences and humanities. Third, identify patterns in approaches to your topic. Systematic
evaluations should include the following. This is one of the spa treatments given to the hands and
feet. You may start with writing research questions and objectives. Don’t miss out on “gray
literature” sources: those sources outside of the usual academic publishing environment. Small
business group health insurance plansSmall business group health insurance plans. A classic
systematic literature review can take different approaches: Effectiveness reviews assess the extent to
which a medical intervention or therapy achieves its intended effect. The search strategy should be
documented in full for each database, and can be published in an appendix to the published review
article. Try to explain points of similarity or difference by considering the authors’ individual
historical perspectives, source usage, methodology, or structure. It does not require approval and asks
direct questions from human beings. Also note when your sources were published and if any
important social, political, or economic events occurred at roughly the same time. Short answer essay
outline breast cancer research paper thesis computer engineering capstone project ideasWeather essay
introduction how to write a business plan free printable research proposal topics in psychology
nursing how to write a reflective essay on an article. Cite this Article in your Essay (APA Style)
Drew, C. (May 15, 2023). 15 Literature Review Examples. Criteria may include factors relating to
the population, the intervention, the type of study and the outcome. To reduce risk for bias, it is also
recommended that at least two people, independent of one another, review all found articles and
choose which studies to include in the review. As a student you should rather do a structured
literature review, including only certain aspects of the methodology described on this page. You
should document details such as: The databases you search and which years they cover The dates
you first run the searches, and when they’re updated Which strategies you use, including search
terms The numbers of results obtained. The authors suggest tables to consolidate evidence, but also
remind us that the use of quantitative evidence to evaluate qualitative data is not necessarily useful.
However, the articles to be included are selected subjectively and unsystematically. Distillersr needs
subscription eppi reviewer subscription free trial or ahrqs srdr tool free which is web based and has a
training environment tutorials and example templates of systematic review data extraction forms.
The basic goal of the literature review is summarizing and justifying the research. Careful planning
will also help you to provide insightful analysis. This is common in the social sciences and
humanities. Journals also often demand that a search be updated if several months have passed since
the article was submitted. Unfortunately, it is not possible to easily retrieve a list containing all the
references from several different publications. Here’s a free detailed template for recording data
extraction, from Dalhousie University. The guidelines describe how systematic reviews should be
reported. If you do so, however, you risk missing material that may have been added retrospectively
to the database. Consider how each source approaches your topic in addition to their collective
points of intersection and separation. In general, there are two forms of research: primary research
and secondary research. These notes will be used in creating one or more tables to display key
elements of the studies reviewed and in forming impressions about the strength and the direction of
evidence on the topic of your review. Campbell offers editorial and methodological support to
review authors throughout the process of producing a systematic review. Within each theme,
students can critique key studies and their strengths and limitations, in order to get a lay of the land
and come to a point where they can identify ways to contribute new insights to the existing
academic conversation on their topic. They can be used to assess the effectiveness of an intervention
from a person-centric perspective. Intervention: which main intervention or treatment are you
considering for assessment. Keep in mind that finishing it could take longer than a year. It is also
easier to structure comprehensive and advanced search strategies, and to edit search strategies.
Systematic reviews usually rate at the top of evidence hierarchy since they analyze and evaluate
results from all available, original research articles that answers a specific research question. These
blog posts are offered in a suggested order for getting your publication done and submitted. They
include: non-peer-reviewed journals pharmaceutical industry files conference proceedings
pharmaceutical company websites internal reports Gray literature sources are more likely to contain
negative conclusions, so you’ll improve the reliability of your findings by including it. The level of
evidence of the type of summary increases from the systematic review to the meta-analysis of
published data to the pooled reanalysis. You may also want to use a program that can help you
screen your references, such as Rayyan. How many publications fulfill the criteria for inclusion.
Before beginning the systematic review, the authors provide guidelines for determining which
evidence should be included or omitted. When you include the subject heading in your search you
will find articles about a subject even if the authors of the article have chosen other, adjacent words
to describe the article themselves. Some databases, for instance Web of Science, do not have a list of
subject headings at all; to conduct a search there, you have to use free-text terms. Small business
group health insurance plansSmall business group health insurance plans. SLRs differ from stand-
alone literature reviews because they follow a rigorous review protocol that is objective and
comprehensive so other researchers may replicate the work. Try to explain points of similarity or
difference by considering the authors’ individual historical perspectives, source usage, methodology,
or structure.