Crafting a literature review for a research paper is no easy feat.

It requires extensive research, critical

analysis, and proficient writing skills. Many students and researchers find themselves grappling with
the complexities of synthesizing existing literature, identifying relevant sources, and presenting a
coherent narrative that contributes meaningfully to their research topic.

The literature review serves as the foundation of a research paper, providing context, theoretical
framework, and insights into previous studies relevant to the research question. It involves thorough
exploration and evaluation of scholarly articles, books, and other sources to identify gaps,
contradictions, and areas for further investigation.

Navigating through the vast sea of academic literature can be overwhelming, especially for those
new to the process or dealing with time constraints. It requires not only finding relevant sources but
also critically analyzing and synthesizing the information to form a cohesive argument.

To alleviate the burden of writing a literature review, many turn to professional writing services for
assistance. ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ offers expert support in crafting comprehensive literature reviews
that meet the highest academic standards. With a team of experienced writers well-versed in various
fields of study, ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ ensures meticulous research, impeccable writing, and timely
delivery, allowing researchers to focus on other aspects of their work with peace of mind.

When it comes to crafting a literature review that stands out, trust ⇒ StudyHub.vip ⇔ to deliver
excellence. Order now and experience the difference professional assistance can make in your
academic journey.
Systematic review of knowledge translation strategies to promote research uptake in child health
settings. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, 1998; Jesson, Jill. Ethics declarations Ethics
approval and consent to participate. The authors state that such a low-tech intervention may be
useful in low- and middle-income countries where paper records are more likely to be the norm.
Now that you know the steps necessary to write a literature review, you will be well equipped to
begin your review. Strategies for writing the literature review Find a focus. Some useful databases to
search for journals and articles include: Your university’s library catalogue Google Scholar Project
Muse (humanities and social sciences) Medline (life sciences and biomedicine) EconLit (economics)
Inspec (physics, engineering and computer science) You can also use boolean operators to help
narrow down your search. JMIR Med Educ. 2016;2:e16.. Brown A, Barnes C, Byaruhanga J,
McLaughlin M, et al. Current research supports the use of propofol, as discussed above; In addition
to providing a rationale, a proposal describes detailed methodology for conducting the research
consistent with requirements of the professional or. It is an important showcase of your talents of:
Emr 6400 fundamentals of research proposals contain extensive literature reviews: As a scientist,
writing a literature review can be. The team seeks to align the review question and the requirements
of the knowledge user with available time and resources. Emr 6400 fundamentals of research
proposals contain extensive literature reviews: Of proposal writing literature research review
importance in. Step 2: Research and collect all the scholarly information on the topic that might be
pertinent to your study. Read through titles and abstracts, select and obtain articles (that is,
download, copy, or print them out), and save your searches as needed. Communicating Results:
Literature review helps researchers to communicate their results effectively by providing a context
for their research. This framework aims to help coproduction leaders and participants understand the
complexity, diversity, and flexibility of coproduction leadership and to challenge and enhance their
capacity to collaborate effectively. More recently, such discussion has focused on the roles of leaders
and leadership in coproduction, seeking to describe and assess the various types of leaders and
leadership that might maximize the goals of coproduction processes and outcomes. A research paper
assigned in a course A thesis or dissertation A grant proposal An article intended for publication in a
journal All these instances require you to collect what has been written about your research topic so
that you can demonstrate how your own research sheds new light on the topic. You will have to
demonstrate valid and interesting findings in the field after the conducted analysis. They play an
important role throughout this process. However, you’re also welcome to consider our private
coaching services. The length of a review of the literature depends on its purpose and target
readership and can vary significantly in scope and depth. Use Evidence A literature review section is,
in this sense, just like any other academic research paper. Social capital, management capacity and
public service performance: Evidence from the US states. Use the key words in your question, as
well as synonyms for those words, as terms in your search. For example, if you are reviewing
literature about inequalities in migrant health outcomes, key themes might include healthcare policy,
language barriers, cultural attitudes, legal status, and economic access. EP and AF wrote the first
draft of the methods section. You don’t want to substitute a thorough review of core research
literature in your discipline for studies conducted in other fields of study. If material is not included
in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory
regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the
copyright holder. Is the opinion of the author well supported in the field.
Development of the Literature Review Four Basic Stages of Writing 1. The introduction should
clearly establish the focus and purpose of the literature review. This automation did not replace
manual work but helped the reviewer to identify eligible studies more quickly. It’s needed to give
potential readers an overview of the writing content, helping to decide whether their research
determines it. We’ve also included links to free resources to help you understand how to write each
section. Literature reviews can also “stand alone” as separate articles by themselves. A literature
review is a survey of scholarly sources on a specific topic. In the sciences, for instance, treatments for
medical problems are constantly changing according to the latest studies. Have you written a stellar
literature review you care to share for teaching purposes. An APA Research Paper Mannequin Thomas
Delancy and Adam Solberg wrote the next analysis paper for a psychology class. What are the
strengths and weaknesses of the research. When we say “literature review” or refer to “the
literature,” we are talking about the research ( scholarship ) in a given field. While we try to offer
these once per academic year, we find providing the recording to be helpful to community members
who have missed the session. During the analysis by stakeholders, no themes were changed or
refined; instead, the analysis confirmed the relevance of the initially identified themes, thus
emphasizing the robustness of our findings based on a process that involved reading four key articles
and identifying the perceived key implications for our research aim. This is not a comprehensive list
of resources on the handout’s topic, and we encourage you to do your own research to find
additional publications. Numerous EPOC strategies were assessed in the review including
educational strategies, local opinion leaders, reminders, ICT-focused approaches and audit and
feedback. The literature represents background and research developments related to a specific
research question, interpreted and analyzed by you in a synthesized way. A literature review is an
assessment of the work while also providing a summary as well as thorough evaluation. The specific
goals were to investigate how outcomes are produced and, most importantly, how variations in
outcomes can be explained. Download Word doc Download Google doc Before you begin searching
for literature, you need a clearly defined topic. You can use a subheading for each theme, time
period, or methodological approach. Health Sci J. 2015;9(1):1. Google Scholar Redwood S, Brangan
E, Leach V, Horwood J, Donovan JL. Now consider some typical ways of organizing the sources
into a review: Chronological: If your review follows the chronological method, you could write about
the materials above according to when they were published. Open access funding provided by
Jonkoping University. Moreover, outlining allows you to learn specific things about your chosen
sources. You want to spell out how you are likely to address your topic. Like any other academic
text, your literature review should have an introduction, a main body, and a conclusion. Specifically,
the study will examine the effects of cyberbullying, social comparison, and excessive social media
use on self-esteem, anxiety, and depression. It includes activities such as evaluating the effectiveness
of coproduction efforts, assessing the impact of coproduction on outcomes, and making adjustments
to improve the coproduction process. Rather, you can take the pieces that other researchers have cut
out and put them together to build a framework on which to hang your own “books”—that is, your
own study methods, results, and conclusions.
Management Information Systems Quarterly. 2002; 26 (2):11. Whitlock E. P., Lin J. S., Chou R.,
Shekelle P., Robinson K.A. Using existing systematic reviews in complex systematic reviews. A
literature review is a comprehensive overview of all the knowledge available on a specific topic till
date. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020.. Pedersen ER, Rubenstein L, Kandrack R, Danz M, et al.
Next, validity characterizes the degree to which the review process was conducted appropriately. M
M Bagali, PhD, Research paper, MBA Faculty, HRM, HR, HRD, PhD in HR and Man. Several
practices identified in this research, such as genuinely valuing diverse perspectives, promoting
mutual transformative power sharing and welcoming conflicts, require a complex mode of meaning-
making that results from psychological development. Also, our service specializing in writing your
literature review includes a complete list of literature. At this stage, you are close to writing the
review itself. Issuu turns PDFs and other files into interactive flipbooks and engaging content for
every channel. Moving stroke rehabilitation evidence into practice: a systematic review of
randomized controlled trials. Often, it will begin with a brief summary of its contents. The results
are synthesized to develop a framework for actors who seek to commission, design, lead or evaluate
coproduction processes. Codesigning health and other public services with vulnerable and
disadvantaged populations: Insights from an international collaboration. Reprints and permissions
About this article Cite this article. Make sure your research question is not too broad or too narrow.
Depending on the length of your literature review, you can combine several of these strategies (for
example, your overall structure might be thematic, but each theme is discussed chronologically).
Currently, you are trying your best to get an undergraduate degree or your Master’s degree and it is
understandable that you have to do a first-rate dissertation literature review as one of the assigned
tasks. Like descriptive reviews, the research questions are generic and usually relate to publication
patterns and trends. The most frequent and easy-to-understand characterization examples are
explained in the following segment. After the literature review is complete, you should incorporate it
into your research paper (if you are writing the review as one component of a larger paper). In some
cases, the literature review begins with the oldest research and advances until it concludes with the
latest research. Service users, community members and community representatives can play a vital
role in the task of deliberatively coproducing or even transforming services, as can third-sector
organizations, external experts, politicians, mid-level facilitators, managers, and senior leaders. Works
consulted We consulted these works while writing this handout. They noted that a wide selection of
different healthcare professionals and patients engaged with this type of social media and its global
reach may be significant for low- and middle-income countries. Types of Literature Reviews
Literature reviews can differ in structure, length, amount, and breadth of content included.
Implementation interventions to promote the uptake of evidence-based practices in stroke
rehabilitation. Keep in mind that your professor will be looking closely into the details you provide in
the thematic structure. The carefully examined examples can be like a treasure with multiple tips.
Some universities may have some additional requirements, but these are typically minor, with the
core structure remaining the same. This study was supported by LSHTM’s Research England QR
strategic priorities funding allocation and the National Institute for Health and Care Research
(NIHR) Applied Research Collaboration South London (NIHR ARC South London) at King’s
College Hospital NHS Foundation Trust.
A good RRL DOES: Present a brief typology that orders articles and books into groups to help
readers focus on unresolved debates, inconsistencies, tensions, and new questions about a research
topic. An APA Research Paper Mannequin Thomas Delancy and Adam Solberg wrote the next
analysis paper for a psychology class. It is an important showcase of your talents of: Emr 6400
fundamentals of research proposals contain extensive literature reviews: As a scientist, writing a
literature review can be. Although based on evaluation projects and qualitative data, their results also
suggest that positive changes on patient outcomes can be made following the implementation of
specific evidence-based approaches (or projects). A literature review is a comprehensive overview of
all the knowledge available on a specific topic till date. Co-designing a Collaborative Chronic Care
Network (C3N) for inflammatory bowel disease: development of methods. A literature review is a
summary of research that has been conducted in the past on a certain subject of interest. A literature
review may be a stand alone work or the introduction to a larger research paper, depending on the
assignment. The extracted data were synthesised using descriptive and narrative techniques to
identify themes and patterns in the data linked to intervention strategies, targeted behaviours, study
settings and study outcomes. As mentioned earlier, when rigorously conducted review articles
represent powerful information sources for eHealth scholars and practitioners looking for state-of-
the-art evidence. Any opinions or recommendations discussed are solely those of the author(s) and
are not endorsed by BMJ. It also includes key references to methodological guidelines and useful
sources that can be used by eHealth scholars and researchers for planning and developing reviews.
In addition, those works whose theories and conclusions directly support your findings will be
valuable to review here. Edit and proofread: Once you have written your literature review, edit and
proofread it carefully to ensure that it is well-organized, clear, and concise. There are various
approaches to organising the body of a literature review. Source: image.slidesharecdn.com A research
proposal is a very difficult and advanced paper to write. Finally, judicious use of Grading of
Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation approach for assessing the Confidence
of Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research assessments and of software as appropriate help
to achieve a timely and useful review product. Table of contents Why write a literature review,
examples of literature reviews, step 1: search for relevant literature, step 2: evaluate and select
sources, step 3: identify themes, debates and gaps, step 4: outline your literature review’s structure,
step 5: write your literature review, frequently asked questions about literature reviews, introduction.
Problem formulation -- which topic or field is being examined and what are its component issues? 2.
Please note that these procedures are not necessarily only for writing a literature review that becomes
part of a larger article; they can also be used for writing a full-length article that is itself a literature
review (although such reviews are typically more detailed and exhaustive; for more information
please refer to the Further Resources section of this page). Some reviews have a relatively small
number of studies (i.e. fewer than 10) and the authors are often understandably reluctant to engage
with wider debates about the implications of their findings. Goals of a literature review: When you
decide on a research topic, usually the first step you take in the direction of. Next, validity
characterizes the degree to which the review process was conducted appropriately. Types of
Literature Reviews What kinds of literature reviews are written. The Creative Commons Public
Domain Dedication waiver ( ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise
stated in a credit line to the data. Decisions on relevance are challenging—precautions for swine
influenza may inform precautions for bird influenza. 28 A smoking ban may operate similarly to seat
belt legislation, etc. It is also worth highlighting the importance of the theory of change underlying
the different interventions. So if you are currently in the academic year in which you have to write a
literature review for a research proposal, a dissertation, or a research paper, this guide is for you.
Articles Get discovered by sharing your best content as bite-sized articles. Parts of Literature
Review Parts of a literature review are as follows: Introduction The introduction of a literature
review typically provides background information on the research topic and why it is important.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018;15(6):1182. McGregor J, Repper J, Brown H. “The college is
so different from anything I have done”. In this regard, we concur with Jesson, Matheson, and
Lacey (2011) that clearly articulated research questions are key ingredients that guide the entire
review methodology; they underscore the type of information that is needed, inform the search for
and selection of relevant literature, and guide or orient the subsequent analysis. For scholars, the
depth and breadth of the literature review emphasizes the credibility of the writer in his or her field.
London: SAGE Publications; 1998. Higgins J. P. T., Green S., editors. Cochrane handbook for
systematic reviews of interventions: Cochrane book series. A summary is a recap of the important
information of the source, but a synthesis is a re-organization, or a reshuffling, of that information.
Sample description We included 73 papers (Additional file 1 ) dating from 1994 to 2019 (the year in
which the initial search was performed). Synthesize the literature make sure to structure the review
in the most effective way possible, whether it be chronologically, thematically, or methodologically.
Types of Literature Reviews It is important to think of knowledge in a given field as consisting of
three layers. Science focus 2 homework booksScience focus 2 homework books thanksgiving
problem solving second grade good essay transition phrases essay on twelve angry men creative
writing vs english literature degree ap lang essay grading scale financial aspects of business plan,
software development business plan template good problem solving skills in career readiness
introduction paragraph example essay sample. The specific goals were to investigate how outcomes
are produced and, most importantly, how variations in outcomes can be explained. But few scientists
are trained in how to write a review — or in what constitutes an excellent one. Realist synthesis:
illustrating the method for implementation research. Writing a Literature Review Research Paper: A
step-by-step approach key to a good literature review or research paper is the abi lity to present the
findings in such a way that. The carefully examined examples can be like a treasure with multiple
tips. To really move forwards in addressing the gap between research evidence and practice, we may
need to shift the emphasis away from isolating individual and multi-faceted interventions to better
understanding and building more situated, relational and organisational capability to support the use
of research in clinical practice. How does the publication relate to other literature in the field. For
instance, Levy and Ellis (2006) proposed a generic framework for conducting such reviews. A team
should start by specifying the phenomenon of interest, the review question, 9 the perspectives to be
included 9 and the sample to be determined and selected. 10 Subsequently, the team must finalise
the appropriate choice of synthesis. 11 Above all, the review team should consider the intended
knowledge users, 3 including requirements of the funder. Fill out the form, provide task
specifications, and get an overview compliant with them. Some systematic reviews included
comparisons of different interventions while other reviews compared one type of intervention
against a control group. Co-building a patient-oriented research curriculum in Canada. What are the
key concepts and how are they defined. Ensure the sources you analyse are directly relevant to your
research question s and topic. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( ) applies
to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. This
added value can, for example, be that the research gaps are made explicit, and this may be very
helpful for readers who plan. The majority of reviews report strategies achieving small impacts
(normally on processes of care). Download citation Received: 11 April 2023 Accepted: 03 January
2024 Published: 17 February 2024 DOI: Share this article Anyone you share the following link with
will be able to read this content: Sorry, a shareable link is not currently available for this article.
Themes: what questions or concepts recur across the literature. According to that, nobody is allowed
to share your information with those from outside. For the sperm whale project, one methodological
approach would be to look at cultural differences between the portrayal of whales in American,
British, and French art work.
Narrow the Topic The narrower your topic, the easier it will be to limit the number of sources you
need to read in order to obtain a good survey of relevant resources. WHAT IS ALREADY KNOWN
ON THIS TOPIC Rapid Qualitative Evidence Synthesis (QES) is a relatively recent innovation in
evidence synthesis and few published examples currently exists. Findings from eight rct s involving
6,615 participants were pooled into meta-analyses to calculate the magnitude of effects that mobile
text message reminders have on the rate of attendance at healthcare appointments compared to no
reminders and phone call reminders. See our academic resources for further advice on references in
your paper, how to write an abstract, how to write a research paper title, how to impress the editor of
your target journal with a perfect cover letter, and dozens of other research writing and publication
topics. Provenance and peer review Not commissioned; internally peer reviewed. For instance, Levy
and Ellis (2006) proposed a generic framework for conducting such reviews. Therefore, it’s always a
good idea to double-check your university’s requirements before you finalise your structure. All you
have to do is read them now or bookmark this page for future reading. Issues with the academic
writing style and field-specific terminology just make matters worse. It is an important showcase of
your talents of: It generally follows a discussion of the paper's thesis statement or the study's goals or
purpose. Ask your professor questions such as: “If you had to read only one book from the 90’s on
topic X, what would it be?” Questions such as this help you to find and determine quickly the most
seminal pieces in the field. The leadership of coproduction that thus emerges is shaped by issues such
as the model of coproduction, the stakeholders involved, participants’ motivations and the context of
coproduction. Social Posts Create on-brand social posts and Articles in minutes. In this way, critical
reviews attempt to constructively inform other scholars about the weaknesses of prior research and
strengthen knowledge development by giving focus and direction to studies for further improvement
( Kirkevold, 1997 ). Guidance for authoring a rapid QES is scattered and requires compilation and
summary. As another methodological contribution, vom Brocke et al. (2009) offered a series of
guidelines for conducting literature reviews, with a particular focus on how to search and extract the
relevant body of knowledge. Providing a historical background also demonstrates to other
researchers and journal editors your competency in discussing theoretical concepts. A rapid QES
may require strict date and setting restrictions 17 and language restrictions that accommodate the
specific requirements of the review. If the literature review is part of your research, you should
highlight voids and show how past studies lead to your own study project as well as your selected
methodology. The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NIHR,
the Department of Health and Social Care or Research England. A theory-led overview of
systematic reviews. BMJ Open. 2015;5:e008592.. Metz A, Jensen T, Farley A, Boaz A, et al.
Questions for Further Research: What questions about the field has the review sparked. The
effectiveness of knowledge translation interventions for promoting evidence-informed decision-
making among nurses in tertiary care: a systematic review and meta-analysis. As you’re doing your
research, create an annotated bibliography ( see our page on the this type of document ). This is an
important aspect that cannot be omitted prior to actual literature analysis. Open Google Slides
Download PowerPoint If you want to know more about the research process, methodology, research
bias, or statistics, make sure to check out some of our other articles with explanations and examples.
The review should be organized thematically, chronologically, or by methodology, depending on the
research objectives. You can structure the body section of the literature review thematically,
chronologically, thematically, or theoretically. In stand-alone reviews, there may be significantly
more texts and more concepts. Combined with the two previous reviews, 86 systematic reviews of
strategies to increase the implementation of research into clinical practice have been conducted.
Transitioning from a single-site pilot project to a state-wide regional telehealth service: The
experience from the Victorian Stroke Telemedicine programme. These are a review focused on the
use of social media and a review considering toolkits. Third, add transitions between the paragraphs,
as well as an introductory and concluding paragraph. 1 A literature review that is part of a larger
research paper typically does not have to be exhaustive. Emr 6400 fundamentals of research
proposals contain extensive literature reviews: Of proposal writing literature research review
importance in. Objectivity -- is the author's perspective even-handed or prejudicial. Debates,
conflicts and contradictions: where do sources disagree. Published examples typically use a single
reviewer for data extraction 8 with use of two independent reviewers being the exception. The
CQIMG endorses three types of synthesis; thematic synthesis, framework synthesis and meta-
ethnography ( box 1 ). 43 44 Rapid QES favour descriptive thematic synthesis 45 or framework
synthesis, 46 47 except when theory generation (meta-ethnography 48 49 or analytical thematic
synthesis) is a priority ( table 2, item R17). Science focus 2 homework booksScience focus 2
homework books thanksgiving problem solving second grade good essay transition phrases essay on
twelve angry men creative writing vs english literature degree ap lang essay grading scale financial
aspects of business plan, software development business plan template good problem solving skills in
career readiness introduction paragraph example essay sample. In other words, a chronological
review would have subsections for each vital time period. In recent years, the number of systematic
reviews in the field of health informatics has increased considerably. We have a wealth of free
resources on the Grad Coach Blog that unpack research methodology, both qualitative and
quantitative. A team should start by specifying the phenomenon of interest, the review question, 9
the perspectives to be included 9 and the sample to be determined and selected. 10 Subsequently, the
team must finalise the appropriate choice of synthesis. 11 Above all, the review team should consider
the intended knowledge users, 3 including requirements of the funder. New York: Longman. Troyka,
Lynn Quittman, and Doug Hesse. 2016. Simon and Schuster Handbook for Writers, 11th ed. View
inline Glossary of important terms (alphabetically) As with other resource-constrained reviews, no
one size fits all. Second, they utilise leadership drawing on a wide set of clinical and non-clinical
actors including managers and even government officials. Next, validity characterizes the degree to
which the review process was conducted appropriately. However, I am thoroughly satisfied with the
work of expert. While the study focuses on one topic, harpoon technology, it will still be organized
chronologically. By Publication Order your sources by publication chronology, then, only if the order
demonstrates a more important trend. To inform research design: A literature review can inform the
design of your research study by identifying appropriate research methods, data sources, and
research questions. Providing a comprehensive overview of the literature: A literature review
provides a comprehensive overview of the current state of knowledge on a topic, allowing the
researcher to identify key themes, debates, and areas of agreement or disagreement. There may be
other places where people are publishing exemplary research. A literature review is important because
it: Explains the background of research on a topic. We searched from January 2010 up to June 2022
and applied no language restrictions. Analyze and synthesize the literature: Analyze each source in
depth, identifying the key findings, methodologies, and conclusions. This will involve drawing on a
wider range of research perspectives (including social science) in primary studies and diversifying
the types of synthesis undertaken to include approaches such as realist synthesis which facilitate
exploration of the context in which strategies are employed. Your devotion to the topic will be
shown in your presented thematic analysis, and you will be able to construct the text body on it.
Within the template, you’ll find plain-language explanations of each section, which should give you
a fair amount of guidance. If you’d also rather trust an expert than write an overview yourself,
there’s good news.