Facts - What happened?

Ryder, a police officer, received an armed man's message. He was the first officer to come to the

stage where the attacker, brandishing him with a hunting rifle of the AR-15, had threatened him.

Ryder quickly arrested the attacker and placed him behind the police car. Back up came later and

it was noticed that rifle was fully loaded with safety off. As a consequence Ryder started to be

scared and depressed by daily phone calls, injured or murdered by someone. Any post-traumatic

stress disorder (PTSD) was then reported as Ryder by a psychiatrist. (Claire M. Renzetti, 2013)

Issue - What is the question of law? (One simple sentence) All the information you want to

put here usually belongs under defense.

The question of law is regarding whether a worker, Ryder, is entitled to the benefits that come

with the workers’ compensation laws.

Holding - What is your decision?

In this case, my answer will be highly inconsistent, either or. It may be either in the way that

common crimes differ from individual to individual in the area of police officers. Everything is

uncommon regarding the sort of circumstance encountered by police officers that contradicts the

scenario regardless of the area of work under consideration. I honestly believe that in this or

related area citizens should be provided any tool to help them resolve or alleviate their daily

lives. Personally, I'd think it's just right for citizens like Ryder to get the money, but apparently

that's not how the workers' insurance policies work. In this case, it is important to remember

what triggered tension and anxiety to Ryder, and what causes it. In the end, the choice is due to

the factors of Ryder's fear and tension. Unfortunately, under workers' compensation legislation

Ryder does not have the right to insurance.