The paper establishes ethical accommodations and implications that CHATGPT does in a Mathematical

Academic Research. As the world succumbs to the greatness of AI technology, pedagogical learning
capabilities are also in the circumstance. Using comparative media discourse analysis, results on the
analyzation of this paper with regards to the (4) media discourses are disclosed as followed:
(a) Springer Nature; (b) The Chronicle of Higher Education; (c) Inside Higher Ed; and (d)
Times Higher Education.
It aims to investigate how writers in mainstream STEM journals and higher education magazines discuss
potential conflicts and crises in various aspects of academic research, publication, teaching, learning, and
human resources (HR) management.
The differential opinions and potentially-deteriorating statements included on those papers are highly
analyzed and brought by different researchers for it arouses potentially-deteriorating problems in (3)
aspects: (a) academic research and publication; (b) teaching and learning; and (c) human resources
management.
The intellectual discourse utilized in this paper brought main factors and results as the primary
methodological lens.
The paper gave and synthesized results given the analyzation of those research publications with regards
to the aspects given previously. The results are as the following;
1. Although at most cases, it is found that ChatGPT can be used as a practical tool to organize data
in scientific research. For example, one editorial underlined, AI-Mathematical tools such as
CHATGPT can be utilized as an algorithm maker that creates graphs and other empirical
illustrations for better understanding.
2. It can be also used to generate spatial-bound illustrations that might be crucial into understanding
of the readers.
3. CHATGPT is bounded by capabilities and seemingly like limitless abilities but it raises ethical
implications questionable actions in the following fields;
a. Access to vast amounts of data – although chatgpt is bounded by information, its
authenticity is highly inquired and questioned.
b. Publications manners – It is needed to check the statements given by the chatgpt for the
site can provide implausible scenarios are statements.
c. Understandability – It is believed that Readers might put statements inside a research or
academic writing that came from the given tool without fully comprehending ad analyzing
it.
4. ChatGpt also threatens the transparency and sense of urgency of Researchers to establish some
ground rules. The existence of AI-chatbots encourages other Researchers to rely on those
information as they can do things one prefaced.