You are on page 1of 11

WARNING!

THIS DOCUMENT CONTAINS SENSITIVE, PRIVILEGED


INFORMATIONS THAT SHOULD ONLY BE ACCESSED
BY INTENDED RECIPIENT. ANY VIOLATION OF THIS
WARNING WILL RESULT IN FURTHER PENALTIES,
THE MOST SEVERE OF WHICH IS DELEGATE
DISQUALIFICATION
Link Spreadsheet for CST-A:
https://bit.ly/CST_ASurveyReport
Link Spreadsheet for CST-B:
https://bit.ly/CST_BSurveyReport
EXISTING WELL
CST-A

CST-A:
- Abandoned for ~10 yrs (2013)
- WH and Tree class : AA + DD
- Tubing = Not installed
- Prod casing: 7” Liner + 9-5/8” casing, Buttress (non CRA)
CST-B

CST-B:

- Abandoned for ~10 yrs (2013)

- WH + Tree materials AA
- Tubing not installed but killstring

- Prod casing: 7” Liner + 9-5/8” casing, Buttress (non CRA)


PLUME MODELLING VS NATURAL BARRIER

Plume CO2 with 6 MMSCFD Injection Rate

CST-B
Status @ Year 2040

Figure 3 Plume Modelling @ Year 2040

CST-B
Status @ Year 2050

Figure 4 Plume Modelling @ Year 2050


CBL RESULT
DEPTH vs PORE PRESSURE

Depth vs Pore Pressure


3000

2500
Depth (mTVDSS)

2000

1500

1000

500

0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000
Pore Pressure (psi)

DEPTH vs Fracture Pressure

Depth vs Fracture Pressure


3000

2500

2000
Depth (mTVDSS)

1500

1000

500

0
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000
Fracture Pressure (psi)

Link spreadsheet:
https://bit.ly/PPFG_CST

You might also like