Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Lesson4 BMD TeamWorkNegotiation
Lesson4 BMD TeamWorkNegotiation
Teaching staff
Prof. Giampaolo Perna and Dr. Daniela Caldirola
The journey of medical doctors’ professional identity formation
But……..
The journey of medical doctors’ professional identity formation
Conflicts between personal values and beliefs and some medical interventions
or decisions
For example
Abortion
Contraception (e.g., IUD, intrauterine device)
The end of life
In Italy it is possible to suspend the therapies even if they are useful for the protection of
life.
Through the Law 219/2017, the patient capable of acting has the right to refuse any
assessment, part or entire treatment indicated by the doctor for his/her pathology, as
well as the right to revoke the consent given at any time, even if the revocation involves
the interruption of treatment.
This area includes, as indicated by the World Health Organization and the Italian scientific
societies, artificial nutrition and hydration, as it is the administration of nutrients based
on medical disposal and through medical devices. The renunciation of these, as well as of
other treatments, can have as a direct or indirect consequence the death of the person
who does not give her/his consent. If this refusal compromises the person's possibility of
survival, the doctor is required to discuss the consequences of the decision and the
possible alternatives to the patient and, if s/he agrees, to her/his family members,
promoting any supportive action, including by making use of assistance psychological
services
Years ago, some famous cases (Piergiorgio Welby-muscular dystrophy-,2006; Eluana
Englaro, 2009) fostered the debate about this topic..
The problem of the end of life
The term "euthanasia" includes medical interventions that involve the direct
administration of a lethal drug to the patient who requests it and meets certain
requirements. At the moment, euthanasia is illegal in Italy.
(Cruess et al, 2014; Cruess et al., 2015; Cruess et al., 2019; Afshar et al., 2021; Sarraf-Yazdi et al., 2021)
The journey of medical doctors’ professional identity formation
In conclusion
“Identity formation is mainly social and relational in nature. Educators, and the broader
medical society, need to utilise and maximise the opportunities that exist in the various
relational settings students experience. Education in its most general sense is about
transforming the self into new ways of thinking and relating. Helping students form, and
successfully integrate their professional selves into their multiple identities,
is a fundamental of medical education” (Goldie J, 2012)
“Medical schools are not only where expert knowledge and judgment are communicated
from advanced practitioner to beginner; they are also the place where the profession puts
its defining values and exemplars on display, where future practitioners can begin to
both assume and critically examine their future identities” (Sullivan et al. 2007)
Who am I not? Who do I want to be ?
Sharing
Desires Neutral Trust
Life Experiences Unbiased Conflict
Preferences Logical Balance
Needs Informed Similarity
Pre-judice Difference
Mental models
Professional identity
Neutral
Unbiased
Logical
Informed Team identity
Personal identity
Sharing
Trust
Desires
You Conflict
Life Experiences
Balance
Preferences
Similarity
Needs
Difference
Pre-judice
Mental models
Professional identity
Personal Team
identity You identity
Yes, it is
A large body of research evidence suggests that:
(West & Lyubovnikova, 2013; Bell et al., 2018; Salas et al., 2018)
is the collaborative effort of a group
to achieve a common goal in the most
effective and efficient way
(West & Lyubovnikova, 2013; Bell et al., 2018; Salas et al., 2018)
A team is a group of interdependent*
individuals who work together
towards a common goal.
* Interdependence is the degree to which team members depend on one another for both individual
and team task completion. It is often high in health care. Task interdependence is not only determined
by the characteristics of the team task itself, but also by the extent of discretion that team members
exercise in establishing the level of interaction and cooperation required for effective performance. Team
members therefore have to decide to behave together interdependently - to work as a team.
(West & Lyubovnikova, 2013; Bell et al., 2018; Salas et al., 2018)
A team is a group of interdependent
individuals who work together
towards a common goal
(West & Lyubovnikova, 2013; Bell et al., 2018; Salas et al., 2018)
Open communication is vital to effective teamwork:
(West & Lyubovnikova, 2013; Bell et al., 2018; Salas et al., 2018)
A negotiation is a strategic discussion that resolves an issue in a way that
both parties find acceptable
By negotiating, all involved parties try to avoid arguing but agree to reach some
form of compromise
To sum up, team identity refers to the mutual
connection of individual team members to
work together and cooperate in accomplishing
goals. It is a sense of responsibility to prioritize
the demands of the “team first” before their
own.
(West & Lyubovnikova, 2013; Bell et al., 2018; Salas et al., 2018)
Sometimes theoretical constructs become reality in clinical practice………
The ideal
But often…..
It is not that easy to integrate a group of people and foster a
sense of belongingness into them!!. It is because everyone
thinks, acts, feels, and believes differently.
The harsh reality?
(West et al., 2012; West & Lyubovnikova, 2013; Bell et al., 2018)
Temporal stability
Team task: Relatively complex tasks that require mutual decision making and organization of care for a
well-defined group of patients during a well-defined period
Team composition:
• Individuals who together have the appropriate knowledge, skills and abilities; multi-professional;
interdisciplìnary (e.g. psychiatrists, clinical psychologists, psychiatric nurses, social workers, occupational
therapists).
• It can be useful to include both “big-picture types” (they can see patterns quickly in complex
problems, but have a low tolerance for detailed work) and “fine-detail observers” (they tend to over-
think and prefer work that has practical aspects; they are conscientious and achievement-oriented)
• Limited number of team members. Bàrriers: If the team is too large, and there are multiple occupiers
of the same specialist role, team members may compete for power or withdraw their participation from
the team.
• Clear role allocation; shared responsibility
(West et al., 2012; West & Lyubovnikova, 2013; Bell et al., 2018)
Temporal stability
(West et al., 2012; West & Lyubovnikova, 2013; Bell et al., 2018)
Temporal stability
Team objectives: Shared, clear, challenging, agreed upon, measurable, and limited
Reflexivity: Team regularly takes time out to think what it is they are trying to achieve, how
well they are working, what they need to change, and then making adjustments accordingly
(West et al., 2012; West & Lyubovnikova, 2013; Bell et al., 2018)
Temporal stability
To resolve conflict, teammates need to participate in open and honest communication. This can occur
only if they do not feel worried about being judged or ridicùled by others on the team, have “the
license to speak up,” and can engage in difficult conversations about a problem.
This is why psychological safety is a must in teamwork. Psychological safety is a trusting behaviour that
is defined as the team’s shared belief that it is safe to take interpersonal risks without fear of backlash
Generally, psychological safety can be developed and/or enhanced through effective team debriefs and
leadership communication. During a debrief, if members are taught to take a learning approach and to
diagnose areas in need of development, they will be more likely to feel comfortable speaking up. Other
team meetings work the same way.
Leaders also play an important role in fostering a psychologically safe environment. When leaders
admit their own faults, they make others feel they too can safely communicate errors they make.
Personal Personal
Discipline experience Discipline experience
of the of the 2
discipline discipline
Person
Context
3
Finding common
ground
• Goals of care
• Team communication
• Mutual support
• Promotion & Prevention
• Policies & Procedures
Such sharing may enable each team member to relate to the others in ways that
promote effective team functioning
The third component represents the shift, from the focus on the individual team member
sharing his or her history and experiences, to all team members co-creating the new team
environment, moving toward a shared language, culture, and perspective
Components 1 and 2 have provided some of the necessary building blocks of information
and experiences from the past.
• Each professional needs to recognize that other disciplines have skills and
interests in that domain too. Bàrrier: team structures that place individuals
in less powerful positions (e.g., relationships medical doctors-nurses)
For example
If you’re a team leader speaking to one of your team If your team leader or a team member is a yeller,
members who’s not performing well, you may say: you may say:
“I feel anxious when you fail to meet your deadlines “I feel offended when you shout at me because I want
because I’m afraid we’ll miss our targets, which will to be treated with respect. What I’d like from you is
threaten all our jobs. For now, what I’d like you to do for you to speak to me calmly so I can take in your
is to create a progress report that we can review at the message”
end of every week for each project you’re working on
so that we can monitor your progress and I can provide
additional support when you need me to.”
• Listening with the intention to understand. Bàrriers: Not maintaining eye contact,
not minimizing external distractions (computer, smartphone), not letting people make
their point, interrupting
(Stewart et al., 2014; Kuhnke E., 2013; Bell et. al., 2018)
Other barriers to
“Exaggerated Egos”: one (or more!) team members think that they
have nothing to learn from, or that they are better than, the other
members of the team
Assumptions, intolerance
Defensiveness: team members can place barriers between themselves and other
team members to protect themselves from criticism and “personal attacks”
(Stewart et al., 2014; Kuhnke E., 2013; Bell et. al., 2018)
Communication Skills Course
aa 2019-2020
Negotiating with emotions
• It is a signal
• It is a strong call for action
Body
EMOTIONAL BRAIN
(Amygdala & Lymbic system)
HOMEOSTATIC BRAIN
(Brainstem)
Control of the muscles of the face
Unconscious control
Cingulate
Gyrus
EMOTION
Orbicularis
oculi
Zygomaticus
major muscle
REASON
Motor
cortex
Conscious and
unconscious control
Emotions can be obstacles in a negotiation
- Equity
- Honesty
- Consistency with the circumstances
Core concerns The concern is The concern is
ignored when... satisfied when...
Appreciation Your thoughts, feelings or …are validated
actions are not validated
• Listening skills
A Always
C Consult
B Before
D Deciding
The ICN grouping system
I Inform
(small decisions)
C Consult
(significant decisions)
N Negotiate
(very important decision)
4. STATUS
Recognize the status!
A) Social status
(It measures the global social level)
B) Particular status
(It is based on a specific experience,
ability or education)
Look for the personal area of each person
that characterizes a particular status
• Collaborator • Colleague
• Competitor • Guest
• Victim • Host
• Attacker • Evaluator
• Who is talking • Friend
• Who is listening • Enemy
• Problem-solver • …
Choose the temporary role
that facilitates collaboration !
• Long-term consequences
3. Influencing others
4. Improving relationships
Some strategies to decrease
the “emotional temperature”
• Count back from 10
• Change topic
• Let that the provocations pass from “one ear to the other”
“The general who wins the
battle makes many
calculations in his temple
before the battle is fought.
(Sun Tzu)