Professional Documents
Culture Documents
net/publication/350433648
CITATIONS READS
0 214
7 authors, including:
All content following this page was uploaded by Naseer Ahmed on 29 March 2021.
C R
I J R
P S
Published by JK Welfare & Pharmascope Foundation Journal Home Page: www.pharmascope.org/ijrps
Article History: A
*
Corresponding Author to the normal dentition. The prevalence varies
Name: Rakhi Issrani among various populations; for primary and perma-
Phone: +966568250031 nent dentitions is 0.2-0.8% and 0.5-5.3%, respec-
Email: dr.rakhi.issrani00@gmail.com tively. (Saluja et al., 2016) The etiology is not yet
completely clear but some of the suggested theo-
ISSN: 0975-7538 ries of ST are inclusive of hyperactivity of the den-
DOI: https://doi.org/10.26452/ijrps.v11i4.4491 tal lamina, atavism, genetic and environmental fac-
tors. (Saluja et al., 2016; Guo et al., 2017) Males are
Production and Hosted by affected twice and ST can be seen in either of the
Pharmascope.org dental arch or in both, can be single or multiple,
© 2020 | All rights reserved. unilateral or bilateral, impacted or erupted, and can
be found as an isolated dental inding or associated
INTRODUCTION with syndromes. (Sulabha et al., 2013) Most of the
times, they are found as an incidental inding dur-
Supernumerary tooth (ST) or hyperdontia is de ined ing routine radiographic evaluation. (Saluja et al.,
as the presence of an extra tooth in comparison 2016) Although they are asymptomatic in most of
Onn, 2006) Additionally, multiple ST is less com- According to Stafne, who had conducted the most
monly seen as compared to a single ST and is even comprehensive study on ST and one often cited,
rarer in the absence of a syndrome or systemic con- states that, unlike other ST, supernumerary premo-
dition. The literature shows single ST account for lars usually resemble normal premolars in shape
76-86% of all cases; double supernumeraries occur and size. (Stafne, 1932). The ST, in this case,
in 12-23% of all cases, whereas only in <1% of the seemed to be with normal premolar morphology
supernumerary cases are three or more extra teeth and belonged to the category of the post-permanent
found. (Santos et al., 2014) para-premolar variant.
Patients with cleft lip and/ or palate have a high Clinical indings
prevalence rate for ST (~28%), especially in the In the permanent dentition, males are affected twice
anterior region. Gardner’s syndrome, in which mul- as frequently as females. (Saluja et al., 2016) Super-
tiple ST is a characteristic feature, a high occurrence numerary premolars are observed in about 10% of
rate of 21% has also been noted. A high incidence cases and nearly 75% of these cases occur in the
of ST is found in patients with cleidocranial dyspla- mandible. Only 1% of non-syndromic cases present
sia, with a combined 35% for both the maxillary multiple ST, which mostly occur in the mandibu-
and mandibular anterior regions and 27% for the lar arch (61%). (Santos et al., 2014; Solares and
combined premolar regions. A higher prevalence Romero, 2004) Analysis for speci ic locations of ST
of supernumerary mandibular premolars was also revealed that there was a predominance of multi-
seen to occur in these patients (15%). (Solares and ple ST in the premolar area (62%) with the high-
Romero, 2004) est frequency of occurrence in the mandibular pre-
Origin and inheritance molar region (45%). (Solares and Romero, 2004)
For the speci ic site analysis, it was found that ST
The etiology of this anomaly is not fully understood is usually present lingual to, or occasionally verti-
even though many theories like phylogenetic rever- cally below, the normal premolar teeth. (Panda and
sion theory (atavism), hyperactivity of dental lam- Ahmed, 2017) When the ST are asymptomatic, they
ina and division of developing tooth bud to form two are detected as a chance inding during radiographic
teeth are being proposed for its occurrence. (Marya examination. (Solares and Romero, 2004)
et al., 2012) Although the theory of hyperactivity of
the dental lamina is the most widely accepted the- The present case is one of the rarest indings as mul-
ory that states that initiation of rests of dental lam- tiple ST were found in a female patient that were not
ina leads to the development of an extra tooth bud related to any syndrome or systemic disease.
that manifests itself as an ST (Marya et al., 2012) Diagnosis
but since many times supernumeraries are part of
A proper clinical and radiographic examination is
a syndrome, so there are lots of other theories that
the most suitable way to determine ST. Usually, ST
suggests the formation of ST being in luenced by the
are asymptomatic and are often identi ied during
genetic and environmental factors. (Açıkgöz et al.,
2006) the routine radiographic examination as an inciden-
tal inding. (Garvey et al., 1999) Moreover, the ratio
As for the hereditary factor, it has been postu- of impacted supernumerary premolars to erupted
lated that this anomaly does not follow a simple ones is nearly 5:1, justifying radiographs as the only
Mendelian pattern of inheritance since only a few diagnostic aid.
supernumerary premolars among siblings are doc-
In recent years, a declining curve is noted in the
umented. A sex-linked mode of inheritance has
diagnosis of ST that could be attributed to the fact
been suggested as ST in the permanent dentition
that many healthcare professionals have reduced
are twice as common in males as compared to their
the number and frequency of radiographs taken
female’s counterparts. (Hall and Onn, 2006)
owing to increased public and professional concern
Classi ication over unwanted exposure to radiation. (Solares and
There are many categories to classify ST (Garvey Romero, 2004)
et al., 1999)viz, (I) according to the morphology, Undoubtedly, cone beam computed tomography
they are of four types-conical, tuberculate, supple- (CBCT) is a valuable tool for determining the
mental, and odontomes; (II) according to the topog- exact localization of impacted ST since it permits
raphy, they are classi ied as mesiodens, paramolar, 3D reconstruction. However, conventional peri-
parapremolar and distomolar; and (III) according to apical, occlusal and panoramic radiographs also
age and chronologically, they are classi ied as pre- offer enough images for the correct planning of
deciduous, pre-permanent and post-permanent. surgery. (Santos et al., 2014) Thus, there was not
the need to identify the CBCT that, despite its excel- Becker et al. (1982) suggested the late removal of
lent image production quality, exhibits a higher cost supernumerary premolars in order to remove nor-
and complexity exam, which was not justi ied in mal deciduous, permanent and supernumerary pre-
this case. Hence, in the patient-reported herein, the molars in one session that considerably reduces the
patient was advised an OPG to rule out any impacted treatment time along with no damage to adjacent
ST as there were erupted ST present in the patient. structures and psychological distress to the patient
as well.
Complications
As the supernumeraries in the present case were not
Many complications are associated with ST, like
associated with any complications, it was decided to
functional impairment, malalignment of teeth,
simply monitor the ST.
unaesthetic appearance and less commonly, devel-
opment of cysts and root resorption of adjacent Recurrence and follow-up
teeth. (Saluja et al., 2016) Of all the aforementioned The recurrence rate of supernumerary premolars
complications, the most troublesome is the asso- after being surgically extracted has been found in
ciation of ST with interference in normal occlusal 8% of the cases reviewed that is often hypothesized
development or with orthodontic mechanics such to be due to the reactivation of a portion of a fol-
as crowding, impaction or delayed eruption of per- licle. (Solares and Romero, 2004) Another possible
manent teeth, rotations, malocclusion, abnormal reason stated is that, in these patients, the dental
eruption sequence, retained primary teeth, com- lamina is incompletely resorbed which gets reacti-
promised space closure, and interference with root vated during the crown completion of normal per-
torque that is very rarely seen. (Solares and Romero, manent teeth, leading to the formation of multiple
2004; Bodin et al., 1978) Additionally, bilateral mul- ST, especially in the premolar region.
tiple supernumerary premolars are also found
associated with odontogenic keratocyst or in close This is the same mechanism found in patients with
vicinity of permanent teeth. (Kasat et al., 2012; cleidocranial dysplasia. (Solares and Romero, 2004)
Bhardwaj et al., 2012) None of these problems were All these scenarios and the related complications
associated with the ST found in the present clinical make the periodic follow-up of such patients an
scenario. extremely important and mandatory step. (Sulabha
et al., 2013) Owing to the above-mentioned facts, the
Treatment patient is recalled every 6-months for the follow-up
The treatment of ST is still a debatable topic to avoid any complications.
since many authors recommend the prophylactic
removal of asymptomatic ST (Solares and Romero, CONCLUSION
2004), whereas other suggests that asymptomatic
ST should be untouched until the development of the This case is unusual as the bilateral occurrence of
adjacent anatomic structures. multiple supernumerary mandibular premolars is
a rare event. A detailed history and clinical exam-
Still, others propose that ST should only be removed ination along with a thorough investigation for an
if it is associated with any of the previously men- early diagnosis and appropriate treatment of ST are
tioned complications. However, regular clinical mandatory. Symptomatic supernumeraries should
and radiographic follow-up is needed if the risks of be treated carefully and those without symptoms
surgery outweigh the bene its of removal. (Garvey should be followed up for the long term. The unique
et al., 1999) features, in this case, include the symmetrical pres-
Marré (1940) and Hanratty (1939) recommend ence of multiple ST in the mandibular premolar
surgical removal of supernumerary premolars in 2 regions with a resemblance to the normal premolars
stages: and without association with any syndrome.
Clinical signi icance
1. Extraction of more developed supernumerary Routine, conventional radiographs as the diagnostic
premolars is accomplished soon after diagno- aid are justi ied, as shown in this case since super-
sis; numerary teeth are usually asymptomatic. Fur-
thermore, the patient needs to be informed and
2. The remaining less-developed premolars are counselled regarding the complications related to
untouched and removed later after their root untreated supernumerary teeth.
development is inished in order to avoid dam-
age to adjacent structures and allow for bone Con lict of Interest
regeneration. The authors declare that they have no con lict of