JOLEJOLE, MICHELLE

BSRT-1A
09/28/2023

REVISED CODE OF PROFESSIONAL ETHICS FOR RADIOLOGIC TECHNOLOGISTS AND X-RAY

TECHNOLOGISTS

Scenarios
ARTICLE 1
Section 1 Radhia, a Radiologic Technologist in a Manila clinic, faced an ethical
dilemma when her friend Mark came in for an X-ray after a car
accident. Mark was worried the X-ray might reveal injuries that
could affect his driver's license, vital for his family's income.
Jennifer had to balance her duty to follow the law and report any
injuries found, as per the Radiologic Technology Act of 1992, with
her loyalty to her friend. In conclusion, this situation demonstrates
that Radhia’s commitment to adhering to Philippine government
authority and relevant laws while providing honest medical care
was tested.
Section 2 Radhia discovered a potentially life-threatening condition in a
patient's X-ray. The patient, Mr. Reyes, was the sole provider for
his family. Upholding Section 2 of the Code of Professional Ethics,
which emphasizes promoting public interest and welfare, Radhia
consulted with the hospital's ethics committee. They advised her to
inform Mr. Reyes compassionately while assisting him in accessing
necessary resources, considering his family's needs. This situation
tested Radhia's commitment to ethical standards in balancing
public welfare with individual circumstances.
Section 3 Radhia is facing a complex medical case. And as he encounters such
case he still upholded the Section 3 of the professional code,
emphasizing the highest standards of competence and ethics, she
diligently pursued additional training and consulted with senior
colleagues to ensure he provided the best care, demonstrating
unwavering commitment to professional excellence and ethical
conduct.
Section 4 Radhia exemplified Section 4 of the Code of Professional Ethics by
actively engaging in community health education programs
organized by a local healthcare association. Her involvement
enhanced the well-being of both her profession and the
community she served, demonstrating her commitment to civic
affairs.
Section 5 Radhia faced a situation again where she needed to uphold Section
5 of the professional code. A patient, Maria, arrived at the clinic
visibly distressed due to her immigration status. Radhia ensured

1
JOLEJOLE, MICHELLE
BSRT-1A
09/28/2023
her X-ray procedure was conducted with empathy and respect for
her human rights, adhering to her commitment to serve with
justice and good faith. This situation tested Radhia's dedication to
upholding human rights in healthcare
Article 2
Section 1 Radhia encountered a scenario requiring her to uphold patient care
in accordance with recognized professional and ethical norms.
During an X-ray procedure, she identified an inconsistency in the
patient's medical history that posed a potential safety concern.
Radhia promptly adhered to professional and ethical guidelines by
consulting with the patient's doctor and updating the medical
records to guarantee precise and secure care. This situation
highlighted her dedication to maintaining the utmost standards of
patient welfare.
Section 2 Radhia came to the extent where she had to uphold the principles
of Article 2, Section 2, respecting patient dignity, privacy, and their
right to self-determination. While preparing a patient for an X-ray,
the patient expressed discomfort with disrobing in front of a group
of medical students observing the procedure. Radhia ensured the
patient's privacy and dignity by offering a private changing area
and obtaining the patient's informed consent to proceed with the
observation. This situation demonstrated John's commitment to
upholding patient rights and respecting their autonomy.
Section 3 A patient arrived with a different cultural background and limited
English proficiency. Radhia ensured the patient received the same
quality care, addressing the language barrier and cultural
differences with respect and without discrimination, in line with
the ethical principle of providing care regardless of factors such as
age, race, creed, or language.
Section 4 In a busy day in radiology department, Radhia encountered a
challenging situation. Section 4 of the professional ethics code
emphasized possessing technical knowledge and skills reflective of
competence. Radhia had to ensure he accurately operated
complex imaging equipment for a critically ill patient, highlighting
the importance of his technical expertise and competence.
Section 5 She encountered a situation where she had to advocate for patient
safety, in line with Section 5 of the Code of Ethics. During a routine
X-ray, she noticed equipment malfunction that could potentially
increase radiation exposure. Radhia took immediate action to stop
the procedure, ensuring minimal radiation exposure, safeguarding
the patient's well-being, and upholding the safety of the healthcare
team.
Section 6 A patient arrived for a complex radiological procedure, but the

2
JOLEJOLE, MICHELLE
BSRT-1A
09/28/2023
patient was not adequately informed about the risks and
alternatives. Sarah ensured the patient received clear information,
allowing them to make an informed decision before proceeding.
This exemplified her commitment to Section 6 of the Code of
Professional Ethics.
Section 7 Radhia discovered a patient's confidential medical information
while reviewing X-ray records. Adhering to Section 7 of the Code of
Professional Ethics, she maintained strict confidentiality and only
disclosed the information as allowed by law and medical ethics,
ensuring patient privacy and legal compliance.
Section 8 Radhia was asked to perform a specialized MRI procedure, which
she had not been trained for. Upholding Section 8 of the Code of
Ethics, she declined, ensuring she only provided services aligned
with her qualifications, education, and experience.
Article 3
Section 1 Radhia was responsible for a crucial X-ray machine at her hospital.
One day, she noticed a malfunction in the machine that could
compromise patient safety. Radhia promptly reported the issue to
the maintenance team and followed established safety protocols.
This situation exemplified his commitment to diligently care for
and use radiologic equipment in accordance with industry
standards.
Section 2 Radhia had to demonstrate respect and support for her colleagues
and healthcare team members, as per Section 2 of the Code of
Professional Ethics. During a hectic shift, Radhia noticed a coworker
struggling to handle a challenging patient. She stepped in to assist
her colleague, ensuring patient care and fostering teamwork,
exemplifying the code's principles.
Section 3 She faced a challenging decision during a patient's X-ray
examination. She applied sound judgment, considering the
patient's medical history and safety concerns. Her actions
exemplified Section 3 of the Code of Professional Ethics, as she
assumed responsibility for her decision, prioritizing patient well-
being.
Section 4 In a hospital, Radiologic Technologist Sarah efficiently assists the
radiologist and referring physician in conducting radiologic
procedures to diagnose and treat patients, aligning with Section 4
of the professional ethics code for radiologic technologists. Her
teamwork ensures smooth patient care and accurate medical
evaluations.
Section 5 Radhia encountered a situation again where she had to
acknowledge the limitations outlined in Section 5 of professional
ethics. While conducting an X-ray, she noticed an abnormality but

3
JOLEJOLE, MICHELLE
BSRT-1A
09/28/2023
refrained from making any interpretation or diagnosis, adhering to
her scope of practice. Instead, she promptly informed the
radiologist responsible for interpretation, ensuring the patient
received proper medical evaluation.
Section 6 Radhia suspected someone without the proper credentials was
performing radiologic procedures. Committed to Section 6 of the
Code of Professional Ethics, which prohibits assisting unauthorized
practice, she reported her concerns to the appropriate authorities
to ensure the profession's integrity and patient safety were upheld.
Section 7 Radhia encountered a colleague who was consistently performing
X-rays without the required certification. Adhering to Section 7 of
the Code of Professional Ethics, she reported this violation to the
professional regulatory board as mandated by law (R.A. No. 8981
and R.A. No. 7431) and the code of ethics, ensuring professional
standards were upheld.
Section 8 Radhia found a colleague engaging in unprofessional behavior in
the workplace, which risked damaging the reputation of their
profession. Sarah discreetly addressed the issue with her colleague,
emphasizing the importance of maintaining proper decorum to
earn public esteem and respect for their profession. This situation
highlighted Radhia's commitment to upholding the profession's
reputation above reproach.
Section 9 Radhia faced a situation where she was tempted to discredit a
colleague, Lisa, to enhance her own reputation. In accordance with
Section 9 of the professional code of ethics, which forbids debasing
colleagues to boost one's own status, Amelia chose to support and
collaborate with Lisa rather than undermine her. This situation
tested Amelia's commitment to professional integrity and collegial
respect
Article 4
Section 1 Radhia faced a decision concerning Section 1 of professional ethics.
He had the opportunity to enroll in advanced courses to enhance
her skills and knowledge in radiologic technology. Committed to his
professional development, she chose to pursue Continuing
Professional Education and Development (CPE/CPD) to elevate the
standards of her practice, aligning with the code's directive. This
situation highlighted Radhia's dedication to her career's growth
and improvement.
Section 2 Radhia participated in a continuing education seminar organized by
a professional radiologic society, aligning with Section 2 of the
Professional Ethics Code. This participation demonstrated her
commitment to staying updated in her field and contributing to
professional growth.

4
JOLEJOLE, MICHELLE
BSRT-1A
09/28/2023
Section 3 Radhia embraced her duty outlined in Section 3 of the Code of
Professional Ethics. She shared her knowledge of the latest
radiologic technology practices and procedures with her colleagues
and healthcare professionals during a departmental training
session, enhancing the team's skills and patient care.
Section 4 Radhia faced a dilemma when she suspected a colleague was
rendering professional service while under the influence of alcohol.
Section 4 of the Code of Professional Ethics for Radiologic
Technologists prohibits providing healthcare services in such
conditions. Lisa had to decide whether to address her concerns
with her colleague or report the situation to their supervisor,
ensuring the effective delivery of patient care.
Section 5 Radhia faced a situation where she needed to adhere to Section 5
of the professional code, which requires avoiding conflicts of
interest and actions that could harm the profession's reputation.
She was offered a part-time job by a radiology equipment supplier
while working full-time at a hospital. To prevent any potential
conflict and uphold professional integrity, Sarah declined the job
offer.
Section 6 Radhia encountered a situation where her employer offered her a
compensation package below industry standards. Upholding
Section 6 of the Code of Professional Ethics, which entitles her to
just and fair compensation for her services, Jane negotiated with
her employer for a salary commensurate with her qualifications
and responsibilities. This situation underscored Jane's commitment
to her professional rights and fair compensation.
Section 7 Radhia had to face a situation where her name and Certificate of
Registration were used in an advertisement without her consent,
violating Section 7 of the professional ethics code. She acted to
address the unauthorized use and protect her professional
integrity.