Title: The Challenge of Crafting a Persuasive Thesis: Should College Athletes Be Paid Research Paper

Crafting a research paper on whether college athletes should be paid is no easy feat. It requires
meticulous research, critical analysis, and persuasive argumentation. For many students, this task can
be daunting and overwhelming. From gathering relevant sources to formulating a compelling thesis
statement, every step demands attention to detail and clarity of thought.

One of the most significant challenges in writing a thesis on this topic is navigating through the vast
amount of information and opinions available. The debate over whether college athletes should
receive compensation for their contributions to collegiate sports is multifaceted, encompassing legal,
ethical, and economic considerations. As a result, synthesizing diverse perspectives and data points
into a coherent argument requires careful deliberation and research skills.

Furthermore, crafting a persuasive thesis requires not only presenting evidence but also anticipating
counterarguments and addressing them effectively. This necessitates critical thinking and the ability
to construct a logical and convincing case that withstands scrutiny.

Given the complexities involved, seeking assistance from reputable academic writing services can be
a wise decision. ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔ offers professional support to students grappling with the
challenges of writing a research paper on contentious topics like whether college athletes should be
paid.

By availing of the services offered by ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔, students can benefit from expert
guidance and support throughout the research and writing process. From formulating a thesis
statement to refining arguments and ensuring clarity and coherence in the paper, their team of
experienced writers and editors can provide invaluable assistance.

In conclusion, writing a research paper on whether college athletes should be paid is undeniably
challenging. However, with the right support and guidance, students can navigate through this
complexity and produce a compelling and well-researched thesis. ⇒ BuyPapers.club ⇔ stands
ready to assist students in overcoming these challenges and achieving academic success.
This essay will examine the reasons for which college athletes should be paid and the reasons that
are given for why they are not paid. It is undeniable that most of the college athletes are actually
qualified as their counterparts in professional athletics. More students will talent will showcase their
talent with the hope of receiving pay. That means they have no hours left in the day to spend at a
part-time job; and it means the temptation to seek illicit compensation or to leave school after a year
to pursue a pro career is strong. College athlete must receive some sort of payment from the colleges
they join or from the NCAA itself. People in favor of paying college athletes should rather be asking
for separate athletic schools, where students can be proper professional future sportsmen; they better
not be making students incline towards something other than education. Overall the NCAA is
allowing rules and regulations that benefit them to be left uninvestigated. Some women do not get
paid as often as they would like to. Now a days in the collegiate world of sports, colleges and
Universities are generating millions upon millions of dollars through the athletic programs. From
football all the way down to the golf team. Any opinions, findings, conclusions or recommendations
expressed in this work are those of the authors and Paying not necessarily Paying the Athletes of
StudySaurus. It goes without saying that student- athletes who participate in the more popular sports
earn millions of dollars for the university that other students and others are able to benefit from.
BusinessCollege athletics has turned into a billion dollar industry with athletes generating huge
revenues for the universities and other stakeholders. If college athletes get paid then the school will
lose money, the athletes could get stuck up, and not all athletes would get paid. Clean solar panels
are more effective at producing energy. The Ncaa started out to be a place where young athletes
could go to further their career. What about the hard earned money college athletes will never see
and earned. First, he argues that many college athletes are being compensated for their work on the
field: it comes in the form of an athletic scholarship that allows them to attend the university for free.
In addition, communication is essential in passing the message to the superiors concerning the fact
that playing college sport is in fact a part time job and students should be paid for their hours of
work. They promise a huge amount of money not with words but with their courage and
performance, which employees cannot even promise but try. But my major audience would be to
attract the NCAA board members to take my opinion into consideration. A university earning a lot
on the expense of athletes is not the only reason why universities should pay to athletes. Giving them
money for engaging in sports makes them better student-athletes. If students have nothing and they
see that their college is making something from them, they will have a fire ignited in them and would
do something that would either dump college into some big problem or dump their own selves in
some big problem. With that slight chance that the athlete makes it to a college sport, they should
give the game their all because that is what they love and. This policy is communicated to athletes
through education, professional guidance, and drug testing procedures. Keep on browsing if you are
OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies. Early morning workouts become a part of an
athlete’s. Peoples think that college jocks work hard and that they deserve to acquire paid. It is only
fair that athletes in colleges spend a small fraction of resources to pay the athletes. Some feel that a
fully paid scholarship is enough for these talented individuals.
However, if colleges give a justification that costs are very high then this thing cannot be agreed
upon because no one is such fool to invest on something, which is not lucrative. Some critics may
argue that these student-athletes are amateurs, and if paid then are becoming professional athletes.
The NCAA is a governing body of college athletics, but without people questioning the NCAA and
demanding changes to the monopoly that the NCAA is nothing will happen to the unfairness to
college athletes like it is currently.In business dealings around the world, a formula is used to see
how much market value a person, property, or business has right now, this formula is called fair
market value. Looking at the pros and cons of paying college athletes, we could lean either way.
Even so, there has been a concern for the well-being of college athletes from as early as 1905 as
cited by Kissinger and Miller (2). While “the love of the game” feeling may have gotten an athlete to
a Division I school to play and the chance to display their. I do believe that college athletes should be
paid and thispaper will talk about the issues that exist between colleges and athletes regarding
paying to college athletes. Please include what you were doing when this page came up and the
Cloudflare Ray ID found at the bottom of this page. The National College Athletic Association over
the previous year provided that schools should award the students two thousand dollars per year as a
stipend but dropped the proposal after concerns were raised on how it would be achieved by the
media. For any other student it would be perfectly fine for the booster to pay for his or her meal.
Athletes also cover additional costs for sports and living that are not directly covered b. It takes a
long time training and luck for some players to join high paying professional teams. Other students
may injure their bodies in the training sessions which may hinder them from pursuing careers in
sports. Both sides of the arguments present many reasons why college athletes should get paid or
not. Deciding upon paying athletes for playing may compel the college to pay all the athletes for all
the different kinds of sports in the college. Secondly, if these college athletes cannot make any
money or benefits, they. The NCAA gave Miami the punishment that included the loss of 12
scholarships over the span of two years, a postseason ban for two years, and the vacating of an ACC
title. (Fox Sports 2013) UNC was given the punishment that included the loss of nine scholarships
over three years, a one year postseason ban, and two years of probation. Additional materials, such
as the best quotations, synonyms and word definitions to make your writing easier are also offered
here. The student athletes work extremely hard at their sport and on their public image. Paying
athletes is good for every one because it would not make them leave their studies in between and go
for sports. Due to this law, not only are college athletes having difficulty in paying off their college
tuition, but also many athletes are being paid under the table through black markets. The NCAA
simply has to lift the ban prohibiting athletes from signing endorsement deals. Athletes sometimes
have extra time to work and some universities also allow them to work and if they earn in that time
they have to forgo delicious meals, stylish clothes and other necessary and luxury items because they
have to save money for their future as they do not always get extra time. This same article goes on to
discuss various cons for this argument as well. The colleges have high revenues they can spend
without getting into a loss. People all over have mixed emotions regarding paying student. Schools
such as Alabama-Birmingham and Arkansas State are already unable to compete financially and
physically with college football powerhouses such as Alabama, Michigan, or Ohio State. Also, if you
don’t pay all athletes you could eventually lose money and athletes. Since the athletes are the
primary source of athletics money, they should then be paid. This makes it important to consider
them for payment since athletics is their career. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find
out how to manage cookies.
Athletes, for instance, may need to visit relatives or travel to different places in an attempt to relax
their minds. The Ncaa started out to be a place where young athletes could go to further their career.
The authors argue that atheletes should get paid, because they generate revenues for the school from
their hard work. Although proponents argue that athletes usually get paid in form of scholarships,
this is not enough compared to what is made through college sports (Alwoods web). This essay
evaluates the arguments against and for paying college athletes borrowing from various secondary
sources. For the amount of work that athletes put in, whether it is on the field or off, they deserve
much more than just tuition and room and board. Logistically, it should be very simple for the
universities to compensate their student-athletes. Some of them receive special gifts like cars or
vacations, others plainly receive cash. NCAA Rules. Despite having a substantial amount of money,
college athletes do not receive any legal compensation for their work. So, if they want to get paid, all
they need to do is to get a job, and colleges even give them full scholarships to play for them. Firstly,
it can be established that college college athletes Communication college athletes There has been an
ongoing debate on whether or not it is justifiable to pay college athletes for their participation in
their respective disciplines. The action you just performed triggered the security solution. The
purpose of going to college is to get the training so you can use it later. Many people think that
paying athletes would exert a pressure on them to win and they would not perform well under
pressure but this is actually not the case. College sports is a lucrative business that seems to
monetarily benefit all stakeholders except for the players. Academic degree, Amateur sports, College
1824 Words 5 Pages Are Professional Athletes paid too much. The University of Miami got around 8
million dollars for the Miami Hurricanes playing in the Nokia Sugar Bowl. Schools should pay the
players some of this money because this is their prime right and if players start rebellion as the
awareness is increasing day by day, colleges would not be able to make much profits from athletics.
This is the biggest question being asked about college athletes today. In addition, some of the college
athletes have gained fame through great talents. So with that being said, athletes are now going to
have debt coming out of college when at the same time colleges can pay the athletes who work
basically a full-time job as a student AND athlete to help them cover cost but they don’t. A full
scholarship that is not associated with monetary rewards limits an individual’s choices. College
athletes: should they be paid for what they do. The players BRING the money into the Universities
all by themselves. College sports is a lucrative business that seems to monetarily benefit all
stakeholders except for the players. Abdul-Jabbar also included that students who were on academic
scholarships were allowed to work and earn money during the year, however students who were on
athletic scholarships like himself were told no and to focus on their sport (Abdul-Jabbar par. 5).
Many college athletes are struggling to get by with a limited amount of money, and to add to that
they aren’t allowed to work even if they have time to. These rules have long been challenged,
however no changes have been made by the NCAA. If one ponders over this scenario, one would
question about the difference between those who earn for college and those who do not (Sack and
Staurowsky, pp. 33-108). If colleges at least ponder over this question and if they are fair in making
their decisions they would definitely agree upon paying athletes. They are unlikely to get the money
for different events that give life more meaning when they are not paid. For example an athlete goes
to a restaurant on campus after practice and there is a booster eating there.
Logistically, it should be very simple for the universities to compensate their student-athletes. This is
causing many athletes leave their colleges without completing their education and getting into
professional sports. Schools such as Alabama-Birmingham and Arkansas State are already unable to
compete financially and physically with college football powerhouses such as Alabama, Michigan, or
Ohio State. There are pros and cons to both sides of the issue, but college athletes deserve to be paid
for several reasons. It is unfair that NCAA will make huge profits and fail to share the benefits justly
with the athletes (Christopher 226). The rest of the money would be used to help schools recruit top-
rated athletes. On the other hand, College football and basketball players do earn money for their
college in larger proportion. What that means is that college athletes bring in over sixty percent more
money to their university then the fair market value. Giving payment is better than allowing them to
work because work might make them very busy, as they have to give time to studies and play as
well, so doing an extra work might be very tiring for them. Although it may appear peculiar and
unfair, paying college athletes. It is true that many colleges do not make profits out of college
athletes. This journal won’t be useful in my essay because it is outdated. They feel that for the effort
that they put in, an award of some sort should be sent their way. To put this into context, Block
compares this scholarship to unpaid internship. Since the leagues get the athletes from the
universities, they should pay them the same way they league players. The people who disagree with
the idea have some good arguments to make. Therefore, many factors need to be considered while
dealing with college athletes. This means that the total amount generated by a win in multiplied to
contribution of athlete in that win. While in college, these athletes should take classes that help them
manage their money, so they know what to do with it when they are done with college and.
However, it did not pay any amount from the revenue earned through the matches. The difference
between the amount of money colleges generate from athletics and what athletes get out of it is so
big, it is almost illegal. However, college athletics also comes with challenges, both personal and
academic as documented by Block. Those who argue in favor of paying athletes generally say that
colleges make millions of dollars off these athletes abilities and, therefore, for them to get no money
from it is unfair, and, in a sense, exploitation to them (Haden 673). This also causes athletes to get
illegal money, cars, bikes, and other stuff. There are arguments for and against paying college
athletes which need to be well understood before making a decision on which argument to follow. A
similar trend is seen in sports; athletes and coaches are paid highly to acknowledge them and show
appreciation. They should keep in mind that their decision of not paying athletes could ruin the lives
of athletes and leave them good for nothing. Works Cited Alwoods. “Should College Athletes be
Paid?” Street Directory. 2007. Web, 29 March 2012. Burget, Joe. “NCAA Football Analysis: Why
College Athletes Should Be Paid to Play.” 2011. Web, 29 March 2012. After all, they are part of the
reason for the revenue that the organization receives. “Those who advocate payment argue that
because colleges make lots of money through their football and basketball programs, student athletes
are being exploited if they don’t get a piece of the revenue pie. Someone that could potentially injure
their body for life deserves more than a free bachelor's degree.
More students will talent will showcase their talent with the hope of receiving pay. College football's
history started with amateurism, which is how college football has been viewed until recent times.
Some perceive that they ought to be paid, whereas others think of it as a bad idea. There are several
actions that could trigger this block including submitting a certain word or phrase, a SQL command
or malformed data. It was believed that he accepted a sum of money from the university to transfer
from Florida University. Dabo Swinney (Clemson Football), John Calipari (Kentucky Basketball),
and Jim Harbaugh (Michigan Football) are not too far behind, earning between 7 and 8.5 million
dollars (TheBestSchools). This idea reinforces free market principles as well as an appreciation for
student athletes’ hard work in the classroom and in their respective sports (Reed, 2016). Let us write
or edit the research paper on your topic. I believe that children should not be paid for good grades
for several reasons. However, when the athletic team scores, this information stays in the newspaper
for the entire year. Only athletes develop a tangible, visible and exciting base that is enough to make
the alumni remain connected with their respective alma mater. But my major audience would be to
attract the NCAA board members to take my opinion into consideration. People come to see Johnny
Manziel play, that’s a huge part why almost every game is sold out on a weekly basis. Due to the fact
that the college students face the same magnitude of risk injury as professional athletes, this makes
the debate of being compensated more viable because scholarships alone are not able to cover this on
their own. They should keep in mind that their decision of not paying athletes could ruin the lives of
athletes and leave them good for nothing. The NCAA’s rules are hurting the athlete more than
helping them by treating everything about college sports as a professional business except the players
which are forced to act as amateurs. This proposal addresses amateurism’s fundamental flaw, which
is that it denies athletes the same basic economic rights and protections that other members of
society take for granted (Branch, 2011). College athletics benefits colleges in the enhancement of
school spirit. So college athletes should not be paid at all because they are basically being paid to
study and play a sport. Everything in the case of a partial or full scholarship is already planned.
Although this is a valid point, we need to remember that for an institution to offer a multitude of
sporting events, it costs the institution a large sum of money to keep all of them running. This can be
seen from the site pictures in which duke athletes from various racial backgrounds can be seen
playing together as one team. Hopefully, as time goes by the NCAA see how unfairly they treat their
athletes and decide to pay these athletes what they deserve. This idea serves as a compromise
between the NCAA, universities, and college athletes. Overall there are many more reasons why
college athletes should be paid rather than not be paid. While minor infractions that are for the good
and well-being of the student athlete bring great consequences to the athlete and his school.If the
NCAA was a struggling organization than it would be a little more understandable that they are
trying to get extra money. A true athlete plays the game that their heart desires. Coaches are expected
to be demanding of their players, but the harsh reality is that their ultimate goal is to break you down
before they build you up. The athletes compete with community teams which have individuals that
receive pay. Even if there would be athletes, they would charge higher stipends because this issue is
getting importance now and athletes are becoming more aware of their rights regarding their work.
Including Florida State University which had the first day of their spring semester on that Monday.
The rewards that students receive are too small for the energy and commitment they show in their
respective games. His comments elicited mixed reactions with some arguing that college athletes
receive more than their fair share through athletics scholarship while others believe schools are
exploiting the student athletes and they should be paid. The people who disagree with the idea have
some good arguments to make. Various magazine articles have been presented, covering the issue
which has necessitated immediate action from reformists and ranking professional in the field. First,
he argues that many college athletes are being compensated for their work on the field: it comes in
the form of an athletic scholarship that allows them to attend the university for free. Hundreds of
classes required little work or had no faculty involvement and many of the students involved were
student-athletes. It was plastered all over ESPN and Sportscenter for weeks. College athletes should
get paid for their performance because their sport is their job. Now a days in the collegiate world of
sports, colleges and Universities are generating millions upon millions of dollars through the athletic
programs. From football all the way down to the golf team. As with all that money they can give
players bigger contracts and the other conferences and teams won’t have a chance to compete
making games A lot less exciting. Besides, the successful schools get local, regional and national
exposures that attract many student applicants. In 40 of the 50 states in the United States of America
the highest paid public employee is not a government official, but the head coach of a college
football or basketball team. You see the players on billboards on the side of the highway and. They
feel that for the effort that they put in, an award of some sort should be sent their way. Until a
group of people like Northwestern football players start to challenge the NCAA no changes will be
made in the current economic monopoly that is the NCAA. While “the love of the game” feeling
may have gotten an athlete to a Division I school to play and the chance to display their. Also, the
local community and businesses profit from game days since people spend money hence reinforce
the municipality support. A university earning a lot on the expense of athletes is not the only reason
why universities should pay to athletes. The National Collegiate Athletic Association, which states
that it “is a member-led organization dedicated to the well-being and lifelong success of college
athletes” (NCAA, 2018), simply argues that student athletes are students —not employees, and that
events like the big-money-making bonanza that is the NCAA tournament do not oblige these same
“students” to miss classes for nationally televised games that bring in huge ad revenue for the
colleges. Sports around the world are a significant concern as they develop talent and promote
health. He says that he and several other Southeast Conference coaches feel so strongly about it that
they’re willing to pay it themselves” (Should). This essay evaluates the arguments against and for
paying college athletes borrowing from various secondary sources. This would not make them suffer
in the real world and face failures. There are opposing arguments that college athletes ought not to be
paid to play. Will college kids be able to handle so much money responsibly. These young men make
lots of money for their schools, but don't get anything in return. If the athletes were to be paid, the
money that the institution could make in order to fund all of the sporting programs would be used up
paying only the athletes in the “big-name” sporting events at the institution. To put this into context,
Block compares this scholarship to unpaid internship. It brings in, as the authors argue, a lot of
money to all the colleges and universities.