Professional Documents
Culture Documents
1. Introduction
2. Experimental
In general, the morphology (and the thickness) of the anodic oxide layers
formed on Ti strongly depends on the electrochemical parameters such as the
applied potential, the time of anodization, or the sweep rate of the potential
ramp. Additionally, the HF-concentration in the electrolyte must be optimized
to achieve self-ordered pore growth. Anodization in solutions with a low HF-
concentration, for instance <0.05 wt.% HF in 1 M H2SO4 solution, yields large
nonregular pores. On the other hand, anodization in solutions containing > 0.5
wt.% HF leads to uniform etching of the surface (electropolishing).
the film is composed of an inner layer of TiOi and a outer layer of Ti(0H)4.
This film is essentialy the high-field passive layer - the thickness very well
corresponds to a growth factor of 2.5 nm / V. At approximately 3 min, first
signs of localized attack become apparent with the FE-SEM; breakdown sites
that are randomly distributed over the film surface and round shaped holes in
the substrate can be observed. Then, the current increases due to the growth of
the pores. At this point, the SEM image reveals that underneath the relatively
compact top oxide film some pore structures become visible. The porous oxide
film shows in the cross-section a thickness of 200 to 300 nm and a relatively
regular but worm-like structure (Fig. 2b). After 30 min from the start of the
polarization, there are areas of porous structure visible but still there are patches
of the top compact oxide film visible. With increasing anodization time the
current drops further while the porous oxide film thicknesses establishes at 500-
800 nm (Fig. 2c). Anodization for longer times leads to a further establishment
of the homogenous self-organized porous structure.
The thickness of the porous layers was determined from SEM cross-sections of
mechanically fractioned samples. For anodization in 1 M H2SO4 + 0.15 wt.%
HF the thickness of the porous layer was found to first steeply increases from
about 47 nm at 20 minutes to 540 nm after 10 hours. This is followed by a
steady state with a plateau of thickness values at approximately 580 nm.
The fact that, both the current and the porous layer thickness reach a limiting
value after a certain polarization time can be explained by a steady-state
situation. Both, pore growth at the inner interface and dissolution of the oxide
layer at the outer interface take place. Steady state is established when the pore
growth rate at the inner interface is identical to the dissolution rate of the oxide
film at the outer interface.
This limiting porous oxide layer thickness can be overcome by the
electrochemical conditions [9]. That is, higher thickness of the porous layer can
be obtained, if the anodization treatment is carried out in less aggressive
electrolytes. One explains the fact that the hydrolysis reaction during
anodizafion leads to acidification of the pore tips (similar to pitting corrosion).
This acidification accelerates the chemical TiOi dissolution exactly there, where
it is desired: at the pore tip (while the rest of the porous structure remains
relatively stable due to the more alkaline pH of the background electrolyte) -
for more details see Ref. [9]. Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 show top views and cross-
sectional SEM images of a range of porous Ti02 layers produced in different
electrolytes. Clearly the thickness of the oxide layer depends on the aggressivity
of the electrolyte and is in line with the idea that the pore growth mechanism is
controlled by competing film growth and dissolution.
Another crucial factor that was found in various electrolytes to affect the pore
morphology is the potential scan rate. This is also well in line with the approach
Anodization ofTi: Formation of Self-Organized Titanium Oxide Nanotube-Layers 183
that local acidification crucially determines the morphology. The higher the
scan rate, the higher the current density and therefore the lower the pH at the
pore tip and the higher the H^ flux from the tip to the pore mouth [9]. Hence it
is understandable that only optimized scan rates (and therefore pH - profiles
within the pore) can produce high aspect ratio tubular structures.
The results in Fig. 3 and 4 clearly show that the morphology of the single pores
and the pore dimensions that are the pore diameter, the pore spacing, the pore
lenght and the occurance of a rippled side-wall strongly depend on the
electrolyte used.
Fig. 3 and Fig. 4 show pores produced using H^SO^, (NH,)2S04, CH3COOH and
(NH4)H2P04 electrolytes. The pore diameter varies from a 15 nm in CH3COOH
to approx. 100 nm in (NH4)2S04. The pore lenght can be varied from approx.
200 nm to about 5 |Lim.
4. Conclusions
References
Ti (a)
barrier layer
\ "worm" structure
0)
Ti (b)
o barrier layer ^ . -
\ -' patches of
\ porous structure
Fig la) Schematic polarization curve and stages Fig.lb) Schematic representation of the
(I,II,III) of pore formation. stages (I=a, II=b, III==c) of self-
organized pore formation.
Anodization ofTi: Formation of Self-Organized Titanium Oxide Nanotube-Layers 185
Fig. 3. Influence of the electrolyte on tube diameter [8-10, 12]. Top-view images of the porous
titanium oxides prepared in (a) CH3COOH/NH4F, (b) (NH4)H2P04/NH4F, (c) H2SO4/HF and (d)
(NH4)2S04/NH4F.
186 P. Schmuki et al.
t = 4.1 pm
Fig 4: Influence of the electrolyte on tube length [8-10, 12]: (for different electrochemical
conditions)