MOSES

BOREHOLES
Presented by Group 3

SBA 2024| Capitol University

Background

- Moses was a young graduate from university of Kilimanjaro with the

bachelor in project planning and management. His uncle was working for
Mwanza water initiative which is non- government. It was receiving fund
from European Union.Moses Boreholes is a community-focused
organization dedicated to providing sustainable and clean water
solutions in regions with limited access. Nestled between rolling hills and
lush greenery, their projects bring hope and vitality to arid landscapes.
The logo, inspired by a water droplet, symbolizes the ripple effect of
positive change spreading through communities.
Background

Matimba informed Moses about funding for specific project because of

nepotism. The project was about of constructing Boreholes for
pastoralist and livestock. The project total of funding $100,000 it is
approximately TSHS 228,933,923.00. Matimba designated Moses as
project Manager to execute the project. Moses encountered several
challenges in the execution of the project. The first challenge was to
understand the scope and coverage of the project.
Background
- Moses tried to build 30 boreholes at once while subcontracting every
borehole to an engineer. Due to the fact that 30 boreholes were constructed
at once, the cost increased substantially to the point that the initial
installments of Tshs. 93,273,823 complete 18% of the intended borehole
instead 25% as stated in the write-up. Moreover, quality control was another
eminent problem.

-At least 10 boreholes were below the required standards and the work could
not proceed forward. The pastoralist and livestock herder were providing
negative feedback on the location and design of the boreholes. They
encountered several challenges due to poor communication with the team
and they do not have clear objectives and goals.
SWOT Analysis
• Access to USaid project financing via Matimba's
connection
• Technical expertise and adequate experience of

Strength 01 Matimba in water projects.

• Successful pre-inspection, indicating initial project
viability.

• Moses had no experience in starting a project to the completion.

Weaknesses 02 • Moses' lack of experience in project management.

• Inadequate understanding of the project scope and coverage.
• Poor quality control resulting in substandard boreholes.
• Negative feedback from stakeholders on location and design.
• Poor communication and unclear duties and responsibilities among
team members.
• Safety and health concerns at working sites.
• Irregularities in the procurement process.
 SWOT Analysis • Addressing stakeholder concerns can enhance project
success.
• Potential for corrective actions and improvements.
• Learning experience for Moses to gain project management
skills.

Opportunities 03 • Thorough examination of the irregularities in the procurement

process and implementing corrective measures.
• Opportunities for growth and success when it comes to roles
and responsibilities.

• Risk of project failure and financial loss.

Threats 04 • Potential penalties from local government due to safety
concerns.
• Damaged reputation and loss of future project
opportunities.
 Statement of
the Problem
- Moses, a fresh graduate overseeing an EU-funded borehole
building project, encounters formidable obstacles. His lack of
project management expertise causes him to struggle with
inadequate planning, subpar quality control, and team
communication failures. Even with $100,000 in funding, only
18% of the planned boreholes are finished because of cost
overruns and strategic mistakes.

Boreholes that are not well-designed or positioned lead to

stakeholder discontent. The project's success is further
threatened by internal problems such as unclear
responsibilities, safety concerns, and anomalies in the
procurement process. Moses requires advice and an action
plan immediately to address these problems and guarantee
project completion.
Alternative
Courses of Action

Impliment Phased Construction

Advantages:
• Improved quality assurance and cost
management.
• Use strategic borehole placement to reduce or
prevent stakeholder concerns.

Disadvantages:
• May cause the project's timeline to be extended.
• All phases might not be sufficiently covered by
the initial budget allocation.
Alternative
Courses of Action
Enhanced Project Alignment with Stakeholder
Expectations

Advantages:

Prioritizing stakeholder engagement ensures that the project

aligns with the needs and expectations of pastoralists and
livestock herders. Gathering feedback on borehole locations
and designs allows for adjustments that better suit the
community's requirements.

Disadvantages:
Stakeholder engagement may lead to conflicting opinions,
potentially causing delays in decision-making and project
implementation.
Alternative
Courses of Action

Health Hazard
Advantage:
Addressing health and safety concerns promptly
will prevent penalties and ensure a safer working
environment.

Disadvantage:
Implementing necessary safety measures might
add additional costs to the project and could
temporarily slow down progress.
Recommendation

Determining the most favorable course of action for Moses

Boreholes is challenging, as each option presents unique
advantages and disadvantages depending on the specific
context and priorities. However, considering the current
situation and prioritizing long-term sustainability and
stakeholder satisfaction. We believe implementing a phased
construction approach emerges as the most favorable option.
Recommendation
It is for the reason that this approach directly tackles the two most
critical concerns: cost overruns and stakeholder dissatisfaction. By
focusing on smaller batches of boreholes, Moses can ensure
stricter quality control, preventing substandard work and rework.
Additionally, ongoing consultations with stakeholders during each
phase allow for adjustments to design and location, increasing
their satisfaction and project viability.

Focusing on smaller batches facilitates better budgeting and

resource allocation per phase. Successfully completing smaller
phases and demonstrating progress will build trust with
stakeholders and the European Union.
Recommendation

While other options offer valuable benefits, they may lead to significant
disruptions and delays in the current context. Phased construction, in
contrast, allows for immediate progress while addressing critical issues.
This balances the need for immediate action with long-term project
viability and stakeholder satisfaction.

In conclusion, implementing a phased construction approach may not

guarantee immediate completion or fully avoid all challenges. However,
it provides the most holistic solution for tackling the project's core
issues, managing resources effectively, and building trust with
stakeholders. This prioritizes long-term sustainability and increases the
likelihood of achieving a successful outcome for Moses Boreholes.