Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Prepared by;
July, 2021
Advisor
Habtamu M. ( M.Sc.) Injibara, Etiopia
I
AKNOWLEGDEMENTS
Primarily we would like to thank God who provides us all the courage to make our dream to
come true. Then our appreciation and dedication go to our instructor Habtamu M. for his
professional guidance, constructive criticism and suggestion in doing this senior research paper.
And also, our appreciation goes to Injibara University, Department of Agricultural Economics
Staff members.
II
TABLE OF CONTENT page no.
AKNOWLEGDEMENTS....................................................................................................................................II
TABLE OF CONTENT......................................................................................................................................III
LIST OF TABLE................................................................................................................................................VI
ABSTRACT......................................................................................................................................................VII
ACRONAME..................................................................................................................................................VIII
CHAPTER ONE...................................................................................................................................................1
1. INTRODUCTION................................................................................................................1
1.3 Objectives.............................................................................................................................................4
CHAPTER TWO..................................................................................................................................................6
2. LITERATURE REVIEW...............................................................................................................................6
CHAPTER THREE............................................................................................................................................11
3. RESEARCH METHDOLGY............................................................................................11
III
3.8 Methods of Data Analysis..................................................................................................................14
3.10 Hypothesis........................................................................................................................................17
CHAPTER FOUR..............................................................................................................................................18
In addition to the above categorical variable, the following are the description of all continues variables.
....................................................................................................................................................................21
4.10 Savings and Accounts Available at the Financial Institutions Where People Save..........................31
4.11 The Main Constraints in the Household Habit of Saving in the Study Area....................................31
CHAPTER FIVE................................................................................................................................................32
5.1 Conclusion..........................................................................................................................................32
5.2 recommendation.................................................................................................................................34
6. REFERENCES...............................................................................................................................................36
APPENDEX A,..................................................................................................................................................38
QUESTIONNAIRES...............................................................................................................38
IV
LIST OF TABLE page no.
Table 3.1 Sample distribution of Respondents ………………………...................……10
Table3.2
hypothesis………………………………………………………………………..................................12
Table 4.1.age of
respondent……………………………………………………………….............................14
Table4.2.sex of
respondent………………………………………………………………...............................14
Table 4.3. Occupation status of respondent…………………………………………….................…………
14
Table 4.4 educational status of respondent of the households ………………………………14
Table 4.5 marital status of respondent……………………………………………..................14
Table 4.6 family size of the respondent…………………………………………….................15
Table 4.7 description of all continues variables…………………………………........…...15
Table 4.8 income and expenditure of household …………………………………….....….15
V
ABSTRACT
The research was conducted under the title determinants of household habits of saving in Awi
zone in the case of Gogusa Shikudad district of Ethiopia. Saving is an important
macroeconomic variable to be studied under the purview of the economic arena on an individual
as well as household basis. In a country like Ethiopia, the income standard is almost uncertain
and leads to more consumption rather than saving which has now been a central problem. The
main objective of the study was to assessing of the determinants of household habits of saving in
case of Gogusa Shikudad district, and more specifically; To identify the factors affecting for the
growth of household habit of saving, to identify the changing of saving pattern in households and
to identify the major constraints that influences household saving patterns. The selected design
to conduct this research is not experimental or laboratory research design rather it is survey.
Both primary and secondary sources were used to gather the data. The primary data were
structured interview and questionnaire. These methods were helpful in collecting information
from sampled respondents, different institutional operators and different key informants. The
secondary data had been collected from different thesis, and internet sources. Simple random
sampling technique was selected to select the sampled respondents. The data gathered during
this study have both qualitative and quantitative nature. For the accuracy of information, the
research was interpreted and analyzed by using descriptive statistics such as percentage, mean,
graph and tables. Based on collected data, the researcher identified the major determinants for
the growth of saving habit of households as well as the challenges encountered to the households
saving performance. In order minimize and alleviate the existed problems, some policy
implications are recommended like encourage saving, access to credit and improving income.
VI
ACRONAME
ACSI Amhara credit and saving institution
LCH Life cycle hypothesis
THI Total household income
VII
CHAPTER ONE
1. INTRODUCTION
According to classical economists like Adam Smith, David Ricardo and J.S.Mill, “saving is an
important determinant of economic growth”. Saving components can be based on an individual
or on household basis which proves to be the well being. As for an individual saving becomes
the cushion for the future’s intercourse of the unforeseen and upcoming as well as the uncertain
circumstances of life. Saving is the part of the income earned by the individuals. For the higher
economic growth for the country, marginal propensity to save should be higher but it helps to the
multiplier process. The determinants and patterns of saving differ from rural to urban region.
Saving is among important variables for economic growth of any country. Saving is about
income that is not consumed by immediately buying goods and services (Prinsloo, 2000;
Manyama,2007). Saving constitutes the basis for capital formation, investment and growth of a
country (Nga, 2007; Nwachuwu and Odigie, 2009). Serious problem confronting poor countries
including Ethiopia is the savings and investment gap. Because of this gap, these countries find it
difficult to finance investments needed for growth from domestic saving (Mirach and Hailu,
2014).
According to kifle (2012), it is also common to see these countries to finance their investment in
the short run partly through domestic government borrowings and/or foreign loan and grants but
this would significantly increase the country’s debt burden and would not be a solution in the
long run. However, both economic variables are not emphasized as a major variable for
interventions for overall development in Africa in general and Ethiopia in Particular. This is the
case mainly because of: First, most of the studies carried out in the field have focused on
developed economies and unable to show the ground reality in poor developing countries.
Second, most of the studies adopted a macroeconomic approach yet the behavior of economic
units on the aggregate level may not necessarily be the same as on an individual or household
level. And third, even the existing limited empirical research results in Africa related to rural
household savings and investment are varied and inconclusive (Zhu,2004, ; Nga,2007).
1
The saving level in Ethiopia particularly in rural areas is very low and little is known empirically
about its patterns and determinants. Savings in rural Ethiopia is mainly made out of the income
from agricultural activities (Kifle, 2012).
Girma sighted as Degene (2012), seasonal and irregular as the cash flow through sale of
agricultural produce and availability of work is seasonal. However, rural household do indeed
save in the form of tangible assets and/or in financial forms which can be potentially utilized by
savings institutions and for investments which is very essential for both households and nation
well-being (Dimova and Sen 2010); (Karlan, Morduch et al., 2010) .
Domestic savings consists of three compromise savings are important determinants of household
welfare(Freidman,2006).On one hand, without savings, households have few other mechanisms
to smooth out. In recent years, economists, international organizations, and governments in
developing countries have placed increasing emphasis on the mobilization of deposits, not only
to increase domestic savings, to achieve sustained economic growth and development but also to
strengthen domestic financial intermediaries . The recent financial crisis has led to serious
repercussions in the global economy due to deep economic and moral losses of investors. These
events revealed the relevance of saving and especially its allocation in the nation economy.
Indeed, saving is very important in the development of industrial and financial systems as well as
the only means to accumulate assets in the absence of credit and insurance markets to households
(Girma, 2013). They could save in banks or nonbank financial institutions in cash form. In this
respect, access to financial institution that meets liquidity needs is crucial. This is the reason to
introduce rural financial institution such as saving and credit cooperatives that strategic in order
to increase financial savings and loan facilities (Kifle, 2012).
2
determinants of household habit of saving in improving the income of households in the study
area.
The present influence of the households in this district has lack of awareness about the use of
saving, inaccessibility sufficient saving and credit institution. Thus, there is an immediate need to
carefully understand the determinants of both the household saving habit and the saving pattern
in the rural households of district. To advocate appeals for saving, there is a need to know about
the saving motives of the individuals (Nayk, 2013). An understanding of the saving preferences
also helps in calculating the saving instruments which can efficiently arouse saving.
1.3 Objectives
3
1.7 Organization of the paper
This paper has five chapter and chapter one deals with introductory part which contains
background, statement of the problem, objectives, basic research questions, significance of the
study, scope and limitation of the study and the significance of study. The second chapter deals
with theoretical and empirical review. Chapter three is methodology which contains description
of the study area, type and source of data, method of data collection and sampling procedure and
method of data analysis. The fourth chapter is result and discussion and the last chapter deals
with conclusion and recommendation.
4
2. LITRATURE REVIEW
5
Many researchers indicate that many rural households in developing countries, particularly in
Africa, are too poor to save (Rutherford, 2000; Robinson, 2001; Devaney et al., 2007). However,
as Coleman and Williams (2006) stated, the poor do save even though they do not have complete
access to savings facilities in formal financial institutions. Instead, they use informal institutions
for their savings. These include livestock, crop products, housing materials, farm equipments,
and some other precious metals like jewelry.
Low saving has been a dominant feature of the Ethiopian Economy. At household level,
irrespective of small size, rural households in Ethiopia do save in many ways, as individuals or in
a group. They usually save in kind mainly in food-grains or in livestock (Dejene, 2003).
In recent years economists, international organizations and governments in developing countries
have placed increasing emphasis on the mobilization of deposits not only to increase domestic
savings, to achieve sustained economic growth and development but also to strengthen domestic
financial intermediaries ( Besley, 1995). Similar study by Baharumshah et al, (2003) argues that
the existence of positive effects of household savings on economic growth. The recent financial
crisis has led to serious repercussions in the global economy due to deep economic and moral
losses of investors (Bhalla, 1998). These events revealed the relevance of saving and especially
its allocation in the nation economy (Bernhiem and Shoven, 1991). Indeed, saving is very
important in the development of industrial and financial systems (Attanasio, 1998; Baharumshah
et al., 2003) as well as the only means to accumulate assets in the absence of credit and insurance
markets to households. Although there is controversy regarding the relation between savings and
economic growth, it is generally agreed that once savings start to rise-perhaps due to increases in
income-they enhance the potential to finance investment , and lead to the creation of more
opportunities in the economy (Attanasio,1998; Bernhiem and Shoven, 1998).
Domestic savings consists of three components, viz., corporate, households, and government
savings. Household saving could be accumulating in real assets or financial assets. Large part of
saving accumulation in developing countries is in the form of real assets (Rehman et al.,2010).
These include livestock, precious metals, or food stocks. However, these real assets less useful
for industrial activities since it does not liquid. The weakness saving in real assets is important
reason for household in developing countries to save in financial assets (Deaton, 1989). They
could save in banks or non- bank financial institutions in cash form. In this respect, access to
financial institution that meets liquidity needs is crucial. This is the reason to introduce rural
financial institution such as saving and credit cooperatives that strategic in order to increase
financial savings and loan facilities. Household save for a variety of reasons such as liquidity
constraint or life cycle savings. In developing countries savings are important determinants of
household welfare. On one hand, without savings, households have few other mechanisms to
smooth out unexpected variations in their income, and so, shocks may create some problems of
human capital accumulation at early ages (Attanasio, 1998).
6
households in Ethiopia do save in many ways, as individual or in a group. They usually save in
kind mainly in food grains or in livestock.
7
2.2.4 Saving Behavior and Household Investments
The investments made by the households in different sectors are subjected to high income and
more savings. The rural households have very less income and high consumption as their
marginal propensity to consume is high and they are subjected to save less which significantly
puts an impact on their investment pattern (Attanasio, 1998, Bernhiem and Shoven, 1991).
Investments in unincorporated businesses and farms or rental properties are no where applicable
for these communities.
In The rural communities have a very less income which supposes them to save less and
even if they save they prefer the savings account through which they can have easy way of
transaction at any point of time and they save a very less amount in the financial
institutions showing a significant result of saving (Cashell, B.W, (2009)).
8
3. RESEARCH METHDOLGY
The major economic activity of the area is mixed farming system mainly crop production and
livestock raring. The most commonly cultivated annual crop in the area is Wheat, red Teff,
barely, potato and others. Their annual crops are cultivated by subsistence farming in the study
area. Due to the accessibility of the respondents, access to information and proximity to the
campus, these study area is selected.
Different type of data was collected and the data that should relevant to the objective of the study
from different sources. This study was using both primary and secondary data sources. The
primary data was collected from sample of respondents and key informants. The secondary data
was collected from other research efforts, books, statistical reports, official documents and
different institutions.
9
3.5 Sample Size
The size of the sample depends up on the precision desires and there is no single rule that can be
used to determine sample size. But the larger sample is much more likely to be representative of
the population. So in these cases, our total population of the study area is about 109,912 from
which 52,758 are males and 57,154 are females. Due to the representativeness of the whole
population, the target population should be minimized to about 100 households. And in the other
word From the total population 100 households are taken as a target population, because they all
are mixed in farmers, governmental employed, students, private sectors etc. the sample size was
determined using the simplified formula developed by Yemane(1967) at 95% confidence level.
According to this formula the sample size is obtained to be 80 households at the given
significance levels.
n = N/1+N (e) 2
e = significance level(0.05)
n= sample size
But, because of shortage of time, budget and distance factors, under these study only 30
households should be taken.
Since the study was concerned with determining household habit of saving in Gogusa Shikudad
district, the conceptual structure of the study to be descriptive. A cross-sectional study should be
made to investigate the determinants of household habit of saving by collecting data from the
randomly selected respondents.
But due to time, money and other constraint it should tries to take only sample of 30. Therefore,
using sample size proportion of population, it is selected 30 from the total of 100 target
households.
10
The overall household survey was following a random sampling technique though the study area.
But at the beginning by simple random sampling 30 households was randomly selected from the
study area.
11
suggests that those with more education and training are more likely to be successful in the
(ACSI).
Older, more educated owners seem to have a better chance for business success than younger and
less educated people. There is a believed that older people bring more maturity to a situation and
those with more education also have more experience to save. This means when educational
status of households increases, their income increases significantly. Studies are also asserted that
the more educated people become successful in their business.
Family size: When the number of family size of the household increases their saving
performance is declined. They consume more rather than to save. The most probable explanation
could be more family size could mean they consume more and decrease their Income and they do
not motivate to save (Demise, 2011). In addition, when family size increases, their income also
increases.
Occupation; Is a task or an employment whether governmentally or privately in order to
safeguard the life time of oneself. It is one of the determinant factors in the saving habits of the
community.
Marital status; Is the condition when the two opposite partners are joint together with
agreement. It is one of the determinant variables that influence the saving habits of households.
3.10 Hypothesis; Is subject to test i.e., to confirmation or rejection on empirical grounds.
Table 3.2 hypothesis
Determinants of Continuous categorical Effects of eachh factor on
saving household saving habits
Income positively
Occupation positively
Family size negatively
Marital status negatively
Sex negatively
Consumption negatively
Age positively
Education positively
12
characteristic factors which describe the total background of the respondents. Such factors are;
age of respondents, sex, marital status and family size.
Age is the most determinant factor that affects household habit of saving positively. As discussed
in the above description, from the total observation the average of the respondent’s age is 33.
From minimum age 20 and maximum age 49. Among this, most of the respondents are falling
under the age of 30-40, those who are the more productive stages. And also the least number of
respondents falls under the age of 40-50. Respondents under this age save higher relative to
others. Because age affects saving of households positively that means if the age of households
increase, the amount they save also increases.
Total 30 100.00
Out of the sample households taken for the study 73.3% are male and 26.7% are female. Under
those respondents 22 of them are males and 8 of them are females. The sex of the head of the
household emphasizes the impact of saving as it is shown that the male population are more and
suppose to involve themselves in different occupational status are inclined to save more. The sex
of the population determines the income to as larger extent as the wage paid to male population
is more than that of female population which is again reveals the differences in the saving
behavior of the population. The consumption pattern also signifies the differences in saving.
Out of the study 40% of respondents are government employed and 60% are private. The
occupation affects saving of household’s habit positively. In the rural area the government
employed is better saving habit than private.
13
4.1.4. Educational status of respondents
Education is one factor that influences the saving habit of household positively. The educated
household is a good saving habit and uneducated is bad saving habit. Out of the study 50% 0f
respondent are educated and 50% are uneducated.
Unmarried 7 23.3
married 23 76.7
Total 30 100.00
Marital status are also factors that affect household habits of saving positively, i.e. unmarried
respondents save more than married people. The marital status of the respondents and the head of
the households also determine the saving habits of the rural households. The married population
is subjected to more liabilities which discourage them to save more as role in the model of saving
pattern. From the above description 76.7 of respondents married and those 23.3% of respondents
are unmarried, who have higher saving habit than married respondents. From the total
respondents 7 of them are unmarried and 23 of them are married.
Family size is one of the continuous variables that affect household habit of saving. That means
if the number of families increase, they run to consume more instead to save. Large household
size could lead to increase in non-farm business expenses such as payment of school fees,
hospital bill, clothing, feeding as well as the purchase of other household consumable items. This
could detrimental to increase production in the rural economy, a disinvestment resulting from
dis-saving. As we can see from the statistical description the average number of families from
the total observation is about 2 members from which maximum number of families are 7 and
minimum number are 1 members.
14
In addition to the above categorical variable, the following are the description of all continues
variables.
Table 4.7 summary of all continues variable
Variable Mean Std Dev.
Age 33 7.02058
Family size 2 1.53316
Income 5177 4501.70826
In the above table the average income of the respondent is 5177birr with standard deviation of
birr 4501.70826 with maximum earning of 20000 birr and minimum earning of 400 birr per
month .The respondent who have higher income saves more than respondents that who have less
income. Savers have higher on-farm as compared to their counterparts.
The total consumption expenditure of sample households ranged from Birr 950 to 6566per
month and the mean expenditure was 2163 birr with standard deviation of 1674.5449. From all
the expenditures of sample households, expenditure for food items, farming inputs, non-food
items and ceremonial purposes are the major one on which the respondents spend their incomes.
House hold savings is value deposited by households. Farmers usually save from their proceeds
for consumption smoothing purposes throughout the year, accumulation of wealth, and for
contingency amount of household savings was 1163.3 Birr with standard deviation of birr
1223.26114. The lowest saving level among the savers was 50 Birr and the highest reaches 5000
Birr per month. The household’s density of saving is varied because there are factors which
affects saving habits of households Since there is no complete information on all household
savings, it can be investigated mainly financial institutions like ACSI, (Amhara credit and saving
institutions) and some sample respondents. From the productive point of view, financial savings
are interesting since raising it could potentially increase resources for investment. As the
information obtained in the ACSI in Tilili institution, in the study area. A study by Adeyemo and
15
Akala (1992) pointed out that as the annual household income increases; the average amount of
savings per month in the household also increases.
16
The level of income is very low but the marginal propensity to consume is very high among the
households. So, the saving rate of those households is very low.
As we can seen the data get from ACSI in the study area Gogusa Shikudad distrct, Most of the
households do not accrue a sufficient level of income which makes on their part to borrow some
amount of money to sustain their livelihood. Very less people often take loans from the financial
institutions. Out of fear and incapability of repaying the loan most of the households do not take
any loans.
4.10 Savings and Accounts Available at the Financial Institutions Where People
Save
As the study survey information from ACSI the financial institutions available nearby
encourages the people to save where the preference of saving over a year signifies short term,
middle term and on a long term basis where short term saving accounts to daily, monthly and
quarterly and medium term saving accounts to half yearly, yearly and more than one year where
as long term saving are applied on a two year, five year and on above five year basis. But most of
the people’s interest and preference towards the amount of saving in different period is below
17
300birr. As the survey result some of the household saves in weekly and some of them save
monthly.
4.11 The Main Constraints in the Household Habit of Saving in the Study Area
Constraints are obstacles which resists something or someone from doing specific tasks. There
are constraints which faces the household performance of saving in the study area. This problems
are governmental, social and economical and others. Such problems are; backward awareness of
households, less education levels, insufficient income earning power of the community, lack of
adequate infrastructure, insufficient accessibility of saving and credit institutions etc. the major
once which are surveyed in the study area.
5.1 Conclusion
This research was conducted in Awi zone in Gogusa Shikudad district on the determinant for
improvement of household habit of saving. Based on the objectives and findings of the study,
the following conclusions are explained. The results of the descriptive analyses of the
determinants of household savings shows that almost all of the household save their income in
18
cash form, but their is a variation in density of saving among the households. The significant
determinant explanatory variables of rural household savings in the study area were household
family size, income and consumption levels of the households. This study shows rural farm
households indeed save in respective of their low economic status. Based on the discussion part
there are factors which describe the demographic characteristics of the households. Among this
determinants some of them are significantly affect the saving patterns of households. These
demographic characteristics are; age, sex, family size and marital status but family size is a
significant determinant variable. The study has found that there has been a significant change in
the levels and density of savings pattern of the rural households because of the increase in
income earning variation among the households. As it can see into the saving pattern of these
communities we find that savings are accounted to be very low as because of their low
occupational status and low income. All of the income is spent on consumption and it’s very
insufficient to feed the larger family groups. From the information gained from ACSI and the
sampled respondents there are different constraints faces the household’s patterns (habits) of
saving. Some this constraints like; low access of saving and credit institution; low awareness
households about their saving patterns; insufficient educational accessibilities; lower income
pattern of communities and some of the households are carelessness on their health status etc, are
more of less assessed in the study area of the household.
5.2 recommendation
The purpose of this paper is to identify the determinants of household saving pattern in Awi zone
sub Gogusa Shikudad district of Ethiopia using the data available from the household survey. As
it can seen from the result of the study savings patterns of household are determined by family
size, income and consumption pattern of households.
1 The households could take different measurements in order to make limited their
family size.
2 The government could also provide family planning service to the households.
3 Households should be encouraged for improving their income levels and enlighten
on the need for savings households could also minimize their consumption levels in
order to develop their saving habits.
4 institutions are also involved in development projects need to increase their
support to improve the business environment of the communities and used to
upgrade their income.
5 Such decisions include supporting through revolving funds since households are
more effective and efficient in mobilizing funds with low default rate. This will
enable them to expand their production output and increase their savings thereby
stimulating the rural economy.
6 An efficient wage act policy should be implemented by the government as many of
the rural people are the daily wage worker amounting them to proper ways which
can meet the consumption needs and some portions of the income can be saved.
19
7 The financial institutions should amount to high interest rates provided on savings
which can motivate the households to save in these institutions mostly in post
offices, banks etc rather than keeping at home.
8 There should be a proper channel of agents who can advise or council these people
regarding saving. Policy-wise, efforts should be made to encourage the rural
households to save through giving trainings for the household and using the formal
channel.
6. REFERENCE
20
Beverly S, Sherraden M (1999). Institutional determinants of saving: implications for low-
income households and public policy. Journal of Socio-Economics. 28(4): 457-473.
Beverly, G. Sondra, A. McBride, and M. Schreiner, (2003). A Framework of Asset-
Accumulation Stages and Strategies. Journal of Family and Economic Issues, 24 (2): 143-
156.
Brata AG (1999). Household Saving Behavior: The case of rural industry in Bantul. Analysis
CSIS. 28(1): 75-86. Browning M, Lusardi A (1996). Household Saving: Micro Theories
and Micro Facts J. Econ. Literature. 34: 1797-1855.
Cashell, B.W., (2009). The Fall and Rise of Household Saving. CRS Report for Congress.
Congressional Research Service 7-5700.
Christensen G (1993). The limits to informal financial intermediation. World Development.
21(5): 721-731.
CSA (Central Statistical Agency), (2010). FDRE General Country Data. Cronje, Mark , (2009).
Creating a Savings Culture for the Black Middle Class in South Africa - Policy
Guidelines and Lessons from China and India. University of Stellenbosch, South Africa.
Deaton A. (1989). Saving in Developing Countries: Theory and review. Proceedings of the
World Bank annual conference on development economics. 1: 61-93.
Dimova, R. D. and K. Sen (2010). "Is household income diversification a means of survival or a
means ofaccumulation? Panel data evidence from Tanzania.
Friedman M (2006). A theory of the consumption function. Princeton: National Bureau of
Economic Research.
Finance and Accounting. 2(7/8): 16-20. www.iiste.org.(downloaded on 17 June 2012)
Greene WH (1992 ). Econometric Analysis. New York, MacMillan Publishing Company.
Gujarati DN (1995). Basic Econometrics. New York: McGraw Hill, Inc. 3rd Edition. .
Karlan D, Ahraf N, Yin W (2006 ). Tying Odysseus to the mast: Evidence from a commitment
savings product in the Philippines. Universities of Princeton and Harvard, Mimeo.
Khalek TA, Arestoff F, De-Freitas NE, Mage S (2009). A Micro- econometric analysis of
Households Saving determinants in Morocco. 1-18.
Kotlikoff LJ, Spivak A (1981). “The Family as an Incomplete Annuities Market.” Political
Economy 89:372-391.
Mirach, T. H. and Y. M. Hailu (2014). "Determinants of household savings in Ethiopia: A case
of
Modigliani and Brumberg(1954). “Utility Analysis and the Consump-tion Function.” In K. K.
Kurihara, ed., Post-Keynesian Economics New Brunswick,N.J. Rutgers University Press.
Nayak, S. (2013). Determinants and pattern of saving behavior in the rural households of western
odisha
Newman C, Tarp F, Broeck K, Quang C, Khani L (2008). Household saving in Vietnam: insight
form a 2006 rural household survey. Vietnam economic management review. 3(1):34-
40.
North GondarZone, Amhara regional state." International Journal of Development and Economic
Sustainabili(4): 37-49.
21
OrbetaJr AC (2006). Children and Household Savings in the Philippines. Philippines Institute for
development studies. Discussion Paper Series. 14: 11-22.
Orebiyi JS, Fakayode SB (2005). Determinants of Saving Mobilization by Farmer Cooperators
in Kwara State, Nigeria. Int. J. Agric.Rural Dev. 6: 66-73.www.ajol.info. (downloaded on
16 April 2012).
Rehman H, Faridi Z, Bashir F (2010). Households Saving Behavior in Pakistan: A Case of
Multan District. Pakistan Journal of Social Sciences (PJSS). 30(1): 17-29.
Robinson MS(2001). Saving Mobilization and Microfinance Enterprise: The Indonesian
Experience. West Hartford, Connecticut: Kumarian Press.
Sameroynina Y(2005). Consumption and Saving Behaviour in Russia”. The Economics of
Saving. . Edited by Gapinski J.H, Kluwer Academic Publishers, London.
Schrooten M, Stephan S(2003). Private Savings in Eastern European EU -Accession
Countries: Evidence from a Dynamic Panel DataModel. German Institute for
Economic Research, Berlin.
Tesfamariam KS (2011). Management of Savings and Credit Cooperatives from the Perspective
of Outreach and Sustainability: Evidence from Southern Tigrai of Ethiopia. Research
Journal of
APPENDEX ,
Injibara University College of Agriculture Food and Climate Science
Department of Agricultural Economics
Dear respondents this questionnaire is designed to investigate the determinants of household’s
habits of saving. You are sincerely and kindly requested to fulfill below questionnaires. You are
one of the respondents selected to participate on this study. Please assist me in giving correct and
complete information to present a representative finding on the current status of the factors
affecting the saving habits of households this study area.
Research questioner
22
1) Name of respondent--------------------
2) Age of respondent----------
3) Sex(gender)------
4) Marital status
a) Married
b) Unmarried
5) Occupation
a) Governmental employed
b) private
6) Education level
a) educated
b) uneducated
7) family size-------------------
8) Sources of income (what are the source of income for most of the farmers?)
a) farm sources
i. livestock and poultry------------------------------
ii. different farm product---------------------------------
iii. others---------------
b) non-farm sources
i. supper market----------------------
ii. restaurants------------------
iii. wage of labor (per day)-----------------
iv. Governmental salary (per munth)---------------------
v. Others---------------------
8) land size (in hectares)--------------------------
9) Amount of output yearly produced per hectare in quintal
10) Price of output per quintal
11) Total amount of expense per years(consumption per year)
A. Inputs
seed
fertilizer
labor
machinery
B. tax
C. housing expense
D. Infrastructures E) consumption--------------------
electric
water
transportation
telephone communication
others
12) Have you participate in saving institution?
23
a) Yes
b) no
justify---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
13) if your answer is ‘’yes ‘in question number 12, what types of saving institution you
participate?
A) Formal (in the form of money)
B) Informal (physical asset at home levels)
Justify----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------
14) If you save in formal saving institution, how much you save per month or yearly?
15) If you are in informal institution, how much you save per year?
16) If your answer is’’ no’’ in question number 12, what are the most determinant
factors that you do not participate in saving institution?
24