Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ANALYSIS
In Chapter 2 we used COG to determine a best location for
Logistica’s capital city. In this chapter we will build on this
idea by now selecting optimal “P” warehouses from a
On the map, Al’s customers are sized by their relative demand, A list of the top 25 most frequently selected locations for
and in the second map, we see demand displayed by each warehouses in the U.S. to use as a potential list to select from.
state’s relative shading (the deeper the shading, the more
demand within that state). With a predefined set of facilities, we can then build a matrix
with the distance between each facility and each customer.
FORMULATING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEM FORMULATING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEM
In Chapter 2, we saw how finding the single best point was relatively
easy. We simply listed all the possible combinations and picked the
best one.
The problem gets more complicated very quickly. When we pick
the best two sites, we need to figure out the best two locations and The need for the use of linear and integer programming techniques
determine which customer is served by each of these two sites. for sorting through these combinations in a systematic approach to
find the best answer.
If we have 25 potential facility locations and need to find the best 5,
there are 53130 combinations to evaluate.
The formula for this in Excel is =COMBIN(# of potential facilities,
# you want to pick).
FORMULATING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEM FORMULATING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEM
Index of key data elements and some terminology:
J is the set of customers we need to serve. E.g. Al’s Athletics, the The objective:
set J would be {New York, Chicago, Los Angeles, and so on}. an Minimize the average demand-weighted distance from the
individual customer is defined as j. warehouses to the stores.
dj is the demand of customer j.
I is the set of potential facilities we can select from an individual
facility will be designated by i. E.g. Al’s Athletics, facilities are the
25 warehouses.
disti,j is the distance from facility i to customer j.
FORMULATING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEM FORMULATING AND SOLVING THE PROBLEM
Constraints: Decision variables:
We have to meet all the demands. We do not want the model to Do we use the facility at location i? We will denote this decision as
outsmart us by minimizing the distance to a customer by not Xi. If Xi = 1, then we use the facility at location i; if Xi = 0, then we
serving the customer at all. do not use this facility. This is what is called a binary variable. It
We are limiting the number of facilities to P. E.g., Al’s wants to can take on a value of only 0 or 1.
know the best two, three, four, and so on. If we did not limit the Does facility i serve customer j? We will denote this decision as
number, the model would likely select all facilities. The more Yi,j. If Yi,j = 1, then facility i will serve customer j. If Yi,j = 0, then
facilities, the closer Al’s may be to the customers (our overall facility i will not serve customer j.
objective).
Locate exactly P
facilities
Binary variables
SOME ANALYSIS SOME ANALYSIS
We can plot the objective function (in the weighted-average distance) You can see that 1% of the demand is within 100 miles, 4% of the
for each of the solutions. As you can see from the graph, there are demand is within 100 to 400 miles, 30% of the demand is within 400
diminishing returns to adding more facilities. When we go from 3 to to 800 miles, and the remaining 65% is over 800 miles away.
4 facilities, distance decreases by 31%.
LESSON LEARNED
When you optimize by allowing multiple sites and your objective is to
minimize the average demand-weighted distance. This model is
useful when:
Ensuring that you are as close to your customers and demand as
possible is the most important consideration.
Distance is a good measure of your ability to quickly deliver. The
END OF
shorter distance the shorter the response time to customers.
Realizing exactly how much value is gained by each additional
facility in your supply chain.
CHAPTER 3
Distance and transportation costs are highly correlated (the farther
you have to drive, the more expensive it is)