RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CAREER DECISION MEANING

IN LIFE AND LIFE SATISFACTION

Project report submitted in partial fulfillment

of the requirements for the degree of

Bachelor of Technology
in
Computer Science Engineering

by

Tushar Singhal - Roll No. 20UCS212

Shivam Garg - Roll No. 20UCS183

Under Guidance of
Dr. Rajbala Singh

Department of Computer Science Engineering

The LNM Institute of Information Technology, Jaipur

December 2023
©The LNM INSTITUTE OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY Jaipur-2022.
All rights reserved.
 The LNM Institute of Information Technology
Jaipur, India

CERTIFICATE

This is to certify that the project entitled “RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN CAREER DECISION
MEANING IN LIFE AND LIFE SATISFACTION” , submitted by Tushar Singhal (Roll no
20UCS212), Shivam Garg (Roll no 20UCS183) in partial fulfillment of the requirement of de-
gree in Bachelor of Technology (B. Tech), is a bonafide record of work carried out by them at
the Department of Computer Science Engineering, The LNM Institute of Information Technol-
ogy, Jaipur, (Rajasthan) India, during the academic session 2023-2024 under my supervision
and guidance and the same has not been submitted elsewhere for award of any other degree.
In my/our opinion, this report is of standard required for the award of the degree of Bachelor
of Technology (B. Tech).

Date Adviser: Dr. Rajbala Singh

Acknowledgments

On this great accomplishment of half of our project ”Relationship Between Career Decision
Meaning In Life And Life Satisfaction”, we would like to express the honor of gratitude to
Dr. Rajbala Singh, who gave us this opportunity and constantly supported us throughout the
completion of the project. Under her guidance, many discussion sessions help us to learn
developmental and health psychology. Finally, as a team effort, we thank each of us for doing
this project with dedication and team coordination. And, I hope we can achieve even more in
future opportunities

iv
Abstract

In order to understand the complex relationships between profession choice, life satisfaction,
and meaning in life, this study project explores their deep interactions. The study uses strong
measurement instruments, such as the Meaning in Life Scale by Steger (10 questions), the Life
Satisfaction Scale by Diener (5 questions), and the Decisional Process Inventory (DPI) scale
for career decision (25 questions, covering making orientation, making closure, and making
resistance), taking cues from well-known psychological theories and literature reviews.

Convenient sampling was used to administer the survey, which resulted in 201 replies from
respondents ages 16 to 25, the majority of whom were 21-year-olds enrolled in bachelor’s
programs. The participant pool has an 8:2 male to female gender ratio. The extensive dataset
was carefully examined with the SPSS program, utilizing regression and Pearson correlation
analysis.

The findings showed substantial associations (**), highlighting a strong correlation between
the choice of a vocation and one’s sense of purpose and happiness in life. The study presents
the idea of meaning in life as a mediator and looks at how it affects the connection between life
satisfaction and professional choices. By enhancing the conceptual framework and combining
relevant ideas like top-down and bottom-up methods, the project adds to the body of literature
already in existence. Thorough explanations of the employed scales provide transparency
and lucidity, guaranteeing the validity of the research technique. The project also includes a
repository of research publications, which adds to its findings and places the study in the larger
context of psychology.

The report’s conclusion outlines the practical ramifications for people and society as a whole,
highlighting the possible uses in career counseling and enhancing general well-being. The
future directions for research are described, allowing for more investigation and improvement
of the links found, thereby deepening the body of knowledge already in existence. Essentially,
this study offers a comprehensive analysis of the connections among a person’s work choice,
sense of purpose in life, and level of contentment, illuminating the complex dynamics that
influence people’s mental health and life paths.

v
Contents

1 Introduction 1
1.1 The Area of Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 1
1.2 Problem Addressed . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3 Literature Review . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 2
1.3.1 Career Decision-Making . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3.2 Meaning in Life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3.3 Theories In Meaning in Life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3.4 Life Satisfaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 3
1.3.5 Interconnections and Mediation . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4
1.3.6 Gender and Age Dynamics . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 4

2 Methodology 5
2.1 Participants . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 5
2.2 Measures . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.2.1 Meaning in Life Scale (Steger, 2006) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.2.2 Life Satisfaction Scale (Diener, Emmons, Larsen and Griffin, 1985) . 6
2.2.3 Decisional Process Inventory (DPI) for Career Decision Making (Har-
tung, 2013) . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6
2.2.4 Demographic Information . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 6

3 Results and Discussion 8

3.1 Pearson Correlation Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.1 Career Decision and Meaning in Life . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.2 Career Decision and Life Satisfaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.3 Meaning in Life and Life Satisfaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 8
3.1.4 Mediation Analysis: Meaning in Life as a Mediator . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.1.5 Significance Level . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.2 Regression Analysis . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 10
3.2.1 Career Decision and Life Satisfaction . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.2.2 Overall Model Fit . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12
3.2.3 Practical Implications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 12

4 Conclusion and Future Work 13

4.1 Conclusion . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.2 Future Work . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 13
4.3 Limitations and Implications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14
4.3.1 Limitations . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

vi
CONTENTS vii

4.3.2 Implications . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 14

5 Appendix 15
5.1 Appendix A . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.2 Appendix B . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.3 Appendix C . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 15
5.4 Appendix D . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16
5.5 Appendix E . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . . 16

6 References 20
Chapter 1

Introduction

1.1 The Area of Work

The complex relationships that exist between life satisfaction, meaning, and career choices
have become a fascinating and important field of study in psychology. This area of study
explores the intricate relationships that exist between a person’s career decisions, search for
meaning in life, and the effect these relationships have on overall life satisfaction. Com-
prehending these connections holds significant consequences for personal welfare and wider
social structures. People in the modern world have to navigate complex decision-making pro-
cesses due to the rapid changes in career landscapes and the growing emphasis on personal
fulfillment. The decisions one makes in the course of pursuing a career are no longer viewed
in a vacuum; rather, they are becoming more and more understood to be connected to one’s
sense of purpose and, ultimately, to overall life satisfaction.

This study explores the complex nature of these connections in an effort to add to the body of
knowledge already in existence. We seek to provide insights that go beyond the conventional
divisions between career counseling and positive psychology by examining the psychological
foundations of career decisions, the search for meaning, and the ensuing life satisfaction. The
goal of this research is to provide a nuanced understanding of how these variables collectively
shape the human experience by revealing the underlying mechanisms that connect them. Our
investigation is guided by theoretical frameworks like top-down and bottom-up approaches,
which offer a theoretical lens through which to interpret the complex relationships within this
dynamic field.

A thorough analysis of the topic is also ensured by the inclusion of pertinent literature reviews
and validated psychological scales. To put it briefly, the goal of this research is to shed light
on the complex issues of career choices, meaning in life, and life satisfaction in order to make
significant contributions to both academic and applied fields. The potential applications for
improving people’s lives and guiding successful career counseling interventions become more
and more clear as we dig deeper into this intriguing intersection.

1
chapter: 01 2

1.2 Problem Addressed

In the quickly changing social environment of today, people have many obstacles to overcome
when deciding on a career, looking for purpose in life, and eventually finding happiness in life.
The amalgamation of these three crucial facets is rife with intricacies, and a thorough compre-
hension of the connections among them continues to be a necessary endeavor in the discipline
of psychology. The primary issue this study attempts to solve is the need to understand the
complex relationships that exist between the processes involved in choosing a career, the pur-
suit of meaning in life, and the subsequent effects on life satisfaction. When people begin
their professional journeys, they are faced with a variety of options that go beyond just ca-
reer choices.Career decisions are becoming more widely acknowledged as significant factors
that impact an individual’s sense of fulfillment and purpose in life, ultimately influencing their
level of satisfaction with life as a whole. The extant literature recognizes the distinct impor-
tance of every variable, such as career choices, life satisfaction, and meaning in life; however,
the intricate ways in which these variables interact and impact one another have not been as
thoroughly examined. Comprehending these associations is essential for psychological inves-
tigations as well as real-world uses, like career guidance and interventions meant to improve
general well-being. By delving into the psychological processes that underpin the complex
relationships between career choices, life satisfaction, and meaning in life, this research seeks
to close this knowledge gap.

The goal of the research is to understand not only the direct relationships between these factors
but also how meaning in life functions as a mediator in the relationship between life satisfaction
and career choices. People are facing more and more pressure to match their career decisions
with a more profound sense of purpose as societal norms and career paradigms change. In
the process of shedding light on the opportunities and challenges inherent in this process, this
study hopes to provide insightful knowledge that can be applied to theoretical frameworks
and real-world interventions in the fields of career counseling and psychology. Our goal is
to advance a comprehensive understanding of the complexities present at the intersection of
career decisions, life satisfaction, and meaning in life through empirical analysis and a detailed
review of the body of existing literature.

1.3 Literature Review

The investigation of the connection between life satisfaction, meaning in life, and career
choices is based on a wealth of prior research spanning numerous psychological domains. In
order to shed light on the complex relationships that exist between these three crucial variables,
this literature review aims to present a thorough summary of important theories, empirical re-
search, and conceptual frameworks.
chapter: 01 3

1.3.1 Career Decision-Making

Studying the many psychological processes people go through when choosing a career en-
tails understanding career decisions. The Social Cognitive Career Theory (SCCT), which was
developed by Lent, Brown, and Hackett, offers a theoretical framework emphasizing how out-
come expectations, personal goals, and self-efficacy influence career decisions. Furthermore,
the scale known as the Decisional Process Inventory (DPI) utilized in this research provides a
detailed examination of decision-making procedures by differentiating between the processes
of making orientation, making closure, and making resistance.

1.3.2 Meaning in Life

The purpose in life has long been a subject of discussion in existential psychology. According
to Viktor Frankl’s logotherapy, people are motivated by a basic need to understand meaning
and purpose in life. This study makes use of Steger’s Meaning in Life Scale, which further
breaks down the search for meaning into dimensions of both search of meaning and presence
of meaning. This allows for a thorough analysis of each person’s existential goals.

1.3.3 Theories In Meaning in Life

Existentialism, hedonism, religious beliefs, and nihilism are some of the theories of meaning
in life. Existentialism suggests that individuals create their own meaning through their actions
and choices. Hedonism posits that the ultimate goal in life is to experience pleasure and avoid
pain. Religious theories of meaning in life are rooted in the beliefs about the nature of God,
the afterlife, and the purpose of human existence. Nihilism, on the other hand, holds that life
has no inherent meaning or value.

1.3.4 Life Satisfaction

In positive psychology, life satisfaction—a crucial measure of general well-being—has re-

ceived a great deal of attention. According to Diener’s Subjective Well-Being Model, which
has life satisfaction as a key component, people assess their lives according to their cognitive
assessments of life satisfaction. Diener’s Life Satisfaction Scale, used in this investigation,
draws on this cognitive assessment and provides a brief but reliable measurement. Common
techniques for measuring life satisfaction include surveys, questionnaires, and interviews. It is
important to note that life satisfaction is not solely determined by external conditions, but also
by individual differences in personality and emotional expression.
chapter: 01 4

1.3.5 Interconnections and Mediation

Numerous academics have proposed that the search for purpose in life could act as a moderator
in the relationship between life satisfaction and professional choices. Through the integration
of top-down and bottom-up processing theories, these relationships can be better understood
in terms of the ways that more immediate, experiential factors and higher-level cognitive pro-
cesses influence each other.

1.3.6 Gender and Age Dynamics

A review of the literature on demographic factors indicates that age and gender are significant
determinants of life satisfaction, meaning in life, and career choices. Research has looked
into how changes in these variables are influenced by life stage and society expectations. This
review serves as a foundation for the current research by synthesizing these disparate strands
of literature, highlighting knowledge gaps, and directing the investigation of the complex rela-
tionships among career choices, life satisfaction, and meaning. The methodology used in this
study, the findings, and their implications for theory, research, and practical applications are
all covered in detail in the sections that follow.
Chapter 2

Methodology

2.1 Participants

Convenience sampling was used to select study participants in an effort to include a broad yet
approachable cross-section of people. A total of 201 people willingly participated in the sur-
vey, offering insightful information about the connections between life satisfaction, meaning
in life, and career choice. The participants’ demographic information provides an overview of
the sample’s characteristics. An 8:2 ratio was found in the gender distribution, with a prepon-
derance of male respondents. The goal of this gender balance is to offer a thorough grasp of
any potential gender-based differences in the relationships that are being studied. Participants
ranged in age from 16 to 25, with the majority being in the 21–25 year age range. This age
distribution offers insights into the experiences of people at a critical point in their educational
and career trajectories, coinciding with the crucial life stage of pursuing a bachelor’s degree.
The wide range of experiences and viewpoints represented in the participant pool enhances
the generalizability of the results. Convenience sampling, while acknowledging potential lim-
itations in terms of representativeness, allows for a practical and feasible approach to data
collection in participant selection. Participation requirements included being a member of the
designated age range and pursuing or having recently pursued a bachelor’s degree. This cri-
terion allows for differences in career stages and aspirations while ensuring a certain level of
uniformity in terms of educational background.

Participants’ willingness to participate in the survey is a sign of the topic’s inherent interest and
applicability to people making career decisions. The recruitment process was conducted with
the utmost ethical considerations, such as informed consent and confidentiality, to guarantee
the protection of study participants’ rights. This chapter will go into detail in the following
sections regarding the survey instruments used, the data collection and analysis procedures,
and the ethical considerations incorporated into the research design. The methodology adheres
to established research practices in the field of psychology and it aims to thoroughly investigate
the relationship between career decision, meaning in life, and life satisfaction.

5
chapter: 02 6

2.2 Measures

In order to fully capture the complex relationships that exist between life satisfaction, meaning
in life, and career decisions, a set of reliable measurement tools was chosen with great care.
Based on each measure’s proven validity and reliability in the psychology community, it was
selected.

2.2.1 Meaning in Life Scale (Steger, 2006)

The participants’ perceptions of meaning in life were measured using Steger’s Meaning in Life
Scale. This 10-item measure differentiates between the components of Presence of Meaning
(such as ”My life has a clear sense of purpose”) and Search for Meaning (such as ”I am always
looking to find my life’s purpose”). Each item was rated by respondents using a Likert scale
that went from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The dual focus of the scale made it
possible to examine participants’ existential reflections in more detail.

2.2.2 Life Satisfaction Scale (Diener, Emmons, Larsen and Griffin, 1985)

The participants’ perceptions of meaning in life were measured using Steger’s Meaning in Life
Scale. This 10-item measure differentiates between the components of Presence of Meaning
(such as ”My life has a clear sense of purpose”) and Search for Meaning (such as ”I am always
looking to find my life’s purpose”). Each item was rated by respondents using a Likert scale
that went from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). The dual focus of the scale made it
possible to examine participants’ existential reflections in more detail.

2.2.3 Decisional Process Inventory (DPI) for Career Decision Making (Hartung,
2013)

Paul J. Hartung’s Decisional Process Inventory (DPI) scale was used to evaluate participants’
career decision-making processes in a comprehensive manner. The scale, comprising 25 items,
addresses three crucial dimensions: Orientation, Closure, and Resistance. Every statement was
rated by participants on a Likert scale ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree).
The depth of the DPI scale allowed for a thorough investigation of the emotional and cognitive
factors that went into participants’ career decision-making.

2.2.4 Demographic Information

The age, gender, and educational background of the participants were gathered through a struc-
tured demographic questionnaire. This data made it easier to classify the participants and
chapter: 02 7

enabled subgroup analyzes to investigate possible differences in the correlations between the
variables under study. These tests ensured a thorough and nuanced investigation of the con-
nections between career decisions, meaning in life, and life satisfaction. They were selected
based on their proven psychometric qualities and applicability to the study questions. The
scale offered a continuum for participants to indicate how much they agreed or disagreed with
the statements in each scale, with response options ranging from 1 to 5. The methods for gath-
ering data and the statistical analyses that were carried out to reveal the complex dynamics are
described in detail in the sections that follow.
Chapter 3

Results and Discussion

3.1 Pearson Correlation Analysis

Pearson correlation analysis was used to look at the relationships between the variables of
career decision, meaning in life, and life satisfaction. Finding the direction and strength of
linear associations between pairs of variables was the goal of this statistical technique.

3.1.1 Career Decision and Meaning in Life

With a correlation coefficient of 0.554 and a p-value of less than 0.001, the Pearson correlation
analysis demonstrated a statistically significant relationship between choosing a career and
finding meaning in life. This suggests that people who reported a clearer process for making
career decisions were also more likely to report a greater sense of purpose in their lives.

3.1.2 Career Decision and Life Satisfaction

With a p-value of less than 0.001, the analysis revealed a significant correlation (r = 0.486) be-
tween career decision and life satisfaction. This implies that people who made career decisions
with greater clarity and decisiveness also tended to report higher levels of life satisfaction.

3.1.3 Meaning in Life and Life Satisfaction

With a correlation coefficient of 0.421 and a p-value of less than 0.001, Pearson correlation
analysis showed a statistically significant relationship between life satisfaction and meaning in
life. This supports the idea that people who are happier with their lives also have a tendency
to find greater meaning in them.

8
chapter: 02 9
chapter: 02 10

3.1.4 Mediation Analysis: Meaning in Life as a Mediator

The study also looked at the relationship between career choice and life satisfaction and the
mediating effect of meaning in life. A significant mediation effect was found in the prelimi-
nary mediation analysis using Pearson correlation coefficients, indicating that the existence of
meaning in life contributes to the explanation of the relationship between career choice and
life satisfaction.

3.1.5 Significance Level

There is a strong correlation between the variables under investigation, as evidenced by the
statistical significance of all reported correlation coefficients at the 0.01 level. The results of
the Pearson correlation study shed important light on the relationships between life satisfac-
tion, meaning in life, and career choice. A thorough analysis of these findings, including its
theoretical ramifications, real-world applications, and possible directions for future study, will
be covered in the sections that follow.

3.2 Regression Analysis

To explore the relationships found in the Pearson correlation analysis in greater detail, regres-
sion analysis was used. Using this statistical technique, we can investigate how well one or
more independent variables predict a dependent variable. Career choice, meaning in life, and
life satisfaction are the main variables of interest in this study.
chapter: 02 11
chapter: 02 12

3.2.1 Career Decision and Life Satisfaction

To determine how a career choice affected life satisfaction, a linear regression analysis was
done. A statistically significant regression coefficient was found in the results, suggesting that
changes in career decision scores were correlated with predictable shifts in life satisfaction.
This suggests that higher levels of life satisfaction are associated with a more decisive and
well-defined approach to career decision-making.

3.2.2 Overall Model Fit

Relevant statistics, such as R-squared, which shows the percentage of variance in the depen-
dent variable (life satisfaction) explained by the independent variables (career choice, meaning
in life), were used to evaluate the overall model fit.

3.2.3 Practical Implications

Regression analysis offers useful implications in addition to illuminating the relationships be-
tween variables. The findings imply that interventions aimed at improving career decision-
making procedures may have a favorable impact on people’s level of life satisfaction.
Chapter 4

Conclusion and Future Work

4.1 Conclusion

In conclusion, this research project has systematically explored the relationships between ca-
reer decision, meaning in life, and life satisfaction. Through a robust methodology involving
surveys and statistical analyses, significant findings have emerged, shedding light on the intri-
cate dynamics within these psychological variables. The Pearson correlation analysis revealed
strong and statistically significant relationships between career decision and both meaning in
life and life satisfaction. Additionally, a noteworthy correlation between meaning in life and
life satisfaction highlighted the interconnectedness of these existential constructs. Regression
analyses further illuminated the predictive power of career decision on life satisfaction, with
meaning in life serving as a mediator in this relationship. The study has practical implications
for individuals, educators, and career counselors. Understanding the impact of decisive career
decision-making on overall life satisfaction emphasizes the importance of career guidance and
interventions that foster a sense of purpose. The mediating role of meaning in life underscores
the need to address existential concerns alongside practical career considerations for holistic
well-being. Moreover, gender and age were explored as potential moderators. These nuances
contribute to a more nuanced understanding of how demographic factors may influence the
relationships under investigation.

4.2 Future Work

While this study makes valuable contributions to the field of psychology, several avenues
for future research merit exploration: Longitudinal Studies: Conducting longitudinal stud-
ies would offer insights into the dynamic nature of these relationships over time, providing
a deeper understanding of how career decisions impact meaning in life and life satisfaction
across different life stages. Cultural Considerations: Investigating the cultural influences on

13
chapter: 02 14

career decisions, meaning-making, and life satisfaction would contribute to the cultural rele-
vance and applicability of the findings. Intervention Strategies: Designing and implementing
intervention strategies to enhance career decision-making processes and meaning in life, fol-
lowed by assessing their impact on life satisfaction, would provide actionable insights for
practitioners. Exploration of Additional Variables: Considering additional variables such as
personality traits, coping mechanisms, or socioeconomic factors could further enrich the un-
derstanding of the complex interplay between career decisions, meaning in life, and life satis-
faction.

4.3 Limitations and Implications

4.3.1 Limitations

Despite the valuable insights gained from this research, several limitations warrant considera-
tion: Sampling Bias: The convenience sampling method used may introduce biases, limiting
the generalizability of findings. Future studies employing more diverse and representative sam-
ples can enhance external validity. Self-Report Measures: The reliance on self-report measures
introduces the possibility of social desirability bias. Participants may provide responses they
perceive as socially acceptable, affecting the accuracy of the data. Cross-Sectional Design:
The cross-sectional nature of the study hinders the ability to establish causal relationships.
Longitudinal designs would provide a clear understanding of the temporal dynamics between
variables. Cultural Specificity: The study’s findings may be culturally bound, limiting their
applicability to diverse cultural contexts. Future research should incorporate a more extensive
range of cultural perspectives.

4.3.2 Implications

Career Counseling: The study highlights the critical role of career decision-making in shaping
life satisfaction. Career counselors can leverage these findings to design interventions that en-
hance decision-making processes and holistic well-being. Educational Programs: Educational
institutions can integrate programs that focus on existential aspects of career development,
fostering a sense of purpose and meaning among students. Policy Development: Policymakers
can use these insights to inform policies related to career guidance in educational institutions,
promoting a more comprehensive approach to career development. Organizational Practices:
Employers can incorporate a better understanding of the significance of meaningful work in
their organizational practices, potentially improving employee satisfaction and retention. Fur-
ther Research: The identified limitations provide a roadmap for future research. Addressing
these limitations can refine the understanding of the relationships between career decisions,
meaning in life, and life satisfaction.
Chapter 5

Appendix

5.1 Appendix A

Survey Instruments Meaning in Life Scale (Steger, 2006): Please rate the following statements
based on your agreement or disagreement. ”I am always looking to find my life’s purpose.”
”My life has a clear sense of purpose.” ... Life Satisfaction Scale (Diener et al., 1985): Indicate
your level of agreement with the following statements. ”In most ways, my life is close to my
ideal.” ”The conditions of my life are excellent.” Decisional Process Inventory (DPI) for Career
Decision Making (Hartung, 2013): Rate how strongly you agree or disagree with the following
statements. ”I have a clear idea of what I want in a career.” ”I find it difficult to make decisions
about my career.”

5.2 Appendix B

Demographic Questionnaire

Age:

Gender: [ ] Male [ ] Female [ ] Other

Educational Background: [ ] Bachelor’s pursuing [ ] Bachelor’s completed [ ] Master’s pursu-

ing. . . ...

5.3 Appendix C

Informed Consent Form

Dear Participants, We invite you to take part in an important research study as part of a B tech
project that aims to delve into the intricate dynamics between Career Decisions, Meaning in
15
chapter: 02 16

Life, and Life Satisfaction. Please respond to the questions honestly and to the best of your
ability. The survey will take approximately 5-7 mins to complete. Your thoughtful responses
will greatly contribute to the accuracy and validity of our research findings.

Confidentiality

Your responses will be kept confidential and will be used for research purposes only.

5.4 Appendix D

Output Statistics

5.5 Appendix E

Questionnaire

Career Decision

1. Asking me about my career plans makes me feel:

2. Thinking about what type of work I would like to do leaves me feeling:

3. The subject of career planning makes me feel:

4. The role of work and career in my life is:

chapter: 02 17

5. The reason(s) why I need to decide about what career I want to choose are:

6. My career interests and abilities are:

7. Trying to make a career decision is:

8. As far as being able to make a career decision, I am:

9. As I think about the career(s) I might choose, I feel:

10. The efforts I am putting into deciding on a career, make me feel:

11. Knowing that I have to decide on a career makes me feel:

12. The energy I invest in determining what type of work I want to do is:

13. In trying to decide on a career, I am:

14. The type of work I could choose from all my options is:

15. As I consider the work I might do, I feel:

16. The time and energy I put into trying to make a career decision is:

17. Knowing that I could read about possible career areas or occupations, I feel:

18. The thought of putting effort into making a career decision makes me feel:

19. My career interests are:

20. The energy I have to make a career decision is:

21. The thoughts I have about the types of work I might do, I:

22. The thought of talking to others about careers makes me feel:

23. Right now, considering the kind of work I could do makes me feel:

24. In talking to people about possible careers I:

25. The thought of me actually deciding on a career is:

Meaning In Life

26. I understand my life’s meaning:

27. I am looking for something that makes my life feel meaningful:

28. I am always looking to find my life’s purpose:

29. My life has a clear sense of purpose:

30. I have a good sense of what makes my life meaningful:

chapter: 02 18

31. I have discovered a satisfying life purpose:

32. I am always searching for something that makes my life feel significant:

33. I am seeking a purpose or mission for my life:

34. My life has no clear purpose:

35. I am searching for meaning in my life:

Life Satisfaction

36. In most ways my life is close to my ideal:

37. The conditions of my life are excellent:

38. I am satisfied with my life.

39. So far, I have gotten the important things I want in life:

40. If I could live my life over, I would change almost nothing.

Form Link : https://forms.gle/FVzDxLZCPUyE3eLr7

chapter: 02 19
Chapter 6

References

1. Allan, B. A., Douglass, R. P., Duffy, R. D., McCarty, R. J. (2015). Meaningful work
as a moderator of the relation between work stress and meaning in life. Journal of Career
Assessment, 23(3), 1–12.

2. Azizli, N., Atkinson, B. E., Baughman, H. M., Giammarco, E. A. (2015). Relationships

between general self-efficacy, planning for the future, and life satisfaction. Personality and
Individual Differences, 82, 58–60.

3. Published: 29 August 2017 Attaining Career Decision Self-Efficacy in Life: Roles of the
Meaning in Life and the Life Satisfaction

4. DeWitz, S. J., Woolsey, M. L., Walsh, W. B. (2009). College student retention: An

exploration of the relationship between self-efficacy beliefs and purpose in life among college
students. Journal of College Student Development, 50(1), 19–34.

5. Diener, E., Emmons, R. A., Larsen, R. J., Griffin, G. (1985). Satisfaction with life. Journal
of Personality and Social Psychology, 48, 94–105.

6. Dik, B. J., Sargent, A. M., Steger, M. F. (2008). Career development strivings: Assessing
goals and motivation in career decision-making and planning. Journal of Career Development,
35, 23–41.

7. Bacanli F., Eşici H., Özünlü B. M. (2013). An examination of career decision-making

difficulties according to several variables. Turkish Psychological Counseling and Guidance
Journal, 5(40), 198–211.

8. Bowman N. A. (2010). The development of psychological wellbeing among first-year

college students. Journal of College Student Development, 51, 180–200

9. LOUNSBURY, JOHN W., et al. ”AN INVESTIGATION OF CAREER DECIDEDNESS IN

RELATION TO ’BIG FIVE’ PERSONALITY CONSTRUCTS AND LIFE SATISFACTION.”
College Student Journal, vol. 33, no. 4, Dec.

20
chapter: 02 21

10. How do career satisfaction and life satisfaction associate? Tamara Hagmaier, Andrea E.
Abele), Kyra Goebel Journal of Managerial Psychology(2018)

11. Frankl, V. E. (1985). Man’s search for meaning. New York: Pocket Books.

12. Albion M. J., Fogarty G. J. (2002). Factors influencing career decision making in adoles-
cents and adults. Journal of Career Assessment, 10, 91–126.