GUJARAT

NATIONAL LAW UNIVERSITY

SEMESTER – V

FAMILY LAW I – 30 MARKS

RESEARCH PAPER TITLED:

A TRYST OF MEDIATION AND FAMILY DISPUTES
A STUDY ON THE EFFICIENCY OF MODERN-DAY MEDIATION
DEVELOPMENTS IN INDIAN FAMILY LAW

SUBMITTED BY: SUBMITTED TO:

YASH KHANNA DR. GARIMA GOSWAMI

19B180. ASST. PROFESSOR OF LAW

B.B.A. LL.B. DATED: 20.11.2021
Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

TABLE OF CONTENTS

1. ACKNOWLEDGMENT ................................................................................................................................ 2
2. PART A – PRELIMINARIES ........................................................................................................................ 3
1. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY FORM .............................................................................................3
2. OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND LIMITATION OF THE STUDY................................................5
3. ABSTRACT ................................................................................................................................6
4. Methodology ...............................................................................................................................7
5. Bibliography ................................................................................................................................7
3. PART B – THE ASSESSMENT ................................................................................................................... 10
6. Statement of the Problem ..........................................................................................................10
6.1. Rocky roots to the inception of mediation ......................................................................10
6.2. Hurdles in Mediation ......................................................................................................11
6.3. Factors making mediation Inefficient .............................................................................11
7. Introduction ...............................................................................................................................12
7.1. Concept of Mediation .....................................................................................................12
7.2. Mediation and Family Law ............................................................................................13
8. Development of Mediation in Family Law ...............................................................................14
8.1. Legislative Development ................................................................................................14
8.2. Development of Family Law Mediation in Courts .........................................................15
9. Procedure of Mediation .............................................................................................................16
10. Mediation: A Duty of Courts.....................................................................................................18
10.1. Section 9 Obligations ...................................................................................................18
10.2. Nature of Referrals to Mediation .................................................................................18
10.3. Binding Power of the Mediation Agreements ...............................................................19
11. Elements Affecting the Referral of Court Mediation ................................................................19
4. PART C- CONCLUDING REMARKS ....................................................................................................... 21
12. Accomplishment of Mediation in India.....................................................................................21
13. Suggestions to make Mediation more successful ......................................................................21
14. Conclusion .................................................................................................................................23

Yash Khanna 1 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

ACKNOWLEDGMENT

We are greatly thankful to our Professor Dr. Garima Goswami, Assistant Professor
of Law, Gujarat National Law University, for her continuous encouragement and
valuable guidance to complete our project. Our grateful thanks are due to her for
all the suggestions and guidance at every stage of this project. Her approach,
vision, hard work and guidance in research enabled us to learn a lot.

Yash Khanna 2 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

PART A – PRELIMINARIES

1. ACADEMIC INTEGRITY FORM

Student Name: Yash Khanna

Registration No. and Semester: 19B180

Subject: Family Law – I

Faculty Member: Dr. Garima Goswami

Faculty Member Assistant: Nil

Allocation Date:

Title Registration Date:

Reason for selection of title: Nil

Synopsis Filing Date: Nil

Final Version Filing Date: 20th November, 2021

Faculty’s pre-submission progress Nil

report, if necessary:

Extension of timeline requested Nil

and approved by faculty:

Viva-Voce/Group Discussion: Nil

Total duration: 2 Months

Faculty Member Signature

Academic Integrity Declaration

I warrant and represent that the attached report/research work/articles does not infringe upon
any copyright or other right(s), and that it does not contain infringing, libelous, obscene or other
unlawful matter and that I have given appropriate credit to the original author or source of
information and fully adhered to GNLU research guidelines. I am aware that the non-compliance

Yash Khanna 3 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

with the GNLU academic integrity directive may result into non-evaluation of the
academic/research work, attracting failure in the subject or course and any other measures as
decided by the concerned faculty members.

Yash
Student Signature & Date

20th November, 2021

*PDAIF is an integral part of the GNLU Exam Records and shall be considered and complied
with the GNLU Exam Rules. Student shall be responsible to ensure full compliance with the above
details.

Original: Exam Department

Copy: 1. Student 2. Faculty Member

Yash Khanna 4 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

2. OBJECTIVES, SCOPE AND LIMITATION OF THE STUDY

OBJECTIVES
The study aims to achieve the following objectives:
• To analyse the position of Mediation vis-à-vis Family Disputes
• To study the Development of Mediation in India
• To study the deficiencies in the mediation procedure in Family Disputes
• To study the impact of Family Law Mediation in India
• To assess the statutory nature of mediation referrals in India
• To provide suggestions to make mediation more efficient in Family Law disputes

LIMITATIONS
• It is self-reported and is limited by the fact that it is not independently verified.
• Also, due to the exceptional and special circumstances presented in light of the ongoing
pandemic, the data collected through this study was limited in a way that the researchers
did not had seamless access to people, organizations, data, or documents.

SCOPE
This study has been conducted to assess the present position in the domain of
Mediation of statutes vis-à-vis Family Law. The method of mediation has changed far and wide
with the influence of the Courts and legislative development. With the SCs ruling inseveral
crucial matters, this position of law changed massively and hence, there is a need to study how
the new position of law has changed from that of the past. In light of such considerations the
author has scoped this paper to deal with how the position of law has changed with the centre
of attention being Mediation and its present efficiency in Family Disputes. The authors have
then moved into assess and analyse the impact of the new developments and see whether it
would lead to positive results in the development of jurisprudence of Interpretation of Penal
Statutes.

Yash Khanna 5 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

3. ABSTRACT

A question which has perplexed the minds of commentators and jurists is that
of the question of mediation in the development of family disputes. The age old
craft of mediation has seen its birth in the use of political and economic disputes.
However, in recent times countries have found other utilities to the aspect of
mediation. One such utility is that of its use in family disputes. With this spirit
of law in mind, there have been developments trying to incorporate mediation
in the fabric of family dispute adjudication. However, this has never been solved
and therefore, to that end there lies a looming question of the lacuna in the
aspect of dealing with family disputes.

In the pursuit of answering this, this paper assess a few broad strokes of law,
hoping to give us an answer to this legal puzzle. The paper is divided into two
parts – A & B. Part A studies the conceptual scope of mediation and the
problems which this paper seeks to solve in detail. The Paper then studies the
development of mediation through the courts of law and legislative
development. The Studies then seem to focus on the aspects of the procedure
of mediation and how it has now become a duty of the Court to constantly ask
the question of referrals to mediation based on its looming obligation under
Section 9 of the Family Courts Act. In Part B, the author seeks to analysis the
concept of mediation in Family law disputes to bring out the aspect of its
accomplishments, if any, in India and further based on the content assessment,
try to provide conclusions, suggestions which will make the mediation process
more fruitful.

Yash Khanna 6 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

4. METHODOLOGY
The study which has been undertaken by the author herein has been pure doctrinal research which
was conducted through a cumulative assessment of various sources of law. The author has worked
for the past year in a Law Chamber undertaking Family Law Dispute Adjudication, and has
therefore sought inputs in work from several stakeholders in the legal practice at Bengaluru.
The Methodology used to conduct this study was to gain conceptual insight into the aspects of
mediation in family law through case law, The author then resorted to the study of section 9 of
the family courts act by studying the legislative development behind it. To further the aegis of the
paper, a study was undertaken on the practice of mediation, in furtherance of which the author
attended two mediation sessions in a Guardian & Wards Case and a Divorce Petition. In Order to
further supplement the research undertaken, case laws were relied upon and a chronological study
was undertaken to progress with the development and evolution of mediation.

5. BIBLIOGRAPHY
ACADEMIC MATERIAL
1. L Mulcahy, ‘Can leopards change their spots? An evaluation of the role of lawyers in
medical negligence mediation’ (2001) International Journal of the Legal Profession
8(3):203–224.
2. Sarah Childs, ‘The lawyer as translator, representation as text: towards an ethnography of
legal discourse (1992) Cornell Law Review 77(6):1298–1387.
3. Anil Xavier (2005) Administrative Justice and ADR: The Australian experience, DCA
Research Series 8/05, London, section 5.3, pp 55–57. at p. 56.
4. Madabhushi Sridhar, Alternative Dispute Resolution 79 Lexis Nexis 2005.
5. V. Hemalatha Devi, Rural Women-Legal Awareness, Supreme Court Journal - 1990, Vol-
3.
6. Vijendra kumar, Expending Horizons of Divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, A
L T 2013 (5) 21-29.
7. V Bondy and M Sunkin (2009) The Dynamics of Judicial Review Litigation: The resolution
of public law challenges before final hearing, Public Law Project, London.
8. Henry J. Brown and Arthur L. Mariot, 'ADR Principles and Practice' 127 (1997, second
Ed. Sweet and Maxwell)

Yash Khanna 7 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

9. Stephen B. Goldberg, Frank E.A. Sander and Nancy H. Rogers , 'Debate Resolution
Negotiation, Mediation and other cycles' (1999, third Ed. Aspine Law and Business,
Gaithesburg and New York)
10. Prof. Kusum, 1 Family Law Lectures Family Law 398 (third edition, Lexis Nexis)
11. Sir Anthony Clarke (2008) ‘Alternative dispute resolution: an English viewpoint’, paper
presented at the Civil Mediation Council’s national conference on the future of civil
mediation
12. T Buck (2005) Administrative Justice and ADR: The Australian experience, DCA Research
Series 8/05, London, section 5.3, pp 55–57.
13. C Menkel-Meadow (2003) Dispute Processing and Conflict Resolution: Theory, practice
and policy, Ashgate, Aldershot and Burlington, Dartmouth.
14. A.M. Bhattacharjee, Hindu Law and the Constitution, 2nd ed., Eastern Law House, 2005.
15. Family Law I & II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, Halsbury’s Law’s of India, Vol. 10, 26 & 28
LexisNexis Butterworth Publications.
16. Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act - Illegitimate Children, 5 Journal of the Indian Law
Institute 424 (1963).
17. Regulating Marriage and Divorce- Need for a Comprehensive legislation, 2006 JILI at 106-
111.

REPORTS
1. Law Commission of India, 45th Report, 1995.
2. Law Commission of Inida, 59th Report 1998.

CASE-LAW
1. Danial Latifi and another v. Union of India (2001) 7 SCC 740
2. Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs Shah Bano Begum And Ors, 1985 SCR (3) 844
3. Lata Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2006 (6) SCALE 583
4. Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal, (2010) 10 SCC 469

Yash Khanna 8 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

5. Seema v. Ashwani Kumar, AIR 2006 S.C 1158

6. Neeraja Saraph v Jayant Saraph (1994) 6 SCC 46
7. Law Commission of Inida, 59th Report 1998.
8. Dhanwanti Joshi v Madhav Unde (1998) 1 SCC 11
9. K. Srinivas Rao v. D. A. Deepa, AIR 2008 SC 1278
10. Masroor Ahmed v. Delhi (NCT) 2008 (103) DRJ 137 (Del.)
11. Padmja Sharma v. Ratan Lal Sharma, AIR 2000 SC 1398
12. K. Srinivas Rao v. D. A. Deepa, AIR 2008 SC 1278
13. M.M. Malhotra v UOI, AIR 2006 SC 402

Yash Khanna 9 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

PART B – THE ASSESSMENT

6. STATEMENT OF THE PROBLEM

Many of Indian Courts are brimming with requests, deferments, amendments, and cross requests;
on a normal a common case takes anything from around 5 to 8 years for its last removal and causes
are not needing when cases have waited in courts for 15 to 20 years. 1 The quantity of cases has
expanded significantly and presently it has reached to a degree of weight for the Indian Judiciary.2
While situations where gatherings resort to mediation require around 3-4 years to be settled.

6.1. Rocky roots to the inception of mediation

In the last part of the 1970s, separate from mediation has been an interdisciplinary field. It began
as a quest for an option to the exorbitant, intricacies, and frequently genuinely savage lawful course
of securing a disintegration of marriage through the conventional two-lawyer ill-disposed
methodology.3 The hypothesis, practice, and methods utilized in family and separation
intervention developed from such assorted fields as work mediation, advising, arrangement, law,
humanities, social brain research, and schooling. Attributable to these measurements and
intricacies and dangers, mediation in the province of New York saw a triumph pace of just 54%
inside a half year of reference to intervention, the remainder of the cases were settled through
litigation.4

In India, Academy of Family Mediators was established in 1981 by an interdisciplinary gathering

of arbiters, including psychological wellness experts, attorneys, scholastics, and financial specialists,
to work with the development of this early stage calling. Family middle people give complete
separation mediation comprising of division of property and obligation, foundation of kid and
spousal help, and advancement of a nurturing plan and authority course of action. 5 The parts of

1 L Mulcahy, ‘Can leopards change their spots? An evaluation of the role of lawyers in medical negligence mediation’
(2001) International Journal of the Legal Profession 8(3):203–224.
2 Ibid.
3 Sarah Childs, ‘The lawyer as translator, representation as text: towards an ethnography of legal discourse (1992)
Cornell Law Review 77(6):1298–1387.
4 Ibid.
5 Anil Xavier (2005) Administrative Justice and ADR: The Australian experience, DCA Research Series 8/05, London,
section 5.3, pp 55–57. at p. 56.

Yash Khanna 10 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

intervention which were utilized here, were of critical significance as they expanded the odds of
gatherings to trust mediation and further hotel to a more pacific settlement of their question.

6.2. Hurdles in Mediation

Mediation is the compelling elective cure since it centers around the non-coercive and consensual
cycle.6 While institutional mediation is of significance, it was noticed that a larger part of the
gatherings to a family question resort to non-institutional intervention. The review uncovered that
the greatest dread of such gatherings was the social disgrace encompassing the course of
intervention.

The stage at which reference of a few marital debates to mediation focuses was done, was of prime
significance.7 In this way, at the most punctual stage for example at the point when the debate is
taken up by the Family Court or by the court of first occasion for hearing, it should be alluded to
mediation focuses as it bragged a higher achievement rate that when the intervention was alluded
to at a later stage.8

The Law Commission of India 45th Report9 and 59th Report10 LCI had accentuated that while
managing debates concerning the family, the Court should embrace a methodology fundamentally
not quite the same as that took on in standard common procedures and that it should put forth
sensible attempts at settlement before the initiation of the preliminary. The reports demonstrated
that the current strategy wherein courts resort to mediation is one which would prompt
inconvenient impacts and would

6.3. Factors making mediation Inefficient

Unfortunately, at the hour of recording of the protest the ramifications and outcomes are not
appropriately imagined by the complainant that such objection can prompt unconquerable

6 Madabhushi Sridhar, Alternative Dispute Resolution 79 Lexis Nexis 2005.

7 V. Hemalatha Devi, Rural Women-Legal Awareness, Supreme Court Journal - 1990, Vol-3.
8 Ibid.
9 Law Commission of India, 45th Report, 1995.
10 Law Commission of Inida, 59th Report 1998.

Yash Khanna 11 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

badgering, anguish and agony to the complainant, blamed and his nearby relations, which
frequently prompts the decreased productivity of mediation.11

There are numerous different reasons which need not be referenced here for not empowering
marital prosecution so the gatherings might consider over their defaults and end their questions
agreeably by common arrangement as opposed to battling it out in a Court of law where it requires
a long time to finish up and in that cycle the gatherings lose their "young" days in pursuing their
"cases" in various Courts,12 wherein it was noticed that segment factors assume a part in choosing
the accomplishment of the Mediation. Typically more youthful families thought that it is more
straightforward to feel free to have a fruitful intervention than the more seasoned families. 13

7. INTRODUCTION
7.1. Concept of Mediation
In their commended book 'ADR Principles and Practice' by Henry J. Brown and Arthur L. Mariot
(1997, second Ed. Sweet and Maxwell, Lord on Chapter 7, p 127), 14 the creators say that
'intervention' is a facilitative cycle wherein "questioning gatherings draw in the help of an unbiased
outsider, the go between, who assists them with attempting to show up at a concurred goal of their
debate. The go between has no power to settle on any choices that are restricting on them, yet
utilizes specific strategies, procedures and abilities to assist them with arranging a concurred goal
of their question without arbitration."15

In one more driving book on 'Debate Resolution Negotiation, Mediation and other cycles' by
Stephen B. Goldberg, Frank E.A. Sander and Nancy H. Rogers (1999, third Ed. Aspine Law and
Business, Gaithesburg and New York)(Ch. 3, p. 123), it is expressed as follows:

11 Vijendra kumar, Expending Horizons of Divorce under the Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, A L T 2013 (5) 21-29.
12 V Bondy and M Sunkin (2009) The Dynamics of Judicial Review Litigation: The resolution of public law challenges
before fi nal hearing, Public Law Project, London.
13 Ibid.
14 Henry J. Brown and Arthur L. Mariot, 'ADR Principles and Practice' 127 (1997, second Ed. Sweet and Maxwell)
15 Ibid.

Yash Khanna 12 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

"Intervention is exchange completed with the help of an outsider. The go between, as opposed to
the authority or judge, has no ability to force a result on questioning gatherings.16

7.2. Mediation and Family Law

Intervention has ended up being a decent choice with regards to family law questions. The debates
which emerge in a family are extremely essential and they should be dealt with persistence and
furthermore arrive at an answer where the two players can benefit.17 It additionally settles the
questions quicker than it occurs in court.18

In our general public, in the prior occasions, the pattern was to resolve the debates among relatives
by sitting together and examining it. At town level, the questions were ordinarily additionally
alluded to the panchayats where choice was taken subsequent to hearing both the sides. 19 The
intervention cycle likewise assumes a similar part where individuals from an in family a conflict
can attempt to settle their complaints by talking about it as opposed to going to a court. In family
relations, harmony and amicability between the individuals from the family is of central
significance.20

The family go between attempts to help individuals arrive at a settlement to which both the
gatherings concur, by empowering correspondence. The family law framework energizes
mediation which should be possible in different ways like utilizing a relative or companion to help,
casual comprehensive gathering or utilizing an extraordinary intervention process covered under
Australian Legislation The Family Law Act, 1975 known as Family Dispute Resolution in which
an expert assists individuals with settling their question and he isn't connected straightforwardly
to any of the gatherings.21

16 Stephen B. Goldberg, Frank E.A. Sander and Nancy H. Rogers , 'Debate Resolution Negotiation, Mediation and
other cycles' (1999, third Ed. Aspine Law and Business, Gaithesburg and New York)
17 Prof. Kusum, 1 Family Law Lectures Family Law 398 (third edition, Lexis Nexis)
18 Ibid.
19 Sir Anthony Clarke (2008) ‘Alternative dispute resolution: an English viewpoint’, paper presented at the Civil
Mediation Council’s national conference on the future of civil mediation
20 T Buck (2005) Administrative Justice and ADR: The Australian experience, DCA Research Series 8/05, London,
section 5.3, pp 55–57.
21 C Menkel-Meadow (2003) Dispute Processing and Confl ict Resolution: Theory, practice and policy, Ashgate,
Aldershot and Burlington, Dartmouth.

Yash Khanna 13 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

There are references of intervention/mollification in family debate goal which are available in
Family Courts Act, 1984,22 Civil Procedure Code, Hindu Marriage Act and the Legal Services
Authorities Act, 1987 that gives an uncommon status to Lok Adalats as it has been extremely
compelling in interceding family questions.23

8. DEVELOPMENT OF MEDIATION IN FAMILY LAW

8.1. Legislative Development

Enactments and Legislative arrangements identified with settlement of wedding question are
Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Special Marriage Act, 1954, Family Court Act, 1984, Civil Procedure
Code, 1908, Legal Service Authority Act, 1987. The idea of goal of question through intervention,
mediation, mollification and arrangement was organized by Legal Services Authority Act. The said
Act24 accommodates holding Lok Adalats where questions are forthcoming in official courtrooms

The fundamental object of the Act to accommodate the foundation of Family Courts so as to
advance assuagement in and secure expedient settlement of debates identifying with marriage and
family asserts and for the issues there with.

However the Family Courts Act, 1984 was conceptualized inside a shortsighted reason of fast
settlement or compromise, as of now in metropolitan urban communities, the suit has become
amazingly challenged and includes high financial stakes. Wedding suit in metropolitan urban areas
is turning out to be incredibly intricate and stretches out a long ways past the reason of fast
settlement or reconciliation41. Wedding debates especially those identifying with guardianship of
kid, support, and so on are pre famously fit for intervention.25 Section 94 of the Family Courts
Act charges upon the Family Court to put forth attempts to resolve the wedding debates and in
these endeavors, Family Courts are helped by Counselors.26 Regardless of whether the Counselors

22 Danial Latifi and another v. Union of India (2001) 7 SCC 740

23 Mohd. Ahmed Khan vs Shah Bano Begum And Ors, 1985 SCR (3) 844
24 Lata Singh v. State of Uttar Pradesh, 2006 (6) SCALE 583
25 Velusamy v. D. Patchaiammal, (2010) 10 SCC 469
26 Ibid.

Yash Khanna 14 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

fizzle in their endeavors, the Family Courts should guide the gatherings to intervention focuses,
where prepared middle people are selected to intercede between the gatherings.27

8.2. Development of Family Law Mediation in Courts

The Courts in India are currently typically taking the view that attempt ought to be taken to
advance appeasement and secure rapid settlement of debates identifying with marriage and family
undertakings,28 for example, wedding questions between the couple or/and between the spouse
and her parents in law.29 India being an immense nation normally has enormous number of wedded
people coming about into big quantities of marital questions because of contrasts in personality,
ways of life, sentiments, contemplations and so forth between such couples, because of which
larger part is going to the Court to get redressal.30

In its 59th report, the Law Commission of India had accentuated that while managing questions
concerning the family, the Court should take on a methodology profoundly unique in relation to
that embraced in conventional common procedures and that it should put forth sensible attempts
at settlement before the initiation of the preliminary.31 Further it is additionally the established
order for expedient removal of such questions and to give fast equity to the defendants. Yet,
Courts are now over troubled because of pendency of huge number of cases due to which it
becomes hard for rapid removal of marital questions alone.32

At the point when wedding questions were settled genially, as held by the Apex Court it isn't in
light of a legitimate concern for equity to proceed with the arraignment. The testimony recorded
by the principal respondent spouse builds up that in this manner because of the mediation of
middle people whole marital questions were settled genially between the couple and ensuing to the
settlement, she has no complaint against the solicitor and has no protest for subduing the
procedures.33 In such conditions, it isn't in light of a legitimate concern for equity to remain on
details and proceed with the indictment

27 Ibid.
28 Seema v. Ashwani Kumar, AIR 2006 S.C 1158
29 Ibid.
30 Neeraja Saraph v Jayant Saraph (1994) 6 SCC 46
31 Law Commission of Inida, 59th Report 1998.
32 Ibid.
33 Dhanwanti Joshi v Madhav Unde (1998) 1 SCC 11

Yash Khanna 15 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

In K. Srinivas Rao v. D. A. Deepa34 the Apex Court gave headings to all courts managing wedding
questions to resolve all marital debates at initial case through the course of Mediation. The
Supreme Court guided Family Courts and Criminal courts to allude gatherings to Mediation
Centers to resolve debates through settlement under mediation. Mediation is an elective course of
goal of debates via prepared arbiters. The Supreme Court of India coordinated Family Courts
taking into account Section 93 to put forth all potential attempts to resolve wedding questions
particularly comparable to support, youngster authority and so on through the course of mediation
and to allude gatherings to intervention centres with the assent of gatherings.35 The peak court saw
that the family courts should try settlement of questions through the course of mediation even
after the recording of disappointment reports by advocates.36

Hindu Marriage Act, 1955, Section 23(2) and (3) gives "Prior to continuing to allow any alleviation
under this Act, it will be the obligation of the Court, in the primary occasion, for each situation
where it is feasible to do as such reliably with the nature and conditions of the case, to make each
attempt to achieve compromise between the gatherings." In perspective on this Section 44 of law,
it is the obligation of the preliminary Court to make each try to achieve compromise between the
gatherings.

9. PROCEDURE OF MEDIATION

Steps followed during the intervention cycle in a family law question37

There are sure advances which are involved with regards to the intervention cycle in a family law
question. They are as per the following:

• Preparation
Before the mediation interaction starts, the arbiter can meet the gatherings and guide them in
regards to the means associated with the intervention cycle. He additionally explains the questions

34 K. Srinivas Rao v. D. A. Deepa, AIR 2008 SC 1278

35 Ibid.
36 Ibid.
37 Masroor Ahmed v. Delhi (NCT) 2008 (103) DRJ 137 (Del.)

Yash Khanna 16 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

and answers any connected inquiries. This discussion isn't important to be held up close and
personal and can be hung on the telephone as well.

• Introduction
As a matter of first importance, there would be opening articulations given by the go between and
he will explain his job as a middle person. The go between will inquire as to whether both the
gatherings consent to the cycle or not? On the off chance that the gatherings concur the mediation
cycle occurs as referenced in the means. In the event that the gatherings won't allude the matter
for mediation they are forced some expense sanctions by the Court for overlooking the interaction.

• Statement of the issue

The go between allows the gatherings an opportunity to introduce their issues as their initial
assertion. The justification behind this is that before the finish of these assertions both the
gatherings and the go between ought to have a superior comprehension of the circumstance.

• Joint conversation
The go between will talk about the issues of both the gatherings and would likewise pose significant
inquiries to them to gain extra data. He would likewise have the option to sort out through this
conversation what issues ought to be settled first.

• Private conversation
After the joint conversation of the issues, each party is offered a chance to examine in private their
interests with the middle person and furthermore assuming they need with their legal counselors.
It is a significant advance which assists the gatherings with being ready for exchange.

• Negotiation
The gatherings haggle until they arrive at a settlement which is adequate to the two sides. The
middle person gives an answer which saves the interests of the two sides. If arrangement bombs
the matter is, alluded to the Court.

• Agreement
At the point when the particulars of the understanding are concluded the gatherings are re-
collected. The middle person would orally affirm the details of the settlement then they would be
composed and endorsed by the gatherings. The settlement has a limiting impact and is enforceable

Yash Khanna 17 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

in a courtroom. The go between gives an end explanation by saying thanks to the gatherings for
their investment and participation during the whole interaction.

10. MEDIATION: A DUTY OF COURTS

10.1. Section 9 Obligations

Segment 9 of the Family Court Act, 1984 states the obligation of the Family Court to put forth
attempts for a settlement. - 38
• In each suit or continuing, attempt will be made by the Family Court in the main occasion,
where it is feasible to do as such predictable with the nature and conditions of the case, to help
and convince the gatherings in showing up at a settlement in regard of the topic of the suit or
continuing and for this reason a Family Court may, likely to any principles made by the High Court,
follow such system as it might consider fit.

• If in any suit or continuing, at any stage, it appears to the Family Court that there is a
sensible chance of a settlement between the gatherings, the Family Court might dismiss the
procedures for such period as it believes fit to empower endeavors to be made to impact such a
settlement.

• The power presented by sub-segment (2) will be notwithstanding, and not in criticism of
some other force of the Family Court to defer the procedures.

10.2. Nature of Referrals to Mediation

Section 9 of the Family Court Act, makes is it obligatory to resolve a wedding question comparable
to support, youngster care, divorces, and so forth, through the course of intervention. It likewise
states to allude the gatherings to visit an mediation community with their assent. The family court
can take the assistance of the instructors if necessary for settling questions. Intervention focuses
should give a period limit for the consummation of the contention question to stay away from
further or pointless postponement regarding the present situation.

38 Padmja Sharma v. Ratan Lal Sharma, AIR 2000 SC 1398

Yash Khanna 18 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

On account of K. Srinivas Rao v. D.A.Deepa,39 the court held that intervention is an

unquestionable requirement before a separation. At the point when any case happens under
Section 489A of IPC, the pinnacle court coordinates the criminal courts not to manage this
grumbling except if the matter is managed by the mediation communities yet in couple of situations
where the pitilessness adds up to be an extremely thorough and a hazardous one, the criminal
courts can take up the case without alluding it to the contemplation places. 40 Further, it has been
held that all the intervention places should set up their very own suit facilities so the wedding
questions can be settled under this without going to court.41

10.3. Binding Power of the Mediation Agreements

A benefit for suit is the execution of the choice of judge. This impulse isn't there in an
understanding of mediation. Especially in the family law region, a considerable lot of the 'washouts'
in a Family Court war disagree with court judgment. Under the Family Law Act 1975 the low
degree of consistence with upkeep orders is all around archived albeit this has been alleviated to
some extent by the Child Support Act 1988.42 Nonetheless, it is for the most part recognized
among scholars on ADR that understanding with intervention arrangements is high, much of the
time higher than for practically identical court forced judgment which are speculatively
enforceable.43 Furthermore, it is feasible to give an mediation understanding satisfied by contract.
Practically speaking, whenever settlement has been reached by the disputants, heads of
arrangement are normally drawn up at the intervention by the go between or the actual gatherings;
the disputants will typically then have the terms checked by their specialists prior to marking. When
concurred in legally binding structure, a culpable party can be sued for break of agreement.

11. ELEMENTS AFFECTING THE REFERRAL OF COURT MEDIATION

Following component should be investigated to go for the course of mediation:

39 K. Srinivas Rao v. D. A. Deepa, AIR 2008 SC 1278

40 Ibid.
41 A.M. Bhattacharjee, Hindu Law and the Constitution, 2nd ed., Eastern Law House, 2005.
42 Family Law I & II, Poonam Pradhan Saxena, Halsbury’s Law’s of India, Vol. 10, 26 & 28 LexisNexis Butterworth
Publications.
43 Ibid.

Yash Khanna 19 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

(a) Whether the request for the Court is required? Where the court request is required, it isn't
fitting to allude the make a difference to intervention.

(b) Whether there is any legal time of restriction to get the law under way? If the law gives that
a specific suit will be recorded inside a particular time, the arbiter can't expand the time of
restriction. Time banished application or suits are not engaged capable either by the arbiter
or even by the gatherings.

(c) Whether the suit was started or safeguarded for key explanation? (d) Whether arranged
settlement is conceivable or not?

(d) Whether there was any connection between the gatherings that has effectively been molded
or separated for example a couple, accomplices, investors, specialist, and patient and so
forth?

(e) Whether there is any charge or counter claim against one another? It isn't unexpected
experience that "where the issues are crude and later, gatherings may not be prepared to
go into dealings to determine them. Where gatherings need to find an answer rapidly and
financially, intervention should be an essential choice".

Yash Khanna 20 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

PART C- CONCLUDING REMARKS

12. ACCOMPLISHMENT OF MEDIATION IN INDIA

Mediation is a deliberately coordinated debate goal process where an impartial outsider assists
these clashing gatherings with arriving at a genial determination in a mutually beneficial
arrangement by which the there are different strategies and exchange estimates used to turn down
the contention and further question goal. Notwithstanding, even though these frameworks are as
yet existing in many pieces of provincial India, individuals of the country, particularly the ones that
were all the while depending on these overall sets of laws for equity, have lost their confidence in
them. This is so because these Panchayats are inclined to impact from the compelling and
influential individuals dwelling here. These compelling individuals regularly utilize these
frameworks to distribute equity relying upon their own impulses and likes and furthermore
practicing their predisposition/impact in the choices of the Panchayats. 44 This has assumed an
immensely bad part in the diminishing of the ubiquity of the Panchayat frameworks. During the
time spent tending to these worries, the Indian government is putting forth perpetual attempts to
restore these native equity conveyance strategies by apportioning assets and attempting to improve
rules for their revitalized and fair functioning.45

13. SUGGESTIONS TO MAKE MEDIATION MORE SUCCESSFUL

The significant undertaking or focus for the accomplishment of intervention local area is to draft
or cut out its future undertakings to be called also arranged and enduring thus that it support being
totally ready for the challenges to survive and subsequently accomplish the peak of sky. 46 Following
are not many ideas to make our stroll with discretion smoother and keep away from hardships to
a bigger degree which probably won't bring triumph yet definitely will further develop chances of
something similar.

44 Section 16 of the Hindu Marriage Act - Illegitimate Children, 5 Journal of the Indian Law Institute 424 (1963).
45 Regulating Marriage and Divorce- Need for a Comprehensive legislation, 2006 JILI at 106-111.
46 M.M. Malhotra v UOI, AIR 2006 SC 402

Yash Khanna 21 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

• Reciprocate settlement figures preceding the cycle. This will assist you with bettering
comprehend the viability and meaning of the cycle and this will assist us with getting ready well
before for the outcome or end that may come later and will likewise cause the individual to catch
concerning the odds of coming out on top. .

• Documents to be presented sufficiently before the intervention cycle. The following system to
improve things and advantageous cycle, one should bring every one of the records relating to the
case ahead of time and guarantee that both the sides know about the equivalent so that further
there is no difficulty in setting up one’s own conflict. This would likewise guarantee that later the
other party doesn't think of some proof that would extricate my case out of nowhere and would
stay away from any postponements on our part.

• All the vital gatherings be available. It is prompted that every one of the gatherings fundamental
for the smooth working of the interaction ought to be available to stay away from any further
disparities and mis-correspondence from both the sides and to make the cycle as quick as could
be expected. It is necessitated that people party to suit, their family members and every other
individual who is an essential party to the suit. Gatherings present in the procedures are one who
has got assent from both the gatherings to understanding. If a party important to the suit isn't
there or not present, then, at that point, a notification of 3 days will be given to the contrary party
so the intervention cycle isn't halted by the said vanishing of the party and further it very well may
be rescheduled, whenever required. All gatherings going to should have full settlement authority.

• Documents vital for the interaction. While it isn't required for the gatherings to submit position
papers, briefs, or reports to the middle person ahead of the mediation meeting, you are
unquestionably allowed to do as such somewhere around seven days ahead of the intervention
meeting. If you decide not to do as such, yet have reports that will be of help to the go between
or to guide, you are urged to bring an adequate number of duplicates of such records to the
intervention.

• Forward the case for repayment. It is consistently prudent to get every one of the terms and
claims clear preceding the procedure which speeds up the cycle and which likewise keeps the
gatherings from having a1nother portrayal for the equivalent while the interaction is continuing.

Yash Khanna 22 Semester - V

Family Law – I A Tryst of Mediation and Family Disputes

• Verdict history. It is regularly desirable over know the decision history in the scene where case is
forthcoming and to the point you can get data from legal advisors in that area or circuit, it very
well might be helpful in the assessment of the case.

14. CONCLUSION

Mediation which is an extremely ongoing interaction known to Indian question goal organization
and the average folks, accordingly it need not appear basically with the enactment made, rather it
requires an adjustment of insight and an endeavor to make it being used. Likewise, what is
implanted in the Indian culture is social delineation as far as economy, actual power, and cultural
power and which further difficulties the gatherings to determine the contention on equivalent
balance which is a quintessence of the assertion arrangement. In this manner these distinctions
shift from one case to another, and in couple of debates its exceptionally difficult to haggle based
on equivalent conditions which makes the suit or Court’s visit unavoidable. Along these lines
toward the finish of the paper what we close is that the family questions are something which
might emerge in any family which is the mainstay of any general public, thusly it is fitting to
determine one’s debate in a time-compelling and financially savvy way which would additionally
add to an individual’s development, society development and development of a country in entirety

Yash Khanna 23 Semester - V