Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Authors:
Robert D Baker, MD, PhD
Susan S Baker, MD, PhD
Jessica Briggs, RD
Georgina Bojczuk, RD, CSP
Section Editor:
Kathleen J Motil, MD, PhD
Deputy Editor:
Alison G Hoppin, MD
All topics are updated as new evidence becomes available and our peer review process
is complete.
Literature review current through: May 2019. | This topic last updated: Dec 16, 2018.
●Abnormal or imbalanced nutrients – The effect of nutrients not ordinarily found in the
systemic circulation or, if present, in differing amounts or ratios.
Knowledge of which nutrients should be included or omitted in PN, and the optimal
nutrient ratios, is based largely on trial and error. Since PN is most frequently used in
severely ill and/or malnourished patients, it is not easy to distinguish among the effects
of PN, the underlying disease, and malnutrition. As an example, it is well known that
malnutrition results in profound changes in the GI tract, with thinning of the mucosa,
blunting of villi, and increased translocation. From animal studies, we know that many
of these same changes are seen in parenterally fed animals that are nutritionally replete,
indicating that some of these effects are due to under-use of the GI tract, rather than
direct effects of the PN itself [3].
One of the most profound effects of not using the GI tract is that infants do not learn
how to eat. Infants learn coordinated chewing and swallowing foods of different
textures and tastes during certain "critical periods" of their development [4]. Infants
who are not fed by mouth during these critical periods may fail to develop normal
interest in food and the ability to eat. Moreover, their parents may fail to develop
normal responses to the infant's cues for feeding. It may take years to overcome the oral
hypersensitivity and food aversion that results from a lack of feeding experience during
the critical periods. This often leads to a prolonged transition from parenteral feeding to
full oral feeds, which can be frustrating to parents and caregivers.
When the enteral route is bypassed, so are the physiologic consequences of eating. The
ingestion of food leads to a surge of hormones, neurotransmitters, and enzymes. These
mediators result in coordinated GI motility. Little is known about the alterations in GI
motility that are associated with PN. Animal data suggest that motility of the stomach,
duodenum, and gallbladder is reduced during PN. The decrease in gallbladder motility
may in part explain the increase in gallstones that is associated with PN. Interestingly,
PN does not affect motility in the jejunum in dogs [5].
PN is indicated for infants and children who are unable to be fed enterally if nutritional
support is expected to be required for seven days or more. PN should not be used for
short periods of time, because the risks can outweigh benefits [9]. The appropriate time
for initiating PN depends on individual patient characteristics, including age, nutritional
status, underlying disease process, and expectations for future nutritional needs.
PN is typically initiated earlier for neonates and premature infants. Premature and term
infants have limited nutritional reserves and are able to tolerate starvation or
semistarvation for only one to three days; if it is clear that the infant will not tolerate
enteral feeds, then PN usually should be initiated within the first two days of life.
However, the optimal timing of PN initiation remains unclear. As an example, early
versus late initiation of PN was evaluated in a randomized trial in critically ill, term
neonates admitted to the intensive care unit (ICU) [12]. The late initiation group had
fewer infections and a greater likelihood of live discharge from the ICU but also a
significant increase in episodes of hypoglycemia. Thus, the relative benefits and risks of
early versus late initiation of PN has not been established for this group of patients.
When caution should be used — PN, whether provided peripherally or centrally, should
only be used in patients who are hemodynamically stable and are able to tolerate the
necessary fluid. PN should be used with particular caution for children with electrolyte
imbalance, renal or hepatic compromise, metabolic acidosis, or alkalosis. Acid-base and
electrolyte abnormalities should be corrected prior to starting PN, or corrected by
infusions through a separate intravenous line. PN should not be used to correct
metabolic imbalances.
Children and adolescents undergoing treatment for cancers may or may not be
malnourished. Their nutritional status plays an important role in deciding on the
nutritional support necessary. PN is no more effective than enteral nutrition in children
undergoing chemotherapy, as suggested by a meta-analysis [13]. No meta-analysis is
available for malnourished children undergoing treatment, but several reviews in adults
raise concerns about the use of PN in patients undergoing chemotherapy, and the
American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) advises against its use [2]. No studies
have identified individual nutrients that have a positive effect on outcomes. These
studies reinforce the concept that PN should only be used when other methods of
nutrition support are not possible or have failed. If PN is deemed necessary in children
and adolescents undergoing treatment for cancer, then general principles should be
followed for the initiation and maintenance of PN in malnourished and non-
malnourished patients, as outlined below.
The osmolarity of a PN solution can be determined with the following equation [16]:
Given this osmolarity restriction, it is usually impossible to supply all of the required
nutrients with peripheral PN, and central venous access will be required to meet the
child's full nutritional needs. Therefore, if an infant or child is likely to need parenteral
nutritional support for more than two weeks, a central venous catheter should be placed
to meet the nutrition needs of the patient.
A variety of catheters are used for PN which differ in how they are inserted, how they
are fixed in place, and where they terminate. These characteristics determine for what
purposes and for how long they can be used. For all catheters that are intended to end
centrally, imaging is required to confirm tip position. The main types of catheters and
their characteristics are:
●Percutaneous nontunneled central catheters – These catheters are usually inserted via
the subclavian, jugular, or femoral veins. This type of catheter is most appropriate for
short-term PN of one to two weeks. These catheters are easily removed and can be
replaced over a guide wire; however, they are associated with a high infection rate
especially those placed via the femoral vein.
●Tunneled cuffed central catheters – These catheters are placed surgically. The catheter
is tunneled subcutaneously before it enters the vein, commonly the jugular or cephalic
veins. This type of catheter is appropriate for long-term PN including home PN. It has a
lower infection rate than the nontunneled catheters. The major drawback of this type of
catheter is that a surgical procedure is required both for placement and for removal.
●Peripherally inserted central catheters (PICC) – These can be placed via any peripheral
vein but are typically placed via the antecubital vein. PICC lines are appropriate for
medium-term use, up to several months. With special care they can be used for home
PN. The major advantage of PICC lines is the ease with which they can be inserted.
PICC placement can occur anywhere in a hospital, from emergency room to the
patient's bedside with low risk. Because of errors in estimates of insertion length, it is
particularly important to confirm central positioning of a PICC line.
●Implanted ports – These are used only for long-term therapies including PN. They may
be of benefit when adequacy of catheter care is in question or when body image is
important. It also may be helpful if intermittent PN is planned. The subcutaneous port is
accessed via a percutaneous needle that can remain in place for hours or up to a week.
When not being used, the needle is removed, leaving nothing externally visible.
Implanted ports have a low rate of infection, but if an infection does develop, it is
difficult to clear, and treatment may require removal of the port. Placement and removal
of an implanted port require surgical or interventional radiology procedures.
Dietary history — The techniques for obtaining a dietary history are discussed in a
separate topic review (see "Dietary history and recommended dietary intake in
children"). Patients who require PN usually have a very limited diet, or have
experienced a catastrophic event that precludes or limits use of the gastrointestinal (GI)
route. As a result, the dietary history is abbreviated and generally limited to medical
foods (eg, formula feeds).
Anthropometrics — The most important components of a nutritional assessment are
accurate measurements of weight and length or height. For infants 0 to 24 months, these
are used to calculate weight for length, and for children 24 months and older, they are
used to calculate body mass index (BMI). These data are plotted on the appropriate
growth curves to determine percentiles and to compare with previous measurements,
when available. These data can also be used to calculate Z-scores, which are valuable
because they eliminate age as a variable and allow comparisons at the extremes of
ranges.
The recommended growth curves and calculators for BMI and Z-scores are presented in
a separate topic review. (See "Measurement of growth in children", section on
'Recommended growth charts'.)
BMI is a good index of adiposity in most patients. In patients with edema or with
unusual ratios of lean tissue to fat, measurements of mid upper arm circumference and
skinfold thickness can be used to assess body composition. These measurements are
inexpensive and easily performed but have limited precision. (See "Measurement of
body composition in children".)
Overweight and obese children can have macro- and micronutrient deficiencies that are
masked by their over-nourished appearance. Overweight or obese patients are at risk for
hepatobiliary disease, respiratory distress, renal impairment, hyperglycemia,
hyperinsulinemia, and infection. These risks should be considered in the nutritional
planning for children with obesity. (See "Overview of enteral nutrition in infants and
children", section on 'Adjustments for children with obesity'.)
Many hospitals and institutions have standard PN formulas available. These formulas
will often meet some needs of pediatric patients and can be used as starter formulas for
PN until an individualized prescription can be prepared. However, standard formulas
should not replace the individualized approach, which is detailed below.
Initiation and monitoring — Prior to initiating PN, goals for fluids, energy, protein,
carbohydrate, fat, electrolyte, mineral, and trace elements are set based on the patient's
individual needs. It is important to determine whether PN is to be used for maintenance,
normal growth, or nutritional repletion and catch-up growth. Anthropometric and
laboratory measures must be obtained at baseline, and repeated periodically after PN
treatment is begun to monitor the patient and adjust the PN prescription as needed (table
4).
Although the fluid and electrolyte content of PN can be customized to the individual
patient, PN should not be used as the sole fluid source in metabolically unstable
patients, nor should it be used to correct electrolyte abnormalities. Instead, any
significant fluid and electrolyte disturbance should be corrected with separate
intravenous fluids administered via separate venous access. If hypophosphatemia is
present, it should be corrected before PN is initiated because the dextrose in the PN
solution will cause an intracellular shift of phosphorus that will further decrease the
serum phosphorus level. Similarly, children with malnutrition typically require
phosphorus and calcium repletion in quantities that cannot be accommodated in a single
PN solution, so additional venous access usually is required. (See "Poor weight gain in
children younger than two years: Management", section on 'Nutritional recovery
syndrome (refeeding syndrome)'.)
Fluids — Parenteral fluid guidelines are based on estimates of needs to maintain normal
hydration ("maintenance" needs), and adjusted for increased or decreased losses as
necessary. The Holliday-Segar method is most commonly used to calculate maintenance
needs (table 5) (calculator 1) [24]. (See "Maintenance fluid therapy in children", section
on 'Components of fluid therapy'.)
Many factors affect individual fluid requirements such as age, disease state, hydration
status, insensible water losses, and changes in metabolic rate and respiratory rate.
Infants and children generally require at least 115 mL of fluid per 100 kcal of energy
provided [25]. Conditions that may alter fluid requirements are outlined in the table
(table 6).
In many cases, PN is given in a volume of fluid that is considerably higher than the
maintenance fluid requirements in order to meet the child's nutritional needs. Most
patients can tolerate fluid administration at 30 to 50 percent above maintenance needs
[25].
●Renal maturity will affect the extent of urinary fluid losses. At birth, urinary
concentrating ability is approximately 600 mOsm/kg of water, and increases to
approximately 1000 to 1200 mOsm/kg by one year of age. Periods of growth decrease
the renal solute load, whereas the renal solute load is higher during times of stress and
catabolism [25]. Thus, urinary fluid losses are relatively high during infancy and times
of stress and catabolism, and lower during times of rapid growth.
●Insensible fluid losses are higher in infants as compared with older patients, and the
maintenance fluid calculation compensates for these differences. Certain conditions can
increase insensible losses. For example, fever increases insensible losses by 5
mL/kg/day for each degree of temperature >38 degrees Centigrade [25]. Other
conditions that increase insensible loss are extensive burns, high respiratory rate, high
ambient temperature, and low humidity.
Fluid restriction may be necessary for patients who have cardiac disease,
bronchopulmonary dysplasia, head trauma, and renal failure. In such patients, PN
composition can be concentrated to optimize the provision of nutrients.
After determining the approximate range for the patient's energy needs, the specific
target is selected from this range based on the individual patient's characteristics, such
as need for catch-up growth, factors that may alter energy requirements, and the
patient's tolerance of fluid. Factors that may alter energy requirements are listed in the
table (table 7). A number of alternative methods can be used to estimate energy needs
such as the Harris-Benedict Equation [27] or the Schofield Equation [28]. These
methods are estimates more appropriate for adults. For children and adolescents they
must be adjusted based on the weight and clinical status.
These approaches to estimating energy requirements are clinically practical, but have
only fair accuracy. As an example, a study that used indirect calorimetry to measure
resting energy expenditure found that the calculated estimates of energy requirements
using these and other frequently employed formulas are inaccurate and lead to the
prescription of overnutrition [29]. However, in most clinical settings, indirect
calorimetry is not available for routine use. Therefore, it is important to monitor the
patient's growth response to the PN with serial weights and adjust the energy input as
needed.
Protein — Targets for protein intake for pediatric patients with normal organ function
for age are as follows [26]:
Protein needs also depend on severity of illness. Stress factors such as sepsis, thermal
injury, surgery, trauma, and stomal losses increase protein requirements. Urinary
excretion of nitrogen related to steroids, diuretics, or primary renal disease also can
increase the protein requirement. Protein may need to be reduced in conditions such as
renal disease, hepatic failure, and inborn errors of metabolism [30].
Once the protein target is determined, the caloric content of the amino acid solution is
calculated as a component of the total energy input (figure 1). PN solutions formulated
with crystalline amino acids provide 4 kcal/g and are assumed to be approximately 16
percent nitrogen. Available concentrations of stock solutions range from 3 percent to 15
percent, with 10 percent most frequently used.
Amino acids are categorized according to whether or not they can be synthesized by the
human body. Essential amino acids are those that cannot be synthesized by the human
body; nonessential amino acids are those that can be synthesized; and conditionally
essential amino acids are those that can be synthesized but, under certain conditions, are
synthesized in insufficient amounts. Both essential and nonessential amino acids are
provided in standard solutions. Cysteine is an amino acid that is conditionally essential
for premature and term neonates. It is not thought to be needed beyond the neonatal
period, but may be beneficial in some instances. Cysteine is not included in crystalline
amino acid solutions, because it is unstable. It can be added separately at the time of PN
infusion, in the form of L-cystine hydrochloride, which is converted to cysteine [25].
Energy and protein are closely related. Within limits, the more energy supplied, the less
protein required to achieve nitrogen balance. One systematic review found that protein
intake of at least 1.5 g/kg/day and energy intake of at least 57 kcal/kg/day result in
positive protein balance in critically ill children who are mechanically ventilated [32].
Fat — Between 20 and 50 percent of energy needs in PN are provided as fat, in the form
of an intravenous fat emulsion (IVFE). For most patients, IVFE is initially prescribed to
provide fat at 1 g/kg per day. If tolerated, the fat dose can be advanced to 3 g/kg per day
(or 2 g/kg/day for older children) if needed to provide adequate energy intake (table 3).
The total calories supplied by fat are calculated using the factor 10 kcals/gram of lipid,
or 2 kcal/mL of 20 percent IVFE.
An IVFE emulsion has a high concentration of energy (2 kcal/mL for a 20 percent lipid
emulsion), and thus increases the caloric density of the PN solution. IVFE are sources
of essential fatty acids (EFAs: primarily linoleic and linolenic acids), which must
comprise at least four percent of total calories to prevent EFA deficiency. (See
"Micronutrient deficiencies associated with malnutrition in children", section on
'Essential fatty acid deficiency'.)
Soybean oil-based lipid emulsions (eg, Intralipid) are the most common form of IVFE
used in the United States and most other countries. They are rich in omega-6 fatty acids,
which have the advantage of supplying EFAs. However, accumulating evidence
suggests that soy-based IVFE also may be associated with increased inflammation and
liver injury, especially in infants on total parenteral nutrition (TPN), in a pattern known
as PN-associated liver disease, also known as intestinal failure-associated liver disease
(IFALD). Newer emulsions, such as a fish oil-based lipid emulsion (Omegaven),
contain omega-3 fatty acids, which have anti-inflammatory properties. Preliminary
evidence suggests that fish oil-based IVFE may be useful for treating infants with PN-
associated liver disease. However, fish oil-based IVFE provides minimal amounts of
EFA, so patients are at risk for developing EFA deficiency and should be monitored. A
mixed soybean, medium-chain triglyceride, olive, and fish oil lipid emulsion has been
developed, and preliminary evidence suggests that it may delay progression of IFALD
[33]. The available IVFE are summarized in the table, and their use for IFALD is
discussed separately (table 8). (See "Intestinal failure-associated liver disease in
infants", section on 'Fish oil-based lipid emulsions' and "Intestinal failure-associated
liver disease in infants", section on 'Mixed oil emulsions'.)
Other strategies to prevent or treat PN-associated liver disease include limiting the total
lipid dose to 1 g/kg per day, and avoidance of sepsis. (See "Intestinal failure-associated
liver disease in infants", section on 'Management'.)
For the PN prescription, the target carbohydrate dose is determined by calculating the
energy (caloric) needs that are not provided by fat or protein. The doses of protein and
fat may vary depending on patient needs:
Energy from carbohydrates = Total energy needs – Energy from protein – Energy from
fats
After calculating the target carbohydrate dose, the glucose infusion rate (GIR) should
also be calculated, to ensure that the hourly carbohydrate dose is in an appropriate range
(table 9).
The acceptable GIR varies with the patient's age and clinical condition (table 3).
Adequate quantities of glucose are important because at glucose infusions <2
mg/kg/min, body fat is mobilized for energy and ketosis occurs. Moreover, the brain
uses glucose as the primary source of energy. The brain represents 12 percent of body
weight in infants, but only 2 percent in adults. Because of this difference in relative
brain size, glucose utilization by infants (6 to 8 mg/kg/min) is far more than adults (2
mg/kg/min) [25,34]. It is also important to avoid excessive glucose; an excessive GIR
can cause hyperglycemia, hyperosmolarity, and osmotic diuresis. Excessive glucose can
increase the risk of hepatic steatosis. A healthy child can tolerate a GIR of 12 to 14
mg/kg/min, but an ill or malnourished child may not. Thus, the glucose concentration
must be carefully advanced in a malnourished patient to reduce the risk of refeeding
syndrome, and serum phosphorus, potassium, calcium, and magnesium should be
closely monitored. Lower GIR targets are used for ventilated patients, and patients with
hyperglycemia, sepsis, and cholestasis or liver disease.
Electrolytes — Electrolytes are essential and must be provided in PN. Requirements for
sodium, potassium, calcium, magnesium and phosphorus are included as a separate
component of the PN prescription (table 10). The chloride content of the PN solution is
determined by the patient's acid-base status: patients who are acidotic should be given a
chloride/acetate ratio of 1:2 or less. The maximum and minimum chloride/acetate ratios
are determined by the overall composition of the PN solution. The electrolyte additives
typically provide approximately 30 mL fluid per liter of PN.
Trace elements and minerals — Trace elements are prepared in standard packages of
four, five, or six essential elements. Individual needs vary and, at times, supplements
beyond what is provided in the solution or other adjustments are necessary. Key
considerations are:
●Zinc is frequently supplemented in patients who have excessive GI fluid losses via
ostomy output or diarrhea. There is no good parameter to monitor for zinc status, but
serum zinc levels and alkaline phosphatase are used clinically.
●Selenium is an essential nutrient so patients who require PN for two months or more
must receive selenium. Selenium is not included in some standard packages of trace
elements, so patients on long-term PN need a trace element preparation that includes
selenium.
●For copper and manganese, decreased doses may be required for patients with
cholestasis. However, in this case, serum levels should be monitored. Manganese can
accumulate in patients with liver disease because it is normally excreted in bile. It is
speculated that manganese accumulation can contribute to the development of PN
cholestasis. Levels should be checked in patients receiving PN for greater than 30 days.
If high levels are found, the amount of manganese should be decreased and levels
monitored.
●Iodine is generally not included in PN; it is not provided in most trace element
solutions or added to the PN. As a result, infants and children on chronic exclusive PN
may develop iodine deficiency. In one report, nearly one-half of children on chronic PN
had severe iodine deficiency, and one-third developed hypothyroidism [37]. Children
for whom parenteral nutrition is their sole source of nutrition should undergo periodic
monitoring of iodine status by checking serum thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH)
every six months. If serum TSH is elevated, then iodine status can be evaluated by
measurement of either 24-hour urinary iodine or spot urinary iodine (and creatinine).
(See "Acquired hypothyroidism in childhood and adolescence", section on 'Iodine
deficiency'.)
For children 3 kg body weight to 11 years of age, the recommended daily dose of the
pediatric parenteral multivitamin preparation is 5 mL. For infants weighing less than 3
kg, a fraction of the 5 mL dose is given. Adult intravenous multivitamin preparations
and doses are given to children and adolescents over 11 years of age. Because of
recurring national shortages of intravenous vitamin preparations, neither MVI Pediatric
nor Infuvite Pediatric may be available. Websites that offer alternatives are given in the
section below.
These frequent shortages require each institution or hospital to assess their supplies and
develop a strategy for their institution. Prescribing providers should consider whether a
nutrient can be safely administered by the oral or enteral route for an individual patient.
If a shortage necessitates rationing, patients should be monitored to detect deficiencies.
A current list of updated drug shortages can be found at the following websites along
with recommendations for PN management during times of shortage.
CYCLINGThe term "cycling" is used when the PN solution is infused at a higher rate
for less than 24 hours, followed by several hours without a PN infusion. Cycling can be
initiated when a patient has been stable on PN for at least one week. Generally the time
off PN is increased and the infusion rate is increased to compensate, so that the total
daily volume of PN is unchanged (table 12).
HOME PNProviding PN outside of the hospital setting ("home PN") promotes a normal
lifestyle and decreases complications and medical costs. Home PN allows continuation
of nutrition support in a more normal environment, facilitates the child's development
and permits participation in family and social activities. Home PN is associated with
fewer infections when compared with PN in the hospital, if the caretakers are
appropriately trained to use sterile technique when accessing the central venous line.
Home PN decreases length of the hospital stay, thus reducing the cost [40].
Indications for home PN include all those for the hospitalized patient, with the
additional provisos of an adequate home environment and support in the home. Home
PN should be considered when the duration of PN therapy is anticipated to be prolonged
and the patient is medically stable, no longer requiring hospitalization. For infants and
children, it is prudent to initiate PN in the hospital. As an inpatient the child can be
monitored more closely, the family adequately trained to provide care, and the PN
tailored and adjusted to the patient's specific needs prior to discharge. The suitability of
the home should be evaluated including assessment of the family members and the
safety of the home environment [41]. Planning should include contingencies for times
when the primary caretaker is not available, when the child becomes ill, when
mechanical problems occur, and for such events as power failure. Federal and state
health care programs, along with private medical insurances, have strict guidelines that
must be met for reimbursement for home PN [42].
It is important for health care providers to recognize and facilitate treatment of the
potential psychosocial problems that may arise with the use of PN. Some common
problems identified in the literature are anxiety, parent-child conflict, sibling rivalry,
peer difficulty, marital discord, loss of employment (due to time away from work
required for medical appointments), financial concerns, physical and emotional fatigue,
social isolation, disruption of family routines, and food refusal/aversion upon
reintroduction of food [8]. Some of these difficulties are amenable to treatment through
psychological counseling and support. Early referral to a qualified pediatric
psychologist or counselor may be helpful for many PN patients and their family
members [16].
●Parenteral nutrition (PN) is indicated for infants and children whose gastrointestinal
(GI) tract function is inadequate to support normal growth and development if
nutritional support is required for seven days or more, except in premature infants and
neonates, who may require earlier intervention. If the GI tract is partially functional, the
enteral route should be used even if it is only able to supply a fraction of the required
nutrients. A wide variety of underlying conditions may lead to a need for PN (table 1).
(See 'Indications and contraindications' above.)
●PN almost always requires central venous access, which is defined as a catheter tip in
the proximal vena cava or right atrium. This is because a PN solution must have high
osmolarity in order to meet most or all of the child's nutritional needs, and solutions
with high osmolarity cannot be infused through a peripheral vein. (See 'Central and
peripheral venous access' above.)
●PN is tailored to the needs of the patient, requiring a series of calculations and an
individualized PN prescription. The prescription for PN is created from a series of
stepwise calculations (table 2 and figure 1). The ranges for macronutrients when
initiating and advancing PN are based on the child's age (table 3), then modified by
individual clinical considerations. (See 'How to prescribe PN' above.)
•Energy needs are estimated based on the patient's age and weight, then modified by
individual patient's characteristics, such as need for catch-up growth, the patient's
tolerance of fluid, and factors that may alter energy requirements (table 7). (See 'Energy'
above.)
•Protein needs are also based primarily on the patient's age and weight. These estimates
are used to calculate the total protein dose per day, and the energy supplied by that
protein (using the factor 4 kcal/g protein). (See 'Protein' above.)
•Fat is supplied by an intravenous fat emulsion (IVFE), and provides between 20 and 50
percent of energy needs for PN. For most patients, IVFE is initially prescribed to
provide fat at 1 g/kg per day. If tolerated, the fat dose can be advanced to 3 g/kg per day
(or 2 g/kg/day for older children). Excessive doses of fat may cause
hypertriglyceridemia, and also may contribute to PN-associated liver disease, especially
in young infants. (See 'Fat' above.)
●Cycling PN (infusing the PN solution for less than 24 hours daily) has psychological,
developmental, and physiological benefits, and should be implemented when possible.
Patients are candidates for cycling when they have been stable on a 24-hour infusion
schedule for at least one week, and are able to tolerate higher infusion rates of fluid and
glucose. Cycling requires care and planning to avoid hypoglycemia, which may be
caused by a sudden discontinuation of a high glucose infusion, especially in children
younger than three years of age. To prevent hypoglycemia, the rate of PN delivery
should be tapered during the final one to two hours of the infusion, and blood glucose
levels monitored. (See 'Cycling' above.)
REFERENCES
1. Heird WC, Driscoll JM Jr, Schullinger JN, et al. Intravenous alimentation in
pediatric patients. J Pediatr 1972; 80:351.
2. Koretz RL, Lipman TO, Klein S, American Gastroenterological Association.
AGA technical review on parenteral nutrition. Gastroenterology 2001; 121:970.
3. Kudsk KA. Effect of route and type of nutrition on intestine-derived
inflammatory responses. Am J Surg 2003; 185:16.
4. Gahagan S. Development of eating behavior: biology and context. J Dev Behav
Pediatr 2012; 33:261.
5. Kaji T, Takamatsu H, Kajiya H. Motility of the gastrointestinal tract and
gallbladder during long-term total parenteral nutrition in dogs. JPEN J Parenter
Enteral Nutr 2002; 26:198.
6. da Costa MA, Campos AC, Coelho JC, et al. Oral glutamine and the healing of
colonic anastomoses in rats. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2003; 27:182.
7. Heyland D, Muscedere J, Wischmeyer PE, et al. A randomized trial of glutamine
and antioxidants in critically ill patients. N Engl J Med 2013; 368:1489.
8. Jeejeebhoy KN. Parenteral nutrition in the intensive care unit. Nutr Rev 2012;
70:623.
9. Fivez T, Kerklaan D, Mesotten D, et al. Early versus Late Parenteral Nutrition in
Critically Ill Children. N Engl J Med 2016; 374:1111.
10. Koletzko B, Goulet O, Hunt J, et al. 1. Guidelines on Paediatric Parenteral
Nutrition of the European Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology
and Nutrition (ESPGHAN) and the European Society for Clinical Nutrition and
Metabolism (ESPEN), Supported by the European Society of Paediatric
Research (ESPR). J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2005; 41 Suppl 2:S1.
11. Braunschweig CL, Levy P, Sheean PM, Wang X. Enteral compared with
parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis. Am J Clin Nutr 2001; 74:534.
12. van Puffelen E, Vanhorebeek I, Joosten KFM, et al. Early versus late parenteral
nutrition in critically ill, term neonates: a preplanned secondary subgroup
analysis of the PEPaNIC multicentre, randomised controlled trial. Lancet Child
Adolesc Health 2018; 2:505.
13. Jones L, Watling RM, Wilkins S, Pizer B. Nutritional support in children and
young people with cancer undergoing chemotherapy. Cochrane Database Syst
Rev 2010; :CD003298.
14. Krzyuda EA, Andris DA, Edminston CE, Wallace JR. Parenteral Access
devices. In: The A.S.P.E.N. Nutrition Support Core Curriculum: A Case-Based
Approach – The Adult Patient, Gottschlich MM, DeLegge MH, Mattox T,
Mueller C, et al. (Eds), American Society for Parenteral and Enteral Nutrition,
Silver Spring 2007.
15. Pezzati M, Filippi L, Chiti G, et al. Central venous catheters and cardiac
tamponade in preterm infants. Intensive Care Med 2004; 30:2253.
16. Pediatric Parenteral Nutrition, Baker RD, Baker SS, David AM (Eds), Aspen
Publishers, Inc, Gaithersburg 2001.
17. Wales PW, Allen N, Worthington P, et al. A.S.P.E.N. clinical guidelines:
support of pediatric patients with intestinal failure at risk of parenteral nutrition-
associated liver disease. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2014; 38:538.
18. Oliveira C, Nasr A, Brindle M, Wales PW. Ethanol locks to prevent catheter-
related bloodstream infections in parenteral nutrition: a meta-analysis. Pediatrics
2012; 129:318.
19. Mokha JS, Davidovics ZH, Samela K, Emerick K. Effects of Ethanol Lock
Therapy on Central Line Infections and Mechanical Problems in Children With
Intestinal Failure. JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2017; 41:625.
20. Bisseling TM, Willems MC, Versleijen MW, et al. Taurolidine lock is highly
effective in preventing catheter-related bloodstream infections in patients on
home parenteral nutrition: a heparin-controlled prospective trial. Clin Nutr 2010;
29:464.
21. Lambe C, Poisson C, Talbotec C, Goulet O. Strategies to Reduce Catheter-
Related Bloodstream Infections in Pediatric Patients Receiving Home Parenteral
Nutrition: The Efficacy of Taurolidine-Citrate Prophylactic-Locking. JPEN J
Parenter Enteral Nutr 2018; 42:1017.
22. Becker P, Carney LN, Corkins MR, et al. Consensus statement of the Academy
of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral
Nutrition: indicators recommended for the identification and documentation of
pediatric malnutrition (undernutrition). Nutr Clin Pract 2015; 30:147.
23. Becker PJ, Nieman Carney L, Corkins MR, et al. Consensus statement of the
Academy of Nutrition and Dietetics/American Society for Parenteral and Enteral
Nutrition: indicators recommended for the identification and documentation of
pediatric malnutrition (undernutrition). J Acad Nutr Diet 2014; 114:1988.
24. Meyers RS. Pediatric fluid and electrolyte therapy. J Pediatr Pharmacol Ther
2009; 14:204.
25. Samour PQ, King K. Pediatric Nutrition, 4th ed, Jones & Bartlett, Sudbury
2011.
26. Mirtallo J, Canada T, Johnson D, et al. Safe practices for parenteral nutrition.
JPEN J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2004; 28:S39.
27. Roza AM, Shizgal HM. The Harris Benedict equation reevaluated: resting
energy requirements and the body cell mass. Am J Clin Nutr 1984; 40:168.
28. Sy J, Gourishankar A, Gordon WE, et al. Bicarbonate kinetics and predicted
energy expenditure in critically ill children. Am J Clin Nutr 2008; 88:340.
29. Mehta NM, Bechard LJ, Leavitt K, Duggan C. Cumulative energy imbalance in
the pediatric intensive care unit: role of targeted indirect calorimetry. JPEN J
Parenter Enteral Nutr 2009; 33:336.
30. Pediatric Manual of Clinical Dietetics, American Dietetic Association, 2003.
31. Samour PQ, King K.. Pediatric Nutrition, 4th Ed, Jones & Bartlett (Ed), Sudbury
2011. p.434.
32. Bechard LJ, Parrott JS, Mehta NM. Systematic review of the influence of energy
and protein intake on protein balance in critically ill children. J Pediatr 2012;
161:333.
33. Diamond IR, Grant RC, Pencharz PB, et al. Preventing the Progression of
Intestinal Failure-Associated Liver Disease in Infants Using a Composite Lipid
Emulsion: A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial of SMOFlipid. JPEN J Parenter
Enteral Nutr 2017; 41:866.
34. Vanek VW, Seidner DL, Allen P, et al. A.S.P.E.N. position paper: Clinical role
for alternative intravenous fat emulsions. Nutr Clin Pract 2012; 27:150.
35. Prestridge LL, Schanler RJ, Shulman RJ, et al. Effect of parenteral calcium and
phosphorus therapy on mineral retention and bone mineral content in very low
birth weight infants. J Pediatr 1993; 122:761.
36. Food and Drug Administration. Aluminium in large and small volume
parenterals used in total parenteral nutrition. Fed Regist 2000; 65:4103.
37. Ikomi C, Cole CR, Vale E, et al. Hypothyroidism and Iodine Deficiency in
Children on Chronic Parenteral Nutrition. Pediatrics 2018; 141.
38. Mirtallo JM, Holcombe B, Kochevar M, Guenter P. Parenteral nutrition product
shortages: the A.S.P.E.N. strategy. Nutr Clin Pract 2012; 27:385.
39. Bendorf K, Friesen CA, Roberts CC. Glucose response to discontinuation of
parenteral nutrition in patients less than 3 years of age. JPEN J Parenter Enteral
Nutr 1996; 20:120.
40. Colomb V, Dabbas-Tyan M, Taupin P, et al. Long-term outcome of children
receiving home parenteral nutrition: a 20-year single-center experience in 302
patients. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr 2007; 44:347.
41. Norman JL, Crill CM. Optimizing the transition to home parenteral nutrition in
pediatric patients. Nutr Clin Pract 2011; 26:273.
42. Wojtylak FR. Medicare enteral and parenteral reimbursement: Requirements for
successful coverage and payment. Support line 2006:28:18. Available at:
http://washington.providence.org/in-home-services/infusion-and-pharmacy-
services/for-healthcare-professionals/~/media/Files/Providence/InHome
%20Services/WA/Pharmacy%20and%20Infusion%20Services/
Wojtylak_SuppLine_MedicareNS_06.pdf (Accessed on August 30, 2013).
43. Gottrand F, Staszewski P, Colomb V, et al. Satisfaction in different life domains
in children receiving home parenteral nutrition and their families. J Pediatr
2005; 146:793.
GRAPHICS
Indications for parenteral nutrition (PN) in children
Partially functioning gastrointestinal tract
Cannot meet nutritional requirements after maximizing enteral support
Burns
Multi-organ failure
Malabsorption
Short bowel syndrome
Chronic intractable diarrhea
Congenital small bowel malabsorptive syndromes such as congenital chloride diarrhea,
tufting enteropathy, or microvillus inclusion disease
Pseudo-obstruction
Severe malnutrition with hypoproteinemia and bowel edema
Non-functional gastrointestinal tract
Paralytic ileus
Small bowel ischemia
Necrotizing enterocolitis
Gastrointestinal surgery
Gastroschisis, omphalocele, gastrointestinal atresias (parenteral nutrition is indicated
until the enteral route is functional and accessible)
Reproduced with permission from: Pediatric Parenteral Nutrition, Baker RD, Baker SS,
Davis AM (Eds), Aspen Publishers, Inc, Gaithersburg 2001. Copyright © 2001 Robert
D Baker, MD, PhD; Susan S Baker, MD, PhD; and Anne M Davis, RD, CNSD.
Graphic 90425 Version 2.0
Initiating parenteral nutrition (PN)
Step Calculations and considerations
Does the patient meet indications for parenteral
nutrition (PN)?
1. Assess medical status and
Is anticipated duration of PN >2 weeks?
determine nutrition goals
Will PN be used to provide full or partial nutritional
requirements?
Does the patient require central venous access to
meet nutritional needs (as for most patients
requiring PN)?
Other content reproduced with permission from: Pediatric Parenteral Nutrition, Baker
RD, Baker SS, Davis AM (Eds), Aspen Publishers, Inc, Gaithersburg 2001. Copyright
© 2001 Robert D Baker, MD, PhD; Susan S Baker, MD, PhD; and Anne M Davis, RD,
CNSD.
Graphic 90423 Version 6.0
Fluid requirements in parenteral nutrition (PN)
Body
Amount of fluid per day
weight
1 to 10 kg 100 mL/kg
11 to 20 kg 1000 mL + 50 mL/kg for each kg >10 kg
>20 kg 1500 mL + 20 mL/kg for each kg >20 kg
Based on the Holliday-Segar method for calculating maintenance fluid requirements in
children.
References:
1. Meyers RS. Pediatric fluid and electrolyte therapy. Pediatr Pharmacol Ther
2009; 14:204.
2. Holliday MA, Segar WE. The maintenance need for water in parenteral fluid
therapy. Pediatrics 1957; 19:823.
Olive 25
Fish 15
Fatty acids (percent)¶
Linoleic (C
44 to 62 48 to 58 1 to 7 18.7
18:2 ω-6)
Linolenic (C
4 to 11 4 to 11 2 2.4
18:3 ω-3)
Palmitic (C
7 to 14 9 to 13 2.5 to 10 9.2
16:0)
Oleic (C 18:1
19 to 30 17 to 30 6 to 13 27.8
ω-9)
Stearic (C
1.4 to 5.5 2.5 to 5 0.5 to 2 2.7
18:0)
EPA (C 20:5
0 0 12.5 to 28.2 2.4
ω-3)
DHA (C 22:6
0 0 14.4 to 30.9 2.2
ω-3)
Caprylic acid
0 0 0 16.3
(C 8:0)
Caproic acid
0 0 0 11.4
(C 10:0)
Ratio (ω-6:ω- Not
7:1 1:7 2.5:1
3) available
Egg yolk
phospholipids 1.2 1.2 1.2 1.2
(percent)
Glycerin
2.25, 2.25 2.5 2.5 2.5
(percent)
Energy
density 1.1, 2 2 1.1 2
(kcal/mL)
Osmolarity
260, 260 390Δ 308 to 376Δ 380Δ
(mOsm/L)
Approved product labeling in the United States and other countries warns of risks
of hyperlipidemia, fat accumulation in lungs, and potential aluminum toxicity with use
of intravenous fat emulsions in preterm and very low birth weight infants. Refer to
accompanying text and local product information.
Smoflipid is not approved by US Food & Drug Administration for use in pediatric
patients.
PUFA: long-chain n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acids; MCT: medium chain triglycerides;
DHA: docosahexaenoic acid; EPA: eicosapentaenoic acid.
* Omegaven fish oil contains several other n-3 PUFAs and arachidonic acid in addition
to those shown in this table. Additional information is available from the oley.org
website.
¶ For fatty acids the percentages shown are based on the lipid component of emulsion
only. Thus, for a 10 percent lipid emulsion, the final concentration (ie, grams per 100
mL) is obtained by dividing each fatty acid percent shown in the table by 10. The
chemical structure is noted as: length of hydrocarbon chain (C atoms): number of
double bonds; and position of first double bond (ω).
Δ mOsm/kg.
Data from:
1. Gura KM, Duggan CP, Collier SB, et al. Reversal of parenteral nutrition -
associated liver disease in two infants with short bowel syndrome using
parenteral fish oil: implications for future management. Pediatrics 2006;
118:197.
2. Nordenstrom J, Thorne A. Comparative studies on a new concentrated fat
emulsion: intralipid 30 percent vs. 20 percent. Clin Nutr 1993; 12:160.
3. Smoflipid (lipid injectable emulsion) US product information; May, 2016
(available at:
http://www.accessdata.fda.gov/drugsatfda_docs/label/2016/207648lbl.pdf)
4. Rayvan M, Devliger H, Jochum F et al. Short-term use of parenteral nutrition
with a lipid emulsion containing a mixture of soybean oil, olive oil, medium-
chain triglycerides and fish oil: A randomized double-blind study in preterm
infants. J Parenter Enteral Nutr 2012; 36:81S.
48 mL/hr x 20 hours
Off 2 hours
55 mL/hr x 17 hours
20 hours on, 4 hours
Step 2
off 25 mL/hr x 1 hour (Cycle down)
Off 4 hours
Step 3 18 hours on, 6 hours
off 35 mL/hr x 1 hour (Cycle up)
61 mL/hr x 15 hours
35 mL/hr x 1 hour (Cycle down)
Off 6 hours
70 mL/hr x 13 hours
16 hours on, 8 hours
Step 4
off 36 mL/hr x 1 hour (Cycle down)
Off 8 hours
Example of a step-wise approach to cycling parenteral nutrition. The cycle length
achieved will be dependent on the glucose infusion rate (GIR) and the glucose tolerance
of the individual patient.
Courtesy of Susan Baker, MD, Robert Baker, MD, Jessica Briggs, RD, and Georgina
Bojczuk, RD, CSP.
Graphic 90966 Version 2.0