Professional Documents
Culture Documents
For the past two decades numerous psychological studies have been
undertaken of individuals subjected to thalamic lesions for the allevia-
tion of neurological symptoms. The vast majority of these were parkin-
sonians undergoing ventrolateral thalamectomy for the relief of tremor
and rigidity (cf. Cooper, 1968). More recently patients with other move-
ment disorders, and with spasticity or pain, secondary to stroke and
other neurologic disorders, were also assessed before and after pulvinar
surgery (Cooper, Amin, Chandra & Waltz, 1973). In most instances the
psychological studies involved pre- and postoperative administration of
standardized psychometric tests.
It is the purpose of this paper to review data derived primarily from
such psychometric studies of patients undergoing therapeutic thalamic
surgery, and to develop concepts on the role of the thalamus in verbal
behavior. Particular emphasis will be placed on the Wechsler Adult In-
telligence Scale (or Wechsler-Bellevue Intelligence Scale) since this par-
ticular test has been most frequently used, and it provides separate
"verbal" and "nonverbal" scores. This is specially useful in the frame-
work of this presentation since a proper assessment of verbal functions
1 Portions of the studies described in this report were supported by the Social and Reha-
bilitation Service of the Department of HEW, and The John A. Hartford Foundation, Inc.,
New York City.
45
with the parietal cortex. The medial nucleus of the pulvinar projects
mainly to the posterior parietal region, and lateral nucleus to posterior
temporal lobe (Simpson, 1952; Truex & Carpenter, 1969). Van Buren
and Borke (1969) have suggested, on the basis of degeneration studies in
a few aphasic cases, that the anterior superior pulvinar is related to the
temporo-parietal speech area, In cats, evoked responses in the pulvinar
were noted following cutaneous stimulation (Richardson & Zorub,
1969). Kreindler, Crighel, and Marinchescu (1968) demonstrated re-
cently that, in cats, visual, auditory, and somatic afferents converge in
the same neuronal pools in the pulvinar-lateralis posterior complex
(PUL-LP). Such pools were found, also, to have projections to homolat-
eral and contralateral neocortical association areas. These authors
suggested that the P U L - L P complex is part of a large integrating
system, including the associative nuclei of the thalamus, the neocortex
(both associative and primary areas), and the thalamic nuclei of diffuse
porjection necessary to the modulation and control of the afferent
systems.
Psychometric Data
Detailed psychometric data of the effect of stereotaxic thalamic le-
sions on verbal: nonverbal functions is presented, first for ventrolateral
nuclear lesions, then for pulvinar.
THE V E N T R O L A T E R A L LESION
TABLE 1
SUMMARY OF THE PRE-POSTOPERATIVE CHANGE FACTORS
(N = 71)
Left-brain Right-brain
variance variance
Change factors (%) (%)
Differential performances were noted in the left brain, right brain, and
bilateral operates in several instances. Lateralized differences, most pro-
nounced in tests based on manipulation, creative retrieval and cat-
egorization of symbols, particularly word fluency and object naming,
showed the most pronounced effects of lesion laterality. For such tests,
left hemisphere operates revealed significant decrease in performance
immediately after surgery in the absence of such changes in the case of
right brain operates. In turn, bilateral operates also tended to perform
less well than unoperated control patients during the immediate post-
operative situation. Thus, in tasks of verbal fluency or verbal "flexibil-
ity," left brain surgery affects performance; so does a second side opera-
tion, regardless of laterality, whereas a unilateral right brain operation
did not have any such effects. Thus, verbal tasks of fluency or flexibility
yield a pattern of changes clearly associated with lesion laterality where
standard clinical tests did not (Riklan & Levita, 1964, 1969). Of further
interest is the fact-that a number of tests which may be described as
spatial-perceptual did not seem to differentiate between the hemisphere
groups to any degree. Specifically, the Graham-Kendall, Minnesota
Paper Form Board, identical pictures tests, and the Muller-Lyer Illusion
did not show any differences between the hemisphere groups at any time
postoperatively.
A multidisciplinary study was also undertaken to compare and con-
trast observations and assessments made by neurosurgeons, psycholo-
gists and speech therapists, with special reference to speech and
language correlates of the VL thalamic nucleus (Riklan, Levita, Zim-
merman & Cooper, 1969). The psychometric test battery included tests
of verbal fluency and articulation similar to those just described. While
findings must be considered preliminary and need of corroboration and
refinement, it was again observed that alterations of fluency, presence of
hesitations, and blocking in language may occur immediately after a left
ventrolateral thalamic lesion in right-handed patients. These changes
cannot be distinguished from dysphasia frequently described following
left-sided cortical lesions. When these alterations occur in patients
operated upon unilaterally, language functions return to the preoperative
level within several weeks after surgery.
Slight alterations in complex language may also occur after the place-
ment of unilateral right hemisphere thalamic lesions in right-handed pa-
tients. Such changes are ordinarily detected by tests of verbal crysta-
lized functions involving permutations of symbols and relations among
signs and symbols, rather than fluency. Findings based on such tests
revealed a lack of significant qualitative differences between left and
right thalamic lesions in this area, although quantitative differences are
present. A second-sided thalamic lesion may lead to a speech impair-
VERBAL FUNCTIONS AND THALAMIC LESIONS 53
TABLE 2
THE POPULATION--AGE, SEX, HANDEDNESS, DIAGNOSIS, LESION SIDE AND SITE
Lesion
Patient
No. Age Sex Handedness Diagnosis Side Site ~
1 51 M R Concussion, L PUL
Right Hemisphere
2 11 F R DMD L PUL
3 33 M R CP L PUL
4 45 M L Torticollis L PUL
5 41 F R CP R PUL
6 21 M R Epilepsy R PUL
7 13 F Ambidexterous DMD L PUL
8 10 F R DMD L PUL
9 29 M R CP R PUL
10 34 M R Athetosis R PUL
11 15 M R CP R PUL
12 56 F R Cancer L PUL
13 50 M L Right Spastic Hemiparesis L PUL
14 30 M L CP L PUL
15 38 F R CP with Torticollis R PUL
16 64 F R Intractable Pain R PUL
17 13 F R DMD R LP
18 52 F R CVA L LP & P U L
19 24 F L CP L LP & P U L
20 22 F R DMD L VL
21 13 F R DMD R VL
22 15 M L Post C V A - L e f t R VL
Hemisphere
23 13 F R DMD R VL
24 16 M R DMD L VL
25 60 M R Intention Tremor L VL & VPL
26 19 F Ambidexterous DMD L VL & VPL
27 44 M R PD L VL
28 16 M L DMD L VL
29 26 M L CP L VL & PUL
30 20 M L CP L VL & PUL
31 14 F R DMD L VL & PUL
32 16 M R CP R VL & PUL
TABLE 3
PULVINAR AND VENTROLATERAL (OR VL AND VPL) THALAMIC LESIONS
VERBAL-PERFORMANCE IQ SCORES--PREOPERATIVE AND IMMEDIATE
POSTOPERATIVE LEFT VS RIGHT THALAMIC SURGERY
Pulvinar lesions
( N = 16) 99.2 89 78.1 77.5 92 92.2 80.5 82.7
Ventrolateral
lesions ( N = 9) 114.8 106.1 102 102.2 101.3 107.6 89 85.6
A SYNTHESIS
Numerous psychometric studies are in substantial agreement that
surgically induced thalamic lesions tend to alter psychological functions,
including verbal performance during the immediate postoperative period.
This pattern has been confirmed by neurosurgical reports and assess-
ments by speech pathologists. In the longer range status, most aspects of
"integrative" psychological functions, including verbal performance, re-
turn to their preoperative level. Thus, concepts derived from assessment
VERBAL F U N C T I O N S AND T H A L A M I C LESIONS 57
REFERENCES
ALLAN, C. M., TURNER, T. W., & GADEA-CIRIA, M. 1966. Investigation into speech dis-
turbances following stereotaxic surgery for Parkinsonism. Brit. J. Communication
Disorders, 1, 55-59.
BIRCH, H. G., & LEE, J. 1955. Cortical inhibition in expressive aphasia. Arch. Neurol., 54,
514-517.
BRAIN, R. 1961. Speech Disorders. Washington, DC: Butterworth.
BROWN, J., RIKLAN, M., WALTZ, J. M., JACKSON, S., & COOPER, I. S. 1971. Preliminary
studies of language and cognition following surgical lesions of the pulvinar in man
(Cryopulvinectomy). J. Neurol., 8, 276-299.
BUSER, P. 1966. Subcortical controls of pyramidal activity. In D. Purpura & M. Yahr
(Eds.) The Thalamus. New York: Columbia University Press. Pp. 328-344.
COOPER, I. S. 1961. Parkinsonism: Its Medical and Surgical Therapy. Springfield, IL:
Charles C Thomas.
COOPER, I. S. 1968. The Involuntary Movement Disorders. New York: Harper & Row.
COOPER, I. S., WALTZ, J. M., AMIN, I., & FUJITA, S. 1971. Pulvinectomy: A preliminary
report. J. Amer. Geriat. Soc., 19, 553-554.
COOPER, I. S. 1972. Personal communication.
COOPER, I. S., AMIN, I., CHANDRA, R., & WALTZ, J. M. 1973. A surgical investigation of
the clinical physiology of the LP-pulvinar complex in man. J. Neurol. Sci., 18, 89-110.
CRITCHLEY, M. 1962. Speech and speech loss in relation to the quality of the brain. In
V. B. Mountcastle (Ed.) lnterhemispheric Relations and Cerebral Dominance. Bal-
timore: Johns Hopkins Press. Pp. 208-214.
EBNER, F. F., & MYERS, R. E. 1962. Direct and transcallosal induction of touch memories
in the monkey. Science, 138, 51-52.
EBNER, F. F., & MYERS, R. E. 1962. Corpus callosum and the interhemispheric transmis-
sion of tactnal learning. J. Neurophysiol., 25, 380-391.
GAZZANIGA, M. S., BOGEN, J. E., & SPERRY, R.W. 1965. Observations on visual percep-
tion after disconnexion of the cerebral hemispheres in man. Brain, 88, 221-236.
GAZZANIGA, M. S., & SPERRY, R. W. 1967. Language after section of the cerebral com-
miNutes. Brain, 90, 131-148.
GESCHWIND, N. 1967. Discussion. In C. H. Millikan & F. L. Darley (Eds.)Brain Mecha-
nisms Underlying Speech and Language. New York: Grune & Stratton. Pp. 72 and
145.
GILLINGHAM, J. 1960-1961. Surgical treatment of parkinsonism. Trans. Med. Soc.
London, 77, 52-56.
GRAHAM, F. K., & KENDALL, B. S. 1947. Note on the scoring of the Memory-for-Designs
test. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol., 42, 253.
GRAHAM, F. K., & KENDALL, B. S. 1960. Memory-for-Designs test: Revised general man-
ual. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 11, 147-188.
GUIOT, G., HERTZOG, E., RONDENT, T., & MOLINA, P. 1961. Arrest or acceleration of
speech evoked by thalamic stimulation in the course of stereotactic procedures for
parkinsonism. Brain, 84, 363-379.
HARTMANN-VON MONAKOW, K. 1965. Psychosyndrome und Sprachtstoerungen nach
stereotaktischen operationen beim Parkinson-Sundrom. Aktuel, Fragen. Psychiat.
Neurol., 2, 87-100.
62 RIKLAN A N D COOPER
HASSLER, R., & REICHERT, T. 1958. Ueber die symptomatik und operative Behandlung
der extrapyramidalen Bewegungstoerungen. Med. Klin., 53, 817-824.
HASSLER, R. 1966. Thalamic regulation of muscle tone and the speed of movements. In
D. Purpura & M. Yahr (Eds.) The Thalamus. New York: Columbia University Press.
Pp. 419-436.
HEAD, H. 1926. Aphasia and Kindred Disorders of Speech. London: Cambridge Univer-
sity Press.
HECAEN, H. 1959. Dominance hemispherique et preference manuelle. J. Evol. Psychiat.,
1, 1-50.
HERMANN, K., TURNER, J. W., GILLINGHAM, F. J., t~ GAZE, R. M. 1966. The effects of
destructive lesions and stimulation of the basal ganglia on speech mechanisms. Confin.
Neurol., 27, 197-207.
HOLZINGER, K. J., • CROWDER, N. A. 1955. Manual for the Holzinger-Crowder-
Unifactor Tests. New York: Harcourt, Brace.
JACKSON, J. H. 1958. In J. Taylor (Ed.) Selected Writings of John Hughlings Jackson,
Vol. 2. New York: Basic Books.
JASPER, H. 1949. Symposium: Thalamocortical Relationships; Diffuse Projection Systems:
Integrative Action of the Thalamic Reticular System. Electroencephalog. Clin.
Neurophysiol., 1, 405-420.
JASPER, H. 1960. Unspecific thalamo-cortical relations. In J. Field (Ed.) Handbook of
Physiology. Washington, DC: American Physiological Society. Pp. 1307-1322.
KRAUTHAMER, G., & ALBE-FESSARD, E. 1965. Inhibition of nonspecific activities follow-
ing striopallidal and capsular stimulation. J. Neurophysiol., 28, 100-124.
KRAYENBUEHL, H., WYSS, O. A. M., t~ YASARGIL, M. G. 1960. Bilateral thalamotomy
and pallidotomy as treatment for bilateral parkinsonism. J. Neurosurg., 18, 429-444.
KRAYENBUEHL, H., & YASARGIL, M. G. 1961. Ergebnisse der stereotakischen Opera-
tionen beim Parkinsonismus, insbesondere der doppelseitigen Eingriffe. Deutsch. Z.
Nervenheilk, 182, 530-541.
KRAYENBUEHL, H., AKERT, K., HARTMANN, K., t~ YASARGIL, M. G. 1964. Etude de la
correlation anatomoclinique chez des malades operes de Parkinonisme. Neurocirugia,
(Santiago), 10, 397-412.
KREINDLER, A., CRIGHEL, E., & MARINCHESCU, C. 1968. Integrative activity of the pul-
vinar-lateralis posterior complex and interrelations with the neocortex. Exp. Neurol.,
22, 423-435.
LASHLEY, K. S. 1951. The problem of serial order in behavior. In L. A. Jeffress (Ed.)
Cerebral Mechanisms in Behavior. New York: Wiley. Pp. 112-136.
LE GROS CLARK,M., & NORTHFIELD, D. 1937. The cortical projection of the pulvinar in
the Macaque monkey. Brain, 60, 126-142.
LENNENBERG, G. H. 1967. Biological Foundations of Language. New York: Wiley.
LEVITA, E., & RIKLAN, M. 1965. Laterality of subcortical involvement and cognitive per-
formance: A factor analysis. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 20, 151-157.
LEVITA, E., RIKLAN, M., & COOPER, I. S. 1967. A psychological comparison of unilateral
and bilateral thalamic surgery: A preliminary report. J. Abnorm. Psychol., 72,
251-254.
MAGOUN, H. W. 1963. The Waking Brain, 2nd ed. Springfield, IL, Charles C Thomas.
MARKHAM, C. H., & RAND, R. W. 1963. Stereotactic surgery in parkinson's disease. Neu-
rology, 8, 621-631.
MARTIN, J. P. 1959. Remarks on the function of the basal ganglia. Lancet, 1, 999-1005.
MORUZZI, G., & MAGOUN, H. W. 1949. Brain stem reticular formation and activation of
the LEG. Electroencephalog. Clin. Neurophysiol., 1, 455-473.
MYERS, R. 1967. Discussion. In C. H. Millikan & F. L. Darley (Eds.) Brain Mechanisms
Underlying Speech and Language. New York: Grune & Stratton. P. 144.
V E R B A L F U N C T I O N S A N D T H A L A M I C LESIONS 63
PAPEZ, J. 1939. Connections of the pulvinar. Arch. Neurol. Psychiat., 41, 277-289.
PATTERSON, D. G,, ELLIOTT, R. M., ANDERSON, L. D., TOOPS, H. A., & HEIDBREDER, E.
1930. Minnesota Mechanical Ability Tests. Minneapolis, MN: University of Min-
nesota Press.
PENFIELD, W., & ROBERTS, L. 1959. Speech and Brain Mechanisms. Princeton, N J:
Princeton University Press.
PURPURA, D. P. 1967. Discussion. In C. H. Millikan & F. L. Darley (Eds.) Brain Mecha-
nisms Underlying Speech and Language, New York: Grune & Stratton. P. 49.
QUASHA, W. H., & LIKERT, R. 1937. The Revised Minnesota Paper Form Board Test.
J. Educat. Psychol., 28, 197-204.
RICHARDSON, D. E., & ZORUB, D. S. 1970. Sensory function of the pulvinar. International
Society for Research of Stereoencephalatomy. Confin. Neurol., 32, 165-173.
RIKLAN, M., DILLER, L., WEINER, H., & COOPER, I. S. 1960. Psychological studies on the
effects of chemosurgery of the basal ganglia in parkinsonism. Arch. Gen. Psychia., 2,
22-31.
RIKLAN, M., & LEVlTA, E. Psychological effects of lateralized basal ganglia lesions: A fac-
torial study. J. Ner, Merit. Dis., 138, 233-240.
RIKLAN, M., & LEVITA, E. Laterality of subcortical involvement and psychological func-
tions. Psycholog. Bull., 64, 217-224.
RIKLAN, M., LEVITA, E., SAMRA, K., & COOPER, I. S. 1969. Psychological functions in
relation to lesion size and site in cryothalamectomy in parkinsonism. Perceptual and
Motor Skills, 28, 727-734.
R1KLAN, M., LEVITA, E., ZIMMERr,~AN,J., & COOPER, I. S. 1969. Thalamic correlates of
language and speech. J. Neurol. Sci., 8, 307-328.
RIKLAN, M., & LEVITA, E. 1969. Subcortical Correlates of Human Behavior: A Psycholog-
ical Study of Basal Ganglia and Thalamic Surgery. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
RIKLAN, M., WEISSMAN, D., & COOPER, I. S. 1974. Psychological functions following pul-
vinectomy in man. In I. S. Cooper, M. Riklan & R. Rakic (Eds.) The Pulvinar-LP
Complex. Springfield, IL: Charles C Thomas. Pp. 138-171.
RIKLAN, M., & LEVITA, E. Psychological studies of thalamic lesions in humans. J. Nerv.
Ment. Dis., 150, 251-265.
SAMRA, K., RIKLAN, M., LEVITA, E., Z1MMERMAN, J., WALTZ, J. M., BERGMANN, L., &
COOPER,I. S. 1969. Language and speech correlates of anatomically verified lesions in
thalamic surgery for parkinsonism. J. Speech Hearing Res., 12, 510-540.
SCHALTENBRAND,G. 1965. The effects of stereotactic electrical stimulation in the depth of
the brain. Brain, 88, 835-840.
SCHUELL, H., JENKINS, J. J., & JIMINEZ-PABON, E. 1964. Aphasia in Adults: Diagnosis,
Prognosis, and Treatment. New York: Harper & Row.
SERAFETINIDES, E. A., & FALCONER, M. 1963. Speech disturbance in temporal lobe
seizures. Brain, 86, 333-346.
SIMPSON, D. 1952. The projection of the pulvinar to the temporal lobe. J. Anat., 86, 20-29.
SPERRY, R. W. 1961. Cerebral organization and behavior. Science, 133, 1749-1757.
STROOP, J. R. 1935. Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J. Exper. Psychol.,
18, 643-661.
SVENNILSON, E., TORVIK, A., LOWE, R., & LEKSELL, L. 1960. Treatment of parkinsonism
by stereotactic thermolesions in the pallidal region. Acta Psychiat. Scand. 35,
358-377.
TRUEX, R., & CARPENTER, M. 1969. Human Neuroanatomy. Baltimore: Williams &
Wilkins.
VAN BUREN, J. M. 1963. Confusion and disturbance of speech from stimulation in vicinity
of the head of the caudate nucleus. J. Neurosurg., 20, 148-157.
VAN BUREN, J. M., & BORKE, R. 1969. Alteration in speech and the pulvinar: A serial sec-
64 RIKLAN A N D COOPER