Ivan R.

Frederiksen 2022

REVIEW – Short Guideline:

Preparation
• The material for reviewing
• Room; other material etc.
• Call for meeting (in good time)
• Roles: Narrator / Coordinator / Reporter / IT Staff / Users / Method Department /
Maintenance Managers
• Checklists: Could be directed at the individual roles (focus areas in the material)
• Start / End (Max. 2 hours)
• It is about finding errors / defects

The meeting and documentation:

Use of the template:
Mark with a “V” or “L” in column “Class.”, and “M” or “W” or “U” or “N” in column “Type”.
Insert your init. in column “Insp” and give a short description of the discovered problem.
Set a “X” in columns for your opinion about corrections (Change/Correct or Not Change)

Review Log Page of

Project Document Chapter

Page Class Type Insp. Description Correction

Chg. Not Chg.

The Review ends with a decision about the need for a new review

Type
Classification Missing Wrong Unclear Needless Total
(Class.) (M) (W) (U) (N)

Very serious - (V)

Less serious - (L)

After the Meeting:

• Corrections - Check again (internal in the project)
• Need for a new review (prepare)
• Method dept. "collect" information to ensure no repetition of errors / omissions.
Increases process maturity